|
This last page makes me realise we should institute a Bleed for the Dole scheme. It would be the culmination of the LNP's life's work of bleeding this country dry.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 05:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 14:05 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:This last page makes me realise we should institute a Bleed for the Dole scheme. Would also be easier, less painful and more productive than anything else proposed.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 06:11 |
|
Fruity Gordo posted:He's a narcissistic Cold War Tory who got elected and ran a government whose raison d'etre was getting reelected while loving people over as much as they would tolerate, and thusly set the tone for Hawke. So, already a capital offense. He apparently regrets the shithouse trajectory his government put us on and so in the early 2000s he started suggesting that maybe it was uncool for us to put refugees in concentration camps/ Because he used to be a Prime Minister who ran concentration camps which were less poo poo, <snip> There was no mandatory detention under Fraser. That was introduced by Keating (Although for a maximum amount of time of around 200 days)
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 06:27 |
|
duck monster posted:There was no mandatory detention under Fraser. That was introduced by Keating (Although for a maximum amount of time of around 200 days) It wasn't mandatory detention but we still had 3 onshore detention centres and did offshore processing of people in camps in Malaysia and Indonesia.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 06:44 |
|
But yeah obviously Fraser's approach was the best we've done, but it doesn't mean it was great and he wilfully appealed to rednecks when it was convenient and put people in jail for political reasons. Mandatory detention has been liberal party policy just as long as the ALP and if he honestly cared he would have left the party during the Howard years, not in 2009 or whenever he finally bailed.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 06:56 |
|
Use a Bleed For The Dole scheme to correctly identify how many people on welfare are off chops at all times.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 06:59 |
|
Fruity Gordo posted:He has no friends left in conservative politics. He sniffed the wind 20 years ago, looked at his bank balance and took a risk because he rightly guessed that he would be vilified in death if he didnt come to jesus Now whether that belief is shared by an important slice of the population is another question. If it's not, it's just him rambling right? I think it's plausible, but obviously polling would be a better source. rudatron fucked around with this message at 07:13 on Dec 20, 2014 |
# ? Dec 20, 2014 07:02 |
|
I don't want dole-bludger fluids polluting the hard-working purity of my veins.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 07:21 |
|
ewe2 posted:All that fits well with my anecdotal experience as a blood donor. Going by your early posts, I'm guessing the public sector Green/Left doctor fraternity wouldn't be well pleased with the government's proposed new Medicare scheme? It does look like a new front in pitting the private against the public systems. I'm aware that the junior staff are already under pressure from other policies, what are they projecting as to the future should this pass? Forgive my opinion for being brash, but nobody with their head screwed on right is happy about the proposed changes. Reviewing the medical literature (even in a fairly cursory way) will reveal that: a) copayment schemes for primary care are not justifiable from a health economic point of view and, b) primary care interventions are probably the best value investments you can make in a health system We should be increasing funding for the GP and primary care sectors, not decreasing it. I mean, it's not even controversial. The evidence has been there for years and years. The fact it's even being argued at all only goes to show that it's a political issue and not a practical one. My colleagues are worried about the load on emergency departments increasing, the increase in chronic disease burden on the health system, that it will spiral health system costs ever upwards (in turn decreasing the quality of secondary and tertiary care, hospitals, etc), and in many cases, people have expressed the opinion that the concept of a "price signal" for primary care treatment is somewhat malicious. The problem is that the rammifications for this policy will be rather insidious. Unlike when someone dies in an emergency department corridor because of inadequate staffing, or when an ambulance is late getting to a medical emergency because of bed block, where you can show the direct link between the policy and its outcome, the GP copayment (or proposed reduction in medicare rebate to GPs) will have a horrible, creeping effect on the health system. It'll take years to recognise (...politically- the data will be clear as it always has been), and even longer to fix.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 07:52 |
|
Yeah, given the way public system hospitals are being run these days, it makes for some nasty administrative decisions.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 08:33 |
|
MichaelCusackDrinkingCultureVideo.mpeg4 PART 3
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 10:29 |
|
quote:Cairns stabbing: Mother arrested for murder after eight children found dead in Manoora home
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 10:32 |
|
Too early to be sure, but is this going to be another great argument for reducing spending on the 'unprofitable' mental health sector?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 12:03 |
|
I sure hope not. I've had to pay full price to see my psychotherapist a couple of times and holy gently caress is mental healthcare expensive.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 12:18 |
|
Just as a side note to anyone that has ongoing mental healthcare costs, if you have extras cover with your insurance provider (assuming you've got one) they'll cover roughly 75% of the cost of seeing your shrink.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 12:20 |
|
Endman posted:I sure hope not. I've had to pay full price to see my psychotherapist a couple of times and holy gently caress is mental healthcare expensive. In neo-liberal parlance, this is an 'externality', with absolutely no meaning to profit. The idea that society is, both economically and socially, better off with mental healthcare does not factor into a bottom line - it is a cost absorbed by the tax payer, and therefore something that business should not be burdened with. Just like business profiting by an educated work force, or the infrastructure of roads, ports and communication. They want all the benefits of government spending, but none of the responsibility. The commonwealth provides them with a fertile ground - a relatively healthy, educated workforce - but they still like to pretend that they built the log cabin they were born in, and all their success is a function of their initiative.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 13:28 |
|
gently caress! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 13:46 |
|
Pudding Space posted:In neo-liberal parlance, this is an 'externality', with absolutely no meaning to profit. The idea that society is, both economically and socially, better off with mental healthcare does not factor into a bottom line - it is a cost absorbed by the tax payer, and therefore something that business should not be burdened with. Just like business profiting by an educated work force, or the infrastructure of roads, ports and communication. They want all the benefits of government spending, but none of the responsibility. The commonwealth provides them with a fertile ground - a relatively healthy, educated workforce - but they still like to pretend that they built the log cabin they were born in, and all their success is a function of their initiative. Pretty much this.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 13:50 |
|
Pudding Space posted:In neo-liberal parlance, this is an 'externality', with absolutely no meaning to profit. The idea that society is, both economically and socially, better off with mental healthcare does not factor into a bottom line - it is a cost absorbed by the tax payer, and therefore something that business should not be burdened with. Just like business profiting by an educated work force, or the infrastructure of roads, ports and communication. They want all the benefits of government spending, but none of the responsibility. The commonwealth provides them with a fertile ground - a relatively healthy, educated workforce - but they still like to pretend that they built the log cabin they were born in, and all their success is a function of their initiative. true neoliberals would actually just stick their fingers in their ears and deny the existence of externalities at all, because once you start considering externalities you have to come to terms with the idea that a consensual transaction between parties can affect parties not involved in the transaction and then your whole system comes tumbling down.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 16:08 |
|
Gough Suppressant posted:a consensual transaction between parties can affect parties not involved in the transaction and then your whole system comes tumbling down. 1/ Do you want fracking? We will pay you for the land we frack on. 2/ Do you want fracking? It's beneath the land we have to pay you for. Democratic conclusion: the people want fracking - they love fracking!
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 16:20 |
|
ABC24 posted:The Prime Minister is expected to announce a ministerial reshuffle this afternoon in Canberra #auspol
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 00:37 |
|
I'm gonna miss Joe, from Treasurer to Sandwich Chef is quite the demotion.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 00:43 |
|
Wonder what Morrison is going to get.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:00 |
|
Merry Christmas Joe, you're fired.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:03 |
|
Prime Minister Morrison is slowly looking more likely as he will probably secure a shitload more power for himself. Such as getting Defense added or even Foreign Affairs if Bishop stirred the pot too much and Tony has to start firing warning shots.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:09 |
|
But if they fired Joe it would be like admitting the budget was a total pile of nasty poo poo!
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:11 |
|
Treasurer Morrison will cancel Medicare and ship all the poors to PNG.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:13 |
|
Julie Bishop as Deputy Leader chooses her portfolio so it might be unlikely that she moves. So far the speculation is Josh Frydenberg taking Assistant Treasurer while Sussan Ley takes his spot as Parliamentary Secretary.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:15 |
|
Nuclear Spy posted:Julie Bishop as Deputy Leader chooses her portfolio so it might be unlikely that she moves. So far the speculation is Josh Frydenberg taking Assistant Treasurer while Sussan Ley takes his spot as Parliamentary Secretary. Sussan Ley possibly might be taking Assistant Education Minister, because let's face facts; Pyne couldn't sell lemonaide on a hot day.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:28 |
|
Anidav posted:Prime Minister Morrison is slowly looking more likely as he will probably secure a shitload more power for himself. Such as getting Defense added or even Foreign Affairs if Bishop stirred the pot too much and Tony has to start firing warning shots. No chance that Bishop will be moved. People keep saying "Defence added" or including aspects of the Defence Department into a new Morrison-led homeland security superdepartment but I can't see it - even if there's a move to a US-style homeland security construct, it's much more likely to absorb the federal police or ASIO from the Attorney General rather than Defence. And if Morrison goes to Defence he'll give up his current portfolio, I can't see a coalition government giving a Defence Minister additional portfolio responsibilities.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:28 |
|
Even though the rumours have been circulating for months, a Morrison superdepartment probably makes some people here wake up in the middle of the night screaming. Lets hope it doesn't actually happen.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:34 |
|
Defence doesn't seem like that much of an added responsibility since judging by David Johnston it consists largely of hiding in your office apoplectic with rage.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 01:37 |
|
Pyne or Joe losing their job would be a sweet Christmas present from Abbott. Might help soften the blow from the turd in the stocking that is the inevitable increase of Morrison's portfolio.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 02:29 |
|
Though I can't remember where, I was reading a bunch of reshuffle reports late last week and one mentioned defence and specifically David Johnston enjoy the protection of Julie bishop herself. Morrison getting defence would probably cause her to background against the government even more than she is doing now. Apparently Johnston is actually a competent manager and minister when it comes to the department, but he's just prone to gaffs. We'll see.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 02:46 |
|
I think integrating the immigration and intelligence portfolios would be for the best, possibly including defense. This would enable Morrison to be as efficient as possible in his stated goal of establishing the Fourth Reich.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 02:48 |
|
Can someone make a Hearts of Iron mod with Scott Morrison leading the Forth Reich?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 02:52 |
|
Murodese posted:I think integrating the immigration and intelligence portfolios would be for the best, possibly including defense. This would enable Morrison to be as efficient as possible in his stated goal of establishing the Fourth Reich. To be fair he should also have transport and infrastructure. Maybe this is what makes the Liberals reconsider their roads not rail policy.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 02:55 |
|
Les Affaires posted:Apparently Johnston is actually a competent manager and minister when it comes to the department, but he's just prone to gaffs. We'll see. Word from some mates in the department is that he at least has shown a passing interest in the portfolio, which puts him ahead of Stephen Smith. The bigger problem is that Abbott's office is apparently showing Rudd-era levels of micromanagement of Defence issues that are often at odds with Johnston's wishes, and Johnston has given up fighting against it.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 03:12 |
|
Tirade posted:Word from some mates in the department is that he at least has shown a passing interest in the portfolio, which puts him ahead of Stephen Smith. Yeah I'd believe that. All the best intentions in the world won't make things go better than they are if the people running the show aren't in your employ.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 03:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 14:05 |
|
Les Affaires posted:Yeah I'd believe that. All the best intentions in the world won't make things go better than they are if the people running the show aren't in your employ. My guess is that with the attempted narrative of resetting everything, it is likely that the reshuffling will be a way to resuscitate any remaining political capital for the senior ministers. My wild prediction is that this will be the second phase of this term, with the final reshuffle next year having fresh ministers with a completely different message. So we could see Turnbull moving to Treasurer today with Cormann replacing him eventually after one budget destroys his capital and Pyne in the 'third phase' moving towards the Federal Election moving to communications, his petition being a foreshadow to extra funding. We'll see a few females in assistant positions to be elevated later to soften Abbott's (or other leader) women's vote.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 04:02 |