|
bobmarleysghost posted:if you're bad at imagination. I definitely am, which is why my preferred outlet for visual expression is using a camera to make pictures of things that already exist. I'll dick around with the grid lines. I just think it's a weird thing to have when the camera is capable of capturing a wider image.
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 14:06 |
|
|
Mung Dynasty posted:I definitely am, which is why my preferred outlet for visual expression is using a camera to make pictures of things that already exist. Don't have an iPhone, but at least on all my Android phones, 16:9 pictures are actually lower resolution than 4:3, because they're essentially just pre-cropping the image.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 18:25
|
|
|
If you were buying a new cell phone with the camera being the most important feature, which phone would you get and why? I'm in the market for a new phone and since I only do the basics (Facebook, text, and web) pretty much any phone nowadays will work. What I'm finding is that I don't bring my real camera with me enough so the next best thing would be my phone. Assuming cost is no object, what phone has the "best" camera?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
iPhone 6+ with its optical image stabilization maybe.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 21:10
|
|
|
nexxai posted:If you were buying a new cell phone with the camera being the most important feature, which phone would you get and why? I'm in the market for a new phone and since I only do the basics (Facebook, text, and web) pretty much any phone nowadays will work. What I'm finding is that I don't bring my real camera with me enough so the next best thing would be my phone. I really liked the cameras on the higher end Lumia WP phones. It's what I'd go with if my carrier had them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
Honestly the differences between the flagship phones are getting smaller and smaller. OIS is baked into almost all the hugephones (Note 4, G3, iPhone 6+), most have some kind of fancy new autofocus system, a couple have dual-LED flashes (still terrible) and the image quality is basically the same except maybe the Lumia 1020 with its 40 megapickle sensor. I'd personally go with either the iPhone 6/+ because of the amount of camera apps available (though Android really isn't that far behind anymore) or the Z3 for its waterproofing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 00:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 02:44
|
|
|
nexxai posted:Assuming cost is no object, what phone has the "best" camera? Comedy Panasonic CM1 option? 1" sensor, limited availability, £899.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 14:33
|
|
|
 Untitled by ninetysevena, on Flickr Untitled by ninetysevena, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 06:16
|
|
|
nexxai posted:If you were buying a new cell phone with the camera being the most important feature, which phone would you get and why? I'm in the market for a new phone and since I only do the basics (Facebook, text, and web) pretty much any phone nowadays will work. What I'm finding is that I don't bring my real camera with me enough so the next best thing would be my phone. I'm pretty happy with the camera on my Galaxy Note 4. Like the Iphone 6+ it has optical image stabilisation and it really does good things for low light picture quality. You won't get dslr quality obviously, but it's pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 08:49
|
|
|
The nokia 1020 is great if you don't care about apps too much. I got mine used for about $200. The out of camera/phone JPEG files are good, but the edited RAWs look better. OIS, the flash, and the shutter button are great to have as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 17:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 02:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 02:13
|
|
|
Adult tourists always forces the local kids to walk in the muddy ditches!
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 15:38
|
|
|
goattrails posted:Adult tourists always forces the local kids to walk in the muddy ditches! She's actually a local!  Those kids were actually catching freshwater shrimp or something in the streams later on too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 17:19
|
|
|
Pukestain Pal posted:She's actually a local! Haha it fooled me. White shorts and tshirt, with a bag and a bottle of water. That's a good description of a tourist.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2014 22:03
|
|
|
 Ventura Boulevard / Winter Solstice by khyrre, on Flickr
404notfound fucked around with this message at 05:10 on Dec 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2014 03:55
|
|
|
If you're an iPhone user noticing noise in low-ISO, long-exposure photos, and/or wish you could crop the view to 16:9 before hitting the shutter, plus gently caress around with all sorts of settings that aren't available in the stock camera app, allow me to suggest 645Pro. Its gimmick is that it mimics the use of a film SLR. It's got: SLR-style Shutter and ISO priority modes, an auto mode with exposure stepping to +/- 3 in 1/3 stops, and a 'manual' mode with full ISO and shutter speed control. Live metering shows degree of over/underexposure on a line at the bottom. (If you're looking to reduce noise at slow shutter / low ISO, these features might help when combined with...) The option to save images as uncompressed TIFFs instead of JPEGs. (This option makes big 20+ MB files and using it a lot will drain your battery, but the improvement in image quality is noticeable.) (With iOS 8+) manual focus with digital zoom and focus peaking during adjustment. This is awesome for getting focus on a close subject that doesn't fill much of the frame - something that I've found the built-in AF often doesn't want to do. 8 different pre-cropped photo sizes, from 16:9 to 1:1. The viewfinder changes size and shape so you can compose within the dimensions shown. 12 or so different color and b&w 'film' styles, each emulating a specific real-world type, like Kodachrome 25 and Ektachrome 64. You can also create custom 'film' profiles. So all in all a great camera app for iPhone. If I could have only one 'enhanced camera' app, 645 would be it. (Of course, if anyone knows of something even better, I'd love to hear about it.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
 Piazza San Pietro by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2015 01:07
|
|
|
My Nokia takes pretty terrible pictures but these two turned out ok. Hood 2015 by sporklift, on Flickr  Hood 2015 by sporklift, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
From a hike a few months back. Taken using the photo sphere setting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2015 15:53
|
|
|
 Stairs by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
 2015-01-14 02.50.47 2 by Geektox, on Flickr 2015-01-08 06.38.35 1 by Geektox, on Flickr 2015-01-14 02.50.40 1 by Geektox, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 07:37
|
|
|
 2015-01-15 11.42.53 1 by khyrre, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Had a company all-hands meeting at Levi's Stadium yesterday   Levi's Stadium by khyrre, on Flickr Levi's Stadium by khyrre, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2015 14:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
 2015-01-31 05.06.00 3 by Geektox, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Can I edit photos in landscape mode in VSCO Cam on iPhone?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 15:08
|
|
|
 20150208_160042 by Dyfan Edwards, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 16:08
|
|
|
 Jellyfeesh
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 15:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 18:34
|
|
|
 2015-02-23 05.50.06 1 by khyrre, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2015 06:06
|
|
|
Is this the Instagram thread? Do we have one of those?
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Is this the Instagram thread? Do we have one of those? Instagram is as fine here as it is anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2015 14:44
|
|
|
 Cabling, Venezia Santa Lucia by alkanphel, on Flickr  Chairs, Venezia Santa Lucia by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
I like this a lot. Looks like a photo from a cheap cartridge camera.  d2 by sporklift, on Flickr  d2 by sporklift, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
 Three Pigeons by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 10:59
|
|
|
 Odeon, Point Village, Dublin by Quantum of Phallus
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 13:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 14:06 |
|
|
me preparing some nice posts 
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 18:21
|
|
