|
Holy poo poo. Amazing.
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 15:51 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:48
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:I had forgotten Samuel L Jackson was in Jurassic Park. how do you forget his greatest role?!?!?!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:53
|
|
|
Kids are evil but that doesn't give you an excuse to sink to their level.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
Jagchosis posted:yes brian, we are a loving and welcoming family here at somethingisawful, please come back. as a gesture of good will i have made you your very own ponytar! haha awesome
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:Kids are evil but that doesn't give you an excuse to sink to their level. Maybe Brian Boyko just thinks all kids are actually Damien Thorn? ^  ^
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:02
|
|
|
 ThirdPartyView posted:Maybe Brian Boyko just thinks all kids are actually Damien Thorn? ^ he hates kids because they give him boners
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
Disabled Hitler posted:Boyko also wrote for The Daily Texan for awhile, probably some awful/stupid opinions in there. I hated gym, it's the one class I can remember being teased in, and even I disagree with everything he says in that.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
Put an SA Grenade on the truck he crashes into and this would be perfect.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:40
|
|
|
Miltank posted:how is this real? How can any of this be real?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
Somebody find his Fetlife account.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6AUifkDkhg Why I'm running: My Wendy Davis Story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpGG4IPeQiA "Geek for State Rep?" Why call yourself a geek? his campaign promos
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
gendered hygiene products have biological implications, people 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:07
|
|
|
Deodorant cooties are no joking matter, son
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
What in the world leads people to the conclusion that it's a good idea to ask the internet these kinds of questions?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
r/atheism has arrived http://www.reddit.com/r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu/comments/o26w3/fixed_after_seeing_ratheism_i_feel_this_should_be/ Reminder: this is someone hoping to hold political office in Texas
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:09
|
|
|
CheesyDog posted:r/atheism has arrived Hilarious.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:14
|
|
|
i laugh, but if every dumbass post and half-baked idiotic opinion I ever shared were going to follow me around for my whole life, I probably wouldn't have a real job either neither would most normal people i bet Being able to hide from lovely Past You is pretty critical to functioning in daily life which is why you don't sign your pony-loving, child-punching posts with your real legal name and then pursue a career in politics lol
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:17
|
|
|
I keep getting that South Park Brian Boitano song stuck in my head, but with Boyko lyrics instead. What would Brian Boyko do, if he was here today? I bet he'd make a blog or two, that's what Brian Boyko'd do. The whole chicken wings part of the song in the DVDA version works without any changes.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:19
|
|
|
There have been 3 posts made by brianboyko, an average of 1.12 posts per day, since registering on May 15, 2014 He upped and left when he realised he wasnt getting any money, he was just using us 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:41
|
|
|
I have a feeling this is probably going to come in handy at some point:
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
CheesyDog posted:r/atheism has arrived Thread's deleted, did I miss anything interesting?
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:00
|
|
|
Actually this was a brilliant plan to get us to do oppo research on him so he can delete everything we find.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:03
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:Thread's deleted, did I miss anything interesting?
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:15
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Actually this was a brilliant plan to get us to do oppo research on him so he can delete everything we find. You goons just set us up for President Boyko, you fools!
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:26
|
|
|
hooman posted:From his Vimeo Account: Is that a lovely camera or did he dub in a Masonna track over the original audio?
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:You goons just set us up for President Boyko, you fools! A goon vetting, and thorough.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Actually this was a brilliant plan to get us to do oppo research on him so he can delete everything we find. *Bill Kristol furiously takes notes*
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
Jagchosis posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6AUifkDkhg I'm going to point this out as a genuinely correct opinion here. A stopped clock is right twice a day etc. but still. Having said that, loving lol again about everything else about this dude.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 01:46
|
|
|
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Boykoquote:1. 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 01:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
this was the southpark face i made of him if anyone wants a closer look
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
Sublime
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:18
|
|
|
I've been laid up in bed since yesterday, and this thread has seriously cheered me up. I love you guys. Living in Austin, and having friends in the improv, tabletop gaming, and political scenes, I'm praying that I can have my own Boyko encounter soon. 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:30
|
|
|
discoukulele posted:I've been laid up in bed since yesterday, and this thread has seriously cheered me up. I love you guys. Likelyhood of him loving torchys tacos is 100% Jagchosis posted:this was the southpark face i made of him if anyone wants a closer look I laughed out loud. Actually i still am. This picture is so great. MasterControl fucked around with this message at 03:59 on May 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:44
|
|
|
On paper, I think progressives - the rank and file at least - have better ideas about how to move the country forward than the rank-and-file conservatives. But what's interesting is that while I'm a progressive, almost no elected Democrats are actually working to solve the country's problems. (Granted, I feel almost no elected Republicans are either.) I also have come to the realization that at the rank-and-file level, progressives and conservatives agree far more often than we think we do. And I'm on Reddit to test out this theory. Progressives - at least from what I have experienced - tend to believe that they have good ideas and that conservatives' primary goals are to block those good ideas. I'm not so sure this is the case. I think that conservatives believe they have good ideas and that progressives' primary goals are to block those ideas as well. But when I think about it, when I think: "What do Conservatives want?" I have to think to myself: Well, hell, I can't think of any progressive that would be opposed to 95% of that... One of the big issues of conservatives is a balanced budget and lowered national debt. Heck, progressives want that too. Conservatives want less governmental regulation in starting up small businesses, progressives wouldn't mind getting rid of some of the cruft if we made sure not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Conservatives want free markets, not crony capitalism... which is something that took me by surprise, because most progressives think that conservatives want crony capitalism, not free markets! We thought we were the free market people! What if we both are? And, on the other side, I don't think that conservatives necessarily want to block environmental regulation because they don't like the environment or they don't want clean air or preservation of wildlife. They just want to also make sure that they have jobs as well. I don't think conservatives are necessarily against solar power or alternative energy sources so long as they're cost effective. (And solar has a lot of military uses that conservatives love - getting batteries/fuel shipped in might give away the position of soldiers in the field, but being able to recharge electronics through solar can help keep them safe.) I also think that conservatives are necessarily opposed to even basic social services - they just "are tired of paying for other people," as my Dad put it. This is my theory: That if conservatives actually pointed out what they actually wanted - that progressives would have no opposition to 90% of it, and if progressives pointed out what they actually wanted, conservatives would have no objection to 90% of it. That's the first part of the theory I want to test: In this thread, can you please point out what you feel you want? But if I'm right... then why does it seem like we're 100% opposed to each other? For that, I have a second part of the theory. And that is that we're both being played for chumps. See, I think that there are two problems: right now, money is very important to running for political office. 95% of house races were won by the candidate who spent the most money. And due to gerrymandering, (and both sides do it) and "natural" safe-seats, we don't have a very strong ability to hold elected officials accountable on either side of the aisle. In short, this has created a strong incentive to keep the significant funders of campaigns happy. And those funders are not from a broad cross-section of America. There are only about 150,000 of them, or 0.05% of America - the special interests, corporate and union concerns that fund elections. So neither of us are going to get the things we think this country needs, let alone what we want - if the funders can effectively use their influence to block reform. The same system of corruption that blocks reforms that the left wants also blocks reforms that the right wants. When we ask why Washington is so screwed up, I think it's simply because the Legislature was designed (as stated in Federalist #52) to be "dependent upon the people alone." But members of congress are far more dependent upon the funders of their campaigns than on the people/the voters. This creates a mis-aligned incentive, where politicians have to do what's best for the funders first. This is a "systemic corruption" - a corruption that can't be solved simply by replacing the people in power with someone of an opposing party. To be sure, rank and file progressives don't like elected Republicans; but you'd be surprised how little the rank and file progressives like the Democrats as well. Look at Nancy Pelosi's extended interview on the Daily Show. She's completely oblivious to the fact that most progressives believe, rightly, that politicians are beholden to the money and not to the voter. And she believes that the Democratic Party isn't beholden to special interests the way that Republicans are! She clearly does not represent the progressives I know! She doesn't get it, and she's never going to get it. And she was until recently our party leader in the legislature! I think that Red and Blue have been fighting each other because we've been played one against the other by "green". That we have more in common with each other than we do with the deep-pocketed interests who wield undue influence over our elected officials in this country. That our political dysfunction is being bred because crony capitalists are feeding upon that dysfunction. And I know that there are some great reformers on both sides of the aisle working towards it: Jim Ruebens (R Sen. Candidate, NH), Fmr. Gov. Buddy Roemer (R-Louisiana), but also Jeff Kurzon (D Cong. Candidate, NY)... and I think that we should find some sort of way to point out the real reformers on both sides of the aisle. I think that most progressives would vote for a Republican who seeks to reform the system over a Democrat who doesn't, and vice versa. We just need a way to identify them quickly - call 'em "mavericks" (like John McCain) or "rebels" or something. I'd vote for a "Rebel Republican" over a "Democrat" any day. Because while I might not agree with them on issues #2-#1000, the first issue is this systemic corruption. Until we fix that issue, we're not going anywhere. I actually was talking to a friend of mine who actually works for the Democratic Party, and led with this line: "We will have more success advancing an agenda that progressives want in the medium to long term by supporting Republican candidates who work to end systemic corruption than by supporting Democratic candidates who do not." He was flabbergasted by this statement (which stood against everything he "knew" to be "true" in politics), but after convincing him of the need for real reform in how our candidates raise money to run for office, he ended up agreeing with me. Cause that's really what's blocking both of us. We can't get what either of us want until we start addressing this problem. We can argue about what form reform can take later, but I believe that we need to first agree that we need reform. I'd like to start what I'd like to call a "cross-partisan" movement. Not bi-partisan, because we don't agree on anything else. But cross-partisan. I'm going to do my best to push for reform on the progressive end, but I'd like to lend aid and support where I can to conservatives pushing for reform on the conservative end. We do not have to work together, but we should be working concurrently towards the same goal. Is this possible? I'd really, really like your genuine thoughts on this. -- Brian Boyko -- Disgruntled Democrat
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:45
|
|
|
MasterControl posted:Likelyhood of him loving torchys tacos is 100%
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 15:51 |
|
|
Dude's linkedin is amazing:quote:Creator of digital marketing collateral, whether blog posts, YouTube viral videos, or powerful animations and presentations. Here's his company website showcasing his mad photoshop skillz: http://www.blogphilo.com/main/b2c-wholesaleretail/ Oh, and he's also got an IMDB entry. Guy gets around.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2014 02:49
|
|