Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Family Values
Jun 26, 2007


Patter Song posted:

If you fast-forwarded to 500 BCE you'd see an explosion of expansion of blue on that map, especially in the Mediterranean/North Africa, parts of India, and China.

I would say earlier than that. By 800 BCE Greece was emerging from its dark age. Which brings up an interesting point, if the map had been of the world circa 1200 BCE there would actually be more blue than 1000 BCE; Greece, western Asia Minor, and Crete had the Mycenaean and Minoan civilizations which were destroyed by the Dorian invasion and the 'Sea Peoples'.

e: oops new page, better add a map

The Dorian invasion:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Baloogan
Dec 5, 2004
Fun Shoe

Regarde Aduck posted:

I know you're a retarded GiP shitlord but can you at least agree they could maybe tighten up the reliability of them so they don't keep blowing up children 10 years after the conflict? Is that acceptable or is it something a socialist would say?

7 billion people, means roughly 28 billion arms and legs. I think we can stand to lose a few.

jeeves
May 27, 2001

Deranged Psychopathic
Butler Extraordinaire

made of bees posted:

Found this on Wikipedia while looking for something else. The state of the world, c. 1000 BCE:



Yellow=hunter-gatherers, Purple=nomadic herders, Green=farmers, Orange=chiefdoms, Blue=formal states, Red line=areas with ironwork, Pink line=areas with bronzework

I know that what does and doesn't qualify as a 'state' is probably pretty subjective, but I never thought about how new the concept is in most of the world, relatively speaking. Three thousand years ago isn't generally thought of as like, the dawn of civilization. Writing, cities, organized religion, etc. had already been around for a while (admittedly mostly in those blue areas). Considering it's more or less universal now, it's weird to think how the entire concept of a state was entirely alien to the overwhelming majority of humanity at the time.
Link to this wiki page? I find these types of maps and time period fascinating.

made of bees
May 21, 2013

Family Values posted:

I would say earlier than that. By 800 BCE Greece was emerging from its dark age. Which brings up an interesting point, if the map had been of the world circa 1200 BCE there would actually be more blue than 1000 BCE; Greece, western Asia Minor, and Crete had the Mycenaean and Minoan civilizations which were destroyed by the Dorian invasion and the 'Sea Peoples'.

e: oops new page, better add a map

The Dorian invasion:



I thought about this too, and while there doesn't seem to be a map for 1200 BCE, the 2000 BCE map shows at least two states that had collapsed by 1000 BCE, on Crete and in the Indus Valley region:



And as Patter Song said, there's a lot more area covered by states by 500 BCE, a lot of it within mutli-ethnic empires, in brown:


jeeves posted:

Link to this wiki page? I find these types of maps and time period fascinating.

I found the first map on the page for stateless societies, which I thought was kinda strange but it does show that they were once the norm. I found the other maps on this guy's page.

made of bees fucked around with this message at 19:56 on Jun 5, 2014

Bates
Jun 15, 2006

Kennel
May 1, 2008

BAWWW-UNH!
Lots of historical maps:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_the_world_showing_history

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

How did they determine if a patch of land had 'civilization' on it or not?

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.

Baronjutter posted:

How did they determine if a patch of land had 'civilization' on it or not?

Most likely with archeology.

Patter Song
Mar 26, 2010

Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.
Fun Shoe

Baronjutter posted:

How did they determine if a patch of land had 'civilization' on it or not?

It's not determining civilization, it's determining the presence of a state, a form of political organization. You can still have commerce, literature, etc. going on without a formal state structure.

Bates
Jun 15, 2006

Baronjutter posted:

How did they determine if a patch of land had 'civilization' on it or not?

I think it's just when you have some form of reliable evidence that there was a stable state structure of one kind or the other beyond a certain size.

TildeATH
Oct 21, 2010

by Lowtax

Baronjutter posted:

How did they determine if a patch of land had 'civilization' on it or not?

Via bullshit, based on the quality of the territorial footprints they give for Sandai Period Chinese cultures.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July

This map does not show the Totally Legitimate Korean Empire of Hwanguk :colbert:

ComradeCosmobot fucked around with this message at 22:54 on Jun 5, 2014

Modern Day Hercules
Apr 26, 2008

Patter Song posted:

It's not determining civilization, it's determining the presence of a state, a form of political organization. You can still have commerce, literature, etc. going on without a formal state structure.

"Civilization" is a politically loaded term, which is why those maps are in this thread. It's an outdated concept used to rank societies somewhat arbitrarily, and you see it less and less in anthropology/history texts these days. These maps are really just showing which areas were part of organized state societies which is an actual archaeologically verifiable fact, and not so much ethnocentric propaganda.

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE
It's also a loaded map in that it only shows the Old World.

Bates
Jun 15, 2006

Torrannor posted:

It's also a loaded map in that it only shows the Old World.

Yeah but I was worried it'd be too big and not that much really goes on over there for a while. Anyway I don't really have the tools to make a good one in a reasonable amount of time.

It's from here - you can go back and forth one year at the time from 3000BC onwards and it displays a few migrations, battles and historical journeys like Marco Polo and such. It's a good overview.

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Anosmoman posted:

Yeah but I was worried it'd be too big and not that much really goes on over there for a while. Anyway I don't really have the tools to make a good one in a reasonable amount of time.

It's from here - you can go back and forth one year at the time from 3000BC onwards and it displays a few migrations, battles and historical journeys like Marco Polo and such. It's a good overview.

Wow, that is a great tool, thanks.

edit: it also shows conquest routes and battles. Neat.

Count Roland fucked around with this message at 03:11 on Jun 6, 2014

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

TildeATH posted:

Via bullshit, based on the quality of the territorial footprints they give for Sandai Period Chinese cultures.

Yeah pretty much as far as I can tell. As a representative example here's their version of Anatolia in the late Bronze age:



Compared to a map from a 2004 book:



All the kingdoms west of the Hittites are missing. Troy and Ugarit not being there is particularly weird since they're both fairly famous.

Modern Day Hercules posted:

These maps are really just showing which areas were part of organized state societies which is an actual archaeologically verifiable fact, and not so much ethnocentric propaganda.

I don't think so, in the ancient period it seems to just show the famous civilisations and most of the states we know existed are absent.

Carbon dioxide
Oct 9, 2012

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE
You mean Finland is not a part of Sweden? :confused:

I see the BBC works hard to copy American news channels.

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

Torrannor posted:

You mean Finland is not a part of Sweden? :confused:

They're just remembering the good 'ol days. :sweden:

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:
At least Denmark isn't pointing to the Netherlands. I assume it's an older map, since Croatia is left out? Something to do with the UK not being the only country that sensibly stayed out of the Euro?

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



The border between Sweden and Finland's not even on there, I don't know how that happens. That sort of thing is really common, too. Do these people just not check the maps they've made before they air them?

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

Phlegmish posted:

The border between Sweden and Finland's not even on there, I don't know how that happens. That sort of thing is really common, too. Do these people just not check the maps they've made before they air them?



I bet if you showed that map to 100 Belgians people from Flanders would just think it's funny but Walloons would flip their poo poo.

Carbon dioxide
Oct 9, 2012

You guys love badly drawn maps, right? Try to spot all the errors in this one!

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

Carbon dioxide posted:

You guys love badly drawn maps, right? Try to spot all the errors in this one!



Wow, that's to many errors to even be funny. The guy who made this is either a joker or on medication.

Pakled
Aug 6, 2011

WE ARE SMART

Carbon dioxide posted:

You guys love badly drawn maps, right? Try to spot all the errors in this one!



The windswept steppes of Greece, the birthplace of democracy and Western Civilization.

Ammat The Ankh
Sep 7, 2010

Now, attempt to defeat me!
And I shall become a living legend!

Kamrat posted:

Wow, that's to many errors to even be funny. The guy who made this is either a joker or on medication.

I'd say it was made in China, but the Chinese wouldn't put Tanwan Taiwan as a separate country.

Pakled
Aug 6, 2011

WE ARE SMART

Ammat The Ankh posted:

I'd say it was made in China, but the Chinese wouldn't put Tanwan Taiwan as a separate country.

The text is Japanese.

e:never mind, I'm an idiot, it is Chinese, it just so happens that the Chinese text for "Japan" is the same as Japanese :v:

Pakled fucked around with this message at 19:40 on Jun 7, 2014

Average Lettuce
Oct 22, 2012


Don't know where the United Kingdom is but got Slovenia pretty close!

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Carbon dioxide posted:

You guys love badly drawn maps, right? Try to spot all the errors in this one!



OK this is just hurtful. I mean Ireland? Irish I'd never seen this map.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



Canada believe someone made that map.

Tumblr of scotch
Mar 13, 2006

Please, don't be my neighbor.
USA it might be bad?

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

Carbon dioxide posted:

You guys love badly drawn maps, right? Try to spot all the errors in this one!



Carribean Islands - The Myth. Coming soon to a cinema near you.

Edit: If it is really of Chinese origin, maybe the mapmaker did not like Russia being bigger than China and took steps to rectify it. So many states in the Russian steppe.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:
At least most of the Northern European labels have just been shifted north-east, otherwise their relative positions are fine. Pretty hard to see what's going on in many places though.

SaltyJesus
Jun 2, 2011

Arf!

Camoes posted:

Don't know where the United Kingdom is but got Slovenia pretty close!

It's fitting that UK is in the ballsack of Scandinavia since the actual islands on the map look like freshly ejected spunk.

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME

A Buttery Pastry posted:

At least most of the Northern European labels have just been shifted north-east, otherwise their relative positions are fine. Pretty hard to see what's going on in many places though.

I, too, remember Belgium being to Ireland's south-west.

Jerry Manderbilt
May 31, 2012

No matter how much paperwork I process, it never goes away. It only increases.
Did Pakistan fall off into the ocean or something, because what's with that gap between (what should be) Iran and India?

Koramei
Nov 11, 2011

I have three regrets
The first is to be born in Joseon.
I was wondering that too; everything else in the map just looks like they simplified it, but carving in there makes no sense.

Pakled posted:

The text is Japanese.

e:never mind, I'm an idiot, it is Chinese, it just so happens that the Chinese text for "Japan" is the same as Japanese :v:

Kanji (like 日本), which is one part of the Japanese written language, are just Chinese characters. Same with Hanja in Korean. Spoken differently, but written the same and with the same meaning across all three languages.

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


I was laughing pretty hard at the "Uinited Arab Emirates" just being in the middle of absolutely nowhere northern Siberia (with most of Europe), like the mapmaker just gave up their last weak pretense of giving even a modicum of a drat and stuck it in a blank spot, until I realized it just had an extremely faint line for some reason. A line pointing quite precisely to Afghanistan, but that's more par for the course on that map.

Also, I just realized that there are two Bangladeshes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jerry Manderbilt
May 31, 2012

No matter how much paperwork I process, it never goes away. It only increases.
Man is it just me, or

a) is China the only other country to have borders on this map
and
b) does China's borders include a massive chunk of the sea and a sliver of North Korea?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply