|
on a completely unrelated note, is there a way to reliably generate an emp that will shut down local electronics but doesn't involve explosions and shaped charges and poo poo i'm asking for a friend
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:26 |
|
|
duTrieux. posted:on a completely unrelated note, is there a way to reliably generate an emp that will shut down local electronics but doesn't involve explosions and shaped charges and poo poo enjoy gitmo brought to you by frito-lay, terrorist scum
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:23
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:on a completely unrelated note, is there a way to reliably generate an emp that will shut down local electronics but doesn't involve explosions and shaped charges and poo poo i binged up a herf gun made out of old microwaves but got nothing
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:35
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:self driving cars will avoid wrecks by automatically pulling off the road and stopping at a 7-11 until you buy something or watch a five minute advertisement for taquitos can't wait for the first malicious ads that detect you have a low tank and direct you to the middle of nowhere where somebody waits charging $40 per gallon.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
you can block radio communications pretty easily with a noise generator, an amplifier, and an antenna, but damaging them is much much more difficult. Most electronics have current limiters on their front end receiver amps so you'd have a tough time damaging those, and getting a high enough electric field at any reasonable distance from you to cause an inductive current spike on a PCB would be pretty much impossible. sorry
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:52
|
|
|
the the google future drive by download will have a completely new meaning.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2014 23:54
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:you can block radio communications pretty easily with a noise generator, an amplifier, and an antenna, but damaging them is much much more difficult. Most electronics have current limiters on their front end receiver amps so you'd have a tough time damaging those, and getting a high enough electric field at any reasonable distance from you to cause an inductive current spike on a PCB would be pretty much impossible. look, i don't care if it's impossible. i want either this or a device which projects a field of silence in a bubble around itself ~orders a half dozen supercaps and one of this belt clip static discharge thingies~
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
~dies~
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:~dies~ at least you cant post
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:07
|
|
|
when I was in high school physics for our final project my friend and I were going to build a railgun but the teacher was pretty sure we'd hurt ourselves doing it so instead of actually building anything we just had to write a report about it
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:08
|
|
|
Caged posted:at least you cant post have you never seen the hit documentary ghostbusters?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:11
|
|
|
oh shi
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:15
|
|
|
get an old fat monitor and hit the degauss button
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
cellphone/radio jammers are real and cool but will also get ur rear end arrested in the US some countries install them in prisons/schools/legislature chambers (not kidding on the last one lol)
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:21
|
|
|
Cygni posted:cellphone/radio jammers are real and cool but will also get ur rear end arrested in the US iirc a dude in florida got busted a few weeks ago for driving around with a cell phone jammer in his suv they found him because metropcs noticed a lot of drops in a certain moving area over a period of time in the morning/afternoon, called the fcc, they set up monitors along the route and found him because he turned it on during his commute and took the same path each day
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
i dont even know why you'd do that. if you don't want to be bothered by phones on your drive to work then turn your phone off.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
so what you're telling me is that i can get somebody arrested by splicing a cell jammer into their car's electrical?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
Caged posted:i dont even know why you'd do that. if you don't want to be bothered by phones on your drive to work then turn your phone off. "i'll show those rear end in a top hat who are on their phone while driving! i'll show them all
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:33
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:so what you're telling me is that i can get somebody arrested by splicing a cell jammer into their car's electrical? yes it's a federal felony at that, iirc
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:"i'll show those rear end in a top hat who are on their phone while driving! i'll show them all a backpack sized one on public transportation would own for all the jerkwads talkin on they phone, but it would also block ppl just tryin to look at titties on their commute hmm
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
please dont get the security thread closed down aga.. oh
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
America isn't really the land of the free because I can't even distort the electromagnetic spectrum here without goin to jail
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:America isn't really the land of the free because I can't even distort the electromagnetic spectrum here without goin to jail sure you can, just not at that wavelength try at 500nm or so and you should be good to go
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 02:32
|
|
|
fuckin- l.m.a.o. http://store.steampowered.com/streaming gently caress google
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 04:48
|
|
|
oh i misread that at the bar and thought they started their own streaming service oh well
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 04:50
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:oh i misread that at the bar and thought they started their own streaming service why would that hurt google anyway
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
hey hey gently caress google quote:The latest version of Chrome comes with the option to just say "OK Google" when opening a new tab or the Google homepage and to speak your query directly. Depending on the information being sought, Google might also respond by voice when returning the results. Though it's described as a universal update, the feature seems to only work for Chrome users with their language set to US English so far. You'll be prompted to enable it when visiting Google.com, or you can dig into the privacy settings of your browser to tick the checkbox. "we'd like to listen to you all the time. ok? ok."
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 12:54
|
|
|
why would anyone ever enable that feature? what kind of company OKs dev time to make that feature?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:20
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:why would anyone ever enable that feature? one that has the parts lying around and doesn't have enough management to say "don't do that it's banal" or "instead of that why not fix some problems affecting actual users lmao"
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:25
|
|
|
p. sure that it's to lay some kind of groundwork for google rear end
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:27
|
|
|
Install Windows posted:why would that hurt google anyway cuz they just bought twitch
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:29
|
|
|
chrome users who speak english with a particular pronunciation, have microphones, leave them turned on while browsing and are in a place where speaking the same words loudly and clearly aloud would be seen as acceptable, are said to be overjoyed at the announcement
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:30
|
|
|
imagine opening a new tab in chrome, but finding it easier to speak your search terms than typing them. try really hard to imagine that, because i sure can't
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:31
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:imagine opening a new tab in chrome, but finding it easier to speak your search terms than typing them. 1) people with disabilities 2) that's it
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:34
|
|
|
maybe i'm masturbating and opened a new tab with my mouse? "OK Google. hot anime babes"
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 14:35
|
|
|
come on, how the hell is this OK to do?quote:Independent music labels are at loggerheads with YouTube over the licensing terms for its upcoming streaming music subscription service.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 15:13
|
|
|
oh no, not the labels my heart weeps
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 15:18
|
|
|
if you don't agree to the terms of use you aren't allowed to use the product so why is this bad now? can't the indie label just tell youtube's nonexistent service to go gently caress itself and make a pandora channel or whatever the cool kids are using these days? or just put the videos up on the regular youtube anyway right next all the other technically-against-the-tos content?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 15:21
|
|
|
indeed, how is it legal to not sell your product to someone!
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 15:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:26 |
|
|
its cool to require licensing for one product to use your other product where you have a near monopoly Vimeo is the Linux on the desktop of video sites
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2014 16:32
|
|
