|
Rutibex posted:It's the structure of capitalism. When you pay people less than the value that they produce debt levels need to continue to increase or no one would be able to afford anything.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 17:47 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 12:47 |
|
Rime posted:^ This. I have many friends that make nearly double my wage, if not more, yet subsist paycheque to paycheque. I tell them I put half my monthly take-home straight in my savings account and they struggle to understand how that is even possible. "It's called not being an irresponsible idiot with your money. What the hell do these sort of folks buy? Other than a weakness for Apple electronics and good food/beer, I genuinely don't find a great deal of things in the world that I'm so keen to deploy dollars to acquire that I'd live close to the margin, never mind go into debt.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 17:49 |
|
Rutibex posted:It's the structure of capitalism. When you pay people less than the value that they produce debt levels need to continue to increase or no one would be able to afford anything. This is only true if you're expecting someone to buy everything they produce. The pilot doesn't have to buy all the tickets on the plane.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 17:51 |
|
Lexicon posted:What the hell do these sort of folks buy? Other than a weakness for Apple electronics and good food/beer, I genuinely don't find a great deal of things in the world that I'm keen to deploy dollars to acquire. Read this and get angry. quote:
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 17:52 |
|
computer parts posted:Read this and get angry. That's a pretty hosed up list. How do you justify $5,000/year for a house cleaner, and only $4,000 for a family holiday? For a family of four, that would basically cover the airfare to some place worth going. I spend in the area of $4,000-6,000 on vacations just for myself each year. And I manage to do it on a lot, lot less than $250,000/year, coincidentally, without going into debt. Lexicon posted:What the hell do these sort of folks buy? Other than a weakness for Apple electronics and good food/beer, I genuinely don't find a great deal of things in the world that I'm so keen to deploy dollars to acquire that I'd live close to the margin, never mind go into debt. Basically, this. I deny myself pretty much nothing in terms of food, booze and travel, and I still have plenty of money to do it with a much-lower-than-$250,000 salary (even lower than that divided by four, depending on the year). Though I guess I don't have a brand new luxury car lease, and a house I can't afford.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:07 |
|
My favorite part is how these poor rich people are so close to the poverty line after fulling funding their 401k and kid's college funds.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:09 |
|
I remember some stupid talk show had a thing on these rich-poors. The number one thing that always came out of it was that they were paying way too much for housing, housing they didn't even need. You've got families of 3-4 people living in 3000+ sqft houses. They've got a massive "great room". They've a huge not very functional kitchen they barely use (because they always order out). Each kid has their own room plus a grand "toy room" to play in. Mom and dad have a huge bedroom, plus their own bathrooms, plus their own "offices" or craft rooms. They've got an entire loving guest bedroom. And of course some monster 3 car garage. They always go maximum when it comes to their mortage, they always buy the biggest most expensive house they can qualify for then don't understand that means all their disposable income will be going to the house. Their utility bills are insane. What they spend on furniture is insane. They'll spend more on utilities and upkeep than I spend on rent! And that's just their loving house. They absolutely can not even fathom down-sizing because "Kaylee needs her play room, her toys won't fit in her bedroom!". So they just go into debt, usually against their stupid house. But it doesn't matter how much money you give these people or how many tax cuts, they will always buy the biggest house the bank lets them, always buy the most expensive things they can possibly afford, and go into the maximum amount of debt the system will allow. There's just always going to be people like that, on welfare or earning 300k. We're a financially illiterate people living in a society that makes debt easy and normal. It's always the house. Baronjutter fucked around with this message at 18:31 on Jul 18, 2014 |
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:13 |
|
It may be lavish - but I can totally see the appeal of a cleaner. My most scarce resource is time - I'd love to have zero housework/laundry to do - that would free up quite a few hours a month. I don't know if that's $5000 worth of a value a year - but I'd definitely pay $3000 or more for cleaning. I don't have a cleaner right now, but I'm seriously considering getting one.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:31 |
|
Rent is definitely where many people bite the bullet. I shack up with three friends because that means we can rent an entire house and pay $500/each a month. While I would love to live alone, I'm not willing to shell out the $1100+/month I would need to pay in order to find a similar bachelor living arrangement in terms of light and location. Not to mention that would only rent me a shoebox, I wouldn't get a full yard, carport, and massive deck to relax on. I know people who spend 2/3rds of their monthly salary on an apartment downtown and buy their food on credit.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:38 |
|
Isn't the rule no more than 1/3 on housing to be financially prudent? 2/3 seems insane. We spend 1/3 and feel a bit finaicially squeezed to the point that we *gasp* can't even buy every single thing we want or travel any time to any place we want. In fact we can't even afford music lessons. I do though have a full toy room because my toys don't fit in the bedroom.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:44 |
|
How do these credit food people manage their debt overall? Are they satisfied to just let it grow? That sounds so ridiculous.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:52 |
|
Cultural Imperial posted:How do these credit food people manage their debt overall? Are they satisfied to just let it grow? Credit card companies aid and abet people in doing it, make no mistake. Right now, for reasons I don't fully understand, and having never requested it (apart from applying for three credit cards in the first place), I've got around $40,000 in available credit. I'm sure if I were knocking up against the limit but still servicing the debt (I pay off every month and just don't buy poo poo I can't afford) they'd be more than happy to give me more.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 18:55 |
|
Yeah, far out man. Autonomous consumption is an idea you can only dig after you listen to a Zappa album backwards.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 19:29 |
|
Baronjutter posted:Can't wait to trust a strata council 20 years from now to keep the system and security up to date. Who are we kidding, poo poo like this is installed to quick sell a condo and then be abandoned by the strata a year later for probably quite valid cost and security issues.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 20:20 |
|
So many people don't look at value for money and what their actual needs are when making buying decisions. As long as they can pay the interest each month, they think they are being fiscally responsible. There are so many bad purchases that people make and don't think twice about it. Getting the top tier cable TV package for $100+ per month when you barely watch TV? Sure why not! Lease a BMW for $750 a month when you only drive 5 minutes each way to work? Do it! I would like to know how many people actually have a monthly budget that they monitor vs just spend whatever they can get away with. In my experience once I set a monthly budget for myself, it was easy to cut out wasteful spending and figure out my priorities. It would be nice to get a new car, but my current car that is fully paid off works just fine so why toss my money away.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 23:29 |
|
I just sort of track if my savings is going up and down each month and adjust from there. Don't actually keep track of poo poo, but I can feel it in my gut if I'm spending too much.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 23:33 |
|
Cultural Imperial posted:How do these credit food people manage their debt overall? Are they satisfied to just let it grow? Garth Turner with a timely blog post. quote:“I had lunch with a fellow accountant the other day and I asked her if she’s seeing this as well in her clients. I was floored with her answer: “Me too! I’m drowning in debt too! I bought my house thirteen years ago for $180,000 and now the mortgage is well over $300,000!” Her house is worth about $400k, so any correction in the market would wipe them out (she’s in her late forties). Hate to say it, but I still have a feeling that the Canadian economy is doomed. Everyone has jumped onto the debt train and there’s no going back now.” I am morbidly curious how many people are going to have to work until they actually die of old age.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2014 23:52 |
|
I'm visiting in-laws in Sweden right now, and this trip more than any other I feel like bubble economics are really out in the open. In my wife's home town, which has grown a whole 2% in the last 20 years, apartment blocks are sprouting like mushrooms. Property prices have increased sixfold over the past 10-15 years. People are driving huge American cars. It just feels like the same kind of conspicuous consumption has taken hold here as in Vancouver. And so I Googled personal debt Sweden, and took a look at Swedish interest rates, and yep, it's pretty much the same. If interest rates in Sweden ever go up, they are gonna have a bad time.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 00:03 |
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:I'm visiting in-laws in Sweden right now, and this trip more than any other I feel like bubble economics are really out in the open. In my wife's home town, which has grown a whole 2% in the last 20 years, apartment blocks are sprouting like mushrooms. Property prices have increased sixfold over the past 10-15 years. People are driving huge American cars. It just feels like the same kind of conspicuous consumption has taken hold here as in Vancouver. I thought those European countries were the ones that were doing things right. The Swedens, Norways, Denmarks... Is nowhere sane?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 01:57 |
|
Rick Rickshaw posted:I thought those European countries were the ones that were doing things right. The Swedens, Norways, Denmarks... No.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 01:59 |
|
Rick Rickshaw posted:I thought those European countries were the ones that were doing things right. The Swedens, Norways, Denmarks... Nope many Euro countries decided that the whole public backing of real estate debt was a really good idea since it makes homes so affordable.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 02:13 |
|
I think the Germans are still contrarian. Anyone know any Dutch? They should be in full meltdown mode.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 02:20 |
|
beepo posted:I would like to know how many people actually have a monthly budget that they monitor vs just spend whatever they can get away with. I budget! I don't have a choice! Maybe everyone should have $300 biweekly paychecks like I do, then they might be more inclined to spend sensibly
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 05:09 |
|
There is the Ah-Ha moment with new people that you meet when you realize that their parents must still be supporting them. I was supporting myself while in school with a job at whole foods and I would have coworkers buying $20 lunches everyday and then go out after their shift spending like $75 a night on drinks. I would go out once in a while and buy a drink or two, but I knew I had rent to pay. These are the people that even if they have a good job, they will just spend beyond their means and end up with zero savings.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 05:38 |
|
Cultural Imperial posted:Anyone know any Dutch? They should be in full meltdown mode. Holland is, how you say, hosed https://insights.abnamro.nl/en/housing-market-monitor-house-prices-resume-upward-trend/ quote:One particular concern for many people is negative home equity. Data from Statistics Netherlands (CBS) show that 1.4 million of the 3.6 million homeowners are contending with a Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio greater than one. Adjusted for mortgage-linked savings and investments, the number of households with an underwater mortgage drops to 1 million. One third of all mortgages underwater, many of which won't even be rescued if nominal house prices increase by 22% over the next ten years. Almost two thirds of older homeowners on interest-only mortgages with questionable repayment vehicles. Yay! On the plus side, however, "taking interest rates into account, the costs of home ownership versus income are historically low." Also, Germany's seeing the beginning of a property boom: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fc912b72-97cf-11e3-ab60-00144feab7de.html#axzz37ncBRDVN
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 08:38 |
|
Holy poo poo why the gently caress are the chinese buying german real estate???
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 09:06 |
|
Rick Rickshaw posted:I thought those European countries were the ones that were doing things right. The Swedens, Norways, Denmarks... Yeah no. The reason economists said they were doing it right was because people had home equity and pensions to back their enormous personal debt. Also, as I understand it, they were doing things mostly right until 2008.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 09:37 |
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:I budget! I don't have a choice! Maybe everyone should have $300 biweekly paychecks like I do, then they might be more inclined to spend sensibly Jesus gently caress, is that before or after tax? Maybe I've been oblivious to how hosed the rest of Canada is, after all... How is it that we have people making $300 bi-weekly, and yet businesses here in Calgary can't find people for a salaried position at $50,000-60,000 per year? Literally, half the applicants my friends deal with every day for these sorts of positions (no degrees required) can't even be arsed to show up for an interview. They half-joke with me that they might have to hire me to cook/bartend/etc. if they can't find anyone soon. We have businesses in this city literally shutting down for some days just due to lack of staff; sorry if I'm skeptical that's it's just due to poor wages. PT6A fucked around with this message at 09:47 on Jul 19, 2014 |
# ? Jul 19, 2014 09:39 |
|
Wages in Canada are pretty lousy. My firm has a back office in Vancouver and the guys there get paid 40-50% less after-tax and currency adjusted compared to our other offices. Given the property bubble affecting rent and housing prices, Vancouver is arguably a higher COL location than our HQ which is traditionally viewed as one of the priciest expat destinations in the world. I honestly wonder how the Vancouver guys save any money. Note that we're paying above market rate salaries for Vancouver.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 10:04 |
|
PT6A posted:Jesus gently caress, is that before or after tax? Maybe I've been oblivious to how hosed the rest of Canada is, after all... that would be before and after tax due to Canadas tax structure. As a resident of Ontario I did not find that level of pay unusual; so yes you are oblivious.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 10:18 |
|
computer parts posted:Read this and get angry. They did one of those in Toronto Life not too long ago too. It was a loving debacle. http://www.torontolife.com/informer/features/2012/02/15/almost-rich/ Saltin fucked around with this message at 13:51 on Jul 19, 2014 |
# ? Jul 19, 2014 13:48 |
|
Saltin posted:They did one of those in Toronto Life not too long ago too. It was a loving debacle. quote:The Lewis-Koonings Now I'm angry. Although I do appreciate the writer's skill in presenting these people as anything but loathsome.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 13:55 |
|
PT6A posted:Jesus gently caress, is that before or after tax? Would it really make much of a difference?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:02 |
|
FrozenVent posted:Now I'm angry. Although I do appreciate the writer's skill in presenting these people as anything but loathsome. Those living expenses aren't out of the ordinary. 5k of their income right off the bat are for mortgage and daycare, and the rest is fairly reasonable too. I'm assuming their takehome is something like 9-10k. Canada should try to make those major expenses more manageable, but you shouldn't begrudge people who are making enough to offset their costs. on the left fucked around with this message at 14:06 on Jul 19, 2014 |
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:03 |
|
I love the WSJ infographic about 'rich-poor' people...
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:06 |
|
on the left posted:Those living expenses aren't out of the ordinary. 5k of their income right off the bat are for mortgage and daycare, and the rest is fairly reasonable too. I'm assuming their takehome is something like 9-10k. Canada should try to make those major expenses more manageable, but you shouldn't begrudge people who are making enough to offset their costs. They're spending $500 a month on wine, $400 a month on eating out and $1000 a month on food. They're not offsetting their cost, they're spending on stupid poo poo. They don't get to complain.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:07 |
|
Why exactly are there people willing to sign up for a non-pseudonymous public airing of their finances and the gross misspending thereof? I wouldn't do this for any amount of money, not any amount that a lovely magazine could pay, anyway.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:22 |
|
Humble brag?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:27 |
|
Yeah, imagine these people as the rich gently caress from Gilligan's Island. "Well, Archibald, I probably should not have purchased that seventh Maserati, now I can barely afford to pay the housekeeping staff for the chateau in Nice. I'll probably have to fire half of them. Shame, I was so looking forward to having the south spire swept out for entertaining this year."
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:30 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 12:47 |
|
Saltin posted:They did one of those in Toronto Life not too long ago too. It was a loving debacle. I love the contrasts, starting with this complete douche: quote:Craig Haynes “People think I make a lot of money because I do, and because I spent $4,000 a month on housing and loving wine combined as a single man and still have enough money left over to buy thousand-dollar suits regularly, dick around in Vegas and max out my RRSP contributions... but the taxes!” FrozenVent posted:Now I'm angry. Although I do appreciate the writer's skill in presenting these people as anything but loathsome. You missed this gem from the first couple: quote:RRSPs and investments: $0. (“Ha! We live month to month. When we have money left over, we go out.”) Savings accounts for the kids: $1,500. (“We put money in on birthdays and special occasions.”) at making $200k per year and living month-to-month with no retirement savings. gently caress you idiots. Now compare to the last couple, who seem reasonable and likeable: quote:The Jibodus Okay, that's a pretty hefty grocery bill. But their monthly expenses only seem to add up to under $6K per month, or $72k per year, and they should be making at least $110k after tax so I have no idea how this example is supposed to illustrate anything besides that it's extremely easy to “get by” on a meager $200K per year in Tronna.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2014 14:51 |