|
what's the deal with nginx vs. apache? just in a nutshell
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
they're both webservers right???
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:26
|
|
|
nginx is more like a http proxy that can also serve static content the big difference is: nginx's architecture is far superior to apache prefork/worker because it's event based. it can handle tons of tcp connections even with keepalive because it multiplexes the requests and this means someone visiting your website doesnt hog up an entire process like apache apache has an event mpm module but it sucked poo poo and mod_php will never work with it so you end up using php-fpm anyway so just use nginx (dont use php)
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
the way apache comes default in linux is basically totally hosed. each prefork process can only really handle one thing at a time. but it comes this way because of one reason: php
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
i have a very difficult time doing setup on nginx/apache because it's not something i really care about. wheneever i'm doing development locally and a part of the site directs to https it times out because i dont have it set up correctly.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:42
|
|
|
nginx is really easy to learn. it's less complex than varnish and apache isn't worth learning
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
my laptop lost the T key and the little hooks are bent out of shape so i couldn't fit the key back in i'm just getting a new one cause lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
pram posted:nginx is really easy to learn. it's less complex than varnish and apache isn't worth learning i'm sure it's easy i just dont want to learn it i want it to work. it's like css or html
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:49
|
|
|
nginx has a default config for port 443 u dunce
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
well it doesnt work with our weird vagrant setup our vagrant setup is supposed to install nginx and setup the configuration and it does, but then that configuration doesn't work, lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
yr vagrantfile is a piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
I don't understand any of that
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
also unlike every other vagrant setup i've seen and used personally where you also run rails from within vagrant, we run rails outside of vagrant, but our nginx server and kafka/other services inside. which honestly makes sense because rails would be insanely slow if we ran it inside a vm. but it is an extra layer of complexity on top of everything else.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:00
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I don't understand any of that its really simple nginx has worker processes that have a single thread. each worker can handle lots of connections because they have an event loop that assigns an http request to a request handler so each request doesnt block the entire process for the duration of the request apache comes default in prefork, it has a user definable number of processes with one thread each. each process can essentially handle 1 http request because its programmed like poo poo u can make apache act like nginx with event mpm but why bother its still gonna SUCVK
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
so do you have to run over 9000 virtual machines serving the same content to get apache to maybe work as well as nginx for certain types of site?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
nah i'm pretty sure apache will crash before then
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:17
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:so do you have to run over 9000 virtual machines serving the same content to get apache to maybe work as well as nginx for certain types of site? in this situation you throw varnish in front of apache
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:23
|
|
|
do they call it varnish because it's like polishing a turd
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2014 23:24
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:do they call it varnish because it's like polishing a turd
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2014 07:46
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I tried this from the start but it just wouldn't autopromote a slave if the master failed. Didn't matter which machine was master. I could promote it manually if I ssh'd to the remaining machine though. HA-Lizard threw an error message along the lines of "this server isn't privileged to become master" despite it being the one selected by the pool to autopromote. couldn't find anyone with the same problem, I'm assuming it's just some really obscure edge case with the two computers I was using to test (they're old core2 HP desktop, one has a slightly newer CPU) hey man write a shell script that pings them both constantly and if one ping fails it logs on to the other and promotes it over ssh. problem solved! and elegantly, I might add!
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2014 20:59
|
|
|
reinventing the wheel ftw
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
pram posted:reinventing the wheel ftw im disrupting the wheel transport industry with an exciting, social, cloud based service that offers 'five nines*' of reliability *a lie
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
pram is right as usual. nginx is the easiest thing even an idiot (its me) can set it up
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2014 23:51
|
|
|
I still use bespoke lighttpd installs
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 01:15
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:im disrupting the wheel transport industry with an exciting, social, cloud based service that offers 'five nines*' of reliability 9.9999% is 5 nines
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 04:23
|
|
|
[quote="CISADMIN PRIVILEGE" post="433608568"] I have a server 2012 vm that throws a bunch of weird errors in the windows event log when the unitrends backup box tells vcenter 5.5 to take a snapshot so it can do a backup of the VM. See below for the errors. http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2006849 Basically the fix seems to be to migrate the disks from MBR to GPT. The server has two drives on two separate arrays both of which are in the physical server. It looks like I could take a bare metal backup of the server and restore it to GPT disks using the unitrends unit or I could drop the $140 for the server version o f this partition tool http://www.disk-partition.com/compare-edition.html (server ed) S http://bramp.net/blog/2010/08/30/converting-mbr-to-gpt-without-deleting-your-partitions/
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 05:01
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:anyone know a good place online that talks about programming the physics of an object with a force applied to it, taking into gravity into consideration, acceleration and deceleration in a 2D environment? nothing complex about the environment or the object needs to be taken into consideration. the object will just be a ball and when it hits something it explodes or i'll figure out how it will deflect if i ever need that. just real simple where something like a cannon would be shooting it out at any angle did you do that kind of physics at uni or whatever? if u didn't you can't really skip some of that stuff you gotta put in the yards that said you're looking at the easy end of the scale. high school level poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 13:17
|
|
|
x and y are separate just derive the components from the angle and keep a constant x and y goes up but gravity is a force that accelerates it downward [y vel = y vel - 10 every second]
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 13:20
|
|
|
 explorer crashed when i was drag+dropping and now this won't go away. tried killing every explorer.exe but it's still here, lock+unlock doesn't fix it. is there any way to make it go away without rebooting?
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:05
|
|
|
log out/log back in?
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:12
|
|
|
i would try changing the resolution to see if i could make it redraw everything but i am no expert
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:17
|
|
|
beanofan69 posted:log out/log back in? Corla Plankun posted:i would try changing the resolution to see if i could make it redraw everything but i am no expert
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
turn the monitor off and go home early for the day
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
I don't know if it works on your version of Windows, but right click on the desktop, maybe you can refresh it?
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
i got 4 ram slots and 2 of them have 4gb cards and i am thinking of adding in 8gb and for that just snagging a single 8gb so is it bad to mix sizes? i mean i know it'll work but also the book told me to put the 2x 4gb, one each in slot 1 and 3. what would be best config for 4+4+8 e: i know having 4x4 at the end of that day would be fastest but i might want to add even more later
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:23
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:i got 4 ram slots and 2 of them have 4gb cards and i am thinking of adding in 8gb and for that just snagging a single 8gb so is it bad to mix sizes? i mean i know it'll work but try not to do this
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
i mean just like add 2 8s now and throw away your 4s or add 2 4s and when u next need to upgrade buy a new pc
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:i mean just like add 2 8s now and throw away your 4s or add 2 4s and when u next need to upgrade buy a new pc this is echi & the correct answer is: use for 20 years even as it crumbles
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
theadder posted:this is echi & the correct answer is: use for 20 years even as it crumbles in that case don;t upgrade it al all, 8gb is fine for shitposting and jerkin it
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
bobbilljim posted:try not to do this why? is it a bad idea or just not a good idea i dont want to spend the money on 2x8gb cards. 2x4gb would be better i agree but significantly more money i think
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 00:53
|
|