|
i like netbeans
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 01:31 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 07:52 |
|
from the way it looks right now there's a decent chance I'll get some sort of offer for a c# role but I'm pretty sure it would be super lowball, partly for geographical reasons and partly because the interview process wasn't really all that challenging. were it me two years ago I would have been perfectly happy with it, but I'm really uncomfortable with how little there was in terms of actual coding done, even if there was a decent amount of technical discussion w/r/t their decisions to use certain tooling.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 01:43 |
|
ain't necessarily so. maybe your experience now means they aren't going to bother you with that low level testing bollocks. might be a good thing. cant speak for the geography obviously.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 01:56 |
|
so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. I would say .NET but I don't want to pay for azure for it. What is the most way to accomplish this with a p-lang? I was thinking Rails but idk.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 02:30 |
|
Necc0 posted:i like netbeans same
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 02:33 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. Sinatra or Flask, Rails would be overkill.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 02:39 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. python's got a bunch of packages to do this, ive used tornado w/ success
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 02:39 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. just use flask
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 02:46 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. just use flask, it's dead simple to set up an api endpoint like this with it
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 03:30 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. azure is the best paas
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 03:30 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. node
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 03:41 |
|
welp, somebody had to say it
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 03:44 |
|
Bloody posted:azure is the best paas yeah its great but i'm going to lose my monthly credit soon and i don't want to pay for it when i already have a sever. looking at flask, yeah super easy. thanks folks
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 04:37 |
|
Necc0 posted:i like netbeans same, but I always feel like that guy when I mention it outside work
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 04:40 |
|
how do people actually use flask in the real world? I tried reading up on it but everyone suggested using a half dozen abandoned flask.ext packages and reimplementing most of django
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 05:03 |
|
I liked werkzeug but I only did a toy app in it
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 05:07 |
|
use asp.net webapi
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 05:16 |
|
about to embark on some swift
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 05:18 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:about to embark on some swift this is v good
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 08:36 |
|
Seaside Loafer posted:So would it be fair to say eclipse is the most used but intellij is better? This is for a small project and it looks like the free version will do what I need. even I as a total ObjC partisan will say use IntelliJ if you have to do Java I never did enough Java with WebObjects (or Cocoa Java, lol) to want to use IntelliJ instead of PBX but if I'd continued doing that kind of stuff I'd have done what every other consultant I knew from the time did and buy a personal IntelliJ license to use on every project I touched
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 08:46 |
|
Careful Drums posted:so i need to make a dead simple api. it has only one endpoint, and the result is going to be a json object with a name and a date and a time. it will accomplish this by querying some database table full of datetimes and names and returning the next closest one in the future. if it's really just a single JSON object with a date and time from a single table then just do it in a couple lines of PHP or whatever, who cares if you have infrastructure or scaling or any other poo poo hell you could even use SQLite instead of MySQL/PostgreSQL for your DB the second you need more then start thinking about picking a technology and building a real app but if that's all it is don't waste your time on trivialities
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 08:51 |
|
theadder posted:
welcome to the future! designed in California
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 08:53 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:about to embark on some swift word of advice: don't get lost in "OMG gotta be pure" land, unless you're specifically trying to explore what's possible in the language if you're just trying to get poo poo done, just "import Foundation" and use the OS X/iOS frameworks, don't try to reinvent the world
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 08:55 |
|
eschaton posted:word of advice: don't get lost in "OMG gotta be pure" land, unless you're specifically trying to explore what's possible in the language why would you use a platform specific programming language if you dont want to use the apple frameworks?
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 19:04 |
|
eclipse is free netbeans is free and yet intelliJ is wildly popular despite costing several hundred bucks
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:03 |
|
Careful Drums posted:I would say .NET but I don't want to pay for azure for it. What is the most way to accomplish this with a p-lang? I was thinking Rails but idk. use .net and host on mono
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:04 |
|
eclipse is fine though, never had any major problems biggest issue is trying to get it cooperate with finding files and using a weird working directory
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:05 |
|
download web cobol
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:05 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:eclipse is free
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:06 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:download web cobol this joke is never funny, because web frameworks and mvc poo poo and any god drat terrible cobol thing you can imagine actually exists
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:06 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this joke is never funny, because web frameworks and mvc poo poo and any god drat terrible cobol thing you can imagine actually exists Actually it's very funny.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:11 |
|
model view cobol
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:12 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:eclipse is free reminder that people have also paid for irredeemable poo poo like textpad
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 21:46 |
|
Forgall posted:How crippled is free version of Idea? i forgot it even existed
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 22:05 |
|
Forgall posted:How crippled is free version of Idea? for a java-only editor it's fine. It's missing a bunch of the enterprisey stuff but meh. http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/features/
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 22:07 |
|
i mean also you are theoretically only supposed to write gnu tools with it also buuuuuuut
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 22:07 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:why would you use a platform specific programming language if you dont want to use the apple frameworks? I couldn't tell you but I've definitely seen that some people seem to have a thing for "no I want to do this all in pure Swift" and that's just silly, it's like saying "no I want to use pure C, no stdlib or OS" when writing something to run on Unix.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 22:54 |
|
Captain Foo posted:Actually it's very funny. certainly is
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 22:55 |
|
confirmed, lol
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 23:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 07:52 |
|
I prefer http://azac.pl/cobol-on-wheelchair/
|
# ? Nov 29, 2014 23:09 |