|
Surely the What the hell are you trying to say here category should just be called Nonsense... This is an election year!
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 02:56 |
|
|
Sardine Wit posted:Nonsense... This is an election year! What's the origin of this, anyways?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
Urdnot Fire posted:Even then, the hashtags are nonsensical given the rest of the comic. Why would child support, broken condoms, and accidental pregnancies be a bigger problem if women get free birth control? Well, clearly, because they need something with which to barter recreational drugs from their secret Negro boyfriends who are cuckolding you behind your back, and what better than a necessary commodity for running a stable of hos? And when the mulatto baby comes along and the Activist Judges order you to pay child support anyhow, why, that's just gravy for them! But no, at this point we're putting more thought into their worldview than they ever did. Really, it boils down to the false dichotomy of "Either we have pure, Godly patriarchy as Jesus intended or EVIL HOMEWRECKING TWO-TIMING SLUTS" plus a generous, (un)healthy helping of just plain hating women. You can't really understand the Republican mindset without first realizing that it's predicated on an overpowering fear of change - all morality as one, big game of "The Floor Is Lava".
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:16
|
|
|
Portals posted:What's the origin of this, anyways? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:19
|
|
|
Is there any thought to sub-categories for some of the worst offenders? I feel like Ramirez could easily be his own category this year, and a few others (Bronco?). Maybe it can be a separate thing, but for those posting multiple cartoons a week there's quite a selection of horribleness.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:20
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:Or it could just be that Reagan was a demented moron who genuinely thought that these were good ideas. I mean the guy campaigned on strong military and lower taxes. I don't think a guy who visited his wife's astrologer for governing advice is that foreward thinking...
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:21
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:22
|
|
|
Glad to see Rameriz speaks for the dead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
After everyone posting some old comics from previous Gay Abortion threads, I just assumed this was an old cartoon that I didn't remember... 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:36
|
|
|
So when Ramirez does poo poo like that to make someone feel what amounts to "we should truly endorse evil acts to prevent evil acts", it just blows my mind. For it be viable I can only think it's because one feels that American exceptionalism is inherent and thus any immorality or depravity is justifiable, but how can you actually think that torturing people is OK when it was made to be such a stink for the Allied populations to point fingers about during WWII and the conflicts afterwards? I mean I could go further into detail but this poo poo just bothers me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:39
|
|
|
 e: Not saying all the people tortured were innocent, but at least one of them was.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:41
|
|
|
I had to check IBD to verify that this wasn't a photoshop to 2014. FFFFFFFFFFFuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:43
|
|
|
Anyone have the "That looks like a great place for a mosque!" cartoon? I thought that was also a Ramirez and also used the "falling man" image, but I may be misremembering.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:45
|
|
|
Wow, loving Ramirez is going to slam dunk the Gay Abortion Awards this year with a late entry.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:47
|
|
|
Urdnot Fire posted:Even then, the hashtags are nonsensical given the rest of the comic. Why would child support, broken condoms, and accidental pregnancies be a bigger problem if women get free birth control? Apparently it's her fault that the condom is broken and that he didn't bother to see if she had any STDs before assuming that just because she was on the pill meant he didn't need to use protection.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:52
|
|
|
Ramirez is treating the Gay Abortions this year like the Pulitzer, god drat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 03:52
|
|
|
Apple Pie Hubbub posted:Anyone have the "That looks like a great place for a mosque!" cartoon? I thought that was also a Ramirez and also used the "falling man" image, but I may be misremembering. You were, it's a Lester. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:00
|
|
|
Xander77 posted:I'm still in favor of "Cartoon with the least amount of thought put into it beyond the most superficial possible level" (the name might use some work) For that, I would nominate the Ramirez cartoon where Obama is dressed as a nun while punishing nuns over contraception, because why is the guy you hate dressed as the people whose side you're taking? Also, "that looks like a great place for a mosque" was Lester, I think. I also thought the above Ramirez was a reprint of that Lester comic at first.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:11
|
|
|
Sorry is this a Dick by Dick edit?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:37
|
|
|
What.. what is going on with that baby's... everything? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:47
|
|
|
I figured Ramirez would come out okaying torture. He did do the comic of the twin towers (while burning) talking to each other saying "did you hear the US illegally wiretapped phones?" "How awful, I know" so this is nothing new for him. Still, gently caress you Ramirez. edit: oops it was a bit different than I remembered:  Second edit - holy poo poo this was the second image in the search: 
seiferguy fucked around with this message at 04:51 on Dec 16, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:48
|
|
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:What.. what is going on with that baby's... everything? Seriously. For some reason Muir decided to color the baby's rear end pink and the rest of it brown so it looks like nothing so much as a baboon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 04:56
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:I figured Ramirez would come out okaying torture. He did do the comic of the twin towers (while burning) talking to each other saying "did you hear the US illegally wiretapped phones?" "How awful, I know" so this is nothing new for him. Ramirez was originally anti-wiretapping, his opinion on it changed somewhere around January 20th, 2009.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 05:06
|
|
|
I think you mean pro-wiretapping. And yeah he did just do an about face on so god drat many things.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 05:08
|
|
|
Shugojin posted:I think you mean pro-wiretapping. They all did. Lester had a cartoon that literally showed America getting fat off a civil liberties cake, then a few years ago one that showed the indignities of getting searched by the TSA 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Getting searched by the TSA is the one element of post-9/11 police-state America that Mike Lester didn't delight in, and he was laughably, transparently "BUT I'M WHITE" about it too. but i'm whiiiii iiiite
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 05:39
|
|
|
Funny how when white guys get mad about the TSA the agent is usually a fat black woman. I wonder what that's all about??
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 05:52
|
|
|
Someone exercised an extremely tiny & limited amount of power over me for maybe 90 seconds out of my life and I got real loving mad about it. Now listen to my opinions on the events in Ferguson, Missouri!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:01
|
|
|
 gently caress, Ramirez. I mean, the drone thing was pretty dumb but this is just hilariously crass.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:04
|
|
|
Apropos of nothing, here's a Kelly parody involving Five Nights At Freddy's. I feel like it's the moral obligation to share these once they're found.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
Erenthal posted:He's holding up the wrong finger in that picture. This thread moves too fast, but I made a thing: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:25
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:hey remember when ramirez used a picture of the challenger disaster to lay a sick burn on obamacare How can anyone forget.. the subsequent scooty elephant edit immortalizes it. Anyone have that edit by the way? I could use a good laugh again after all these people literally defending torture.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:31
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:hey remember when ramirez used a picture of the challenger disaster to lay a sick burn on obamacare Cpt.Americant posted:How can anyone forget.. the subsequent scooty elephant edit immortalizes it. Anyone have that edit by the way? I could use a good laugh again after all these people literally defending torture.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:32
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:I'm having a dumb moment. What should I be looking up to read more on this? http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:41
|
|
|
God drat I could go for some investments right now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:57
|
|
|
So I recently got back from the states and while I was in Portland I picked up this gem from Powell's.  It's Ted Rall's "ATTITUDE", a primer on whom Rall considers the best of the alternate political cartoonists. This particular edition was published in 2002, and the cartoons inside are from around then. The basic concept for the book is each cartoonist is interviewed by Rall and the interview sits alongside a sample of their comics. I don't have a scanner, but I'll happily take some terrible iphone photos of any sections people are interested in. Here's Rall's foreword:     And here's the cartoonists covered:  Edit: Yes, he put himself in it. He got Ruben Bolling to interview him for it. Sardine Wit fucked around with this message at 07:02 on Dec 16, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 06:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 07:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 02:56 |
|
|
This is so outside of anything actually going on that I just dumbly, I can't even get exasperated.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 07:23
|
|
