|
So is Clive Palmer our enemy or friend? Is he a frenemy?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 21:19 |
|
When I visited my dad recently it was the first time I'd ever met his girlfriend. In our first conversation she told me she hates refugees, in our second conversation she told me that she hates the Japanese. They live in the Shire though so I guess I should have been expecting it.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:07 |
|
Anidav posted:So is Clive Palmer our enemy or friend? Is he a frenemy? Frenemy, yeah. He's doing the right things for the wrong reasons, which I suppose is better than doing the wrong thing.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:07 |
|
Scylo posted:When I visited my dad recently it was the first time I'd ever met his girlfriend. In our first conversation she told me she hates refugees, in our second conversation she told me that she hates the Japanese. They live in the Shire though so I guess I should have been expecting it. Should tell her the Nazis considered them honourary aryans, she'll probably change her tune.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:08 |
|
Wayne Swan wrote an interesting article after getting kicked out of parliament for calling Abbott a liar. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/02/joe-hockeys-budget-is-an-assault-on-social-justice
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:09 |
|
Anidav posted:So is Clive Palmer our enemy or friend? Is he a frenemy?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:09 |
|
UWA Circulated News email posted:UWA anticipated the budget would contain some measures to allow universities across the country to become more globally competitive and provide more choice to students. The university sector, valiant defenders of the rights of the rich and privileged.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:34 |
|
hooman posted:
Sandstone unis don't count because they think that they'd all be the Aussie Harvard if they weren't being held back by things such as affordable and non-exclusive fees.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:47 |
|
Wheezle posted:3 days without auspol and Al Gore is announcing things with Clive Palmer. Well, we had to find something to do right?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:51 |
|
http://gawker.com/australian-cafe-was-docking-pay-if-you-cooked-not-cris-1596267714quote:The Fair Work Ombudsman issued the business with on-the-spot fines totalling $7650 and a letter of caution placing it on notice for any further contraventions. Well at least the punishment fits the crime, right? People should be locked up.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:56 |
|
Haters Objector posted:Do you guys want some poo poo opinions from a garbage newspaper? The Australian had a lovely comment accusing Muslims of secretly loving ISIS because they weren't on the streets protesting against the violence in Iraq. Also that we should restrict all muslim immigration for the safety of our beautiful western paradise of freedom+liberty+democracy
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 04:59 |
|
open24hours posted:http://gawker.com/australian-cafe-was-docking-pay-if-you-cooked-not-cris-1596267714 Publish the name of the cafe so people can
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:03 |
|
I think the Australian article it linked to named it, but I didn't want to click on it. I wonder if I could go eat there then tell the owner I was deducting money from the check because of xxxx
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:07 |
|
open24hours posted:http://gawker.com/australian-cafe-was-docking-pay-if-you-cooked-not-cris-1596267714 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...3-1226966256816
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:23 |
|
Bompacho posted:
Uh the head of Thailand's new military junta getting (predictably) pissy because we called for the restoration of democracy does not count as a foreign relations fuckup fyi. They still very much want our planeloads of bogans and sex tourists touching down in Phuket and Bangkok.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:51 |
|
Nibbles141 posted:I think the Australian article it linked to named it, but I didn't want to click on it. The Australian only mentioned which suburb in Perth it was in. Unless it is called "The Subiaco Cafe" I tried to use urbanspoon to work out who it was based on the menu but could only get 2/3 menu items and the place wasn't technically a cafe. Negligent posted:Uh the head of Thailand's new military junta getting (predictably) pissy because we called for the restoration of democracy does not count as a foreign relations fuckup fyi. Good point about the junta. I wasn't saying it was the wrong thing to call for democracy, just highlighting incidents where we are currently not well liked. Ol Sweepy fucked around with this message at 06:01 on Jun 26, 2014 |
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:54 |
Speaking of being hosed over, my work has told me that the reason I am paid less than my male colleague is "labour market conditions". I don't think there is any rational response to that. I have tried to be reasonable, but now I am looking at my options.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 05:57 |
|
froglet posted:Speaking of being hosed over, my work has told me that the reason I am paid less than my male colleague is "labour market conditions". I hope those options include: 1) union 2) Fair Work Ombudsman 3) Sex Discrimination Commissioner (i.e. complain to the Australian Human Rights Commission) 4) lawyer
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:03 |
|
froglet posted:Speaking of being hosed over, my work has told me that the reason I am paid less than my male colleague is "labour market conditions". That's a cute way of saying "because we think we can get away with it"
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:07 |
Those On My Left posted:I hope those options include: I've been to Professionals Australia and they weren't exactly helpful so I'm now wondering if I should go to the sex discrimination commissioner or to fair work next.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:24 |
|
froglet posted:I've been to Professionals Australia and they weren't exactly helpful so I'm now wondering if I should go to the sex discrimination commissioner or to fair work next. No reason you can't do both! Personally I would do Fair Work first but I would discuss with them making a complaint to the AHRC (which is what you do to get it into the Sex Discrimination Commissioner's jurisdiction).
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:25 |
Those On My Left posted:No reason you can't do both! Personally I would do Fair Work first but I would discuss with them making a complaint to the AHRC (which is what you do to get it into the Sex Discrimination Commissioner's jurisdiction). The real kicker in all this is that I've been told my best bet to get a pay rise is to "shine" and work really reaaaally hard and work towards a promotion. I am not joking. They seriously think I should work harder. For less money than my male colleagues. On the off chance they are as good as their word and reward hard work.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:45 |
|
Might as well start looking for a new job.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 06:58 |
|
The Usual Suspect posted:26 Jun 2014 The Australian PATRICIA KARVELAS Mentions of Culture and Agency? 0.00 Exaggerated claim about levels of TAFE funding? CHECK. Advocating the abolishion of TAFE funding? CHECK. I hope you missed this.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:05 |
|
Why the gently caress are we treating what a mining company owner says about childhood welfare with anything but derision? This is beyond even the "rich people know how to economics" wealth-worship you normally see and straight up into "rich people are polymath ubermenschen."
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:18 |
|
I've missed the rollercoaster of shame/anger/nausea of being Australian, yes. Also, Jesus Christ milky, so sorry for you.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:20 |
|
I assume people attending these new private education / training centres would be be eligible for the new HECS loans?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:20 |
Tommofork posted:I've missed the rollercoaster of shame/anger/nausea of being Australian, yes. It's frustrating. DIBP says to go to the Tribunal, Tribunal says she has to be in the country to appeal (and yet their form doesn't make that explicit and in fact mentions that only the person applying for the review, who is different on the form to who the the visa applicant is, needs to be in the country) and that any questioning of it is outside their jurisdiction. I wish I could find and quote the form. I rang the person from the Tribunal who notified my girlfriend of the refusal and gave her a bit of a tongue-lashing. It's like: we've done everything right, who do we go to if whoever the case officer was screwed up? No useful information. "It's outside our jurisdiction" over and over. My girlfriend emailed the case officer back when it was first refused and said, hey, I actually did give you valid information, and all they said was 'hey, we've passed it on to the manager, you'll hear something in ten business days'. Then nothing. When she contacted them again, it was the same thing - passed on to a manager and then nothing. You know what's funny, though? If I search this case officer's name on Google, I can find other angry people. I used to work for loving Flybuys and I would have lost my job if this was how I treated people's concerns - and that was for meaningless bullshit reward points that affected nothing in the grand scheme of things, not people's lives. Sure, we could probably just lodge another application but that stuff isn't cheap. It really isn't. Neither is a lawyer.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:34 |
Oh, here it is.quote:The tribunal can only accept an application for review made by a person who has the right to apply for review. In some cases the only person who can apply for review is the visa applicant or former visa holder, in other cases it can only be the sponsor or a close relative. In some cases the review applicant must be within Australia at the time of decision or at the time the application for review is lodged, or both. The tribunal cannot provide advice on individual circumstances, however you may seek advice on these issues from a registered migration agent or other registered provider of immigration assistance. Notice the difference between the visa applicant (girlfriend) and review applicant (her brother). Notice that there is nothing that mentions the visa applicant must be in the country. All the tribunal does is read written documents that are given to them - that's it. There's no need for someone to be there in person when the whole thing is literally an online form. Milkfred E. Moore fucked around with this message at 07:42 on Jun 26, 2014 |
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:39 |
|
A local is attempting to get the AEC to release the source code for the Senate counting system, the importance being everything that comes out from below the lines votes is dependant on the correctness of this application. AEC is declining, claiming trade-secrecy, so he's taking it to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and that costs money. He's running a Pozible campaign at http://www.pozible.com/project/183015 if anyone would like to chip in and help him get the best representation possible for the case.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:45 |
|
froglet posted:I've been to Professionals Australia and they weren't exactly helpful so I'm now wondering if I should go to the sex discrimination commissioner or to fair work next. Oh bugger, I just put in an application to join them after lurking auspol and a round of layoffs at work.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:50 |
|
Milky Moor posted:You know what's funny, though? If I search this case officer's name on Google, I can find other angry people. Milky, I know you're probably sick to loving death of complaining, but I honestly think the Commonwealth Ombudsman might be able to help you out here: http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/pages/making-a-complaint/ Definitely give them a call and have a chat. In fact, I'd recommend you do this before going to a lawyer. e: to clarify, this isn't just complaining so that you get this guy in trouble. The Ombudsman may be able to help you actually achieve a result. If you do need to go to a lawyer, use this site: http://www.liv.asn.au/Referral Here's why: quote:All law firms included in the Find Your Lawyer Referral Service provide a 30-minute enquiry interview free of charge. You can use this interview to determine with the solicitor the nature of the legal issue, discuss the available options and receive an estimate of costs to proceed with the matter. If you request the solicitor to undertake any legal work on your behalf (e.g. reading contracts, writing letters etc) the solicitor’s normal fees will apply. Please be sure to discuss these costs before any work is completed on your behalf. So sorry you're going through this dude.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 07:58 |
Those On My Left posted:Milky, I know you're probably sick to loving death of complaining, but I honestly think the Commonwealth Ombudsman might be able to help you out here: Thanks, TOML. I'll definitely see about getting the Ombudsman in on this.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:01 |
|
Milky Moor posted:Thanks, TOML. I'll definitely see about getting the Ombudsman in on this. Another option is always your local member of federal parliament.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:09 |
|
Actual advice I once received from a practicing lawyer: write your MP and/or the Ministers office about any problem you have with a government department. Mention names. It's the only thing that can put the wind up a permanent public servant.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:16 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QtbRczmKNU New Clarke and Dawe - The Title of This Item Was Deemed to be Freighted and Has Been Removed.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:20 |
|
The minister for that department is Scott "baby killer" Morrison, I'm not sure that will help.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:26 |
norp posted:The minister for that department is Scott "baby killer" Morrison, I'm not sure that will help. My girlfriend's brother suggested writing to him. I'm far more likely to think that he's got some secret 'no brown names' policy than anything helpful.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:32 |
Night Shade posted:Oh bugger, I just put in an application to join them after lurking auspol and a round of layoffs at work. Don't get me wrong, they did want to help but they were a bit limited in what they could offer. They did help by going through my contract, though.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 21:19 |
|
If you write in to an MP's office and give them details of your issue there's like a 80% chance they will ask the department what's up. The response might be 'well mr moor hosed up his application, gg no re' but they will at least look into it.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2014 08:38 |