|
theadder posted:they have a bunch of new customer stuff that looks good & i kept being told i cant have the correct response to this is "oh so if I cancel my service I can get this?"
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 23:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:15 |
|
|
just pay more money I mean that's what you do when apple has a new thing
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 19:02
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:the correct response to this is "oh so if I cancel my service I can get this?" thx echinopsis posted:just pay more money I mean that's what you do when apple has a new thing :iamafag:
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2014 02:10
|
|
|
i am not well-versed in matters of security, so i come here seeking wisdom. here's the scenario: you have a server running tomcat. it's got apache configured to do reverse-proxying and https-serving magic. is the traffic between apache and tomcat essentially available to anybody who can log onto the server? one person is saying tomcat should be set up to do https, and then apache (also doing https) should reverse-proxy for tomcat, but that seems weird to me and kind of overkillish thanks for any help you can give 
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2014 21:11
|
|
|
my computer crashed while my VM was running apt-get upgrade and i think it broke my linux
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:my computer crashed while my VM was running apt-get upgrade and i think it broke my linux try http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1285098 alternately, if there's nothing you care about just make a new vm
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:my computer crashed while my VM was running apt-get upgrade and i think it broke my linux
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2014 23:23
|
|
|
prefect posted:i am not well-versed in matters of security, so i come here seeking wisdom. here's the scenario: you have a server running tomcat. it's got apache configured to do reverse-proxying and https-serving magic. is the traffic between apache and tomcat essentially available to anybody who can log onto the server? this is true to a point because for most scenarios you'd need root access but why would you need to protect your webserver from your local users? the point being is that you should never allow untrusted users to log in anyway
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 07:51
|
|
|
another question from a person who knows less than he probably should: will ulimit kill processes that try to take up too much memory, or will it just prevent them from sucking up too much? i'm hoping for the latter
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 15:29
|
|
|
someones got a box that drops into initramfs on boot and fsck nor fixing the superblocks doesnt work any ideas
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 16:14
|
|
|
graph posted:someones got a box that drops into initramfs on boot and fsck nor fixing the superblocks doesnt work any ideas
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 17:00
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:why do you think that is a filesystem error i dont fuckin know linux is bad and giving students root is cool and good id wipe it and start over obvs but LOL NO ONE KNOWS WHATS ON THERE~
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 17:02
|
|
|
graph posted:i dont fuckin know linux is bad and giving students root is cool and good Boot a live cd, mount the filesystems, get the data off, flatten & reinstall. I've fixed all kinds of boot issues and yours is highly likely recoverable but it's too much 
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:Boot a live cd, mount the filesystems, get the data off yeah theres 20 partitions lol but yeah. thx tho
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 17:56
|
|
|
graph posted:yeah theres 20 partitions lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 18:04
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:murder whoever did your lunix aint my poo poo *~grad students~*
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 18:07
|
|
|
graph posted:aint my poo poo i love coming upon crazy rear end partition tables that just seem like whoever installed it was stoned as gently caress sure, yes, of course your own home directory and a subdirectory under your home directory both need their own partitions, obvs
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 18:16
|
|
|
less fragmentation
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 09:59
|
|
|
I came across this one when I went to reimage a random windows machine setup by my predecessor. . . 
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 15:29
|
|
|
prefect posted:another question from a person who knows less than he probably should: will ulimit kill processes that try to take up too much memory, or will it just prevent them from sucking up too much? i'm hoping for the latter it won't directly kill them, but of course it depends on how gracefully the program handles ENOMEM errors man getrlimit should describe the behaviour of each resource limit http://linux.die.net/man/2/getrlimit
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
does anyone know of big (45"+) lcd screens with motion sensors on them so they only turn on when someone is by them? we keep putting in these stupid kiosk screens in hallways that are on 24/7 even though nobody gives a single poo poo about them and its loving up our energy reduction targets. also touch-screen enabled
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
its probably cheaper to find a motion sensor power controller for the existing monitors.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:its probably cheaper to find a motion sensor power controller for the existing monitors. probably but I think quite a few of them are conventional TVs with tuners and I'm not sure how they would handle having power interruptions like that. I suspect the initialization delay will be too much, compared to turning the backlight on/off which is where most your power draw is going anyhow
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:19
|
|
|
no one will care is my guess. also if the input is already tuned the tv boot time is probably not much. really what you need is a way to detect the people who care about the kiosks cause they probably don't come round much.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:22
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:probably but I think quite a few of them are conventional TVs with tuners and I'm not sure how they would handle having power interruptions like that. I suspect the initialization delay will be too much, compared to turning the backlight on/off which is where most your power draw is going anyhow get some sort of HDMI splitter/switch and put its power adapter on the motion sensor so it goes to no input. most modern tvs should sleep p quick
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:get some sort of HDMI splitter/switch and put its power adapter on the motion sensor so it goes to no input. most modern tvs should sleep p quick that's a good idea, thanks
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:get some sort of HDMI splitter/switch and put its power adapter on the motion sensor so it goes to no input. most modern tvs should sleep p quick wish mine would, min 15 minutes of no input 
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 20:23
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:does anyone know of big (45"+) lcd screens with motion sensors on them so they only turn on when someone is by them? we keep putting in these stupid kiosk screens in hallways that are on 24/7 even though nobody gives a single poo poo about them and its loving up our energy reduction targets. also touch-screen enabled if you have sensor lights could you wire the tvs onto the same sensor? What I mean is that maybe the whole hallway of tvs should turn on instead of each tv individually, less granular could be better
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 23:24
|
|
|
what's a decent wireless router? my dad wants a recommendation but he's probs not going to lay out five bills for a professional setup
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:what's a decent wireless router? my dad wants a recommendation but he's probs not going to lay out five bills for a professional setup RT-AC68U RT-AC87U
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 00:01
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:if you have sensor lights could you wire the tvs onto the same sensor? What I mean is that maybe the whole hallway of tvs should turn on instead of each tv individually, less granular could be better Nothing is consistent here. We have over 100 buildings with that kind of kiosk poo poo jammed in them over the years and I need something that can retrofit on to existing equipment for <$100. Disrupting the video signal with a motion sensor seems like the best bet and hopefully most of the displays will play nice and go to sleep all on their own.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 00:18
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:what's a decent wireless router? my dad wants a recommendation but he's probs not going to lay out five bills for a professional setup apple airport express
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
graph posted:apple airport express "but it costs $40 more than this belkin one I'm looking at"
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:"but it costs $40 more than this belkin one I'm looking at" lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:57
|
|
|
no matter what router you like i think we can all agree that belkin is garbage piss trash for idiot clowns at a circus
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:02
|
|
|
Panty Saluter posted:no matter what router you like i think we can all agree that belkin is garbage piss trash for idiot clowns at a circus and D-Link
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:41
|
|
|
https://wikidevi.com/wiki/EHome_EH100
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:47
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:get some sort of HDMI splitter/switch and put its power adapter on the motion sensor so it goes to no input. most modern tvs should sleep p quick not my veon
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
my tv goes to sleep if the connection drops when it's on the vga input, but not on the hdmi or component or whatever. i had to get back in the habit of turning the tv off when i started using hdmi instead
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 21:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:15 |
|
|
theadder posted:lol "would you buy an android phone?" "no" "belkin is the android of routers" "but 40 dollars!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 21:38
|
|