|
Sludge Tank posted:What's up? Open shade is blue colored light, not exclusively blue light. So yeah 10 stops of extra exposure probably would register.
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2014 06:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
This is not a great picture (and I went wild on the sharpening) but it illustrates the effect of a red #25 + Circular polarizer on a blue (but not really deep blue) sky with clouds. Film is Tri-X, rated 1600. Time of the shot was 2 or 3 hours from sunset (thought it was in patagonia, so the sun position was closer to ~1hour before sunset on any reasonable latitude). I'd meter and overexpose 4 or maybe 5 stops for this combination of filters, so unless you have a tripod or are shooting fast and wide it can be hard to hand-hold. But this is the large format thread so maybe it doesn't matter. You can see how the sky gets lighter the closer you get to the horizon as someone else has said. You can also see that on the right situations you can get close to a pitch black sky in the middle of the day. The vignetting is thanks to the lovely CPL. It's also 135 posted on the large format thread, but I'm only showing it to make my point.  DSC08141 by Hernando Rosa, on Flickr On yellow filters, I find they are very subtle, so I don't really use them, but ymmv. Orange #15 on the other hand is almost glued to my walk-around lens by now. Not that any of this matters since I only take bad photographies anyways. Primo Itch fucked around with this message at 22:21 on Oct 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:
 I LOVE this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 00:19
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:
Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 02:12
|
|
|
eggsovereasy posted:I found I only get those marks on the inner most sheets, so I just use my mod54 with 4 sheets in the outer two slots on each side and it seems to work perfectly. I've started doing this the last coupleof weeks and I haven't had any problems with those uneven developing marks since. Cheers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 02:06
|
|
|
Well it was bound to happen but I had my first big fuckup with film. I have two backs for my Bronica ETRS - usually one loaded with Tri-x the other with Portra, both labelled on the back. So I spent an hour out last night at dusk taking long exposures with the Portra, finish the roll, come home and open it up and there is actually a roll of Tri-x in there. Now I don't know for sure what is in the other back (labelled 400tx), but I am assuming Tri-x and that I also loaded the "Portra back" with Tri-x by mistake seeing as they both come in yellow wrappers with Kodak on them. loving frustrating because I work slowly with medium format and am very selective with what I actually shoot, those 15 shots were taken over the last 3 days and were metered for Portra not b&w...
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 23:07
|
|
|
deaders posted:loving frustrating because I work slowly with medium format and am very selective with what I actually shoot, those 15 shots were taken over the last 3 days and were metered for Portra not b&w... Hopefully it won't be too bad, since they're both iso 400 and negative film. Would be a very different story if it was Provia 100F instead! I'd be more concerned about your subject matter, since normally what one shoots for colour would be different from b&w.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 00:55
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:Hopefully it won't be too bad, since they're both iso 400 and negative film. Would be a very different story if it was Provia 100F instead! I'd be more concerned about your subject matter, since normally what one shoots for colour would be different from b&w. Yeah exactly, it was all shot with colour in mind, I look for different things for b&w. Could be interesting but I think the evening stuff will be a total waste because it was all about the colour.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 01:06
|
|
|
Well it wasn't a complete disaster, I can go back and reshoot this scene easily enough because it is 10 minutes from my place, a few I am not happy with in b&w are annoying because it was a one hour drive and I won't be going back any time soon. North Beach, October 2014 by Simon Deadman, on Flickr deaders fucked around with this message at 09:03 on Nov 2, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 06:36
|
|
|
If you look on the horizon left hand side you can see the Chinese ship "Xue Long" off in the distance during rescue of Akademik Shokalskiy earlier this year. Velvia 50 no adjustments. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 08:01
|
|
|
I hosed up the shooting of these, x-ray film is ageing quickly. And I over developed them so the negs were as flat as poo poo, a bit of an accomplishment for x-ray film: Untitled by mr_student, on Flickr  Untitled by mr_student, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 10:03
|
|
|
Spedman posted:
I find this shot intriguing. It stimulates me. I want more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 14:46
|
|
|
Yeah that looks cool. What caused the hazy/foggy effect?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 14:50
|
|
|
 Musei Vaticani by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:
Love your work, but the way you crush your blacks (like upper right corner of this photo) drive me nuts. But such are the vagaries of shooting slide film I guess. Love the 3d effect you have going in this one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 16:16
|
|
|
deaders posted:Yeah that looks cool. What caused the hazy/foggy effect? At a guess? It's double sided xray film so no antihalation layer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 17:59
|
|
|
deaders posted:Yeah that looks cool. What caused the hazy/foggy effect? 8th is spot on I think, the shot was made with a 8x10 plate holder rather than a film holder, so there's a little air gap behind the film, also there's no anti-halation with x-ray film you can get some weird effects happening. Also the neg was pretty thin in the tree/hill area so there are also details from the non-optimal processing I'm doing at the moment with the dunk tank.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 21:08
|
|
|
Putrid Grin posted:Love your work, but the way you crush your blacks (like upper right corner of this photo) drive me nuts. But such are the vagaries of shooting slide film I guess. Thanks! Yeah The crushing of the blacks isn't usually done by me, the Provia film happily does it with great gusto when I'm shooting in dim areas. Amusingly you will get a similar effect if you use the VSCO slide film presets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 23:45
|
|
|
Spedman posted:8th is spot on I think, the shot was made with a 8x10 plate holder rather than a film holder, so there's a little air gap behind the film, also there's no anti-halation with x-ray film you can get some weird effects happening. Also the neg was pretty thin in the tree/hill area so there are also details from the non-optimal processing I'm doing at the moment with the dunk tank. Yeah, one of the 2nd hand holders I bought was a kodak which has some circular depressions on the septum. I'm concerned it's gonna show up on the HR-T I have to shoot.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 01:12
|
|
|
That's the kind of regular film holder I've got, and I haven't seen any problems with it yet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 01:21
|
|
|
Awesome, my other stuff are all Liscos with flat septums. My only experience with no antihalation layer film was Kodak's HIE and under some conditions that stuff would show the pressure plate dimples.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 01:27
|
|
|
Sludge Tank posted:If you look on the horizon left hand side you can see the Chinese ship "Xue Long" off in the distance during rescue of Akademik Shokalskiy earlier this year. Your Tasmanian / Australian black and whites are really effective but when it comes to your ice world that Velvia might be king.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Yeah, I only just got the slide film developed and looking over the scans I'm pretty convinced of the same opinion. Stocked up a few boxes of 120 and 4x5 for this season.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 05:51
|
|
|
Sludge Tank posted:Yeah, I only just got the slide film developed and looking over the scans I'm pretty convinced of the same opinion. Stocked up a few boxes of 120 and 4x5 for this season. Yeah Velvia 50 is really working for those ice shots. Did you have to use any sort of GND filters?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 06:04
|
|
|
No I didn't. I shot at box speed,too despite others telling to me to rate slower. They do look super bright but that's just how loving bright it is down there in full daylight. I've got a CPL on the way too which might come in handy. Even some of the shots in the overcast/fog came out a lot nicer than I expected, and certainly a lot nicer than the portra.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 06:08
|
|
|
Sludge Tank posted:No I didn't. I shot at box speed,too despite others telling to me to rate slower. Yeah there's colour and texture on the ice so that's not blown even if it's quite bright. Overcast light is really the best light for Velvia.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 06:49
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:Overcast light is really the best light for Velvia. That's a real nice tip. Thanks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 07:02
|
|
|
 Surveillance by rstop bstop, on Flickr rohan fucked around with this message at 14:09 on Nov 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 14:05
|
|
|
Baron Dirigible posted:
That's awesome. I've tried doing some of that selective focusing with my LF but it's harder than I thought to pick a good scene for it. I always just end up cracking the shits. f/128 yolo Sludge Tank fucked around with this message at 13:29 on Nov 4, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 12:00
|
|
|
Went to the mountains and shot some random 100 speed film I had in the fridge with the GW690ii, first some Adox CHS 100: Donna Buang by mr_student, on Flickr  Donna Buang by mr_student, on Flickr  Donna Buang by mr_student, on Flickr And some Kodak T-Max 100  Donna Buang by mr_student, on Flickr  Donna Buang by mr_student, on Flickr Both dunked in some Rodnal
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 13:03
|
|
|
Sludge Tank posted:That's awesome. I've tried doing some of that selective focusing with my LF but it's harder than I thought to pick a good scene for it. I always just end up cracking the shits. f/128 yolo Pretty drat awesome stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 14:57
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Went to the mountains and shot some random 100 speed film I had in the fridge with the GW690ii, first some Adox CHS 100: That's some good poo poo. So sharp.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 15:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 03:02
|
|
|
I can finally participate in this thread. https://www.flickr.com/photos/30580418@N04/15713852825
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 03:57
|
|
|
e: nvm. Sorted.
Sludge Tank fucked around with this message at 22:51 on Nov 5, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 09:57
|
|
|
Sludge Tank posted:That's awesome. I've tried doing some of that selective focusing with my LF but it's harder than I thought to pick a good scene for it. I always just end up cracking the shits. f/128 yolo Also, that's a great shot, Helicity.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 10:56
|
|
|
Aghghghgh the texture on the paint  So goood
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2014 12:37
|
|
|
 Musei Vaticani by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
gently caress
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 00:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
Yes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 01:36
|
|