Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Rude Dude With Tude
Apr 19, 2007

Your President approves this text.
Hur hur hur gently caress you dictators favourites Bell Pottinger http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/27/hugh-muir-diary-express-migration-watxh-express

quote:

• The Pan-Arabia Enquirer, offering “the finest satire from the Middle East”, has no illusions about its material. “It’s made up. All of it,” it says. “Not intended, in any way whatsoever, to be taken as factual.” But these disclaimers don’t always work. Hence the following on its Facebook page on Tuesday: “Yesterday we received a complaint about one of our articles and subsequently removed it … Following on from this, we would like to offer our apologies to PR firm Bell Pottinger for a satirical story that suggested it had won the account to represent the Islamic State. Although the article was entirely in jest, we feel we must apologise for any sullying of the name of a company whose standing in the international community is reflected in a client list that has included the likes of Augusto Pinochet and the government of Bahrain. Oh, and the government of Sri Lanka. And Rolf Harris.”

• Who complained? Was it Bell Pottinger itself? Strangely for a company specialising in communications, it declined to say. “We don’t comment on lies,” a spokeswoman told us several hours later. Then, with the farrago appearing on British websites, Bell did just that. “Bell Pottinger would like to make it absolutely clear we have not been hired to do the public relations for the Islamic State,” said a statement posted on Wednesday afternoon. All quite strange. As for the Enquirer: on to the naughty step.

• Still, multiple posts prompted by the fictional story show why even a firm with a hide as thick as Bell Pottinger’s might have been worried. And it isn’t the first time the Pan-Arabia Enquirer funsters have caused trouble. In March, when it said in jest that Qatar had banned Saudis, Bahrainis and Emiratis from ever entering Harrods, a Pakistani newspaper appropriated that story, complete with the quotes from the Enquirer’s fictitious Middle East expert Bella Cockpit. With the Middle East so tense, silly japes bring some relief.

PR shits get out

e: 1838 - The People's Charter is drawn up, kicking off the chartists movement and votes for all* in the UK, and the Royal Exchange burns down for the second time.

*no girls allowed

Rude Dude With Tude fucked around with this message at 11:12 on Aug 28, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

StoicFnord
Jul 27, 2012

"If you want to make enemies....try to change something."


College Slice

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28967904 posted:

Tory MP Carswell switches to UKIP

Tory MP Douglas Carswell has defected to the UK Independence Party saying he wants to "shake-up" the cosy Westminster "clique".

The maverick Eurosceptic backbencher unveiled his surprise announcement at a press conference in central London.

More to follow.

Just...gently caress

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

Ddraig posted:

There's tons of references to it in various comedy shows. Lee and Herring did something about Savile, as did Mitchell and Webb. Jerry Sadowitz has been saying it for years, naturally.

There were several references on Drop the Dead Donkey and then Andy Hamilton on Have I got News for You claimed he didn't know anything about it.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

StoicFnord posted:

Just...gently caress

On the up side: the Tories are fracturing.

Ukip still have an MP, though, which is terrible even if he wasn't elected.

blunt
Jul 7, 2005

Jedit posted:

On the up side: the Tories are fracturing.

Ukip still have an MP, though, which is terrible even if he wasn't elected.

He's resigned. Incoming by-election.

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

same way they've got all their lords. defections from the tories.
and remember they've had 1 MP before in the brief time Bob Spink defected to them before he was forced to be an independant. then decidedly not re-elected.


the one and only election for Carswell's constituency doesn't look like he'll be in a job after May the by-election

Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative Douglas Carswell 22,867 53.0 +8.6
Labour Ivan Henderson 10,799 25.0 −10.9
Liberal Democrat Michael Green 5,577 12.9 −0.6
BNP Jim Taylor 1,975 4.6 N/A
Tendring First Terry Allen 1,078 2.5 N/A
Green Chris Southall 535 1.2 N/A
Independent Chris Humphrey 292 0.7 N/A
Majority 12,068 28.0
Turnout 43,123 64.2 +1.6

tdrules
Jan 12, 2014
A 10% swing in 2010 is a pretty big indicator that he will be re-elected

Loonytoad Quack
Aug 24, 2004

High on Shatner's Bassoon

StoicFnord posted:

Just...gently caress



:-/

notaspy
Mar 22, 2009

tdrules posted:

A 10% swing in 2010 is a pretty big indicator that he will be re-elected

If he personally is popular with the voters there. If he is one of those air dropped MPs then isn't it that the Tories got the swing?

But Carl Gardener is saying that Carswell has been advised that his seat is the most vulnerable to a UKIP insurgency.

Heisenberg1276
Apr 13, 2007

Heisenberg1276 posted:

Hey everyone,

I'm currently doing my PhD looking at online citizen journalism - specifically ways of getting different ideological groups to work together in a way that doesn't 1) end up like Twitter, where on anything major it's just constant arguments and 2) end up like Reddit, where minority viewpoints get shouted down and eventually stop posting.

Right now I'm running an experiment to see if an algorithm can group together similar sentiment in news comments. If anyone is interested in participating (it'd be a huge help) - go to http://research.jscott.me. It'll take 15 minutes or so and you get to read CNN/Telegraph comments from UKIPers - yay!

Early next year I'll be running an experimental open/unmoderated liveblog around some key UK events (e.g. the events leading up to the general election) where people from different ideological groups will be asked to update the liveblog (much like people post news & opinion in this thread). The people in this thread seem pretty clued up and interested in the news so it might be something you'd be interested in. If so send me a PM and I'll get in touch when it starts :)

Thanks a lot to everyone who responded to this - and to those who expressed interest in the next phase of experiments (the open liveblog) :)

My data collection is almost complete and I'll start the analysis soon. I'll post what I find so those of you who participated know what you contributed to.

I'll be in touch with those of you who expressed interest in the liveblog when it's time to get started - if anyone else is interested send me a PM or email js3g10@soton.ac.uk.

Kin
Nov 4, 2003

Sometimes, in a city this dirty, you need a real hero.

ReV VAdAUL posted:

In unsurprising but depressing news: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/28/closed-shop-deepy-elitist-britain


In light of this I'm sure the media will be confronting the root causes of this inequality, poor people getting 'too much' benefits, a tiny minority of people getting strange treatments on the NHS and non-white and foreign people committing crimes.

You've highlighted a root cause for the problems with Westminster and the UK at large as well as a root cause for why it is unlikely to change for any number of years (inaccurate press scapegoating against the vulnerable and propagating the Westminster line) so i'm genuinely curious about why you're voting to stay in this as if Scotland's "input" into the UK is somehow going to change any of what you just complained about.

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

Kin posted:

You've highlighted a root cause for the problems with Westminster and the UK at large as well as a root cause for why it is unlikely to change for any number of years (inaccurate press scapegoating against the vulnerable and propagating the Westminster line) so i'm genuinely curious about why you're voting to stay in this as if Scotland's "input" into the UK is somehow going to change any of what you just complained about.

I've responded in the other thread.

3peat
May 6, 2010

Mister Adequate posted:

It's rather odd how when Pakistani men do something hideous and vile, it's accepted by many as a damning indictment of the entire Pakistani people and culture, but when a bunch of white British men do that same thing, there's no talk of how those people and their culture is responsible.

If it makes you feel any better, from here in eastern europe it looks like all men in England are ukip fascists, pedophile rapists and terrible at international tournament football.
Hopefully Scotland can escape the imperialist clutches of this awful country :)

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

3peat posted:

If it makes you feel any better, from here in eastern europe it looks like all men in England are ukip fascists, pedophile rapists and terrible at international tournament football.
Hopefully Scotland can escape the imperialist clutches of this awful country :)

:respek:

Too true. :)

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

3peat posted:

Hopefully Scotland can escape the imperialist clutches of this awful country :)
It is noteworthy how Scots have managed to absolve themselves in the eyes of themselves and the international community from their deep involvement in the operation and expansion of the Empire:

http://www.historytoday.com/blog/2012/06/scotland-and-british-empire
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6524149.stm
http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/scotlandshistory/makingindustrialurban/empire/index.asp

Scotland was not a victim of imperialism, nor can it give the excuse Scots were just following orders, quite frequently they were the ones giving them. Even aside from active participation by Scottish politicians, business men and military commanders Scotland benefited greatly from the global markets the Pax Britannia gave them unfettered access to.

In the white paper Scottish nationalists lay claim to an equal share of the Empire's remaining assets yet, alas, nationalists cannot conceive of taking an equal share of the blame.

Kin
Nov 4, 2003

Sometimes, in a city this dirty, you need a real hero.

ReV VAdAUL posted:

I've responded in the other thread.

Well, i was hoping you'd post it in here as it opens your viewpoints to debate by other Non-Scots (the majority of this thread) who don't read the Scotland thread for one reason or another.

edit: After all, i wonder how many posters in this thread know that there are people in the Scotland thread who think the UK is generally OK at the moment. It's not something i think they'd dare post in this thread because lovely posting hasn't driven all the good effort-posters from this thread yet.

Kin fucked around with this message at 16:52 on Aug 28, 2014

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
People who think the UK is generally OK are wrong. It is a living neoliberal nightmare the likes of which a human has never witnessed, salvageable only by the return of Marx himself.

Renaissance Robot
Oct 10, 2010

Bite my furry metal ass

KKKlean Energy posted:

People who think the UK is generally OK are ... neoliberal

For actual contribution, I'd like it if rev would post his response here. I'm interested, but gently caress wading through scotthread.

Renaissance Robot fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Aug 28, 2014

mrpwase
Apr 21, 2010

I HAVE GREAT AVATAR IDEAS
For the Many, Not the Few


KKKlean Energy posted:

People who think the UK is generally OK are wrong rich.
ftfy

One of my friends from uni told me yesterday that 'some people see problems everywhere and are cynical just because they think it's cool'. So I guess I'm cool now :smugdog:

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


ReV VAdAUL posted:

It is noteworthy how Scots have managed to absolve themselves in the eyes of themselves and the international community from their deep involvement in the operation and expansion of the Empire:

http://www.historytoday.com/blog/2012/06/scotland-and-british-empire
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6524149.stm
http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/scotlandshistory/makingindustrialurban/empire/index.asp

Scotland was not a victim of imperialism, nor can it give the excuse Scots were just following orders, quite frequently they were the ones giving them. Even aside from active participation by Scottish politicians, business men and military commanders Scotland benefited greatly from the global markets the Pax Britannia gave them unfettered access to.

In the white paper Scottish nationalists lay claim to an equal share of the Empire's remaining assets yet, alas, nationalists cannot conceive of taking an equal share of the blame.
Do you have examples of Scottish nationalists washing their hands of our national share of the blame for empire? I want to laugh at them because even as a Yes voter I think that position is entirely absurd. Are you saying there are politicians with such a simple grasp of history, the equivalent of when I was 8 & thought the Battle of Culloden was Scotland vs England?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

ReV VAdAUL posted:

In the white paper Scottish nationalists lay claim to an equal share of the Empire's remaining assets
How would that work? 7 Overseas Territories each?

TinTower
Apr 21, 2010

You don't have to 8e a good person to 8e a hero.
Clearly what Westminster should do is officially incorporate the BOTs into the country. Also has the added effect of removing UN complaints about colonialism (hey, it worked for France and Spain), which would please the Tory right.

Answers Me
Apr 24, 2012

thehustler posted:



Edit: Boris AND Farage? loving hell it's the end of days.

You know how this thread often discusses how poo poo Labour are but it might be worth voting for them if only to keep the Tories out? Well pretty soon we'll be voting Boris to keep UKIP out :suicide:

Phoon
Apr 23, 2010

TinTower posted:

Clearly what Westminster should do is officially incorporate the BOTs into the country. Also has the added effect of removing UN complaints about colonialism (hey, it worked for France and Spain), which would please the Tory right.

It really seems like they should have mps, if I was a tory I'd be all over getting the falklands into parliament so I could just blanket the islands in pictures of thatcher, free seats!

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008

Answers Me posted:

Well pretty soon we'll be voting Boris to keep UKIP out :suicide:

If Boris doesn't win the next Tory leadership contest, I reckon it's 50/50 on him defecting to UKIP and trying to take over from Farage.
Then you'll be voting Farage to keep Boris out :suicide:

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

Kin posted:

Well, i was hoping you'd post it in here as it opens your viewpoints to debate by other Non-Scots (the majority of this thread) who don't read the Scotland thread for one reason or another.

edit: After all, i wonder how many posters in this thread know that there are people in the Scotland thread who think the UK is generally OK at the moment. It's not something i think they'd dare post in this thread because lovely posting hasn't driven all the good effort-posters from this thread yet.

The Scottish Nationalism thread is for Scottish Nationalism, the post you responded to was about the UK as a whole which you tried to crowbar discussion of Scotland into. If people want to discuss Scotland they can read the thread and post there.

It is an awful thread with a very unpleasant level of debate which has included accusing everyone who doesn't support Nationalism of being a Tory, using mental disability as a slur, demands that non-Scottish people should not be allowed to discuss the issue (the only thread I've seen that happen in D&D, I can discuss America or the Middle East as a Briton but I'm discouraged to discuss events affecting my own nation) and tone arguments every few pages. I will not be party to that level of hostility being imported into this thread.

Heck even in this post you've insinuated claiming the UK is doing fine is a regular thing for No supporters in the thread, rather than something one poster said.

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014
What's a briton? Is it that thing English people say they are?

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

ReV VAdAUL posted:

The Scottish Nationalism thread is for Scottish Nationalism, the post you responded to was about the UK as a whole which you tried to crowbar discussion of Scotland into. If people want to discuss Scotland they can read the thread and post there.

It is an awful thread with a very unpleasant level of debate which has included accusing everyone who doesn't support Nationalism of being a Tory, using mental disability as a slur, demands that non-Scottish people should not be allowed to discuss the issue (the only thread I've seen that happen in D&D, I can discuss America or the Middle East as a Briton but I'm discouraged to discuss events affecting my own nation) and tone arguments every few pages. I will not be party to that level of hostility being imported into this thread.

Heck even in this post you've insinuated claiming the UK is doing fine is a regular thing for No supporters in the thread, rather than something one poster said.
It is a very bad thread but it is not the Scottish nationalism thread and Yes voters are not the same as Scottish nationalists any more than No voters are British nationalists.

Kin
Nov 4, 2003

Sometimes, in a city this dirty, you need a real hero.

ReV VAdAUL posted:

The Scottish Nationalism thread is for Scottish Nationalism, the post you responded to was about the UK as a whole which you tried to crowbar discussion of Scotland into. If people want to discuss Scotland they can read the thread and post there.

It is an awful thread with a very unpleasant level of debate which has included accusing everyone who doesn't support Nationalism of being a Tory, using mental disability as a slur, demands that non-Scottish people should not be allowed to discuss the issue (the only thread I've seen that happen in D&D, I can discuss America or the Middle East as a Briton but I'm discouraged to discuss events affecting my own nation) and tone arguments every few pages. I will not be party to that level of hostility being imported into this thread.

Heck even in this post you've insinuated claiming the UK is doing fine is a regular thing for No supporters in the thread, rather than something one poster said.

My "crowbar" of a discussion of Scotland into a point on the UK is actually me trying to highlight that you're actively complaining about a thoroughly entrenched UK problem whilst voting against a progressive action that would remove us from it. Either you're not as bothered about the issue as you're claiming or you somehow think the UK can overcome it by itself. Either stance is something that's of interest to this thread because i'm sure the people here would love to understand how you think the UK is going to overcome the "closed shop" and broken news media we've had for decades now.

Also your points about the Scotland thread are disingenuous. Cohoolin, for example, has been chastised on numerous occasions by unionists for not being Scottish but he, at least, is participating in fair debate. Pissflaps, on the other hand (and the person in question who has been recently under fire for not being Scottish) barely puts any effort into debating, refuses to cite sources or justify his drive by shitposting, doesn't live in Scotland and can't even vote in the referendum. Yet he has the highest post count and is the clear reason why both this current Scotland thread and previous one were driven to poo poo as those willing to put effort into posting left due to his lovely low effort posts, goalpost moving and 5 page derails.

Dare to call him out on any of this nonsense and he cowers behind a post he must have copied into notepad of "Send me a PM if you have an issue with my posting" :rolleyes:. If you think Pissflaps is providing a healthy contribution to the thread then you're sorely mistaken. Just ask Jedit, a no voter who has differing opinions to mine, recently driven from the thread because of Pissflaps ruining it.

The UK doing fine is also something said by more than one person. I can think of 3 off of the top of my head and more in the the first thread before they were corrected by everyone that used to post there. And yet still, despite those of us spelling out all of the problems with the UK, the problems continually discussed in this thread that you post in, not you, or anyone else in support of staying in the union has presented a viable plan for addressing these in the Scotland thread.

Also while i'm on a roll here, one of your fellow unionists has continually described Gaelic speakers as "moonspeakers" who's language is a waste of funding and the last disability slur i remember is from Hoops deriding this thread as being worthless because half the posters here have mental disabilities (paraphrased).

I also note that you still haven't posted your reply to my question in this thread for everyone else to discuss.

Kin fucked around with this message at 22:28 on Aug 28, 2014

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN
:stare:

So yeah, the toxic Scottish independence poo poo really needs to stay in the Scottish thread.

Pork Pie Hat
Apr 27, 2011
Monster Munch, world's greatest invention or Satan's own arse biscuit? Are all Northeners culturally ignorant whippet fanciers or is everyone from London really just dead cool and that? Do you like trains? Why not? Oh you know who probably is a paedo but we cant say for sure? [REDACTED]. So anyway there was this guy in a band who shagged dogs, turns out he was a vet, does anyone know him? People who put milk in tea first are worse than five Hitlers. Or are they in fact better than 6 Jesuses? Jesi?

There, that's probably enough to keep ScotNatChat out for a page or so.

e: Redacted because you never know who reads this, and I just pulled a name out of thin air.

Pork Pie Hat fucked around with this message at 23:28 on Aug 28, 2014

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
Gonna post this here because the Scots thread is no place for fun with noted racist Pissflaps being a big boring racist.

http://news.stv.tv/scotland-decides/analysis/289974-indyref-daily-stephen-daisley-on-independence-referendum-campaign/

quote:

David Cameron is in Scotland on a surprise visit today, after getting lost and taking a wrong turn at Carlisle.

The Prime Minister had been scheduled to cut the ribbon on a new Tesco Extra in Dalston when the travel flap happened.

A source close to the Tory leader said: "It was just like that bit in Die Hard when Bruce Willis realises he's just walked into the middle of an almighty s***storm. We considered doing a sharp U-turn and flooring it till we were over the border and had reached somewhere safe. Like Staffordshire. But we decided it was too risky and people might have become suspicious."

It is understood Tesco drafted in Diana Beard from the Great British Bake Off at the last minute.

Speaking from a secure location, where the Prime Minister is being given refuge until nightfall when the SAS will attempt a rescue mission, the source added: "We've tried to avoid Scotland during the referendum, what with the PM being as popular as diarrhoea in dungarees up here. But someone decided they knew better than the SatNav and we were in Hawick before we realised.

"It's been a traumatic experience. We don't even have any food with us. We were thinking of sending a special adviser to Waitrose undercover but we didn't have any tartan or heroin syringes to make him fit in with the locals. They probably only sell deep-fried asparagus up here anyway."

Asked for a comment, First Minister Alex Salmond said: "YES WE WILL HAVE THE POUND. ALISTAIR DARLING SAID SO. YOU'RE WORSE THAN FAISAL ISLAM!!!"

He then proceeded to place his fingers in his ears and sing "la la la la la la" for several minutes.

Can't tell if they got hacked or not. Who can tell.

twoot
Oct 29, 2012

Gonzo McFee posted:

Gonna post this here because the Scots thread is no place for fun with noted racist Pissflaps being a big boring racist.

http://news.stv.tv/scotland-decides/analysis/289974-indyref-daily-stephen-daisley-on-independence-referendum-campaign/


Can't tell if they got hacked or not. Who can tell.

It's a joke blog. They've been doing them for a few weeks.

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-
Well that last line does sound like Alex Salmond, I'm calling it as genuine.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

twoot posted:

It's a joke blog. They've been doing them for a few weeks.

I still like it. It is good. :)

Pork Pie Hat
Apr 27, 2011
No quote because I'm phoneposting, but Ukip's current Clacton candidate says he won't stand aside for the Tory defector

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/28/ukip-clacton-carswell-roger-lord

And the hilarity continues....

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler

If you don't have pissflaps on ignore already, I really don't know what to say to you.

gorki
Aug 9, 2014
I was watching Channel 4 news earlier and they were interviewing the person on the street (:eek:) in Clacton about their voting intentions. All the people they showed said they would definitely vote for a UKIP candidate at a by-election but wouldn't be so sure about voting for them at a general election. I'm still pretty new to English politics, and I'm wondering what the reasoning is behind this? Are by-elections just a bit of fun?

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

gorki posted:

I was watching Channel 4 news earlier and they were interviewing the person on the street (:eek:) in Clacton about their voting intentions. All the people they showed said they would definitely vote for a UKIP candidate at a by-election but wouldn't be so sure about voting for them at a general election. I'm still pretty new to English politics, and I'm wondering what the reasoning is behind this? Are by-elections just a bit of fun?

"I'd vote for them as a protest but Jesus don't give these maniacs any real power" is the only thing I can think of.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.

gorki posted:

I was watching Channel 4 news earlier and they were interviewing the person on the street (:eek:) in Clacton about their voting intentions. All the people they showed said they would definitely vote for a UKIP candidate at a by-election but wouldn't be so sure about voting for them at a general election. I'm still pretty new to English politics, and I'm wondering what the reasoning is behind this? Are by-elections just a bit of fun?

Because it's unlikely to mess up the actual government they're often an occasion for a protest vote.

  • Locked thread