|
Shath Hole posted:Also, if he is healthy, he will get you barely over 1K yard rushing and not a lot receiving since Woodhead hawks all the receptions, so his ceiling is pretty low for a RB1. There are worse options, but there are also much better. Does this mean I should sit Mathews in favor of Gerhart?
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 17:02 |
|
|
Q_res posted:Does this mean I should sit Mathews in favor of Gerhart? Usually I would outright say No, but perhaps in the case of the Eagles defense you should consider it. I'd say it's a coinflip but still leaning toward Mathews since Jacksonville will be behind early most likely and will abandon the run.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:30
|
|
|
Tiptoes posted:Jesus Christ don't roster Tim Wright as your THIRD TE. His usage and numbers will be completely unpredictable and he's not a red zone factor for the team. White is at least playing on something like 20% of snaps and will catch passes. I'd rather have Dobson on the Pats or someone else not on the Pats. I didn't catch that either, lol, yeah you don't need to roster 3 TE's 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:42
|
|
|
Q_res posted:Does this mean I should sit Mathews in favor of Gerhart? I'd roll with Mathews over Gerhart, at least until we see what Gerhart can do in that offense.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:43
|
|
|
In a ppr league, would I be right in ranking JHill>Benjamin>Watkins>Evans? It's an 8 man league and someone just dropped Hill and I have two bench spots and first waiver. There's also Romo, but I have Peyton and would rather build more WR and RB depth.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:51
|
|
|
Shath Hole posted:I'd roll with Mathews over Gerhart, at least until we see what Gerhart can do in that offense. Alright sit tight until next week then, not too stressed since it's my Flex spot.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:53
|
|
|
Our 12th member is in Europe right now and thus far has been unable to sign up before tonight's draft. On Yahoo, is there a way to add the 12th team before the draft and then have the 12th member take over this team when he's finally able to sign up?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 18:54
|
|
|
Splinter posted:Our 12th member is in Europe right now and thus far has been unable to sign up before tonight's draft. On Yahoo, is there a way to add the 12th team before the draft and then have the 12th member take over this team when he's finally able to sign up? We made an email for someone, invited them on that email (so we could log in and accept the invite), and gave them the usename/pass to use for the season. Make sure to name the email address something funny like Tebow-Tastic123@yahoo etc. Or if they have a fav team, XteamIsPoop@yahoo etc
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
Latimer is still on waivers in my league. I should be dropping Dunbar to grab him right? QB: Stafford RB: Lacy, Ellington WR: J Jones, Garcon Flex: J Bell TE: J Reed BN: Edelman BN: Moreno BN: K Davis BN: H Miller BN: Dunbar
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
Maybe Davis. Dunbar doesn't (seemingly) need an injury to be a relevant FLEX/starter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
Ugh, some nincompoop straight up dropped FJax. Didn't even pick up someone else to fill in the empty roster spot. I have 1st waiver priority and my worst RB is Devonta Freeman, out of a stacked RB stable. Is FJax worth burning the first waiver priority over? I'm not thinking he is, but let's say he makes it through waivers unclaimed, at that point I think he is worth more than Freeman.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Ugh, some nincompoop straight up dropped FJax. Didn't even pick up someone else to fill in the empty roster spot. gently caress yeah he's worth a waiver pickup. He's the undisputed starter in Buffalo and will remain so until Marrone decides he doesn't hate Spiller anymore, which a) will never happen and b) even if it did FJax would continue to be the Jeremy Hill/Steven Ridley to Spiller's Gio Bernard/Shane Vereen. That is a pro depth pickup. Heck, you could package another of your RBs with a WR/QB for a big upgrade, and lean on FJax as your flex/backup.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
Franks Happy Place posted:gently caress yeah he's worth a waiver pickup. He's the undisputed starter in Buffalo and will remain so until Marrone decides he doesn't hate Spiller anymore, which a) will never happen and b) even if it did FJax would continue to be the Jeremy Hill/Steven Ridley to Spiller's Gio Bernard/Shane Vereen. Alright, I'll bite. The waiver resets weekly to reverse standings anyway so might as well use it. Current stable (.5ppr): Gio, Ellington, Rashad Jennings, MJD, JHill, Freeman.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:36
|
|
|
Fred Jackson has won me so many weeks, and I'd argue even some leagues, simply on the back of a few 28-yard, 2-td games every now and then.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:39
|
|
|
Espn standard league, 12 teams. My RBs are: Murray, Forte, MJD, Hill, and D. Brown. Someone just dropped Devonta Freeman. Would Freeman be an upgrade / flyer over Brown?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:50
|
|
|
Yes. I have Freeman as the #31 RB and D.Brown as #60.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Yes. I have Freeman as the #31 RB and D.Brown as #60. Well that settles it I suppose. Gracias!
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
I'm drafting in a 10 man tonight where the only reason difference in the scoring are higher passing/receiving and rushing bonuses... that's not really enough to change using the standard beersheet is it?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
Those bonuses are pretty hard to predict, so I would just draft more or less normally with the BeerSheet that aligns with your scoring.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
With Derek Carr getting his first regular season start this Sunday, is it worth dropping the Broncos TD and picking up the Jets? Also, I'm wondering about all the hype around Kelce. I have Greg Olsen Bennett as my TEs. Should I drop one of them for Kelce, or wait and monitor before acting?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
Koth posted:With Derek Carr getting his first regular season start this Sunday, is it worth dropping the Broncos TD and picking up the Jets? Denver is a better week to week D/ST than the Jets. I wouldn't drop either of those guys for Kelce unless you can FLEX a tight end.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:42
|
|
|
Koth posted:With Derek Carr getting his first regular season start this Sunday, is it worth dropping the Broncos TD and picking up the Jets?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:43
|
|
|
I'm looking to Upgrade QBs in my 6PaTD work league. Is it worth trading away J.Bell or G.Tate for Brady? That's my baseline but since his team's so weak I'm guessing he wants more. I'm pretty confident in my team but I'm getting antsy. I think my team would be stellar with a solid QB, but my gut tells me to wait until some QB gets injured and snipe his back up. My Team/His Team  
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:44
|
|
|
Gyshall posted:Denver is a better week to week D/ST than the Jets. Cool, thanks. I wish I wasn't in an 8-man league. There are very little waiver movements that can be made to benefit my team so all this knowledge I'm gaining is going to waste this season.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
I'm going to drop Lamar Miller, because I keep hearing more and more about how, at best, that's now a committee, and one he'll start to lose quickly. Also, those reports say that he sucks. In 1 PPR Yahoo rules, which of these are worth replacing him with? Fred Jackson Steven Jackson Knowshon Moreno Darren Sproles Or I could pick up Knile Davis since I have Jamaal Charles.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
OfChristandMen posted:I'm looking to Upgrade QBs in my 6PaTD work league. Rivers gets no respect
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:I'm going to drop Lamar Miller, because I keep hearing more and more about how, at best, that's now a committee, and one he'll start to lose quickly. Also, those reports say that he sucks. Fred Jackson rules, and unless its' like an 8 team league, he should not be a free agent.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
Gyshall posted:Denver is a better week to week D/ST than the Jets. I actually think Bennett is borderline droppable for Kelce if you also have Olsen. Bennett is a really low end TE1, so you're never starting him over Olsen, whereas if Kelce does the Orange Julius/Jordan Cameron thing then you've got an actual useful asset on your hands.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
What D is everybody rolling with on week 1? I'm rolling with Philly (vs. Jags) and Bears (vs. Buffalo). Lions (vs. Giants) wouldn't be bad either, just I'm playing Rashad and don't like playing against myself.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
Shath Hole posted:Fred Jackson rules, and unless its' like an 8 team league, he should not be a free agent. Done, thanks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
89 posted:What D is everybody rolling with on week 1? I'm starting the Rams, but don't really feel great about it for whatever reason...
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
89 posted:What D is everybody rolling with on week 1? I'm rolling with Philly (vs. Jags) and Bears (vs. Buffalo). Lions are by far the best bet, the Giants on the road is going to be a dookie show.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
89 posted:What D is everybody rolling with on week 1? I'm rolling with Philly (vs. Jags) and Bears (vs. Buffalo). I have Pats @ Miami.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
Yeah I grabbed the Pats over the Lions because they have a pretty decent schedule going forward. Still ok with streaming defenses though if they have a bad matchup or don't look as good as they should.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:01
|
|
|
Once Week 1 is over I will probably drop Detroit for New Orleans, I just didn't like them on the road in Atlanta's shootout dome. But I do like them season long, I think they are one of the NFL's most improved defenses.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
New England, NYJ, Denver, Tampa, Cleveland - all defenses I've been able to get late as gently caress or on the waiver wire
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:06
|
|
|
I'm taking Pittsburgh against Cleveland this week. Poor choice?
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
keldegar posted:I have Pats @ Miami. Same. E: and I plan on rolling with them for most of the season.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:28
|
|
|
Historically that is good, but I think Pittsburgh's D is not nearly as good as it used to be. Against Philly in the preseason they allowed something retarded like 7.5 YPC.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 17:02 |
|
|
Gyshall posted:Historically that is good, but I think Pittsburgh's D is not nearly as good as it used to be. Against Philly in the preseason they allowed something retarded like 7.5 YPC. I watched that whole game and they looked loving dreadful on D. Big Ben is gonna have to throw the poo poo out of the ball because they'll be behind a lot.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 21:32
|
|