|
|
# ? May 1, 2014 04:09 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 17:18 |
|
|
# ? May 1, 2014 05:33 |
|
Goodbye Seventh Fleet. I will not miss your Liberty policy, nor your paranoia over possibly going to war with China every other weekend. Easily the worst place to begin a career ever. If there ever came a point in my life where all I wanted to do was work, and do nothing BUT work, I would gladly stay in Japan. Thankfully, I want more out of my life. Edit: oh fun, Nam #2. Fun i guess?
|
# ? May 1, 2014 06:24 |
|
|
# ? May 1, 2014 07:37 |
|
pandasmores, is your legal grudgematch with your chain of command still ongoing or has it been resolved?
|
# ? May 1, 2014 15:34 |
|
Karma has struck down a terrible dependa or I am an evil sorceror. I just got a call from my ex wife apologizing for everything she ever did to me. Apparently in the last two years, her drug use increased from pot and pills to coke and finally heroin. She robbed the liquor store she worked at and ended up getting hepatitus. She sounded like she is in a better place now but I looked her up on facebook and drat she looks like the stereotypical after pictures. A small part of me feels bad, the rest of me is a terrible person for laughing about it after I hung up. LordNad fucked around with this message at 18:44 on May 1, 2014 |
# ? May 1, 2014 16:29 |
|
Sounds like it's time to take her back and do it all over again. Just think of it as re-enlisting.
|
# ? May 1, 2014 17:57 |
|
My bank account and penis both disagree with you.
|
# ? May 1, 2014 18:11 |
|
LordNad posted:My bank account and penis both disagree with you. Was she a dependapotamus?
|
# ? May 1, 2014 19:06 |
|
SketchesOfSpain01 posted:Was she a dependapotamus? Not if she was on heroin/coke/meth/crank/etc Then she's a Walking Deadpendant
|
# ? May 1, 2014 19:10 |
|
SketchesOfSpain01 posted:Was she a dependapotamus? She was never a beached whale and thank god we never had kids. Now she looks positively ghoulish.
|
# ? May 1, 2014 19:17 |
|
Booblord Zagats posted:Not if she was on heroin/coke/meth/crank/etc I love you.
|
# ? May 1, 2014 20:09 |
|
tuluk posted:pandasmores, is your legal grudgematch with your chain of command still ongoing or has it been resolved? Resolved at XOI. XO just looked at me, reviewed the evidence and then asked what I was even doing there, dismissing it all. Feel bad that it wasted his time but it was all out of my control.
|
# ? May 1, 2014 23:49 |
|
Pandasmores posted:Resolved at XOI. XO just looked at me, reviewed the evidence and then asked what I was even doing there, dismissing it all. Feel bad that it wasted his time but it was all out of my control. So what was it?
|
# ? May 2, 2014 00:23 |
|
I have such good ideas when drinking beer and eating pizza. I just acquired Iron Eagle for some ultimate 80s F-16 action.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 00:54 |
|
ded posted:So what was it? Art. 111, Reckless Driving. Went to a restaurant to celebrate a friends birthday, had a few drinks, everyone walked to a bar while the DD took me to our apartment. Couple of dudes came back to the pad hammered several hours later, birthday boy was toasted so I babysat him for a bit/cleaned him up while everyone else sobered up for work. We got hungry so I got in my car and left to get some food when one of the guys called me up before we left and said some of the other guys got jumped (in reality one of them started a fight and got his rear end handed to him and ran off). Apparently, they left a guy at the bar, so we had to go pick him up. Grabbed a dude for directions and I went to the bar, cops said he was taken to the local hospital so I went there and picked him up after a few more hours to discharge. Went to the barracks and got ready for work. Luckily no one out of the idiots got hurt. I never got pulled over or anything, and from the calculations of the dudes that did my SARP screening/treatment I was sober by the time I got behind the wheel, so I just didn't understand what the hell I was being charged with.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 02:41 |
|
So reckless of you to try and help out a shipmate, shipmate.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 03:18 |
|
glad you kept that under the wraps until it was resolved, big case
|
# ? May 2, 2014 03:21 |
|
ded posted:So reckless of you to try and help out a sea warrior, sea warrior. Obviously you haven't been keeping up with the latest MCPON guidance.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 03:52 |
|
Pandasmores posted:Art. 111, Reckless Driving. So during the above time period, you interacted with the police and they didn't worry about you maybe driving drunk. But some chiefs took a stab at math and tried to estimate what your BAC would be and charge you with what is essentially a DUI. Is that about right?
|
# ? May 2, 2014 03:56 |
|
Seqenenra posted:So during the above time period, you interacted with the police and they didn't worry about you maybe driving drunk. But some chiefs took a stab at math and tried to estimate what your BAC would be and charge you with what is essentially a DUI. Is that about right? Sounds pretty much like the navy
|
# ? May 2, 2014 04:35 |
|
Seqenenra posted:So during the above time period, you interacted with the police and they didn't worry about you maybe driving drunk. But some chiefs took a stab at math and tried to estimate what your BAC would be and charge you with what is essentially a DUI. Is that about right? Well they did each have almost 20 years of experience individually, culminating into almost 200 years among them. What do police and SARP counselors know? Oh, AND in their own personal experience they wouldn't have limited their drinks like I did so obviously anyone under Chief is a thoughtless animal.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 05:08 |
|
While I am happy that your xo didn't roast you, you have probably painted a huge target on your back.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 05:11 |
|
orange juche posted:Sounds pretty much like the navy It's been my experience that when the chiefs don't have any evidence, they'll make it or trick you into providing it.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 05:12 |
|
I don't understand what the chief's mess has to gain from roasting you like that, other than a temporary relief from the existential horror of existence.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 13:50 |
|
MancXVI posted:I don't understand what the chief's mess has to gain from roasting you like that, other than a temporary relief from the existential horror of existence. Don't you know they sustain themselves on the steady blood sacrifice of lower enlisted?
|
# ? May 2, 2014 15:17 |
|
orange juche posted:Don't you know they sustain themselves on the steady blood sacrifice of lower enlisted? I get that, but I'm interested in practical answers. I know MA eval bullets read like "Administered expeditious justice to 158 dumb sailors, resulting in 85 successful Non-Judicial Punishments (NJPs) and 30 courts martial with an involuntary separation rate of 60%, saving the Navy over $600,000 in recovered pay and compensation and providing 100% of the human blood required for the FY14 Chief Selection Board" but do chief FITREPS have numbers like that? Do you get a COM for loving people over?
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:02 |
|
Nah you get an MSM usually as a CMC.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:09 |
|
Haha so what's the policy for recalling after hours? They tried to recall some of us for some bs but 4/5 of us had been drinking. It wasn't even a lie we're just all alcoholics. Sure I'll hear about it today. I know you only have one hour to respond to a recall or some poo poo, correct? I think I remember a guy getting written up for not responding fast enough.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:12 |
|
"Unless the Papa flag is flying, gently caress you and I'll see you at mast."
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:33 |
|
SquirrelyPSU posted:"Unless the Papa flag is flying, gently caress you and I'll see you at mast." I don't think they fly signal flags at hospitals.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:35 |
|
What's a papa
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:38 |
|
Christoff posted:What's a papa its the recall flag
|
# ? May 2, 2014 16:45 |
|
MancXVI posted:I don't understand what the chief's mess has to gain from roasting you like that, other than a temporary relief from the existential horror of existence. I'm half convinced pandasmores chiefs are having subic bay-withdrawl symptoms whenever they deal with him. He looks like a filipino boy. Why isn't he going down on me right now?
|
# ? May 2, 2014 21:50 |
|
Christoff posted:Haha so what's the policy for recalling after hours? They tried to recall some of us for some bs but 4/5 of us had been drinking. It wasn't even a lie we're just all alcoholics. Sure I'll hear about it today. I know you only have one hour to respond to a recall or some poo poo, correct? I think I remember a guy getting written up for not responding fast enough. This was like every week with us for a while. It became a game to see who would get caught sober enough to be called back, culminating in guys chugging 40s in the parking lot before driving home. Of course we weren't clinic corpsmen and didn't, you know, live in the barracks right by work or anything
|
# ? May 2, 2014 21:55 |
|
So apparantly the Russian's SU-24 can jam Aegis ships? http://indian.ruvr.ru/2014_04_21/Russian-Su-24-scores-off-against-the-American-USS-Donald-Cook-5786/
|
# ? May 2, 2014 21:57 |
|
Also guys. Gals. People...do this survey. Tell the Navy hows u doin and poo poo. Tell 'em how to keep you Navy. Tell them they suck. I don't care. Just get your voice heard: http://www.dodretention.org/ This is a serious post on a serious forum thread.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 22:02 |
|
SketchesOfSpain01 posted:Also guys. Gals. People...do this survey. Tell the Navy hows u doin and poo poo. Tell 'em how to keep you Navy. Tell them they suck. I don't care. Just get your voice heard: I'm the anti-botnet password that never changes.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 22:08 |
|
scroogle nmaps posted:I'm the anti-botnet password that never changes. Regardless, I felt that they asked the right questions. It took me 15 minutes, and I felt a little better after answering the survey. No required. You should do it.
|
# ? May 2, 2014 22:14 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 17:18 |
|
SketchesOfSpain01 posted:So apparantly the Russian's SU-24 can jam Aegis ships? This story is hilariously barefaced nonsense
|
# ? May 2, 2014 22:16 |