Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Lawman 0 posted:

Is he still boning that gymnast?

:v: Which one? I've heard theres a ballerina recently.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

My Imaginary GF posted:

:v: Which one? I've heard theres a ballerina recently.

Please fill me in on the latest gossip. :allears:

Dusty Baker 2
Jul 8, 2011

Keyboard Inghimasi

Maarek posted:

This thread is starting to get hilarious. From the 'I am glad that Russians are dying out' guy to the the calls to fight the Russian army to the last Ukrainian, I guess we now know exactly what you need to turn D&D into Freep.

Blatant imperialist aggression and evidence of war crimes? Yes, just like Freep.

axelord
Dec 28, 2012

College Slice
It's pretty disgusting how willing you guys are to throw away Ukrainian lives for your hate of Russia. Maybe think about what your proposing and how it would effect the actual people living there.

Or even what happens if this war continues to escalate.

rargphlam
Dec 16, 2008
I foresee a pornographic mockumentary along the lines of Who's Nailin' Palin?, entitled Who's He Putin It Into?

Now to find a leading man.

SirJohnnyMcDonald
Oct 24, 2010

by exmarx
There are some times where goons manage to absolutely disgust me.

For the love of god I hope you people are trolling.

Finlander posted:

Their only alternative seems to be genocide at the hands of the Russian forces, though.
Giving Ukraine weapons with which to protect its people from a slaughterer horde from a terrorist rogue state is the morally right thing to do.

I wasn't aware Russia was committing genocide!

burnishedfume
Mar 8, 2011

You really are a louse...

Gimmick Account posted:

They cannot even bring themselves to call this a 'War' or an 'Invasion'.

DMZ, haha.

A DMZ is not an alternative to a 'war' or 'invasion', it means a Demilitzrized Zone. It's basically a no man's land, kinda like between North and South Koreas. I'd imagine if the USA did do this, it would be done in a way that doesn't directly say it's an Anti-Russia zone in response to Russian invasion (it would probably be presented as something like "We don't know who is east of here, if it's Russians or rebels or what, but whoever you guys are, we're gonna shoot the gently caress out of you if you go enter this zone") but establishing a DMZ is not mutually exclusive with calling Russia's actions an invasion.

Broken Cog
Dec 29, 2009

We're all friends here

axelord posted:

It's pretty disgusting how willing you guys are to throw away Ukrainian lives for your hate of Russia. Maybe think about what your proposing and how it would effect the actual people living there.

Or even what happens if this war continues to escalate.

Sooooo, what do you propose the Ukrainians should do? Just roll over and let Russia slaughter their army and run away with their industrial regions and coastline?
Seriously, if Russia plans to annex the areas mentioned earlier, Ukraine is going to end up being landlocked.

I also worry what's going to happen to the non-russians living in those areas if Crimea is something to go by.

Dusty Baker 2
Jul 8, 2011

Keyboard Inghimasi

axelord posted:

It's pretty disgusting how willing you guys are to throw away Ukrainian lives for your hate of Russia. Maybe think about what your proposing and how it would effect the actual people living there.

Or even what happens if this war continues to escalate.

I absolutely agree with you that it's disgusting to see people posting about making Ukraine into Russia's Vietnam. Not only is that hosed up for the Ukrainian people, it's also hosed up for the Russian soldiers who will die fighting something they probably don't agree with/wouldn't agree with if they knew what was actually happening. I'm all for loving Putin over for eternity, I'm not for violence just for the sake of violence.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Lawman 0 posted:

Please fill me in on the latest gossip. :allears:

I'm presenting a paper in a few months with a friend from Harvard's Ukranian Institute. I'll offer a raincheck on when I can get back to you, as long as you accept that it may be bias towards a Ukranian narrative.

E:

DrProsek posted:

A DMZ is not an alternative to a 'war' or 'invasion', it means a Demilitzrized Zone. It's basically a no man's land, kinda like between North and South Koreas. I'd imagine if the USA did do this, it would be done in a way that doesn't directly say it's an Anti-Russia zone in response to Russian invasion (it would probably be presented as something like "We don't know who is east of here, if it's Russians or rebels or what, but whoever you guys are, we're gonna shoot the gently caress out of you if you go enter this zone") but establishing a DMZ is not mutually exclusive with calling Russia's actions an invasion.

Yup. That's the plan for the Baltics where its requested, from what I've heard. And certainly kidnapping an interior minister makes it heard faster.

My Imaginary GF fucked around with this message at 01:20 on Sep 7, 2014

Dusty Baker 2
Jul 8, 2011

Keyboard Inghimasi

SirJohnnyMcDonald posted:

There are some times where goons manage to absolutely disgust me.

For the love of god I hope you people are trolling.


I wasn't aware Russia was committing genocide!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Chechen_War

hope this helps

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

Guess its time to call the exorcist.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/06/us-ukraine-crisis-patriarch-putin-idUSKBN0H10F920140906

quote:

Putin is under Satan's influence: leader of Kiev Orthodox Church
10:25am EDT

By Gareth Jones

KIEV (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin has fallen under the spell of Satan and faces eternal damnation unless he repents, a top Ukrainian clergyman said on Saturday in an unusually blunt statement that squarely blamed the Russian leader for the war in Ukraine.

Patriarch Filaret heads the Kiev Patriarchate, a branch of the Orthodox Church that broke away from Moscow in 1992 after the fall of the Soviet Union and the declaration of an independent Ukraine.

His church, a rival of the Moscow Patriarchate which is closely linked to Putin, strongly supports Ukrainian nationhood and the Kiev government's struggle to defeat pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.

"With great regret I must now say publicly that among the rulers of this world ... there has appeared a new Cain, not by his name but by his deeds," Patriarch Filaret said, invoking the Biblical character who killed his brother Abel.

"Like the first fratricide of history Cain, these deeds show that the afore-mentioned ruler has fallen under the action of Satan," he said in the statement, published on the patriarchate's website in Ukrainian, Russian and English. (here)

The statement, entitled "New Cain", was released on the first full day of a ceasefire between Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian rebels. At least 2,600 people have died in fighting in eastern Ukraine since it erupted in April.

Putin is a baptized Orthodox Christian and has forged close ties with Russia's Orthodox Church, seeing it as a valuable ally in his battle with what he sees as a decadent Western world.

Filaret, who recently took over the Kiev patriarchate, said Putin had deliberately stoked the conflict in Ukraine by sending mercenaries, troops and weapons across the border and had spread lies via Russia's mass media about what was really happening.

Putin denies sending Russian troops into Ukraine or arming the separatists, despite what Kiev and its Western backers say is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

"This ruler is cynically lying, saying his country is not a party to the conflict in Ukraine, though he did everything in order to foment the conflict and maintain it," said Filaret.

"He calls himself a brother to the Ukrainian people, but in fact according to his deeds, he has really become the new Cain, shedding the brotherly blood and entangling the whole world with lies," Filaret said.

Filaret urged the Orthodox faithful to pray that Putin would "come to his senses". Otherwise, the patriarch added, he would face "an ignominious end and eternal damnation in hell".

pigdog
Apr 23, 2004

by Smythe

Ardennes posted:

My point about Estonia is that shock therapy wasn't a solution for it either, the real turn about was in 2004 when Estonia joined the EU.
No doubt EU helped quite a bit, but the biggest difference-maker was monetary reform in 1992 and use of our own, convertible currency pegged to German Mark instead of increasingly worthless, hyperinflating Soviet/Russian rouble. That made actual market economy possible, instead of bizarro economics where people buying too much stuff was a problem that caused shortages. Russia kept using the same rouble for a number of years, at crazy inflation rates.

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

DrProsek posted:

A DMZ is not an alternative to a 'war' or 'invasion', it means a Demilitzrized Zone. It's basically a no man's land, kinda like between North and South Koreas. I'd imagine if the USA did do this, it would be done in a way that doesn't directly say it's an Anti-Russia zone in response to Russian invasion (it would probably be presented as something like "We don't know who is east of here, if it's Russians or rebels or what, but whoever you guys are, we're gonna shoot the gently caress out of you if you go enter this zone") but establishing a DMZ is not mutually exclusive with calling Russia's actions an invasion.

I know what a DMZ is, I just find the idea of NATO actually sending troops to fortify the east of Estonia against Russian aggression to be laughable, considering they aren't even willing to call a spade a spade in the current Ukrainian crisis.

They're afraid of using mere WORDS, so don't expect any actual deeds from them.

SirJohnnyMcDonald
Oct 24, 2010

by exmarx

No not really

Crowsbeak posted:

It's pretty disgusting you want people to accept cultural genocide and imperialism.

If you're not willing to cause untold human suffering and geopolitical catastrophes for the feelsies then you are for cultural genocide and imperialism!

:goonsay:

SirJohnnyMcDonald fucked around with this message at 01:27 on Sep 7, 2014

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

axelord posted:

It's pretty disgusting how willing you guys are to throw away Ukrainian lives for your hate of Russia. Maybe think about what your proposing and how it would effect the actual people living there.

Or even what happens if this war continues to escalate.

It's pretty disgusting you want people to accept cultural genocide and imperialism.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Gimmick Account posted:

I know what a DMZ is, I just find the idea of NATO actually sending troops to fortify the east of Estonia against Russian aggression to be laughable, considering they aren't even willing to call a spade a spade in the current Ukrainian crisis.

They're afraid of using mere WORDS, so don't expect any actual deeds from them.

If you call it an invasion, there are legal ramifications in NATO member-states. Its one option of many; you don't employ it until you want.

E:

To clarify, there is no fear in using words. Words are a weapon, to be used as necessary; they are not a tool of propaganda like in Russia.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Maarek posted:

This thread is starting to get hilarious. From the 'I am glad that Russians are dying out' guy to the the calls to fight the Russian army to the last Ukrainian, I guess we now know exactly what you need to turn D&D into Freep.

The new thread title was supposed to be "Watch LF posters turn into neocons before your eyes"

Rah!
Feb 21, 2006


axelord posted:

It's pretty disgusting how willing you guys are to throw away Ukrainian lives for your hate of Russia. Maybe think about what your proposing and how it would effect the actual people living there.

Or even what happens if this war continues to escalate.

Russia is already dong a great job at throwing away Ukrainian (and Russian) lives, and has been at it for months...all while blatantly lying to the rest of the world about being involved. Which was/is a good way to get others to hate it, by the way. But yes, the people who are upset about that and are calling for a strong response against Russia due to it's violent and illegal invasion of a neighboring country, are simply bloodthirsty savages who want to see more Ukrainian/Russian blood spilled just to spite Russia. :downs:

Hoping for the conflict to turn into a long and bloody guerrilla war like Vietnam/Afghanistan, like that one dude said, is hosed up, but it's not disgusting to want Ukrainians to fight back against Russia.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




BBC reporting the shelling in Mariupol. At 1:05 they feature a rebel leader declaring that they won't be happy until they've reached the Romanian border and restored Novorossia.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


So does the most likely outcome at this point seem to be Donetsk Oblast becoming a Transnistria/South Ossetia/Abkhazia style quasi-state?

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

Rah! posted:

Hoping for the conflict to turn into a long and bloody guerrilla war like Vietnam/Afghanistan, like that one dude said, is hosed up, but it's not disgusting to want Ukrainians to fight back against Russia.

But it's exactly the 'Vietnam/Afghanistan' and 'Four Chechnyas' schemes that people have been getting upset about. I think everyone here except for MightyPeon and the few other people on the Russian payroll really do wish the Ukrainians the best. :( It's just that some posters tend to get carried away and lose touch with reality as they hammer out those grand plans in their heads, and in the end their solutions appear to many of us on the outside to be worse than the already bad issue that they are supposed to fix.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Lead out in cuffs posted:

BBC reporting the shelling in Mariupol. At 1:05 they feature a rebel leader declaring that they won't be happy until they've reached the Romanian border and restored Novorossia.

Yes, that is the Russian plan. NATO is responsing that its unacceptable, that sovreign nations deserve to be respected as sovreign, and that anyone who agrees should see these individuals for vetting and quality control assurance.

Its pretty much a countdown until there is a West Ukraine/East Ukraine at this point, if Russia pushes on Kyiv.

E:

There is no 'fix' to Russian aggression other than to make it both as expensive as possible for Russia and to ensure that Putin understands its continued spread brings consequences that he won't be willing to accept.

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant

Vladimir Putin posted:

You can have a guerrilla war in an terrain. The most important thing is the willingness of the local people to fight without being artificially propped up by an external force.

Actually, having an external force helps quite a lot - see North Vietnam during the Vietnam War, or the role played by Iran during portions of the USA's invasion of Iraq, or indeed the USA's support of muhajideen in Afghanistan.

axelord
Dec 28, 2012

College Slice

Crowsbeak posted:

It's pretty disgusting you want people to accept cultural genocide and imperialism.

No I never said that, but I understand what an insurgency would mean for the actual people in Ukraine, Suffering and death. I guess you would feel better that Russians would be dying too?

Again think about what you are proposing.

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

icantfindaname posted:

So does the most likely outcome at this point seem to be Donetsk Oblast becoming a Transnistria/South Ossetia/Abkhazia style quasi-state?

No, just plain old annexation, like in Crimea. Everything else is just a Russian smokescreen.

Speaking of Crimea: I actually fully expect Putin to admit to his troops having been there all along, right after the last bullet is fired and the last Ukrainian soldier surrenders/falls.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

axelord posted:

No I never said that, but I understand what an insurgency would mean for the actual people in Ukraine, Suffering and death. I guess you would feel better that Russians would be dying too?

Again think about what you are proposing.

Yes I guess I do want a occupying people to die if diplomacy will not force them out. How is that wrong?

Kainser
Apr 27, 2010

O'er the sea from the north
there sails a ship
With the people of Hel
at the helm stands Loki
After the wolf
do wild men follow

icantfindaname posted:

So does the most likely outcome at this point seem to be Donetsk Oblast becoming a Transnistria/South Ossetia/Abkhazia style quasi-state?

Well, it would probably be the entire Donbass.

HUGE PUBES A PLUS
Apr 30, 2005

icantfindaname posted:

The new thread title was supposed to be "Watch LF posters turn into neocons before your eyes"

Everyone liked the other one instead, including me. :colbert:

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

icantfindaname posted:

The new thread title was supposed to be "Watch LF posters turn into neocons before your eyes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pymXCkaklm8&t=1828s

Neocons made this world, we all have to live in it.

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

Crowsbeak posted:

Yes I guess I do want a occupying people to die if diplomacy will not force them out. How is that wrong?

Because the power ratio between 'an occupying people' and 'an occupied people' is always so extremely slanted in favour of the occupier, that in any conceivable scenario, A LOT more of the occupied people are going to die for every occupying soldier killed.

You'd be cutting off your nose to spite your face, basically.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Gimmick Account posted:

Because the power ratio between 'an occupying people' and 'an occupied people' is always so extremely slanted in favour of the occupier, that in any conceivable scenario, A LOT more of the occupied people are going to die for every occupying soldier killed.

You'd be cutting off your nose to spite your face, basically.

The difference being, these occupied peoples have American support.

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
kalstrams, today I find myself really missing your massive update posts. :(

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

My Imaginary GF posted:

The difference being, these occupied peoples have American support.

I'm guessing this isn't a sarcastic post, right?

Broken Cog
Dec 29, 2009

We're all friends here

axelord posted:

No I never said that, but I understand what an insurgency would mean for the actual people in Ukraine, Suffering and death. I guess you would feel better that Russians would be dying too?

Again think about what you are proposing.

And I ask you again what you would propose. That Russia get the entire Ukrainian coastline and gently caress Ukraine and anyone who lives in the annexed areas?

Seriously, I'm scared for anyone living there based on what the rebels have been doing and Russian history with occupied territories.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy
So you think the Palestinians should just peacefully protest what has happened to them? Should the Irish not have resisted British occupation. Should the Blacks of Namibia not lead a guerrilla campaign against South Africa?

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Gimmick Account posted:

I'm guessing this isn't a sarcastic post, right?

I can't see what red title I have now, I'd presume my reputation for sarcasm is on par with Kissinger's.

Gniwu
Dec 18, 2002

Broken Cog posted:

And I ask you again what you would propose. That Russia get the entire Ukrainian coastline and gently caress Ukraine and anyone who lives in the annexed areas?

Seriously, I'm scared for anyone living there based on what the rebels have been doing and Russian history with occupied territories.

Pretty much, yeah. There are situations where no good outcomes exist - At this point, this seems to be one of them. Unless you were to quickly send soldiers from a first world country in there to achieve more favourable battlefield conditions for the Ukrainian army (and I don't think many people are seriously proposing that, considering what this could lead to, and how little Ukraine means to them, personally, in the end), there isn't really much you can do to influence the outcome of this war anymore. Sanctions - even if they had more teeth than the lukewarm, mostly-PR bullshit we have been seeing - will not have any short-term effects on the ground, and arming rebels won't, either. Ukraine is in such a strategically bad position right now that the dice have more or less already been cast.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe
If Russia seizes the Ukranian coastline, I think Turkey would be well within its moral rights to break the straits treaties and bar Russian sea traffic through their straits and their new canal (once it opens).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

jaete
Jun 21, 2009


Nap Ghost

My Imaginary GF posted:

Yup. That's the plan for the Baltics where its requested, from what I've heard. And certainly kidnapping an interior minister makes it heard faster.

What? It was an officer of the security police, not a minister.

Anyway, is there any source for DMZ plans for the Baltics?

  • Locked thread