Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


forgot my pants posted:

The real bummer is polio was supposed to have been eradicated by 2010. I believe the UN and WHO both set this as their target goal some time back. Then as 2010 approached they delayed it a few more years, and now it looks like polio may not be eradicated in our lifetimes.

The Arab Spring filled all the old problems with that just-washed minty freshness, like they're brand new!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Aleph Null posted:

It also mentioned how the CIA used a doctor/spy to locate bin Laden by taking blood samples while under the guise of providing vaccinations and how that is being used as an excuse to murder and expel

I don't understand how this isn't considered a war crime. Isn't there something in the Geneva convention about appropriating the trappings of humanitarian organizations as a cover for military or espionage activities?

Or is it a war crime, and this is just another instance of the USA not giving a gently caress.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

VitalSigns posted:

I don't understand how this isn't considered a war crime. Isn't there something in the Geneva convention about appropriating the trappings of humanitarian organizations as a cover for military or espionage activities?

Or is it a war crime, and this is just another instance of the USA not giving a gently caress.

I think that would require the US to be in a bona fide war first, instead of this bourne identity style "we've always been at war with __________"

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

VitalSigns posted:

I don't understand how this isn't considered a war crime. Isn't there something in the Geneva convention about appropriating the trappings of humanitarian organizations as a cover for military or espionage activities?

Or is it a war crime, and this is just another instance of the USA not giving a gently caress.

They do provide the actual services, just to be clear here. They are actual doctors giving actual medicine and vaccinations, while also keeping track of anyone going through.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Install Windows posted:

They do provide the actual services, just to be clear here. They are actual doctors giving actual medicine and vaccinations, while also keeping track of anyone going through.

is it more of a problem of skimming data from the NGO doing the work than an actual CIA front? It wouldn't be hard to get an asset in an organization like that I would imagine.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

VitalSigns posted:

I don't understand how this isn't considered a war crime. Isn't there something in the Geneva convention about appropriating the trappings of humanitarian organizations as a cover for military or espionage activities?

Or is it a war crime, and this is just another instance of the USA not giving a gently caress.

War crimes are for people dude, not governments. If it's policy (and you haven't lost a war and surrendered), war crimes are called "The Way It Is by Bruce Hornsby and The Range."

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Sword of Chomsky posted:

is it more of a problem of skimming data from the NGO doing the work than an actual CIA front? It wouldn't be hard to get an asset in an organization like that I would imagine.

Well people don't trust the doctors at all once it turned out they were there because they were working for the CIA. You probably wouldn't trust your regular doctor either if it turned out the local practice he works at was set up by the CIA for some reason.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Install Windows posted:

Well people don't trust the doctors at all once it turned out they were there because they were working for the CIA. You probably wouldn't trust your regular doctor either if it turned out the local practice he works at was set up by the CIA for some reason.

If the CIA wanted to treat my illnesses in exchange for knowing who I was and where I was from I'd let them myself.

MrNemo
Aug 26, 2010

"I just love beeting off"

That's a pretty pointless analogy, better one might be if the Chinese Intelligence services started setting up free clinics in American cities and wanted to also keep hold of your financial records, SSN, etc. Would you use those clinics if they were substantially cheaper than private US equivalents?

Also the Syria thing isn't just the result of the Civil war (though that breakdown in infrastructure is a large factor in facilitating the spread) but the influx of foreign fighters from Pakistan and Afghanistan where Islamic fundamentalists prevented effective vaccination programmes because if Polio was good enough for the Prophet then it's good enough for us! Also by causing general chaos and warfare that prevents NGOs from being able to operate successfully. But, while a very different group from most US anti-vaccination types, many of these groups are also anti-vaccination on religious grounds. Although unlike Christian Scientists they'll execute people for helping doctors and kill the doctors as well if they think they're doing things they disapprove of.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Tatum Girlparts posted:

The point is you have no idea what you posted. Polio never went away in a fair amount of the world, mainly in chunks of the world that either just had or are currently still having very violent, messy, civil wars. Civil wars cause breakdown in systems, in most of these areas the systems were already pretty garbage, so yea poo poo like Syria and all now has polio as a 'thing' in a bigger way. Or in Pakistan's case, a bunch of poorly educated people hear a story about a specific military thing and just kinda assume it's a massive thing and start kicking out doctors.

You're basically reading a global report that's specifically talking about pretty much ruined nations and going "THANKS JENNY MCARTHY" in some crazy America focused knee jerk.

You might want to redirect your anger to Neo Rasa, not me. All I wanted was for Aleph Null to actually say what he meant rather than dropping a little snark and then running away.

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Or in Pakistan's case, a bunch of poorly educated people hear a story about a specific military thing and just kinda assume it's a massive thing and start kicking out doctors.

What about a months-long fake vaccination drive isn't "a massive thing"? Like, if some anti-vaccination employee at Phizer started filling vials with water instead of vaccinations because he was ethically opposed to it, and people were administered this water thinking it was vaccines, that would be a massive, massive problem. That's what happened here, except it was officially sanctioned, and the kicker is that when you went to get this fake vaccine the orderly stole your bank records and started poking through them.

That's definitely a massive thing, incredibly unethical, and incredibly undermining of vaccination programs in developing countries. The fake vaccination programs have most certainly contributed to the resurgence of Polio in Pakistan.

I mean, you guys will argue the ethics of herd immunity from vaccination programs and call people who don't vaccinate "child murderers" till you're blue in the face, but here's people getting useless fake vaccinations en masse because of a massive ethical violation and now it's no big deal? Why is that, specifically? Is it just because the military is involved? I'm drawn back to that phrase of yours, it's just "a specific military thing".

Even apart from the massive ethical problems inherent in a fake vaccination drive, using the Red Cross or other humanitarian organization as a cover to perform military or intelligence operations is a war crime.

Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 18:18 on May 6, 2014

Mrit
Sep 26, 2007

by exmarx
Grimey Drawer

Paul MaudDib posted:

What about a months-long fake vaccination drive isn't "a massive thing"? Like, if some anti-vaccination employee at Phizer started filling vials with water instead of vaccinations because he was ethically opposed to it, and people were administered this water thinking it was vaccines, that would be a massive, massive problem. That's what happened here, except it was officially sanctioned, and the kicker is that when you went to get this fake vaccine the orderly stole your bank records and started poking through them.

That's definitely a massive thing, incredibly unethical, and incredibly undermining of vaccination programs in developing countries. The fake vaccination programs have most certainly contributed to the resurgence of Polio in Pakistan.

I mean, you guys will argue the ethics of herd immunity from vaccination programs and call people who don't vaccinate "child murderers" till you're blue in the face, but here's people getting useless fake vaccinations en masse because of a massive ethical violation and now it's no big deal? Why is that, specifically? Is it just because the military is involved? I'm drawn back to that phrase of yours, it's just "a specific military thing".

Even apart from the massive ethical problems inherent in a fake vaccination drive, using the Red Cross or other humanitarian organization as a cover to perform military or intelligence operations is a war crime.

Both are bad. But one is a problem that we run into and see in our daily lives. The other is politics.

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

Install Windows posted:

They do provide the actual services, just to be clear here. They are actual doctors giving actual medicine and vaccinations, while also keeping track of anyone going through.

They actually didn't. The vaccinations require two more follow-up doses in a relatively short timeframe to be effective, which the fake vaccination program did not administer. That's particularly important for people who are likely to come into contact with Hep-B, like healthcare personnel or people who live in places like Pakistan.

quote:

In March health workers administered the vaccine in a poor neighbourhood on the edge of Abbottabad called Nawa Sher. The hepatitis B vaccine is usually given in three doses, the second a month after the first. But in April, instead of administering the second dose in Nawa Sher, the doctor returned to Abbottabad and moved the nurses on to Bilal Town, the suburb where Bin Laden lived.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/11/cia-fake-vaccinations-osama-bin-ladens-dna

So yes, people were administered useless vaccinations. It may have been "real medicine" but it was not administered in the proper fashion to be effective, so in the end it might as well have been water.

There's a reason the headline was "CIA runs fake vaccination program" and not "CIA-administered vaccination program takes blood samples".

Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 19:13 on May 6, 2014

CuddleCryptid
Jan 11, 2013

Things could be going better

I have to side with Paul on this, it was a grossly unethical and irresponsible way to gather information. Now they have groups of people that falsely think they are immunized, and yet are still susceptible to the disease. Imagine the implications of this! Not only can people get the diseases, the area will see people getting "vaccinated" and still getting sick. What will that do to their opinions of doctors and vaccination?

Legitimate organizations like the MSF already have enough problems. Doctors are supposed to be above the politics if it means they can help people, there's even an oath about it. That's why they are supposed to get special treatment in otherwise hostile zones. But no, the CIA rolls in and fucks it up for everyone.

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE
Oh yeah and I forgot to mention that they literally stole the WHO's vaccines in order to do this fake program. As in, walked into their stores warehouse, opened up the coolers, and walked out with their boxes of vaccines.

So in total we have:
  • Stealing medicine from the people who would actually administer it properly
  • Squandering it with improper administration
  • Letting people run around spreading disease while thinking they're vaccinated
  • Leaving the real doctors to figure out who's actually vaccinated
  • Setting an already-wary population against the medical authorities
  • Setting an already-wary population against vaccination specifically

In the short term, not only did a bunch of people not get vaccinated properly, now we have a bunch of people going around thinking they're vaccinated when they're actually potential carriers - carriers in an environment with rampant disease levels. They all need to be revaccinated, wasting even more resources. Doctors will face the difficult task of figuring out who the people with the fake vaccinations are, and to be safe probably anyone vaccinated in those regions during that time window will need to be revaccinated, making the scale of the waste huge. Easily millions of dollars of doctors' time and medicine will be spent unraveling this poo poo, in a country that's broke as gently caress. More likely aid organizations will eat the majority of the cost, at the expense of care elsewhere.

In the long term, the population just had their suspicion that vaccines are a Western conspiracy confirmed in the worst way. They're likely to be even more suspicious of aid programmes in general, both putting the aid workers at increased personal risk and causing continued harm among the general population.

It's an absolute debacle for public health on every timeframe. There's no way that any self-respecting believer in vaccination should treat this as just a minor incident. Under the logic put forward about parents who fail to vaccinate their children, this intel operation will directly maim tens of thousands of people and result in them foregoing vaccinations that will kill and maim countless more.

If an anti-vaccer had been involved the tone of this discussion would be quite a lot different, but the military is an authority figure and we gotta respect that. They came up with a way to confirm their other intelligence that Bin Laden was cloistered in Abbottabad, it's gotta be worth screwing over the Red Cross and maiming a bunch of people, right?

quote:

The vaccination plan was conceived after American intelligence officers tracked an al-Qaida courier, known as Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti, to what turned out to be Bin Laden's Abbottabad compound last summer. The agency monitored the compound by satellite and surveillance from a local CIA safe house in Abbottabad, but wanted confirmation that Bin Laden was there before mounting a risky operation inside another country.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/11/cia-fake-vaccinations-osama-bin-ladens-dna

Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 17:10 on May 7, 2014

Volcott
Mar 30, 2010

People paying American dollars to let other people know they didn't agree with someone's position on something is the lifeblood of these forums.
On the other hand, we now live in a world where bin Laden is super dead. Blood for the blood god.

Ravenfood
Nov 4, 2011

MrNemo posted:

That's a pretty pointless analogy, better one might be if the Chinese Intelligence services started setting up free clinics in American cities and wanted to also keep hold of your financial records, SSN, etc. Would you use those clinics if they were substantially cheaper than private US equivalents?
Still not correct, because the hypothetical Chinese Intelligence service needs to be stealing drugs from legitimate services and then failing to administer them properly.

There is nothing redeeming about this action. It is loving appalling and could set back WHO, MSF, and general vaccination efforts for decades.

edit: Soundly beaten by MuadDib

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Solkanar512 posted:

They've certainly done enough to undermine confidence in the first world.

How about instead of snark, you lay out your point.

The confidence was never there in the first place in these countries. These are generally places which don't have a decades-long history of universal vaccination, sometimes barely even know what vaccination is, tend to hold quite a bit of distrust for the West, don't always trust the intentions of Western NGOs and aid organizations, and sometimes have leaders or organizations quite happy to make up a Western conspiracy to destroy their people. And just when their area is a shot-up smoking warzone with both sides trying to exterminate anyone who might dare to deal with their enemy, one side of which is probably supported by the West, a bunch of Western doctors come in and insist very strongly that they have to give medicinal shots to everyone, even those who aren't sick, which the rebel-affiliated cleric the next village over says is actually a sterilization campaign intended to wipe out their people at the behest of the Western imperialists. It's got nothing at all do to with Jenny McCarthy. The CIA operation simply gave credibility and confirmation to all those people who claimed the aid doctors were actually doing the nefarious bidding of the US government, and completely shattered the trust that aid organizations have been struggling to build in those areas.

Hypation
Jul 11, 2013

The White Witch never knew what hit her.
I was going to post a postable post but then I found this, which I agree with and has taken much of the effort out - although I did have to transcribe all the links....


quote:

Dear parents,
You are being lied to. The people who claim to be acting in the best interests of your children are putting their health and even lives at risk.

They say that measles isn’t a deadly disease.
But it is.

They say that chickenpox isn’t that big of a deal.
But it can be.


They say that the flu isn’t dangerous.
But it is .


They say that whooping cough isn’t so bad for kids to get.
But it is .


They say that vaccines aren’t that effective at preventing disease.
But 3 million children’s lives are saved every year by vaccination, and 2 million die every year from vaccine-preventable illnesses.

They say that “natural infection” is better than vaccination.
But they’re wrong.


They say that vaccines haven’t been rigorously tested for safety.
But vaccines are subjected to a higher level of scrutiny than any other medicine. For example, this study tested the safety and effectiveness of the pneumococcal vaccine in more than 37,868 children.


They will say that doctors won’t admit there are any side effects to vaccines.
But the side effects are well known, and except in very rare cases quite mild.

They say that the MMR vaccine causes autism.
It doesn’t. (The question of whether vaccines cause autism has been investigated in study after study, and they all show overwhelming evidence that they don’t.)


They say that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism.
It doesn’t, and it hasn’t been in most vaccines since 2001 anyway.


They say that the aluminum in vaccines (an adjuvant, or component of the vaccine designed to enhance the body’s immune response) is harmful to children.
But children consume more aluminum in natural breast milk than they do in vaccines, and far higher levels of aluminum are needed to cause harm.


They say that the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (and/or the “vaccine court”) proves that vaccines are harmful.
It doesn’t.


They say that the normal vaccine schedule is too difficult for a child’s immune system to cope with.
It isn’t.


They say that if other people’s children are vaccinated, there’s no need for their children to get vaccinated.
This is one of the most despicable arguments I’ve ever heard. First of all, vaccines aren’t always 100% effective, so it is possible for a vaccinated child to still become infected if exposed to a disease. Worse, there are some people who can’t receive vaccinations, because they are immune deficient, or because they are allergic to some component. Those people depend upon herd immunity to protect them. People who choose not to vaccinate their children against infectious diseases are putting not only their own children at risk, but also other people’s children.


They say that ‘natural’, ‘alternative’ remedies are better than science-based medicine.
They aren’t.


The truth is that vaccines are one of our greatest public health achievements, and one of the most important things you can do to protect your child.


I can predict exactly the sort of response I will be getting from the anti-vaccine activists. Because they can’t argue effectively against the overwhelming scientific evidence about vaccines, they will say that I work for Big Pharma. (I don’t and never have).

They will say that I’m not a scientist (I am),and that I’m an “Agent 666” (I don’t know what that is, but I’m pretty sure that I’m not one).

None of these things are true, but they are the reflexive response by the anti-vaccine activists because they have no facts to back up their position. On some level, deep down, they must understand this, and are afraid of the implications, so they attack the messenger.

Why are they lying to you? Some are doing it for profit, trying to sell their alternative remedies by making you afraid of science-based medicine. I’m sure that many others within the anti-vaccine movement have genuinely good intentions, and do honestly believe that vaccines are harmful. But as a certain astrophysicist recently said “The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it”. In the case of vaccine truthers, this is not a good thing. Good intentions will not prevent microbes from infecting and harming people, and the message that vaccines are dangerous is having dire consequences. There are outbreaks of vaccine-preventable illnesses now throughout the United States because of unvaccinated children.


In only one respect is my message the same as the anti-vaccine activists: Educate yourself. But while they mean “Read all these websites that support our position”, I suggest you should learn what the scientific community says. Learn how the immune system works. Go read about the history of disease before vaccines, and talk to older people who grew up when polio, measles, and other diseases couldn’t be prevented. Go read about how vaccines are developed, and how they work. Read about Andrew Wakefield, and how his paper that claimed a link between the MMR vaccine and autism has been withdrawn, and his medical license has been revoked. Read the numerous, huge studies that have explicitly examined whether autism is caused by the vaccine…and found nothing. (While you’re at it, read about the ongoing research to determine what IS the cause—or causes —of autism, which is not helped by people continuing to insist that vaccines cause it).


That may seem like a lot of work, and scientific papers can seem intimidating to read. But reading scientific articles is a skill that can be mastered. Here’s a great resource for evaluating medical information on the internet, and I wrote a guide for non-scientists on how to read and understand the scientific literature. You owe it to your children, and to yourself, to thoroughly investigate the issue. Don’t rely on what some stranger on the internet says (not even me!). Read the scientific studies that I linked to in this post for yourself, and talk to your pediatricians. Despite what the anti-vaccine community is telling you, you don’t need to be afraid of the vaccines. You should instead be afraid of what happens without them.

Read more at http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/dear-parents-you-are-being-lied#HGC8jwuuxbIjqfpB.99

VenusInFurries
Apr 12, 2014

<3 tsalaroth
I don't know what's more frightening, the fact that people so offhandedly disregard solid science for unverified anecdotes, or that it slowly seems to be spreading to central Europe. I've seen it crop up as a subject of public talks and presentations every now and then, and I hope that this is something that won't catch on here.
I should go to one of these talks and see what kind of demographic shows up there. It'd be really interesting to know.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost
The Daily Show had a bit of fun with anti-vaxxers recently. Interestingly enough, they focus on the fact that this is happening in well off, highly educated liberal enclaves.

Rebochan
Feb 2, 2006

Take my evolution

Solkanar512 posted:

The Daily Show had a bit of fun with anti-vaxxers recently. Interestingly enough, they focus on the fact that this is happening in well off, highly educated liberal enclaves.

Ironically, the only ones I've personally met are religious fundamentalists.

Also in well off, highly educated enclaves though.

Also, I grew up in Florida. Note the little red dots all over Florida.

EDIT: And was educated there, as my spelling shows.

Rebochan fucked around with this message at 20:34 on Jun 4, 2014

BUSH 2112
Sep 17, 2012

I lie awake, staring out at the bleakness of Megadon.

Solkanar512 posted:

The Daily Show had a bit of fun with anti-vaxxers recently. Interestingly enough, they focus on the fact that this is happening in well off, highly educated liberal enclaves.

Liberal douches and religious fundies are the two groups who overlap on this conspiracy theory.

Pohl
Jan 28, 2005




In the future, please post shit with the sole purpose of antagonizing the person running this site. Thank you.

BUSH 2112 posted:

Liberal douches and religious fundies are the two groups who overlap on this conspiracy theory.

People who are liberal because they "feel" that they should help the lower classes are loving worse than rear end in a top hat conservatives that don't care. To me, it is akin the white man's burden. gently caress people that are only liberal because they feel like they need to help the lowly beggars because it makes them look good.

Shachi
Nov 1, 2004

I'm a simple man. I like pretty, dark-haired women and breakfast food.
Just stopped by to drop this little gem.

My wife, being a new mother, is a moderator and very active participant on a lot of natural parenting groups and breast feeding groups etc. The primary basis on most being education and promotion of breastfeeding, natural foods and weening techniques, as well as "green" baby keeping ie. Cloth diapering, making your own baby foods, etc.

My wife and I being quite science minded of course are very pro vaccine and modern medicine and she tells me the culture on these sites tends to agree, despite what you might think given the whole "natrual" theme.

Anyways, there is of course, no shortage of anti-vaxx nut jobs that surface once in a while and either get gloriously shot down or a debate happens, for which there shouldn't be a debate.

One of the most recent and in my opinion, most horrifying, as of late was a woman who came on to report her 9 month old baby had the measles. She was posting asking for help on what she could do to help treat the poor child, and if you don't know, measles at that young of an age is extremely dangerous.

My wife, reading them to me, tells me that the thread gets flooded with women who now want to get their kids together and have a "measles party" :stare: in the vein of the way, for those of us who were kids before the vaccine, our parents would get us kids together for sleep overs when one of us got the chicken pox.

The fact alone that these idiot's don't understand measles =/= chicken pox is horrifying. Not to mention not knowing that the measles is a very dangerous disease especially to babies. All in the name of "natrual life long immunity." I guess they don't know about other problems caused by the virus later in life...

It's also confounding that the common rebuttal I hear is "measles aren't that big of a deal just manage the fever." I mean are we forgetting the fact that it carries a risk, however slight and surely greater than any risks associated with vaccines, of permanent disability or death and it is a COMPLETELY preventable disease???

I feel that the danger of the anti-vaxx movement coupled with social media is especially greater than that of the usual pseudo-science or grossly misinformed political rhetoric because this bullshit goes viral (no pun) on social media and now you have a bunch of idiots putting their children at danger not to mention the children of non-idiots who can't be vaccinated.

I feel like there isn't an adjective strong enough to classify these people without doing a disservice to the other nouns that the adjective would normally be used to describe.

Shachi fucked around with this message at 21:28 on Jun 4, 2014

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Shachi posted:

I feel like there isn't an adjective strong enough to classify these people without doing a disservice to the other nouns that the adjective would normally be used to describe.

I think the term "child abuser" fits the bill here.

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
Call CPS, pretty sure they had similiar cases before and they won kept the kids away from the stupid.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

PhazonLink posted:

Call CPS, pretty sure they had similiar cases before and they won kept the kids away from the stupid.

I don't really give a gently caress, the parents are denying their children medical care. By any common understanding of the term "child abuse", denying a kid medical care falls under that.

TheSpartacus
Oct 30, 2010
HEY GUYS I'VE FLOWN HELICOPTERS IN THIS GAME BEFORE AND I AM AN EXPERT. ALSO, HOW DO I START THE ENGINE?
I think he meant the CPS won, not the parents.

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug

IANAL, but I would think that denying your kids medical are like vaccines can sometimes be acceptable (like for Jehovah's witnesses and such) but I really doubt that intentionally infecting your children with dangerous diseases is.

wheez the roux
Aug 2, 2004
THEY SHOULD'VE GIVEN IT TO LYNCH

Death to the Seahawks. Death to Seahawks posters.

Ogmius815 posted:

IANAL, but I would think that denying your kids medical are like vaccines can sometimes be acceptable (like for Jehovah's witnesses and such)

Which is absolute horseshit and shouldn't be considered any more tolerable than if someone had a religious conviction that God told them to stab their child. It's child abuse and people unwilling to enter the 21st (or gently caress, even the 20th) century and protect a child do not deserve to keep them.

Caros
May 14, 2008

wheez the roux posted:

Which is absolute horseshit and shouldn't be considered any more tolerable than if someone had a religious conviction that God told them to stab their child. It's child abuse and people unwilling to enter the 21st (or gently caress, even the 20th) century and protect a child do not deserve to keep them.

Despite the fact that I am both very, very pro vaccine and not at all religious, I tend to have to disagree with you on this.

Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs is just... wrong. Its no different, or perhaps even worse than laws forbidding the burka, or wearing of traditional headdress/beards and so forth. I absolutely disagree with their choice since I think its faulty, but it isn't the place for the government to go and force someone to receive vaccinations that violate a deep facet of their faith. Mind you Jehovah's Witnesses are actually allowed to take vaccinations as a matter of personal choice, but whatever.

There is also a practical reasoning for this. The number of people who will not end up vaccinated for religious reasons is very, very small near as I can tell, and its easily a number that could be covered by herd immunity for the most part. By contrast, forcing religious folks to be immunized is going to piss off a LOT of people, and stir up more anti-vaccination bullshit. Just isn't a good risk reward in my opinion.

SodomyGoat101
Nov 20, 2012

Caros posted:

Despite the fact that I am both very, very pro vaccine and not at all religious, I tend to have to disagree with you on this.

Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs is just... wrong. Its no different, or perhaps even worse than laws forbidding the burka, or wearing of traditional headdress/beards and so forth. I absolutely disagree with their choice since I think its faulty, but it isn't the place for the government to go and force someone to receive vaccinations that violate a deep facet of their faith. Mind you Jehovah's Witnesses are actually allowed to take vaccinations as a matter of personal choice, but whatever.

There is also a practical reasoning for this. The number of people who will not end up vaccinated for religious reasons is very, very small near as I can tell, and its easily a number that could be covered by herd immunity for the most part. By contrast, forcing religious folks to be immunized is going to piss off a LOT of people, and stir up more anti-vaccination bullshit. Just isn't a good risk reward in my opinion.

Hats, clothes, and beards don't generally kill children. Just thought you might want to know.

Lead Psychiatry
Dec 22, 2004

I wonder if a soldier ever does mend a bullet hole in his coat?
No one has to worry about Burkas or other religious garments magically appearing on them if they come within 15ft of someone from a culture with that style of clothing though.

It really shouldn't have to be pointed out that these illnesses do not respect religious beliefs nor hold their own exemptions. The only exemptions that should be allowed should be due to medical considerations, not religious.

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug

Way to ignore the second half of the argument guys.

Irradiation
Sep 14, 2005

I understand your frustration.

Caros posted:

Despite the fact that I am both very, very pro vaccine and not at all religious, I tend to have to disagree with you on this.

Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs is just... wrong. Its no different, or perhaps even worse than laws forbidding the burka, or wearing of traditional headdress/beards and so forth. I absolutely disagree with their choice since I think its faulty, but it isn't the place for the government to go and force someone to receive vaccinations that violate a deep facet of their faith. Mind you Jehovah's Witnesses are actually allowed to take vaccinations as a matter of personal choice, but whatever.

There is also a practical reasoning for this. The number of people who will not end up vaccinated for religious reasons is very, very small near as I can tell, and its easily a number that could be covered by herd immunity for the most part. By contrast, forcing religious folks to be immunized is going to piss off a LOT of people, and stir up more anti-vaccination bullshit. Just isn't a good risk reward in my opinion.

Except they are now having to make it harder to get religious exemptions because people do just put that down:

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/06/10/2127601/oregon-vaccine-stigma-bill-advances/

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug

Irradiation posted:

Except they are now having to make it harder to get religious exemptions because people do just put that down:

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/06/10/2127601/oregon-vaccine-stigma-bill-advances/

Yeah you should probably have to document a history of expressing a particular religious preference just like COs do. So unless everyone who hates vaccines goes to their local kingdom hall and goes through whatever initiation procedures I assume they have (joining a church is very rarely just "hey I want to join you guys" "yup okay you're in") it isn't going to be a viable excuse for most people.

Ogmius815 fucked around with this message at 04:32 on Jun 5, 2014

ChairMaster
Aug 22, 2009

by R. Guyovich
And what exactly happens if one of those retarded-rear end anti-vaccination religions ends up becoming more popular and a larger percentage of the population starts following it? Do we just accept that our kids are gonna get measles or whooping cough or fuckin polio because some stupid assholes refuse to do anything about it?

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug

ChairMaster posted:

And what exactly happens if one of those retarded-rear end anti-vaccination religions ends up becoming more popular and a larger percentage of the population starts following it? Do we just accept that our kids are gonna get measles or whooping cough or fuckin polio because some stupid assholes refuse to do anything about it?

The point is that at the present numbers weird religions like Christian Science or Jehovah's witnesses aren't sufficient to compromise herd immunity (I don't think anyway; I'm not a doctor or an epidemiologist or whatever) and it isn't likely that huge numbers of people will change religions because they don't want to vaccinate their children. If for some reason this changes we can always reconsider the policy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ChairMaster
Aug 22, 2009

by R. Guyovich
Or how about we don't play games with public health in the first place? If your religion prohibits you from safely interacting with the rest of society, then you shouldn't be allowed to do that.

I'm not entirely unsympathetic here, we could always just exile them to an island or something instead of taking their kids away if they prefer that.

  • Locked thread