Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
GolfHole
Feb 26, 2004

The Hungerford Massacre is currently occupying a lot of my curiosity, largely because nobody to date has been able to discern a viable motive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungerford_massacre

In 1987, a recluse named Michael Ryan decides to use several rifles and a handgun to destroy as many people as humanly possible -- which turns out is a frighteningly high number. 17 people died, including the shooter, while 16 were wounded. Police were largely helpless as they lacked the weaponry to confront the firepower of the murderer, and despite the offer of a passing SAS Team, were unable or unwilling to neutralize the man until he had taken his own life.

"He refused to leave before knowing what happened to his mother, saying that her death was "a mistake". At 18:52, Ryan committed suicide by shooting himself in the head with the Beretta pistol. One of the statements Ryan made towards the end of the negotiations was widely reported: "Hungerford must be a bit of a mess. I wish I had stayed in bed.""

What makes this massacre unique in my mind is the absolute lack of appreciative motive, the events that seem to have spiraled completely out of control (the term FUBAR comes to mind), the fact he killed his own mother in his battle fury, and his sheer aptitude at killing. Reading the chronology of events reminds me heavily of that stupid Uwe Boll film about the guy who shoots up a whole town.

Humanity is disgusting without empathy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

El Estrago Bonito
Dec 17, 2010

Scout Finch Bitch

Doctor Malaver posted:

How about a music break?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayhem_%28band%29

Some murders, a suicide, corpse necklaces, churches burning... (you'll need to click around, it's not all on this page)

There are two pretty good movies about this; Until The Light Takes Us and Once Upon a Time in Norway. The issue is that to get a good look at the issue you kind of need to see both because one is a very dry "facts only" history approach and the other is much more a look at the people involved in the crimes (but basically assumes you are familiar with the background information already). It does do a good job of capturing the sometimes strange and awkward relationship the modern extreme metal scene in Europe has with the church burnings and Varg.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

http://jalopnik.com/this-is-the-video-cnn-will-play-when-the-world-ends-1677511538

So were you ever curious what the last thing shown on earth would/or would have possibly been?

Here's your answer at least for CNN.

I do wonder if any other networks have stuff like this..and like what they're to do in the event of some sort of major diaster.

muscles like this!
Jan 17, 2005


Well, one thing that every network has is pre-written obituaries for pretty much every major world figure. They just need periodic updating for any big changes and a blank spot at the end of date of death/age at time of death.

Nckdictator
Sep 8, 2006
Just..someone

muscles like this? posted:

Well, one thing that every network has is pre-written obituaries for pretty much every major world figure. They just need periodic updating for any big changes and a blank spot at the end of date of death/age at time of death.





Nckdictator has a new favorite as of 06:09 on Jan 6, 2015

Syd Midnight
Sep 23, 2005

I was just reading the WW2 thread and wound up at 36th Waffen Grenadiers. I mean, I knew Nazis were evil, but fuuuuuck. The kinds of guys who'd have death camp commanders complaining about their harsh treatment of the prisoners. It was supposed to be a penal battalion, but it looks like someone hand-picked the absolute worst psychopaths and criminally insane to try and build some kinda Dirty Dozen battalion. They committed atrocities that were downright Japanese. But they did them to Slavs so Hitler was like "lol" and hoped they'd be inspirational badasses.

When I started reading I was thinking "Man this article is POV, I wonder why nobody toned down the 'heinous bastards who were totally evil'-style language." but when I finished I was just thinking "this is why people who cosplay as the SS need to have their asses kicked". I do appreciate that when the war ended, the captured officers were either lynched or beaten to death by their own guards. Poland is still hunting these guys down.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


FuzzySkinner posted:

http://jalopnik.com/this-is-the-video-cnn-will-play-when-the-world-ends-1677511538

So were you ever curious what the last thing shown on earth would/or would have possibly been?

Here's your answer at least for CNN.

I do wonder if any other networks have stuff like this..and like what they're to do in the event of some sort of major diaster.

I think they took the video down unfortunately.

BurroughsBane
May 21, 2007

I mean to know before I go how come the devil smiles.

FuhrerHat posted:

The Hungerford Massacre is currently occupying a lot of my curiosity, largely because nobody to date has been able to discern a viable motive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungerford_massacre

In 1987, a recluse named Michael Ryan decides to use several rifles and a handgun to destroy as many people as humanly possible -- which turns out is a frighteningly high number. 17 people died, including the shooter, while 16 were wounded. Police were largely helpless as they lacked the weaponry to confront the firepower of the murderer, and despite the offer of a passing SAS Team, were unable or unwilling to neutralize the man until he had taken his own life.

"He refused to leave before knowing what happened to his mother, saying that her death was "a mistake". At 18:52, Ryan committed suicide by shooting himself in the head with the Beretta pistol. One of the statements Ryan made towards the end of the negotiations was widely reported: "Hungerford must be a bit of a mess. I wish I had stayed in bed.""

What makes this massacre unique in my mind is the absolute lack of appreciative motive, the events that seem to have spiraled completely out of control (the term FUBAR comes to mind), the fact he killed his own mother in his battle fury, and his sheer aptitude at killing. Reading the chronology of events reminds me heavily of that stupid Uwe Boll film about the guy who shoots up a whole town.

Humanity is disgusting without empathy.

If you haven't seen it yet, you should watch Southcliffe. It's on Netflix, and according to wikipedia, follows the events and personal repercussions of a mass shooting in the fictional town of Southcliffe, the events and location of which contain very strong similarities with the Hungerford massacre. It's pretty good and the acting alone is incredible moving.

Pharnakes
Aug 14, 2009

Kimmalah posted:

I think they took the video down unfortunately.

It wasn't anything very exciting, just a blurry clip of a band playing Nearer My God To Thee.

JacquelineDempsey
Aug 6, 2008

Women's Circuit Bender Union Local 34



Kimmalah posted:

I think they took the video down unfortunately.

AV Club still has it:
http://www.avclub.com/article/cnns-doomsday-video-leaks-internet-213449

Pharnakes posted:

It wasn't anything very exciting, just a blurry clip of a band playing Nearer My God To Thee.

And yeah, that. ^^^

Pipski
Apr 18, 2004

FuhrerHat posted:

The Hungerford Massacre is currently occupying a lot of my curiosity, largely because nobody to date has been able to discern a viable motive.

At the time, I remember various authorities blaming it on him playing some dungeons and dragons-type game. I think Star Trek was involved too. And horror films. Open and shut case.

Kurtofan
Feb 16, 2011

hon hon hon

"QUOTE,Quote", how moving.

Irisi
Feb 18, 2009

BurroughsBane posted:

If you haven't seen it yet, you should watch Southcliffe. It's on Netflix, and according to wikipedia, follows the events and personal repercussions of a mass shooting in the fictional town of Southcliffe, the events and location of which contain very strong similarities with the Hungerford massacre. It's pretty good and the acting alone is incredible moving.

I watch drat near anything fictional on TV without flinching, and I simply could not watch the scene where a father had to go to the morgue to identify the body of his teenage daughter. It was unbearably raw and horrible. It's really very good, in a desperately bleak way.

stickyfngrdboy
Oct 21, 2010
I wrote the top review on Netflix for Southcliffe, while drunk.

Crash Fistfight
Mar 29, 2007

First now I understood the true complexity of women.
Southcliffe is, indeed, good.

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
http://www.damninteresting.com/this-place-is-not-a-place-of-honor/

I don't know if it's already been posted, but it's interesting how the U.S. department of energy has to make sure that people of the future don't mistake nuclear waste disposal sites as anything but what they are.

Teach
Mar 28, 2008


Pillbug
It has been posted before, but not that article, thank you.

There are excerpts from the original report, as a PDF, HERE and it makes interesting reading. How do you tell people about the Mummy's Curse, way off in the future, when the language I'm typing in has only around like this, recognisable, for maybe 500 years? How do you make it look like "Stay Away! Danger!", and not "Stay Away! This Treasure Is Ours!"?

The North Tower
Aug 20, 2007

You should throw it in the ocean.

Teach posted:

It has been posted before, but not that article, thank you.

There are excerpts from the original report, as a PDF, HERE and it makes interesting reading. How do you tell people about the Mummy's Curse, way off in the future, when the language I'm typing in has only around like this, recognisable, for maybe 500 years? How do you make it look like "Stay Away! Danger!", and not "Stay Away! This Treasure Is Ours!"?

You show them one of these: https://www.google.com/search?q=goa...iw=1248&bih=764
And realize that goat.se isn't even on the front page. And cry. And be very sad.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


The North Tower posted:

You show them one of these: https://www.google.com/search?q=goa...iw=1248&bih=764
And realize that goat.se isn't even on the front page. And cry. And be very sad.

From what I remember of my archaeology classes in college, they'll probably just be like "Hmm, yes this gaping anus clearly had some ritualistic significance." If you don't know what the hell it is or what it means - just say it was used in a ritual.

The North Tower
Aug 20, 2007

You should throw it in the ocean.

Kimmalah posted:

From what I remember of my archaeology classes in college, they'll probably just be like "Hmm, yes this gaping anus clearly had some ritualistic significance." If you don't know what the hell it is or what it means - just say it was used in a ritual.

#gapinganuses WE WILL NEVER FORGET

The Mighty Moltres
Dec 21, 2012

Come! We must fly!


quote:

Another suggested leaving significant human remains above-ground at the site, to frighten off any who might stumble across it

This is exactly what I was going to say. If piles of skulls and skeletons impaled on pikes doesn't say "Do not enter, you will die," I don't know what will.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


The Endbringer posted:

This is exactly what I was going to say. If piles of skulls and skeletons impaled on pikes doesn't say "Do not enter, you will die," I don't know what will.

Or they'll just research the site in-depth like they do with ancient burials people find today. :shrug: Unfortunately I think it'll be really hard to overcome human curiosity. If they're lucky, even if people forget what the site was specifically used for there might still be a taboo surrounding the place that's passed down. Especially if the first few guys that went never came back or do but die of radiation sickness (which would probably seem like a mummy's curse if you didn't understand it).

Kimmalah has a new favorite as of 13:26 on Jan 8, 2015

pienipple
Mar 20, 2009

That's wrong!
Yeah piling up skeletons would be like catnip to archaeologists. "Look at all these bones we have to see wtf else is in there!"

Anything that attracts attention is going to cause more people to dig into it, not less. Either bury it super deep, cap the chamber with a shitload of concrete and as many ways we can say "danger radioactive as hell" and fill the rest in with stone and soil like nothing was ever there or shoot it into the sun.

Walton Simons
May 16, 2010

ELECTRONIC OLD MEN RUNNING THE WORLD
To steal from Oglaf: "Maybe it's so amazing, even dead people want to get in."

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


Maybe bury something semi-obvious and make it look like nothing else is there?

Freudian
Mar 23, 2011

KozmoNaut posted:

Maybe bury something semi-obvious and make it look like nothing else is there?

People are smart and curious enough to see through that and go "ooh I wonder what they wanted to hide? let's put all the stuff they buried on public exhibition" and then half the population of New New New New York shits their organs out.

Medieval Medic
Sep 8, 2011
Just booby trap the poo poo out of it with millions landmines. Even brain rotted desert apocalypse scavengers will eventually get the message when half their tribes has been turned to a fine red misty paste.

ReidRansom
Oct 25, 2004


Best thing to do is bury it deep in a remote and inhospitable place with no significant natural resources, leave no marker, and then just forget about it and hope for the best.

Or chuck it all into a subduction zone and let the Earth take care of it.

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.

ReidRansom posted:

Best thing to do is bury it deep in a remote and inhospitable place with no significant natural resources, leave no marker, and then just forget about it and hope for the best.

Or chuck it all into a subduction zone and let the Earth take care of it.

These are the real answers. Building anything will always make people curious.

Atmus
Mar 8, 2002
I say we go the other direction, and make it look really appealing. We keep good enough records so that the only way some bullshit other society is going to go poking around in that place is if our current society is destroyed. That new society is a bunch of creeps and they told me that they thought you had a stupid haircut, so gently caress em.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything
Hide the stuff behind a wall decorated with really ornate and beautiful art. Or porn.

Then no one's going to want to destroy it to see what's behind it.

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Ague Proof posted:

Hide the stuff behind a wall decorated with really ornate and beautiful art. Or porn.

Then no one's going to want to destroy it to see what's behind it.

The visigoths might like to have a word with you...

Lurkman
Nov 4, 2008

Ague Proof posted:

Hide the stuff behind a wall decorated with really ornate and beautiful art. Or porn.

Then no one's going to want to destroy it to see what's behind it.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Ok wait maybe he's onto something, if only assholes destroy priceless poo poo like that.

Taeke
Feb 2, 2010


Solice Kirsk posted:

These are the real answers. Building anything will always make people curious.

I agree. Put it somewhere hard enough to find where, if they do find it, it's because they already have sufficient knowledge/technology to know what they're dealing with.

Pharnakes
Aug 14, 2009
Just burying it as deeply is possible in a stable geological area and covering over seems the best way. Only way to find it would be a radiation sensor, and if you had that you'd presumably know not to go in. I'd imagine that's why burying it in a subduction zone is a bad idea, it would work eventually but before it goes under the chances are pretty good the chamber gets cracked open and contaminates the water table I'd imagine.

moller
Jan 10, 2007

Swan stole my music and framed me!
Just chiming in to say I still support the color-changing cats plan.

Atmus
Mar 8, 2002
Just dump it all into the Marianas trench. Who are you going to piss off? Aqua Man? Godzilla? Cthulhu? Those guys all suck, and it's Future humanity's problem anyway.

Literally Kermit
Mar 4, 2012
t

Wasabi the J posted:

Ok wait maybe he's onto something, if only assholes destroy priceless poo poo like that.

Yeah but they discovered 12 old caves after they dynamited, that had century old paintings.

Moral muddy at best.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GOTTA STAY FAI
Mar 24, 2005

~no glitter in the gutter~
~no twilight galaxy~
College Slice
Why not find the most desolate, uninhabitable shitbox of a place on the planet and just dump it there? Nobody willingly goes there anyway, and it's not like the people living in New Jersey will even notice the difference

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply