Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

So did Le Pen just win all elections forever?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eye of Widesauron
Mar 29, 2014

thompson posted:

Well, not until now I guess right?

It would take a lot of effort and cooperation between each EU country (and some who aren't currently members) in order for this to be done effectively. There are also still existing stockpiles and due to a peculiarity with the way most E.U. country's gun laws work (where demilitarizing a weapon simply means clipping a firing pin, putting some holes in the barrel and welding the chamber, all fairly easy to reverse if you have anything from an auto repair shop) as opposed to the US' bizarre regulations (where there is a legal process to buy the actual machine guns but demilitarizing a weapon involves torch cutting the crap out of it) it's actually easier to get inert ordnance or a bolt action/semi auto weapon that can be readily converted to fire both live and fully automatic in many places in Europe than some might think. In that case often times there isn't even any paperwork involved since the weapons are treated as "deactivated to EU standards" and can just be mail ordered most of the time.

These guys probably didn't go that route since it seems like they were well connected but this prompted me to do some research on it and I was surprised at how easily one could come by easily reactivated weapons of war in the E.U.; largely it doesn't seem to have been a problem violence wise with a few exceptions in the U.K. where street gangs were taking blank guns and deactivated weapons and reactivating them. That's a whole other thread though and I'm sorry for the derail. :ohdear:

Private Eye
Jul 12, 2010

Don't be so bloody gay, Cambo

Retail Slave posted:

I never once said that. Islam has plenty of hosed up poo poo in it. So does Christianity and just about every other single organized religion in the history of the world.

I'm just saying here that I don't blame the religion if an extremist decides to warp the teachings to fit his personal agenda.

The problem, like someone earlier up said, is that Islam (and Christianity and Judaism) are almost schizophrenic in their holy books. These kind of extremists can point to their holy book and say it told them to do it, just as moderates can point to them and highlight a passage that directly contradicts the justification. Different people get out of religion what they want, and think everyone else blind to the true way. Perhaps all the extremist poo poo should be neutered from the holy books so that extremists really don't have a leg to stand on.

Periodiko
Jan 30, 2005
Uh.

Arkane posted:

Maybe, just maybe, the religion founded by a violent psychopath pedophile is the problem.

It really is strange that liberal moderate minded people don't embrace this rhetoric. Why could this be?

GyverMac
Aug 3, 2006
My posting is like I Love Lucy without the funny bits. Basically, WAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Retail Slave posted:

I never once said that. Islam has plenty of hosed up poo poo in it. So does Christianity and just about every other single organized religion in the history of the world.

I'm just saying here that I don't blame the religion if an extremist decides to warp the teachings to fit his personal agenda.

But when it happens on such a large scale as it does within the islam world community, then you should start examining what exactly makes that religion stand out. We are not talking about one or two isolated incidents, we are talking about regular happenings. Not all muslims are terrorists, but when compared to the other major religions in the world today, Islam stands out as the one with the most terrorists acts committed in its name. Its time for islam to take a good look at itself and see what can be done to counter this development.

FourLeaf
Dec 2, 2011

Private Eye posted:

The problem, like someone earlier up said, is that Islam (and Christianity and Judaism) are almost schizophrenic in their holy books. These kind of extremists can point to their holy book and say it told them to do it, just as moderates can point to them and highlight a passage that directly contradicts the justification. Different people get out of religion what they want, and think everyone else blind to the true way. Perhaps all the extremist poo poo should be neutered from the holy books so that extremists really don't have a leg to stand on.

As if the extremists would ever accept that.

unlimited shrimp
Aug 30, 2008

Retail Slave posted:

I never once said that. Islam has plenty of hosed up poo poo in it. So does Christianity and just about every other single organized religion in the history of the world.

I'm just saying here that I don't blame the religion if an extremist decides to warp the teachings to fit his personal agenda.
When you say "I don't blame the religion" what are you talking about, exactly?
You don't blame the raw text of the Quran? You don't blame the Idiots Guide to Islam? You don't blame the imam these guys presumably listened to?

Statements like "the problem isn't Islam" sound so meaningless and imprecise. Islam may not be the problem, but the problem is Islamic.

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!

Arkane posted:

And, please, enough with the "it's religion that is the problem!!!!" There is no Christian airplane hijacking epidemic. The world is not facing a problem of Buddhists going around beheading children. There are not Jewish people putting bombs on themselves and blowing up a bus full of people or blowing up a pizzeria. Hindus aren't blowing up night clubs. Atheists aren't blowing up trains. Taoists aren't killing people for drawing cartoons. RELIGION in and of itself isn't the issue. That equivalency doesn''t exist in any plane of reality. Islam has a virtual monopoly on violence. And try as you might to ignore that fact, you get reminded year after year with each new terrorist attack that you are obnoxiously wrong.

There's no christian airplane hijacking epidemic, but then again, there's no Islamic one either. There does seem to be a Christian nation that does bomb/shoot the gently caress out of Islamic countries a lot, tho.

Forgall
Oct 16, 2012

by Azathoth

Arkane posted:

Always mind boggling that the most violent, repressive religion gets essentially defended by people who self-describe as "liberal." Muslim terrorist attack after Muslim terrorist attack, the script is the same. "Please think of all of the good Muslim people!" "It's just a coincidence that these hundreds of terrorist attacks have all been perpetrated by Muslims." "Christianity is just as bad!!!!!" Thread is super predictable in its abundance of horrible posting.
Terrorist attacks are done by islamic conservatives. And yes, the world would be a much better place if we managed to get rid of the whole lot of you.

Mukip
Jan 27, 2011

by Reene

Private Eye posted:

The problem, like someone earlier up said, is that Islam (and Christianity and Judaism) are almost schizophrenic in their holy books. These kind of extremists can point to their holy book and say it told them to do it, just as moderates can point to them and highlight a passage that directly contradicts the justification. Different people get out of religion what they want, and think everyone else blind to the true way. Perhaps all the extremist poo poo should be neutered from the holy books so that extremists really don't have a leg to stand on.

They would just use pre-modified texts and justify their beliefs as being even more legitimate that way.

Combed Thunderclap
Jan 4, 2011



Luigi Thirty posted:

So did Le Pen just win all elections forever?

The next election is in 2017, I think we've got a while before we can really answer that question.

Private Eye
Jul 12, 2010

Don't be so bloody gay, Cambo

FourLeaf posted:

As if the extremists would ever accept that.

Then they can form their own super extreme chrislamaism religion that we would be well justified in eradicating.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Arkane posted:

Always mind boggling that the most violent, repressive religion gets essentially defended by people who self-describe as "liberal." Muslim terrorist attack after Muslim terrorist attack, the script is the same. "Please think of all of the good Muslim people!" "It's just a coincidence that these hundreds of terrorist attacks have all been perpetrated by Muslims." "Christianity is just as bad!!!!!" Thread is super predictable in its abundance of horrible posting.

How about we just think that the world has a shitload of good people in it, including many Muslims? That the VAST majority of people on this Earth don't want to kill random people?

Let's start with that baseline. Then let's examine Islam irrespective of whether its adherents are "good" or "bad." And when you examine that religion, you find shockingly backwards and violent teachings . Being gay can be a death sentence in Islamic countries due to the religion. Apospasty is a death sentence due to the religion. Women are widely regarded as property due to the religion. If a Muslim woman is raped, a commonplace occurrence in Muslim countries, she is now at risk of being killed by her family members due to the religion. Sexual abuse is rife due to the religion. Blaspheming can lead to death (and has led to death today) due to the religion. And finally, and perhaps most importantly, killing non-believers is encouraged.

Maybe, just maybe, the religion founded by a violent psychopath pedophile is the problem. Maybe, just maybe, Muhammad was a bad person, and that bad people who are Muslims can follow his example and start killing random people, hanging gay people, beating raped women to death, marrying children, and all sorts of other deplorable things. People like the lovely posters in this thread and people who share their views in the media (e.g. Ben Affleck) are a major problem in this world. They refuse to identify Islam for what it is. They ignore reality. They're enablers. The Neville Chamberlains of the modern world.

And, please, enough with the "it's religion that is the problem!!!!" There is no Christian airplane hijacking epidemic. The world is not facing a problem of Buddhists going around beheading children. There are not Jewish people putting bombs on themselves and blowing up a bus full of people or blowing up a pizzeria. Hindus aren't blowing up night clubs. Atheists aren't blowing up trains. Taoists aren't killing people for drawing cartoons. RELIGION in and of itself isn't the issue. That equivalency doesn''t exist in any plane of reality. Islam has a virtual monopoly on violence. And try as you might to ignore that fact, you get reminded year after year with each new terrorist attack that it is obnoxiously wrong.

We might be more willing to give your rhetoric any consideration at all if you didn't keep going on about "Islam." This is Islamism and political terrorism plain and simple, and it has as much to do with Islam as the Jamestown Massacre had to do with animism.

unlimited shrimp
Aug 30, 2008

Forgall posted:

Terrorist attacks are done by islamic conservatives. And yes, the world would be a much better place if we managed to get rid of the whole lot of you.
If we're getting all taxonomical then a terrorist is absolutely, definitionally not conservative.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Forgall posted:

Terrorist attacks are done by islamic conservatives. And yes, the world would be a much better place if we managed to get rid of the whole lot of you.

Kurtofan
Feb 16, 2011

hon hon hon

Combed Thunderclap posted:

The next election is in 2017, I think we're good.

There's some cantonal/regional elections this year but I don't think people know/care (even though they're kind of important, oh well).

I really wonder what's going to happen when the regional councils are all filled with FN people, I want to say not much since France is so centralized but they must have some sort of local power.

FourLeaf
Dec 2, 2011

GyverMac posted:

But when it happens on such a large scale as it does within the islam world community, then you should start examining what exactly makes that religion stand out. We are not talking about one or two isolated incidents, we are talking about regular happenings. Not all muslims are terrorists, but when compared to the other major religions in the world today, Islam stands out as the one with the most terrorists acts committed in its name. Its time for islam to take a good look at itself and see what can be done to counter this development.

Your problem is your inability to understand that Christians don't need to commit their terrorist acts under an explicit religious banner.

Also, do you know how loving ridiculous it is to say that "islam" needs to take a good look at itself and see what can be done to counter this development? "islam" is loving enormous.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
I hope that France can finally start talking about getting serious with gun control after this.

Dilkington
Aug 6, 2010

"Al mio amore Dilkington, Gennaro"

Cat Mattress posted:

No, I only said he was from a Jewish family, which I knew only from looking at the Wikipedia page in question.

That he himself does not identify as Jewish isn't really important. For the hardcore antisemites, the vice-president of the FN is "tainted" by Jewishness; and that alone should limit the antisemitic agitprop from the party, if only to prevent exacerbating internal tensions.

That's a fair point. I was a little too keen to argue and missed what you were saying.

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!

Powercrazy posted:

I hope that France can finally start talking about getting serious with gun control after this.

Their gun death rate is already very low, seems like they're doing an ok job? :confused:

Willie Tomg
Feb 2, 2006

Periodiko posted:

It really is strange that liberal moderate minded people don't embrace this rhetoric. Why could this be?

Its getting so a red-blooded Man can't even call for the invasion of a sovereign territory and further subjugation of groups who largely had nothing to do with it because of a criminal act perpetrated by a nonstate actor without those fuckin PC SJWs considering the rammifications of acting on impulse. Makes me sick to think how far we done fell since 911. A G-ddamn Travesty.

Droopy Goines
Aug 2, 2003

Presented in DTS ES 6.1 where available.

SedanChair posted:

There's nothing "moderate" Muslims can do to curb extremism, period. It's not in their power and it's not their job anyway.

I'm curious. Who do you think can help curb Islamic extremism?

Periodiko
Jan 30, 2005
Uh.

Arkane posted:

The world is not facing a problem of Buddhists going around beheading children. ... Hindus aren't blowing up night clubs.

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.

Mukip
Jan 27, 2011

by Reene

Periodiko posted:

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.

something something fedora

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
Yeah Indian Hindus are raping people like it's going out of style. Not sure if that's the best example.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Hammerstein posted:

As European I can only speak for my continent. But I can't remember a terror attack (or anything remotely close to the current events) by Christian fundamentalists on European soil in the last decades. The US and Ireland are a different topic.
Although this rather makes the point that it's not always as simple as "it's about religion" even when the perpetrators defined themselves as Catholic.

Only registered members can see post attachments!

FourLeaf
Dec 2, 2011

Droopy Goines posted:

I'm curious. Who do you think can help curb Islamic extremism?

The US.

Act One: Stop support of KSA, responsible for funding acts of jihadist violence around the world.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Periodiko posted:

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.

Yeah, pretty much every religion has either been violent and lovely in the past, or is being violent and lovely currently.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

Radbot posted:

Their gun death rate is already very low, seems like they're doing an ok job? :confused:

Sorry I project all my, often times erroneous, preconceived notions on current events. Factual reality doesn't allow me to whinge hard enough so it's welcomed relief.

unlimited shrimp
Aug 30, 2008

Periodiko posted:

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.

He forgot the pronoun "our" give him some slack.

BigBallChunkyTime
Nov 25, 2011

Kyle Schwarber: World Series hero, Beefy Lad, better than you.

Illegal Hen

FourLeaf posted:

There's a difference between examining how religious fundamentalism is harmful to modern society and proclaiming a blanket condemnation of a whole religion like the others are any better.

This is pretty much what I'm trying to say. gently caress the extremists in any religion is my point, but don't condemn the entire religion. There are plenty of peaceful muslims, jews, christians, etc who are good people and don't practice or condone any sort of violence. It's just that you never hear about those people. You hear about the fraction of a percentage who goes off on a rampage and kills people because reasons.

Private Eye posted:

The problem, like someone earlier up said, is that Islam (and Christianity and Judaism) are almost schizophrenic in their holy books. These kind of extremists can point to their holy book and say it told them to do it, just as moderates can point to them and highlight a passage that directly contradicts the justification. Different people get out of religion what they want, and think everyone else blind to the true way. Perhaps all the extremist poo poo should be neutered from the holy books so that extremists really don't have a leg to stand on.

You're not entirely wrong, but again, just because it says so in a book does not give you justification to do whatever the book says to do. Personal choice and all that. Blame the fringe who preach violence and killing against a group of people as just and right and as what their god would want. Your post points out a matter of personal interpretation (one passage says this, another says directly the opposite) and it's all in how one chooses to believe the holy book.

GyverMac posted:

But when it happens on such a large scale as it does within the islam world community, then you should start examining what exactly makes that religion stand out. We are not talking about one or two isolated incidents, we are talking about regular happenings. Not all muslims are terrorists, but when compared to the other major religions in the world today, Islam stands out as the one with the most terrorists acts committed in its name. Its time for islam to take a good look at itself and see what can be done to counter this development.

Also true. Islam should change itself. But good luck trying to convince any sort of religion to change its holy book to include or exclude anything, even the addition or omission of so much as a comma would be seen as blasphemy. It shouldn't be, and the religions should get with the times, kind of like how the Constitution should update itself to reflect the modern times. But again, good luck with that.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Periodiko posted:

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.
The current prime minister of India has serious questions hanging over him about whether he let anti-Muslim riots go unchecked when he was governor of Gujarat in 2002. Dozens of people died in the attack on the train that set the riots off, one or two thousand died in the subsequent violence. The BJP, one of India's two biggest parties, is shot through with ugly Hindu nationalism and religious violence is a serious problem. So yeah, exactly, Hinduism lives in a glass house like most every other religion. We just don't hear about it much because the Western media doesn't report on India much.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

GyverMac posted:

But when it happens on such a large scale as it does within the islam world community, then you should start examining what exactly makes that religion stand out. We are not talking about one or two isolated incidents, we are talking about regular happenings. Not all muslims are terrorists, but when compared to the other major religions in the world today, Islam stands out as the one with the most terrorists acts committed in its name. Its time for islam to take a good look at itself and see what can be done to counter this development.

Terrorism and political and sectarian violence has been widespread in the Middle East since before WWII, but it wasn't really until recently (I'd say in the 80s) that ideologies grounding themselves in Islamic identity (Islamism) became truly significant. There were a bunch of terrorist attacks in the Middle East before this most commonly committed by nationalist or socialist groups. Islamism came to the forefront with the decline or failure of these ideologies and, I think, it is a much more powerful and persuasive ideology for Middle Easterners than what nationalism or socialism was/is given the still significant place of religion in pretty much all Islamic countries which also gives it international appeal.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Retail Slave posted:

This is pretty much what I'm trying to say. gently caress the extremists in any religion is my point, but don't condemn the entire religion. There are plenty of peaceful muslims, jews, christians, etc who are good people and don't practice or condone any sort of violence. It's just that you never hear about those people. You hear about the fraction of a percentage who goes off on a rampage and kills people because reasons.

I know plenty of nice republicans, please stop assuming they all share beliefs consistent with their party platform.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

WoodrowSkillson posted:

I know plenty of nice whites, please stop assuming they all share beliefs consistent with their racial platform.

BigBallChunkyTime
Nov 25, 2011

Kyle Schwarber: World Series hero, Beefy Lad, better than you.

Illegal Hen

WoodrowSkillson posted:

I know plenty of nice republicans, please stop assuming they all share beliefs consistent with their party platform.

Well, to be fair, I DO know plenty of Republican gun owners who haven't gone on a public rampage with one.

Or: gently caress you guys for not pigeonholing every single member of a group into a neat little stereotype of my choosing.

BigBallChunkyTime fucked around with this message at 19:39 on Jan 7, 2015

DutchDupe
Dec 25, 2013

How does the kitty cat go?

...meow?

Very gooood.

Periodiko posted:

Also, just for the record, the essence of this is total horseshit. There are violent extremist Buddhist monks in Myanmar slaughtering people en masse, and there are tons of examples of Hindu terrorism and mob violence, to the extent that I'm kind of amazed you included Hindus at all.

To be fair to the guy you responded to, he said the "world" isn't facing a problem of extremist Buddhists and Hindus. While they definitely exist, when was the last time an extremist Buddhist conducted a terror attack outside of Myanmar? The essence isn't complete horseshit because the types of extremism are different.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*


relgions and political parties have far more in common then religions and race

Josef K. Sourdust
Jul 16, 2014

"To be quite frank, Platinum sucks at making games. Vanquish was terrible and Metal Gear Rising: Revengance was so boring it put me to sleep."

Zephro posted:

Although this rather makes the point that it's not always as simple as "it's about religion" even when the perpetrators defined themselves as Catholic.



The IRA are/were Irish nationalists. They have never advocated the forced conversion of anyone to Catholicism nor the murder of non-Catholics and were responsible for the murders of many Catholics in the security services and drug dealers and petty criminals who were Catholic.

E: The IRA have never been described as Catholic fundamentalists either by themselves or by the press (British or Irish). British posters itt will attest to that.

Josef K. Sourdust fucked around with this message at 19:41 on Jan 7, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

WoodrowSkillson posted:

relgions and political parties have far more in common then religions and race

Outside of the Catholic Church, no.

  • Locked thread