|
On her other Facebook account, she said she was really glad that she and her boyfriend broke up when they did because she was fed up with having bad sex due to his circumcised dick. In the most dick-shaming way possible, like he had any choice in the matter.
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 06:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:07 |
|
|
Do people really sit around and think about dicks this much? I don't really have an opinion on male circumcision (because what difference does it make?) but I can't fathom the level of vitriol and obsession these people posses. Seriously though, how many times an hour does this woman think about dick? I have one and I don't think about it even a fraction of how much this woman thinks about men's reproductive organs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 07:50
|
|
|
PervertedLogic posted:Do people really sit around and think about dicks this much? I don't really have an opinion on male circumcision (because what difference does it make?) but I can't fathom the level of vitriol and obsession these people posses. Seriously though, how many times an hour does this woman think about dick? I have one and I don't think about it even a fraction of how much this woman thinks about men's reproductive organs. Considering how many topics about female genital mutilation (female circumcision) I see get hijacked by men going 'WHAT ABOUT THE MEN WHO GET CIRCUMCISED?!', the answer is yes, probably they do.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 08:35
|
|
|
Careful. Even something awful isn't immune to a circumcision debate. RagnarokAngel has a new favorite as of 09:11 on Jul 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 09:06
|
|
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Careful. Even something awful isn't immune to a circumcision debate. There's already been a few of them and they were just as terrible as you might expect.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 09:22
|
|
|
Ninjasaurus posted:There's already been a few of them and they were just as terrible as you might expect. Good thing you guys cut it short this time, then.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 09:40
|
|
|
M.Ciaster posted:Good thing you guys cut it short this time, then. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 10:07
|
|
|
M.Ciaster posted:Good thing you guys cut it short this time, then. Take note goons, this is how you end a debate.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 10:17
|
|
|
Beartaco posted:
Thanks for the tip.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 12:36
|
|
|
For some reason I feel this is relevant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flcnIVDCnFA
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 12:40
|
|
|
One of her friends mentioned reconstructionists I googled it to see if it was what I thought it was. Don't do that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 12:55
|
|
|
Need to keep an eye on red in case he posts more sovereign citizen hilarity on green's wall.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 13:02
|
|
|
Korgan posted:Need to keep an eye on red in case he posts more sovereign citizen hilarity on green's wall. "Barry Powell, Conscious Entity, and their friends" sounds like the name of an indie music night.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 13:35
|
|
|
Korgan posted:Need to keep an eye on red in case he posts more sovereign citizen hilarity on green's wall. You would think that after their "secrets" have failed to work time and time again people would wisen up, but no. Do they think if they annoy enough judges their fantasy legal roleplay will accepted as a thing?
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 13:59
|
|
|
Just based on random youtube searches; you get lots of videos titled "FREEMAN EXERTS RIGHTS AND MAGISTRATE DISMISS CASE" when in reality the court is thinking "I'm not dealing with this much poo poo for a £50 parking fine". They apparently exist in the UK which is crazy since their garbage makes even less sense in the UK than in does in the US...
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 14:25
|
|
|
IceAgeComing posted:Just based on random youtube searches; you get lots of videos titled "FREEMAN EXERTS RIGHTS AND MAGISTRATE DISMISS CASE" when in reality the court is thinking "I'm not dealing with this much poo poo for a £50 parking fine". They apparently exist in the UK which is crazy since their garbage makes even less sense in the UK than in does in the US... It doesn't make a whole lot of sense in the US to start with; that being said the security guards at US courts have tazers.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 14:41
|
|
|
It's simply a cult mentality. You don't see Scientologists giving up the first time they're told they are 'clear' and don't suddenly get superpowers. If something fails it's because you didn't believe enough or say the right thing at the right time. You created a joinder because you nodded your head when the judge said your name giving him evil magic powers over you not the fact your entire belief system is magic thinking.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 14:53
|
|
|
Sovereign citizens are the PUAs of laws. They basically put in enough "magic" legal sounding bullshit coins and hope to get immunity out of it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 15:06
|
|
|
IceAgeComing posted:Just based on random youtube searches; you get lots of videos titled "FREEMAN EXERTS RIGHTS AND MAGISTRATE DISMISS CASE" when in reality the court is thinking "I'm not dealing with this much poo poo for a £50 parking fine". They apparently exist in the UK which is crazy since their garbage makes even less sense in the UK than in does in the US... Some of the laws they like to cite come from the UK. One I remember is a 17th century English law that says you're considered legally dead if you're lost at sea for seven years. Freemen pretend that it's still on the books, that if it were on the books it would apply outside of the UK, and that what it really means is that on your seventh birthday the state automatically stops thinking you exist unless you explicitly re-apply to not be considered dead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 15:14
|
|
|
For those interested, there's a long and thorough Canadian court decision explaining why Freeman on the land philosophy is moronic. http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 15:22
|
|
|
MyFaceBeHi posted:Sovereign citizens are the PUAs of laws. They basically put in enough "magic" legal sounding bullshit coins and hope to get immunity out of it. Except (though I hate to say it) PUA's occasionally have their tricks work.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 15:31
|
|
|
MyFaceBeHi posted:Sovereign citizens are the PUAs of laws. They basically put in enough "magic" legal sounding bullshit coins and hope to get immunity out of it. Magic is right. Sovereign citizenry is legal mysticism - the core belief is that there is a hidden True Law (No liability! Free money!) accessible to the educated few that have unlocked the Secret Code (mostly UCC filings and liens combined with schizophrenic syntax). It's the idea of Revelation in the context of tax dodging. Edit: Also, talking about Australian sovereigns, this video will never not be funny: http://youtu.be/ZsoUArgpo9s Wax Dynasty has a new favorite as of 16:06 on Jul 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:01
|
|
|
To be fair advertising and branding on a police car seems pretty loving Robocop.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:09
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Some of the laws they like to cite come from the UK. One I remember is a 17th century English law that says you're considered legally dead if you're lost at sea for seven years. Freemen pretend that it's still on the books, that if it were on the books it would apply outside of the UK, and that what it really means is that on your seventh birthday the state automatically stops thinking you exist unless you explicitly re-apply to not be considered dead. I'm also curious why they've latched onto maritime law/land vs. water laws so much. To me it always reads like a second year physics student just choosing convenient variables to get the correct answer to a problem (that they looked up in the back of the book) but doing the problem wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:15
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Some of the laws they like to cite come from the UK. One I remember is a 17th century English law that says you're considered legally dead if you're lost at sea for seven years. Freemen pretend that it's still on the books, that if it were on the books it would apply outside of the UK, and that what it really means is that on your seventh birthday the state automatically stops thinking you exist unless you explicitly re-apply to not be considered dead. Seems like if this were the case then they'd stop giving you government benefits at 7. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3605809 Pretty good gbs thread on it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:17
|
|
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Pretty good gbs thread Heh.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:21
|
|
|
 Let's see: competing with Amazon in two different dying brick-and-mortar businesses, with a bonus "catering to people who don't have any money" on the side. Why not throw a restaurant or coffee shop in there too and hit all the "basically guaranteed to fail" bases? The way I've heard it, basically the only way to survive starting any sort of business is to have enough startup money to not make any profit for at least a year. These wonderful people are trying it with crowdfunding for starting capital.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:36
|
|
|
You sound fun.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:41
|
|
|
Don't tell me there's not single a part of you that wants a book/record store with a community art space to open and succeed in 2014.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:51
|
|
|
If I were to try a guaranteed to fail business, I would want to use other people's money, too.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 16:52
|
|
|
Imagined posted:with a bonus "catering to people who don't have any money" on the side. Yeah, gently caress the poors. Let them pull themselves up by their bootstraps until they can afford to go to a real shop 
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:02
|
|
|
razorrozar posted:Yeah, gently caress the poors. Let them pull themselves up by their bootstraps until they can afford to go to a real shop Yes, this is an accurate reading of what I said. Ron Paul 2016. Look, a "community art space" is great, but it's not a business. It's something a foundation or a museum or a local government or an independently wealthy philanthropist runs. Not a bookstore. Imagined has a new favorite as of 17:07 on Jul 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:05
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:Except (though I hate to say it) PUA's occasionally have their tricks work. I was wearing a dog-tag that I got from an art festival near my town on Saturday. My coworker told me I needed to keep wearing it, and I was already pretty annoyed by it, so I said I was getting rid of it the next day. He said "Nah man, that's how you get the ladies! It gives them something to fiddle with, and it brings them really close to you! Have you ever heard of this show The Pickup Artist?" I laughed, and went on with my day. Literally later that night I had that exact thing happen to me at a bar, the girl fiddling with it, coming real close, everything. The problem with PUA poo poo isn't that it won't increase your chances of getting laid, it just also requires seeing women as objects and numbers, and basing your life and self-worth around how many women you can trick into having sex with you. Also, there's the fact that you can just improve yourself as a human being and it'll work way better than strange formulas and manipulative tricks.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:06
|
|
|
Imagined posted:Yes, this is an accurate reading of what I said. Ron Paul 2016. I don't know how else to read it. What's the problem with a shop that makes itself accessible to low-income people? They have precious few entertainment options as it is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:07
|
|
|
razorrozar posted:I don't know how else to read it. What's the problem with a shop that makes itself accessible to low-income people? They have precious few entertainment options as it is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:10
|
|
|
Imagined posted:Yes, this is an accurate reading of what I said. Ron Paul 2016. Not everyone that produces art is on the brink of starvation. Also, a community art space can be some pictures hanging on the wall from local artists. This is seriously the dumbest thing to nitpick about a store that wants to sell physical books and music in 2014.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:12
|
|
|
Cage posted:The problem is the guy who wants to run it is asking for money on a website, and when the business is doing terrible in a year he'll probably ask for more. Yes, that is a problem, but the way he said it presented the low-income thing as a separate problem, which it isn't. Asking money from poor people is bad; giving them something to do is not. Maybe it was just poor wording, in which case I was wrong and I apologize.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:13
|
|
razorrozar posted:I don't know how else to read it. What's the problem with a shop that makes itself accessible to low-income people? They have precious few entertainment options as it is. I read it as that it would be out of business pretty quick, not some sort of 'gently caress the poors' or anything.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:15
|
|
|
Breaky posted:I read it as that it would be out of business pretty quick, not some sort of 'gently caress the poors' or anything. Okay, poor wording and me being a confrontational jackass. I'm sorry.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:07 |
|
|
Imagined posted:
Yeah, gently caress local businesses! Bow down to our corporate overlords.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2014 17:17
|
|
