|
Cernunnos posted:When did we get deck names? The leak of the Black deck had the names of the other 4 decks with their associated Mana Symbol next to them. Red is called Built From Scratch, White is Forged in Stone
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
darkwolf220 posted:^^ Tell me another walker you 'know, but not by name'? I wanted Jaya Ballard the planeswalker, but I'll totally settle right now if the red unknown is a goblin.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:09
|
|
|
Watch the red one be loving Sandruu from Homelands.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Chorocojo posted:Watch the red one be loving Sandruu from Homelands. The flamekin is a reasonable theory, I was thinking they'll probably introduce some character from Shandalar, they seem to like going to that old well as of late.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:13
|
|
|
Bob From Accounting His +2 will be to summon an Orgg.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:15
|
|
|
Neat. And then you stifle it when they try and they get sad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:17
|
|
|
Oh cool. Artifact Hot Potato. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:18
|
|
|
This is adorable 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:18
|
|
|
Clearly the white planeswalker is Elesh Norn who has manufactured a spark.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
Perfect for Zedruu?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:43
|
|
|
The white planeswalker will be Lin Sivvi, because her time in standard was a good and vibrant time and everyone should be reminded of that with a tribal rebels edh deck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:49
|
|
|
Deofuta posted:The white planeswalker will be Lin Sivvi, because her time in standard was a good and vibrant time and everyone should be reminded of that with a tribal rebels edh deck. I agree, Lin Sivvi was great and also relatively simple to shut down in standard and block constructed with Rising Waters. That's pretty much my only memory of Lin Sivvi. I was the Rising Waters player. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 05:53
|
|
|
New, right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:09
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:New, right? This seems much, much worse than Balefire Dragon
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
If it isn't Serra, Planeswalker I'm going to be Mad as Heck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:14
|
|
|
The March Hare posted:If it isn't Serra, Planeswalker I'm going to be Mad as Heck. You may as well get your mad out of the way then, because it's gonna be Nahiri.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:This seems much, much worse than Balefire Dragon It has Haste, is bigger than Balefire if your commander's out, and does the damage with the attack trigger so you can blow up a blocker if you need to. Usually worse, but sometimes better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
Courtesy of CFB, 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
Elyv posted:Courtesy of CFB, Man, that card is totally powerful enough for the formats where it's not legal because it's in a Commander product.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 07:05
|
|
|
EDH rules committee's card: Is this not very good? It seems not very good. On the plus side, he's from that plane in Conspiracy, which is neat. And it doesn't say "do damage" anywhere on it, the first red planeswalker to do that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 08:44
|
|
|
If you think he's super cool, you should probably just be playing Sharuum.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 08:46
|
|
|
I feel like all these walker-commanders that don't protect themselves are just awful. After all they're trivially easy to kill. At least regular creatures require a removal spell.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 08:47
|
|
|
OK someone needs to do Imperial Painter in commander, because all of the spoiled cards enable the poo poo out of it, but aren't good enough for legacy painter.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 08:47
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:EDH rules committee's card: He has some mad synergy with Feldon so I really don't see why he is an alternative to him and not just a card in the deck (or vice versa)
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:06
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:EDH rules committee's card: gently caress reverse looting. gently caress it. The -2 could be really cool if it searched for something from your deck, but from the graveyard seems pretty weak. E: I'm being a little harsh, the two abilities do work pretty well together. Does it really need reverse looting though? TheKingofSprings fucked around with this message at 09:25 on Oct 29, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:22
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:The -2 could be really cool if it searched for something from your deck, but from the graveyard seems pretty weak. Are you really surprised that they didn't just print a Tinker that lives in your command zone?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:27
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Are you really surprised that they didn't just print a Tinker that lives in your command zone? No, just disappointed
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:30
|
|
|
Yeah, none of these Planeswalkers seem that amazing on paper but they synergize wonderfully with the cards we've seen spoiled for their individual decks so I am not complaining.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:31
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:No, just disappointed I, too, am disappointed that Wizards didn't print a card that would be literally instantly banned in Legacy and restricted in Vintage.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:32
|
|
|
Jabor posted:I, too, am disappointed that Wizards didn't print a card that would be literally instantly banned in Legacy and restricted in Vintage. Well, either way it won't see play in Legacy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:35
|
|
|
I'm angry that this rear end in a top hat isn't Slobad. Seriously, all the abilities fit him, and I bet he was Slobad until late in development.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:36
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:I'm angry that this rear end in a top hat isn't Slobad. Seriously, all the abilities fit him, and I bet he was Slobad until late in development. Alter it to have some goggles on his head and a hammer in his hand. Bam, it's Slobad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:38
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Well, either way it won't see play in Legacy. Good thing it was designed for Commander then, and not Legacy. If the -2 was Tinker, it wouldn't see play either, because it'd get banned immediately. Zemyla posted:I'm angry that this rear end in a top hat isn't Slobad. Seriously, all the abilities fit him, and I bet he was Slobad until late in development. I thought design and creative had the most say in characters and names. It could be creative saving Slobad for something, but I'm 99% sure that development doesn't really care about who a character is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:39
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:EDH rules committee's card: 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:41
|
|
|
He's an extra 3 mana for a Goblin Welder with haste. I don't see him replacing Welder in anything, but maybe Imperial Painter wants a Daretti as an extra copy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:50
|
|
|
Chamale posted:He's an extra 3 mana for a Goblin Welder with haste. I don't see him replacing Welder in anything, but maybe Imperial Painter wants a Daretti as an extra copy? When they already effectively have 8 copies in their deck?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:51
|
|
|
Chamale posted:He's an extra 3 mana for a Goblin Welder with haste. I don't see him replacing Welder in anything, but maybe Imperial Painter wants a Daretti as an extra copy? The thing with Painter is that it uses Recruiter to look for creatures (Painter's Servant and Welder mostly), and Daretti is a 'walker.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:53
|
|
|
superstepa posted:He has some mad synergy with Feldon so I really don't see why he is an alternative to him and not just a card in the deck (or vice versa) I hope I'm reading this right, apologies if I'm not. The Commander 13 decks also had 3 could-be generals and the two you didn't pick were also part of the 100-card deck that you used.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
Goods point. The most I can say for Daretti is that he's more like to see play in Legacy than the other new planewalkers they've spoiled.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 09:55
|
|