|
gatz posted:I uploaded a cutscene in Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines for my ongoing LP. It received a copyright claim by some entity called "XMediaDigitalAggregator". Only relevant thing google brings up is that they are some sort of Russian content distributor (wut?). Pretty sure those guys have no claim to it in the first place since apparently X-Media only came to exist over a year after the release of the game. This is their website: http://www.xdigital.ru/index-eng.php X-Media Digital posted:WebSheriff - copyright projection Jobbo_Fett fucked around with this message at 06:44 on Jun 1, 2014 |
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 23:41 |
|
|
gatz posted:I uploaded a cutscene in Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines for my ongoing LP. It received a copyright claim by some entity called "XMediaDigitalAggregator". Dispute on the grounds that the claimant does not own the property in question (and cite who does).
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:43
|
|
|
berryjon posted:Dispute on the grounds that the claimant does not own the property in question (and cite who does). Wouldn't Youtube just go "Yeah, it actually belongs to Activision. Therefore it's *still blocked* just under a different license now. Enjoy your content hit."?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:47
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:Wouldn't Youtube just go "Yeah, it actually belongs to Activision. Therefore it's *still blocked* just under a different license now. Enjoy your content hit."? Only if Activision actually cares about it and Gatz is trying to monetize his views.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:49
|
|
|
I don't monetize anything, put ads on any videos (that I can control), etc. I'm not sure if Activision owns the right to the game or just distributes it, though. Even so, my options are:quote:I believe this copyright claim is not valid because: gatz fucked around with this message at 06:54 on Jun 1, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:51
|
|
|
gatz posted:I don't monetize anything, put ads on any videos (that I can control), etc. I'm not sure if Activision owns the right to the game or just distributes it, though. Even so, my options are: -I'm not selling the video or making any money from it. Pretty easy choice.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 06:58
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:-I'm not selling the video or making any money from it. Lol, youtube doesn't care. This is what they say: "Whether or not you benefit financially from using the content doesn't matter. Unless you have permission from the owner, it's not yours to use." I uploaded a slightly longer version of the cutscene which seems to have escaped the copyright claim. gently caress youtube.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:08
|
|
|
How is "I think/can prove that the person or persons behind the copyright claim are making a fraudulent claim." not an option?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:09
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:-I'm not selling the video or making any money from it. I'm pretty sure all but maybe one of those options will just give a text blurb that basically reads "I don't give a flying gently caress, rear end in a top hat, we're muting the audio", actually. I also like their unspoken assumption that people won't abuse the system to try and claim things they don't actually own like what's going on right now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:14
|
|
|
frozentreasure posted:How is "I think/can prove that the person or persons behind the copyright claim are making a fraudulent claim." not an option? I guess because then Youtube would have to prove that the jerk in question in no way got permission from the copyright holder to put claims on the video, which is a lot of paperwork. lovely of them, yes, but they don't really care about us.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:16
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:lovely of them, yes, but they don't really care about us. It's all about the Benjamins baby! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:38
|
|
|
For some odd reason, the copyright claim just disappeared.  E: Nevermind, it just popped back up. What is youtube's deal?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:43
|
|
|
berryjon posted:Dispute on the grounds that the claimant does not own the property in question (and cite who does). This is the right answer. You don't have to answer to anyone until Activision themselves come after you. Don't let YouTube scare you. You shouldn't let assholes who have nothing to do with the game profit off poo poo they didn't have anything to do with. Seriously, don't worry about the fine print. Hammer that dispute button.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:46
|
|
|
gatz posted:I uploaded a cutscene in Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines for my ongoing LP. It received a copyright claim by some entity called "XMediaDigitalAggregator". Dispute any claim you see that isn't from the actual rights holder. What you really need to know about how copyright claims is that when you file the dispute, if the "entity" they say owns it doesn't actually respond after a while, youtube will find in your favor and drop it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 07:51
|
|
|
When in doubt dispute on grounds of fair use. You'll have the possibility to enter a bit of text explaining the situation since the reasons for a dispute YT will let you choose from are very limited. It's what I always do when I get a claim not by the actual copyright holder (which is always, by the way). I tend to do some googling beforehand, though. One time I got a claim for "Unknown Music" which I thought was kinda funny. IGgy IGsen fucked around with this message at 13:13 on Jun 1, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2014 13:11
|
|
|
What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:23
|
|
|
IGgy IGsen posted:When in doubt dispute on grounds of fair use. You'll have the possibility to enter a bit of text explaining the situation since the reasons for a dispute YT will let you choose from are very limited. It's what I always do when I get a claim not by the actual copyright holder (which is always, by the way). I tend to do some googling beforehand, though. It's always funny seeing grossly incorrect content ID matches. CBS decided to claim a No More Heroes vid of mine because it had a blonde girl and two burly dudes in suits next to her so I guess they thought it was Big Bang Theory or something. centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. Basically, your posts were poo poo and you were making a new reply for everything you wanted to say instead of consolidating it all into one post.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. Your posts are bad and you should feel bad.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. Your posts did not contribute anything to the The Let's Play Sandcastle, and thus you spent a week in kitty jail. Please post better next time!
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:25
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. You got probated for lovely posting because you posted like garbage, or as some would call it, poo poo. Often several times in a row. There is an edit button, you know. Click the question mark on your post (right below your Stupid Newbie avatar) to see your posts in this thread. Please look over them and reflect on how bad they were, mainly because of their low content (read: meaningless) and stupidity (read: stupid). Really the main thing is stop typing like a goddamn young teenager on the internet. Spell out your words.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. Let me tell you about GBS.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 03:06
|
|
|
ChaosArgate posted:It's always funny seeing grossly incorrect content ID matches. CBS decided to claim a No More Heroes vid of mine because it had a blonde girl and two burly dudes in suits next to her so I guess they thought it was Big Bang Theory or something. I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. Either way, if you do commentary, you claim under Fair Use (transformative work for parody and/or review purpose, because an LPer always at least says "I like this about the game" or "This is an objectively bad thing", so it has aspects of a longass review) in the first paragraph of your letter to YT copyright dudes, then your second paragraph then explains that the fucktard in question doesn't actually own the rights or its a misidentification. Always be sure, however, it's a misidentification. That one tripped me in the past too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. centralpotatoez posted:NYO! hmmmm
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 04:42
|
|
|
centralpotatoez posted:What does "lovely posting" mean? Got banned for a week for it. lovely. Adjective/Adverb. Pertaining to or having characteristics of fecal matter. Used in a sentence: Your posting was lovely.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
JamieTheD posted:I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. Holy poo poo, I always thought that was just an urban legend.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 04:53
|
|
|
JamieTheD posted:I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. Wait. The claim was that your video was 4 minutes and 33 seconds long? Am I reading this right? How can someone make a claim on the length of a video?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 09:35
|
|
PureRok posted:Wait. The claim was that your video was 4 minutes and 33 seconds long? Am I reading this right? How can someone make a claim on the length of a video? 4'33'' is the name of an actual song. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%E2%80%B233%E2%80%B3 You'll quickly see just why the claim is ridiculous.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 09:41
|
|
|
Oh, so it's just a claim on sound in general. That makes... even less sense.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 10:29
|
|
|
PureRok posted:Oh, so it's just a claim on sound in general. That makes... even less sense. A claim on the absence of sound.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 13:09
|
|
|
JamieTheD posted:I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. No way.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 13:09
|
|
|
JamieTheD posted:I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. That is absolutely beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 14:12
|
|
|
JamieTheD posted:I think my favourite, which actually happened to me, was 4'33" being claimed in one of my vids. They were trying to push the boundary of "What is copyright, anyways?". Maybe Youtube wants to host some seminars about "Modern Copyright Art".
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
If there was a claim on 4'33'' on one of my videos I'd acknowledge it since it's a "piece" that consists of just about any sound that happens during the duration of it. I love that there's actually sheet music for it and all it says is to turn the pages after a certain amount of bars. I'm too rhythmically challenged to play it by myself unless I use a metronome, though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 18:12
|
|
|
IGgy IGsen posted:If there was a claim on 4'33'' on one of my videos I'd acknowledge it since it's a "piece" that consists of just about any sound that happens during the duration of it. I love that there's actually sheet music for it and all it says is to turn the pages after a certain amount of bars. I'm too rhythmically challenged to play it by myself unless I use a metronome, though. They just use a stopwatch during performances.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2014 19:14
|
|
|
I thought somebody here tried to claim ownership of 4'33 on Youtube just to be a goon/demonstrate how dumb Content ID is? Assuming they actually followed through, maybe that's what got you? also, I really want to see a screenshot of that notification screen.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
ChaosArgate posted:It's always funny seeing grossly incorrect content ID matches. CBS decided to claim a No More Heroes vid of mine because it had a blonde girl and two burly dudes in suits next to her so I guess they thought it was Big Bang Theory or something. Did you successfully dispute it? What happened?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
Psion posted:I thought somebody here tried to claim ownership of 4'33 on Youtube just to be a goon/demonstrate how dumb Content ID is? Assuming they actually followed through, maybe that's what got you? Makes me wish I'd saved it and the one on the Rogue Trooper vid, where they tried to claim it was some ambient wind CD thing, and, in fact, there was no ambient sounds save mah boot treads. But mostly, I get ones from Sony and EMI. Sony are mostly bros about their soundtrack, and just slap an ad on it, all fine with me. EMI tend to be a bit more schizophrenic about things (Blue Monday got through, nearly everything else I tried so far was blocked in Germany, because GEMA and other fun stuff.) But, of course, once you successfully dispute a claim, it no longer shows on your Copyright Notices thingumajigger. Sadly, I'm pretty sure somebody actually had the same idea, because it was an official recordings company. Didn't bother checking whether the company actually owned the rights, because... Well, when a claim's just plain wrong, it's pretty fecking easy to dispute.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2014 04:13
|
|
|
I don't know where else to go to ask this, so hey thread, my next LP is gonna be Dead Space (I want to do the whole trilogy someday but I'll just start at the start) but my co-commentator and I had a couple disagreements and so he will not be joining me for it. If anyone watched my Max Payne 3 LP (0 people) or likes me (-5 people) feel free to PM me because I'm looking for someone to ride shotgun with me on it! If you haven't played Dead Space that's preferable but everyone and their brother has played Dead Space so it's not necessary.
CJacobs fucked around with this message at 22:01 on Jun 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2014 21:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 23:41 |
|
|
CJacobs posted:I don't know where else to go to ask this, so hey thread, my next LP is gonna be Dead Space (I want to do the whole trilogy someday but I'll just start at the start) but my co-commentator and I had a couple disagreements and so he will not be joining me for it. If anyone watched my Max Payne 3 LP (0 people) or likes me (-5 people) feel free to PM me because I'm looking for someone to ride shotgun with me on it! If you haven't played Dead Space that's preferable but everyone and their brother has played Dead Space so it's not necessary. Probably want to give more details than that. What kind of schedule are you shooting for? Is it going to be a completionist or just going through it? Are you expecting a YouTube-standard "oh a scary monster that made me jump" commentary or are you going to try and loredump?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2014 22:09
|
|