|
Strawman posted:Fellaini cost £27 million, also Yeah, and the guy is saying you have to spend money, but not waste it on players like Fellaini which is what we've done? Net spend does not equal spend. Chelsea have spend 472 million, City 438 and United 265 since 10/11 season. We havent sold a player for an amount over 7 million since Ronaldo.
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 11:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
One of the best two goalies in concacaf
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 12:22
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Yeah, and the guy is saying you have to spend money, but not waste it on players like Fellaini which is what we've done? You haven't sold a player for over £7m since Ronaldo and Chelsea just sold David Luiz for £50m. Hell, it's starting to sound like Man United don't know how to buy nor how to sell. Clueless club. Absolute shambles.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 14:01
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Yeah, and the guy is saying you have to spend money, but not waste it on players like Fellaini which is what we've done? Tbh, that says more about United's lack of strength in depth than anything else.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 16:00
|
|
|
Machinegunboyo posted:You haven't sold a player for over £7m since Ronaldo and Chelsea just sold David Luiz for £50m. Hell, it's starting to sound like Man United don't know how to buy nor how to sell. Clueless club. Absolute shambles. I dont doubt that, but the guys point still stands and is not a bad post imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 16:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 17:31
|
|
|
Haggis Heed posted:Tbh, that says more about United's lack of strength in depth than anything else. Wrong thread for this but one thing United have had, apart from the last couple of seasons in midfield, is buckets of strength in depth. Probably part due to not shipping out loads of players. A team that can start three defenders after having three defenders injured, four defenders leave and only one arrive isn't exactly lacking loving numbers.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 18:22
|
|
|
It is now
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Wrong thread for this but one thing United have had, apart from the last couple of seasons in midfield, is buckets of strength in depth. Probably part due to not shipping out loads of players. A team that can start three defenders after having three defenders injured, four defenders leave and only one arrive isn't exactly lacking loving numbers. That's not strength in depth that's just depth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Wrong thread for this but one thing United have had, apart from the last couple of seasons in midfield, is buckets of strength in depth. Probably part due to not shipping out loads of players. A team that can start three defenders after having three defenders injured, four defenders leave and only one arrive isn't exactly lacking loving numbers. That's not strength. That's just a bunch of players. E: never seen the above post.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 18:50
|
|
|
Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs. United have been famous for strength in depth it's how we've won as many titles has we have while being in other competitions. Last couple of seasons in midfield, and now in defence with LVG wanting 3 active centre backs with some cover, is where we lack any depth, but the dumb comment saying we've no strength in depth and that's why we've only sold 7m of players is loving ludicrous.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2014 23:59
|
|
|
You don't have strength in depth if you just have a bunch of dogshit players, Ninpo. Also nice meltdown.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:17
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs. Yeah this is completely wrong.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:31
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions. No it doesn't.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
I'll give you a clue Ninpo, since you are a clown, the keyword is "strength"
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
Man these are some really loving terrible posts! Sources?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs. lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs. Where's this from?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 02:25
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 12:40
|
|
|
Gigi Galli posted:Man these are some really loving terrible posts! Sources? www.goal.com/storyid66904.html
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 13:47
|
|
|
Gigi Galli posted:Man these are some really loving terrible posts! Sources? they're coming from inside the internet
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
I'd be very surprised if they sell Kagawa. He's one of their main money spinners. If he goes, they'll probably bring someone else in like Honda. Such a waste of a player. Its so obvious they just bought him to sell shirts in asian while not playing. Hopefully they don't do the same with Heung-Min Son. I think Woodward is too stupid to target a young up-and-comer like him though. That and the fact that their "asian quota" is filled at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
Strawman posted:I'd be very surprised if they sell Kagawa. He's one of their main money spinners. If he goes, they'll probably bring someone else in like Honda. loving lmao
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:11
|
|
|
quote:Strength in depth means having lots of cover for positions, loving hell you're retards it doesn't mean having loving world class players 5 injuries in on a single position ffs.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
None of these are funny, what am I missing?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
Insanely Sikh posted:None of these are funny, what am I missing? Hips?
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:37
|
|
|
Enough about bloody chips already, goodness
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2014 23:57
|
|
|
Insanely Sikh posted:Enough about bloody chips already, goodness Did someone say...chips? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUn4-6huLOM
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 09:44
|
|
|
 quote:Rojo Rojo row your boat
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 11:35
|
|
|
Rhyming league with league ffs, smh
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 12:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 18:07
|
|
|
lol nice
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 18:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
Please don't post my chants without my permission
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
This si the wrong thread I think https://twitter.com/TotallyManU Thirteenth Step fucked around with this message at 13:46 on Aug 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 13:43
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 14:00
|
|
|
Thirteenth Step posted:This si the wrong thread I think
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 14:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
straight up brolic posted:this is incredible It really is. https://twitter.com/TotallyManU/status/501735715013939200
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2014 14:08
|
|
