|
Les Affaires posted:Just a reminder, something being constitutional does not necessitate it being just or right. Yeah the High Court can only say whether or not it's legal in a strict constitutional sense; they're not really there to make value judgements.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 01:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 05:55 |
|
Those On My Left posted:Yup, a 6:0 decision (Gageler recused himself). "(6) Who should pay the costs of and incidental to this Stated Case? Answer: The plaintiff." I hope he tells them to get hosed.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 01:42 |
|
Mike Daube is a pretty cool dude. I got drunk with him earlier this year EDIT FOR CONTENT: Guardian Australia posted:Hillary Clinton: Australian PM Julia Gillard faced 'outrageous sexism' At least we aren't getting away with being horrible shits entirely. hooman fucked around with this message at 02:42 on Jun 18, 2014 |
# ? Jun 18, 2014 01:58 |
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-18/changes-to-australian-foreign-aid-julie-bishop/5531106 Now if you want aid from Australia, you have to do meet certain "criteria". I can only imagine what this might even be.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 02:48 |
|
Christine Milne is advertising a loving unpaid internship.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 02:49 |
|
So with the High Court decision, is it the case that what the Government are doing is not explicitly prohibited by the constitution?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 02:53 |
|
Mr Chips posted:So with the High Court decision, is it the case that what the Government are doing is not explicitly prohibited by the constitution? Correct.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 02:56 |
|
First potential DD trigger pulled. The senate rejected the CEFC. Doesn't it have to be rejected again to really get the panic started?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:02 |
|
WebDog posted:First DD trigger pulled.The senate rejected the CEFC. Rejected the CEFC repeal, it's probably important to note.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:03 |
|
Guardian Politics Blog posted:Tony Abbott gets his first double dissolution trigger Holy poo poo I just found Electionnow.com.au ahahahahahahahaha. EDIT: Too slow hooman, curse you electionnow.com.au and your mesmerising train wreck like nature.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:05 |
CrazyTolradi posted:http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-18/changes-to-australian-foreign-aid-julie-bishop/5531106 Criterion #1 - Do you have any mineral goodness buried underneath you? Criterion #2 - Will you allow us to build a concentration camp inside of you? Criterion #3 - Do you have an unending army of labour for our future Special Economic Zones?
|
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:14 |
Quantum Mechanic posted:Christine Milne is advertising a loving unpaid internship. The Greens have been doing this heaps and it loving pisses me off
|
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:14 |
|
Those On My Left posted:Yup, a 6:0 decision (Gageler recused himself). Les Affaires posted:Just a reminder, something being constitutional does not necessitate it being just or right. So the legislation they had to pass relating to the NT intervention was to ensure constitutionality? From what I can tell they just created a new piece of legislation to say that the intervention is classified as a 'special measure' (as described in the racial discrimination act). If a legislative act includes broadly defined 'exception clauses', can you use them to do things which would otherwise be unconstitutional? Is there any legal process that can challenge the validity of these exceptions? Or do we solely rely on politicians to not enact legislation where a prime minister can easily decide who it does and doesn't apply to?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:28 |
|
Ashby has dropped his case against Slipper.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:43 |
|
Tokamak posted:So the legislation they had to pass relating to the NT intervention was to ensure constitutionality? From what I can tell they just created a new piece of legislation to say that the intervention is classified as a 'special measure' (as described in the racial discrimination act). In general we rely on the parliament not to enact a law that gives the executive powers over and above what the community would expect. Unfortunately the expectations of community are a fickle thing and what the community expected when Australia first implemented the racial discrimination act is not necessarily what the community expects now.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:44 |
|
hooman posted:Ashby has dropped his case against Slipper. Is there any word of Slipper seeking costs?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:44 |
|
Quantum Mechanic posted:Christine Milne is advertising a loving unpaid internship. What do you expect? The greens are a bunch of bourgeoise latte-sipping doctors wives who wouldn't know a class struggle if you beat them to death with it. Labor is and always has been the true party of the working class.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 03:53 |
|
hooman posted:Election Now. Maybe this time... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7u9hP4r1S8
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:00 |
|
Now we get to see that (some) double dissolution triggers are absolutely meaningless. The likely result now is the House presents the bill to the Senate for a third time after the 30th June where the numbers would have changed and the vote to abolish the CEFC will pass. As much as I'd like to see the end of TA as PM. So its really a case of: Bummer.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:07 |
|
Really depends how much Palmer cares about the CEFC. Coalition won't get the numbers to scrap it otherwise considering Madigan and Xenophon right now.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:18 |
|
CrazyTolradi posted:http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-18/changes-to-australian-foreign-aid-julie-bishop/5531106 quote:In what Foreign Minister Julie Bishop says are "radical" changes, aid programs will be delivered in partnership with the private sector.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:56 |
|
It's good to see foreign aid finally getting the managerialist mutual obligation treatment that the rest of the welfare system has to put up with. Those countries have had it too good for too long.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:58 |
|
quote:Libs left without a candidate for Riverstone after Kevin Conolly disendorsed Ahahahaha. Looking forward to the election.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 04:59 |
|
When you've killed all your own poor you've got to get new ones to gently caress with somewhere.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:00 |
|
adamantium|wang posted:Ahahahaha. Looking forward to the election. Wait the liberals actually think they have a left faction in the party?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:06 |
|
quote:"We're not getting the outcomes we should expect from the billions and billions of dollars we invest in aid, so I want to see better outcomes." Not giving money to the worlds most needy because they don't see it as a good investment. Hang on, does this mean the money they cut is going to be uncut and given to other groups now?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:09 |
|
Saw this site going around on facebook; What is your Game of Thrones Name? Seems accurate.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:13 |
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Wait the liberals actually think they have a left faction in the party? They're the part who realises that bankrupting the poor and middle classes will annihilate the economy.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:16 |
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Wait the liberals actually think they have a left faction in the party? Well you see they have the lot that think their policies has go too far, the lot who think they've struck the balance and then the other lot who think they haven't gone far enough. So yeah, relatively they do
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:18 |
quote:aid programs will be delivered in partnership with the private sector. quote:aid programs will be delivered in partnership with the private sector. quote:aid programs will be delivered in partnership with the private sector.
|
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:24 |
"Feeding the Poor: A partnership between Serco and the Australian Government"
|
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:26 |
|
Haters Objector posted:"Feeding the Poor: A partnership between Serco and the Australian Government" [Click here to Like this]
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:27 |
|
I may not be as cynical as some, but surely that would be referring to NGO charities, and not outsourcing aid to for-profit organisations right....right?
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:28 |
|
Haters Objector posted:"A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick"
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:29 |
|
Zenithe posted:I may not be as cynical as some, but surely that would be referring to NGO charities, and not outsourcing aid to for-profit organisations right....right? Well, maybe. While definitely private entities they aren't typically referred to as the 'private sector' and would usually be referred to as NGOs or the not for profit sector. I'd be pleasantly surprised to be wrong though.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:32 |
|
open24hours posted:It's good to see foreign aid finally getting the managerialist mutual obligation treatment that the rest of the welfare system has to put up with. Those countries have had it too good for too long. I expect to see a 3-year, 10% return on famine relief foodstuffs. You can deliver the crops to our export markets and send us the cash, if it would make things easier. Thanks Africa. Regards, GrainCorp.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:34 |
I'm pretty sure a lot of aid programs already get contracted out to NGO's, so this change in language makes me think that it's going to be megacorporations buying the rights to suck whatever profit they possibly can from the poorest countries in the world
|
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:35 |
|
Foreign Aid™ Now with 50% more exploitation!
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:37 |
|
Future News.com.au Article posted:Hancock prospecting has today been awarded the contract for providing humanitarian services to Cambodia. The 200 million dollar package is expected to create thousands of jobs and the supporting infrastructure for employment of some of the poorest members of villages near large ore deposits. Ms. Rhineheart today has generously offered any local villages 1% of operating profits for participation in the scheme. Directors of Serco expressed disappointment that their venture of refugee internment camps did not receive the go ahead. "Foreign" "Aid"
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 05:55 |
|
Haters Objector posted:I'm pretty sure a lot of aid programs already get contracted out to NGO's, so this change in language makes me think that it's going to be megacorporations buying the rights to suck whatever profit they possibly can from the poorest countries in the world Probably more along the lines of companies latching onto the aid budget and sucking money out of that in return for providing threadbare 'outcomes' to the target nation, and pocketing the difference. Money for jam.
|
# ? Jun 18, 2014 05:43 |