|
If you want to step up your hot sauce game, make some pepper vinegar.
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
Wade Wilson posted:So if somebody breaks the cease fire, does the thread reopen? Lol "if". Also I don't give a poo poo about your handcrafted artisan bullshit niche edge case hotsauces, Tabasco, Tapatio and Cholua are fine for me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 17:47
|
|
|
comes along bort posted:If you want to step up your hot sauce game, make some pepper vinegar. A full on fermented hotsauce or just throw some peppers in vinegar in a jar? Because both are great.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 17:51
|
|
|
Pepper vinegar is the best
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 17:55
|
|
|
BrandorKP posted:A full on fermented hotsauce or just throw some peppers in vinegar in a jar? Because both are great. The latter mainly, though I guess if you gently caress it up bad enough it'll eventually turn into the former.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 17:55
|
|
|
Sephiroth_IRA posted:Has anyone read "Economics: A user's guide"? I just saw it on Amazon and I really like Ha Joon Chang's other books. Yeah it's decent but not amazing
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:02
|
|
|
Before I had a kid I used can banana peppers ( jalapeno planted with them to make them spicy, can make spicy tomatoes that way too) in straight vinegar canned with garlic and dill. That was some good vinegar. Never done the full on fermented hot sauce thing, mostly because I don't want mother in the house. Last thing I need is to accidentally turn my home-brew into malt vinegar.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:02
|
|
|
If you like Sriracha and are looking for a wing recipe: http://hotsaucedaily.com/hot-sriracha-garlic-chicken-wings/ I make them most every time we host a sports-viewing-thing and people go nuts.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:05
|
|
|
Non vinegar based wing sauce smfh.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:11
|
|
|
I make a nifty BBQ sauce that's basically vinegar, crushed red peppers, and Cayenne. Feel free to sweeten with brown sugar.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:12
|
|
|
Melt butter into Crystal and add a good amount of honey. Best wings sauce ever.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:13
|
|
|
zoux posted:Non vinegar based wing sauce smfh. Am I the only one to immediately get an allergic reaction as soon as I see anyone use "smh" or "smfh"?! They invented "ffs" for a reason, ffs! <  >
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:13
|
|
|
I like smh because if you pronounce it it is like a verbal shaking your loving head and frankly I can't believe we don't have a smiley for smh yet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:16
|
|
|
I actually backed this. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/714810375/elixirs-of-pain quote:Anguish: The sweet one. Think of running through a field, getting kicked in the face and landing on a bushel of raspberries. Bane and Torment were my favorite, but Grief was good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:18
|
|
|
People need to knock it off with the stupid names for their hot sauces. Or at least come up with something suitably colorful like You're Gonna poo poo Pure Lava In 45 Minutes or Don't Touch Your Wife's Dick After Handling.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:21
|
|
|
I like sriracha on pizza sometimes
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:21
|
|
|
Vignette from tubing on the Comal River yesterday: the police asked some people to turn down their stereo which was blaring bro-country, the whole river boos, and several people shout "THIS IS AMERICA"
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:30
|
|
|
Was it the Comal that San Marcos tried to ban drinking while tubing on, and a court was like "hell naw".
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:32
|
|
|
comes along bort posted:People need to knock it off with the stupid names for their hot sauces.  
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:33
|
|
|
zoux posted:Was it the Comal that San Marcos tried to ban drinking while tubing on, and a court was like "hell naw". The very same, although we got in in New Braunfels.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:34
|
|
|
I'd rather eat something that's made to be spicy, like phaal, than jack up the temperature with a hot sauce.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:37
|
|
|
So let's say they invented a machine that with 100% reliability could tell if a person was lying. Would using that in lieu of due process and jury trials be justified?
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:40
|
|
|
comes along bort posted:Valentina's where it's at. Basically the same as Tapatio but less salt. Plus it's only like a couple bucks for a giant bottle of the stuff. Cholula uber alles. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:43
|
|
|
zoux posted:So let's say they invented a machine that with 100% reliability could tell if a person was lying. Would using that in lieu of due process and jury trials be justified? If I learned anything from watching Lie to Me, it's that just because you know someone's lying, doesn't mean that you know why. Also that there's nothing like circumventing due process through a private contractor! USA#1 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:44
|
|
|
zoux posted:So let's say they invented a machine that with 100% reliability could tell if a person was lying. Would using that in lieu of due process and jury trials be justified? Holy hell would just machine be abused in the workplace.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:45
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:If I learned anything from watching Lie to Me, it's that just because you know someone's lying, doesn't mean that you know why. Right, in this thought experiment we can assume there would be sentencing trials where extenuating circumstances, etc. can be considered, but isn't the root of due process and other similar protections under the constitution the fact that humans are fallible? So, given an infallible machine, is its rather than jury trials a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:46
|
|
|
zoux posted:Right, in this thought experiment we can assume there would be sentencing trials where extenuating circumstances, etc. can be considered, but isn't the root of due process and other similar protections under the constitution the fact that humans are fallible? So, given an infallible machine, is its rather than jury trials a good thing. I don't like jury trials, anyway. Complete lack of accountability.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:49
|
|
|
zoux posted:Right, in this thought experiment we can assume there would be sentencing trials where extenuating circumstances, etc. can be considered, but isn't the root of due process and other similar protections under the constitution the fact that humans are fallible? So, given an infallible machine, is its rather than jury trials a good thing. There are still defenses where people can be found not guilty even if the act happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:53
|
|
|
Juries' verdicts are held accountable by the judge and appeals courts. Juries only decide on a slim range of issues.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:54
|
|
|
Sure but you could build questions to determine those circumstances. "Mr. Zimmerman, did you believe that Trayvon Martin actually posed a threat to you?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:55
|
|
|
If I learned anything from sci-fi, it's that someone will tell the machine "This sentence is false" and then it blows up and society collapses.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
language is so nuanced and memory is so bad I don't know if such a machine is possible! thank you come again.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
Solkanar512 posted:Holy hell would just machine be abused in the workplace. There's a great episode of Nathan For You involving just that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:58
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Juries' verdicts are held accountable by the judge and appeals courts. Juries only decide on a slim range of issues. You still decide whether or not someone is guilty. And if you decide they are not guilty, then in the most serious cases, they cannot be retried. What if you made a bad call? Woops, back to the jar you go, no way of consistently improve the judgment of the jury.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:58
|
|
|
This Rosetta asteroid probe could be a cool thing if the ESA doesn't gently caress it up and send it instead hurtling into deep space to never be heard from again like every non-US space mission ever.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 18:59
|
|
|
basically zoux you would run into a problem wherein you would be like Wittgenstein trying to determine if human language/thought/expression can be reducible to concrete, but discrete, logical units and, well to save you a bunch of time, it cannot.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
zoux posted:This Rosetta asteroid probe could be a cool thing if the ESA doesn't gently caress it up and send it instead hurtling into deep space to never be heard from again like every non-US space mission ever. You could say that they might send it into a.. deep hurtling.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
euphronius posted:basically zoux you would run into a problem wherein you would be like Wittgenstein trying to determine if human language/thought/expression can be reducible to concrete, but discrete, logical units and, well to save you a bunch of time, it cannot. I'm not talking about the tactical realism of such a device but the philosophical reasons behind certain societal things. I'm not proposing such a device be invented nor even that it could but rather what it would mean if a device like that did exist and if the surety of justice it provided would be worth the erosion of privacy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 19:02
|
|
|
euphronius posted:basically zoux you would run into a problem wherein you would be like Wittgenstein trying to determine if human language/thought/expression can be reducible to concrete, but discrete, logical units and, well to save you a bunch of time, it cannot. We can do it with a new language. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 19:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
Joementum posted:There's a great episode of Nathan For You involving just that. "I have never pleasured myself with internet pornography, your machine must be broken."
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2014 19:03
|
|