|
for a real good time combine tnef-ensnared email forwards and pretty much any webmail someone replied to and forwarded a rather imflammatory email but somehow it didn't encapsulate it so everyone's outlook got The original message, verbatim, with the new person's from/sender and a series of attachments comprising of the real reply that no one could see
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 04:33 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 17:27 |
|
the best part is they saw the email correctly in their sentbox
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 04:35 |
|
infernal machines posted:yeah, but even exchange uses semi-standard x.400/x.500 and straight smtp to AD mapping for their internal fuckery. gmail makes it look like an smtp header but with a completely invalid address x.400 was not a standard in any meaningful sense you're just accustomed to exchange. and exchange documents their fuckery.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 04:55 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:and exchange documents their fuckery. yes, this is the point
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 04:57 |
|
they also don't take a know standards compliant header format and silently break it in a way that looks right but completely fails to work
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 04:58 |
|
infernal machines posted:i'm reasonably certain that gmail doesn't internally. they do some weird, nonstandard message header fuckery that ensure that mail sent or received within gmail will completely loving break if exported and hosted elsewhere whether or not it's non-competitive fuckery, i definitely remember someone years back showing that gmail->gmail messages were basically database transactions rather than full emails. i mean it's not like you really need to use your external protocols/apis for internal mail, and lord knows google does not give a gently caress about dogfooding.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 06:51 |
|
cremnob posted:the verge with some spin straight from google PR on the new gmail api how much of this was possible with activesync that gmail dropped?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 08:29 |
|
ultramiraculous posted:whether or not it's non-competitive fuckery, i definitely remember someone years back showing that gmail->gmail messages were basically database transactions rather than full emails. i mean it's not like you really need to use your external protocols/apis for internal mail, and lord knows google does not give a gently caress about dogfooding. today i read a good post and learned a word truly a man of our times
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 13:42 |
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 17:23 |
|
marketing. yeah, thats it. lol
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 17:24 |
|
"marketing yourself better than microsoft" and "marketing yourself well" are not the same thing
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 17:46 |
|
AtomD posted:how much of this was possible with activesync that gmail dropped? activesync did more
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 18:22 |
|
activestink
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 18:28 |
|
Shaggar posted:activesync did more no poo poo. it's actually a well documented standard implemented by multiple vendors, basically the first choice for anyone who wants multi-platform mail calendar and contact sync in an integrated system. so of course google dropped it
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 18:30 |
|
you can have a version of it that doesn't support message flagging in tyool2014 if you pay for google apps lol
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 20:18 |
|
quote:When we launched Google+ over three years ago, we had a lot of restrictions on what name you could use on your profile. This helped create a community made up of real people, but it also excluded a number of people who wanted to be part of it without using their real names. https://plus.google.com/u/0/+googleplus/posts/V5XkYQYYJqy
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:16 |
|
cool. real names are dumb and lame on 'net.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:17 |
|
call me by my hacker handle pls
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:18 |
|
Smythe posted:call me by my hacker handle pls okay "cockgargler69"
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:20 |
|
please dont post my kfcname
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:35 |
|
lol
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:35 |
|
too bad I liked it when racist/sexist assholes on youtube switched their account to their real name without knowing it
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:40 |
|
AtomD posted:all i really give a gently caress about is that google loose their ... idk nerdy hero kid in a bad action movie?? (that the real heroes visit so they can hack into the military satellite) brand with with all the dumb poo poo their pulling spoiler tag this die hard 4 plot please
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:50 |
|
infernal machines posted:okay "cockgargler69" its actually ZideW1nd3R
|
# ? Jul 15, 2014 22:58 |
|
rofling on the floor lmboing my rear end off
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 11:35 |
|
i will start using google+ for sure now
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 11:36 |
|
...not!
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 11:36 |
|
Wheany posted:i will start using google+ for sure now just a reminder about gooble+ quote:If you have a Google Account, we may display your Profile name, Profile photo, and actions you take on Google or on third-party applications connected to your Google Account (such as +1’s, reviews you write and comments you post) in our Services, including displaying in ads and other commercial contexts. We will respect the choices you make to limit sharing or visibility settings in your Google Account. For example, you can choose your settings so your name and photo do not appear in an ad. obviously youre a loving moron if you click like buttons or +1 something anyway but +1 or rating something on google play seems particularly heinous because of this
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 16:26 |
|
also still pissed i'll lose activesync once i get a new phone. gently caress google
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 16:27 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:just a reminder about gooble+ i hate the social media links that are on sites everywhere. no, i don't want to "+1" some filthy porno i'm watching using my real name, dammit. don't even ask i have clumsy fingers, so i know it's going to get me someday
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 18:40 |
|
prefect posted:i hate the social media links that are on sites everywhere. no, i don't want to "+1" some filthy porno i'm watching using my real name, dammit. don't even ask grandma why
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 18:42 |
|
you can adblock those social media buttons using the 'fanboys annoyances' list from https://www.fanboy.co.nz/
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 18:51 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:grandma why
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 19:05 |
|
Rufus Ping posted:you can adblock those social media buttons using the 'fanboys annoyances' list from https://www.fanboy.co.nz/ hey, they even have a link for opera! doesn't look like they have the "annoyances" thing for opera, but maybe i can fiddle with the normal one
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 19:26 |
|
p much the only thing I miss from opera is the tabs on the left. my mouse buttons has replaced the need for gestures
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 19:37 |
|
prefect posted:i hate the social media links that are on sites everywhere. no, i don't want to "+1" some filthy porno i'm watching using my real name, dammit. don't even ask google plus just lifted their reqiurements for real names so...
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 20:30 |
|
in six months google will announce "only 0.72% of our users user a pseudonym instead of their real name" and they will conclude that "everyone actually wants to use their real name" instead of "nobody actually uses google+". also i have been posting "heil hilter 14/88" to every youtube video i have watched for the last 2 years under my real name, who the gently caress cares if i start using a pseudonym at this point.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 20:46 |
|
prefect posted:i hate the social media links that are on sites everywhere. no, i don't want to "+1" some filthy porno i'm watching using my real name, dammit. don't even ask lol why not just use incognito or whatever unless i guess you really want to save your porntube links in your history or whatever
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 20:51 |
|
yo just dropping in to the gently caress google thread to say gently caress google hangouts and gently caress anyone who thinks its capable of enterprise use peace out
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 20:55 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 17:27 |
|
lol no matter what you do
|
# ? Jul 16, 2014 20:59 |