|
mackintosh posted:The good: three points, clean sheet. The bad: pretty much everything else. how bad is Macnairs injury ffs
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 11:04 |
|
serious gaylord posted:how bad is Macnairs injury ffs another injury? jesus all the physios need firing now
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:52 |
|
lol how did Burnley win
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:52 |
|
serious gaylord posted:how bad is Macnairs injury ffs Hopefully not bad enough to have Mata start in the back four.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:53 |
|
imagine if we'd not put Nolan on and had Noble passing to Big Andy. Mark Noble has the most assists to him. Hoof. Nolan did absolutely loving nothing.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:53 |
|
Spangly A posted:imagine if we'd not put Nolan on and had Noble passing to Big Andy. Mark Noble has the most assists to him. Hoof. the cool thing is he'll get another contract if he doesn't retire and big sam isn't sacked
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:54 |
|
Carlos Sanchez is really good. Vlaars alright. Everyone else is loving poo poo
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:54 |
|
mackintosh posted:Hopefully not bad enough to have Mata start in the back four. Van Persie seems pretty good at clearing the ball out of dangerous attacking areas, he could do a job.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:56 |
|
mackintosh posted:The good: three points, clean sheet. The bad: pretty much everything else. Shaw deserves a good. He's getting better every week imo. RvP makes me
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 17:59 |
|
Glad to see United manage 3 points at the Theatre of Dreams, this calls for a beer. Actually gently caress it I ain't going all the way downstairs. Congrats to Burnley for winning what has been described as a game of football.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:00 |
|
Agreed. Shaw was good and RVP was hopeless.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:00 |
|
Sagna-Demichelis-Mangala-Clichy
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:12 |
|
Tsaedje posted:Sagna-Demichelis-Mangala-Clichy CDSM
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:21 |
|
Tsaedje posted:Sagna-Demichelis-Mangala-Clichy So the gap between full back and centre back will be equally massive on both sides then?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:21 |
|
rip hull tigers
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:22 |
|
that purple kit is atrocious
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:30 |
|
Eau de MacGowan posted:that purple kit is atrocious It is
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:34 |
|
people who can get away with purple: prince
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:35 |
|
See I like purple, but that kit is awful
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:37 |
|
miles offside lol
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:37 |
|
Fuuuuuck
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
Lol then lol
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
LMAO
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
looooooooooooooooooooooooool
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
lmao that ones counts
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:38 |
|
hahaha
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:39 |
|
lol ffs
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:39 |
|
Hahahaha gently caress off City
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:39 |
|
he touched it twice it not hard to understand
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:39 |
|
Hahaha
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:39 |
|
Hahahajahhahahahaha no way
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:40 |
|
now I want city to get bummed
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:40 |
|
if thats not disallowed then surely it has to be a freekick in the box? bizarre
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:40 |
|
Eau de MacGowan posted:if thats not disallowed then surely it has to be a freekick in the box? the ball isnt in play if the same person who took the free kick takes the next touch, it just a retake.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:41 |
|
loving shambles. Should it be indirect QPR free kick in the box by the letter of the law? Nice to see a ref bottle it in our favour
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:42 |
|
I'm guessing thats some kind of karma re: rojo booting yaya up the arse last week
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:42 |
|
oh idk gnev is making me doubt myself but im almost certain it was the right call
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:43 |
|
Austin mate, you need to slot those home
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:44 |
|
Austin
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 11:04 |
|
big club bias
|
# ? Nov 8, 2014 18:44 |