|
Spedman posted:Probably moving into Leica territory, where guys who shoot maybe one roll a year are obsessed with getting them CLA'd. I have a Leica and I beat the poo poo out of it. It's just gonna get cooler looking whocares. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrQBvUCENes
|
# ? Jan 6, 2015 05:39 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 18:58 |
|
deaders posted:No idea, this one seems good and it had just been posted across the country. I hope that it doesn't need adjustment too often but right now the closer focused shots at f4 seem accurate, and the stuff at f16 that I scale focused is very sharp as well. Just a word of warning, with rangefinders you're usually not really gonna notice if it's slightly off at mid-short distances. Like I said, my Mamiya initially was misaligned but the close-up shots looked fine enough. The shots shot at 4-5m (10-15feet) range were drastically off though. It makes sense if you think of it as rangefinder movement (the patch always moves the same distance) vs actual distance. Like the patch moves 1mm and you close focus then maybe that 1mm means like 10cm at most. But if you focus at 5m that 1mm rangefinder patch movement can suddenly mean almost a meter difference. Which is easily noticeable.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2015 10:04 |
|
4WD by rstop bstop, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 9, 2015 13:21 |
|
Prevelly After Sunset, January 2015 by Simon Deadman, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 02:27 |
|
Are there any notable landscape photographers/pools/galleries/whatever for people shooting with Mamiya 7s? I feel like the pools and tag searches on Flickr are really selling that system short, compared to other systems.
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 03:59 |
|
There are quite a few. https://www.flickr.com/photos/woutervandevoorde/ is one of the best on flickr in my opinion. https://www.flickr.com/photos/brianmcswain/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/35336382@N00/ Not strictly landscape but she has a really good eye and quite original approach https://www.flickr.com/photos/williamswishwellingtons/ Pretty sure he uses a Mamiya 7 as well
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 04:25 |
|
deaders posted:https://www.flickr.com/photos/woutervandevoorde/ is one of the best on flickr in my opinion.
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 05:08 |
|
Bukit Merah by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 11:08 |
|
deaders posted:There are quite a few. Oh, I wasn't doubting there was good stuff (especially the last one) - I think the rangefinder aspect lends itself to a more casual style compared to a Blad or something, so that's what I was seeing frequently. Thanks for the links, that's some good stuff. From the first link: https://flic.kr/p/nFG5dv luchadornado fucked around with this message at 16:53 on Jan 10, 2015 |
# ? Jan 10, 2015 16:43 |
|
Helicity posted:From the first link: Mad Max is a documentary
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 21:12 |
|
Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 10, 2015 21:48 |
|
pootiebigwang posted:Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr Face seems a bit hot, but otherwise I dig it.
|
# ? Jan 11, 2015 09:55 |
|
Derelict Refrigerator by zacharytong, on Flickr (Newton Rings ) Twin Trees by zacharytong, on Flickr Decaying Barn by zacharytong, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 12, 2015 02:54 |
|
The golden hour, or something. img762.jpg by spikemccue, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 13, 2015 00:22 |
|
pretty good "eye of the pumpkin monster" shot here
|
# ? Jan 13, 2015 17:56 |
|
Can anyone identify this? My girlfriend got it from her grandfather. Sorry for the poo poo photos. It's Graflex, but I don't know what it is exactly. IMG_8399 by nmb04f, on Flickr FullSizeRender-1 by nmb04f, on Flickr FullSizeRender by nmb04f, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 13, 2015 19:53 |
|
Ramms+ein posted:Can anyone identify this? My girlfriend got it from her grandfather. Sorry for the poo poo photos. It's Graflex, but I don't know what it is exactly. There's a button hidden under the leather along the top, should release the front (it drops down, and you pull the standard along the metal tracks). From the pictures it looks to me like a 4x5 Crown Graphic, would be written on the front standard once you open it though.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2015 19:58 |
|
|
# ? Jan 15, 2015 22:29 |
|
Did you do any layer masking on the window or is that just the usual P400 magic?
|
# ? Jan 15, 2015 22:52 |
|
I brought up the highlights in my curve to blow the window out a bit more as it was pretty distracting. Just Portra Things
|
# ? Jan 15, 2015 22:54 |
|
Bukit Merah by alkanphel, on Flickr Bukit Merah by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 16, 2015 00:11 |
|
Low rez scan from my Mamiya Press. _DSC7964 by Stingray of Doom, on Flickr that roll got chewed up by the plastic reel during development. Gotta clean those suckers and see if it helps.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2015 09:20 |
|
Putrid Grin posted:Low rez scan from my Mamiya Press. Wow I've had film pinched, bent and scratched but never torn... ... did you walrus that? If nothing helps you could do what I did and pop out those little metal ball bearings in the flange. I have to push in the film manually, but got quite good at it. Basically you hold the film between your fingers and unroll only a tiny bit and then push the roll and your fingers holding it towards the reel (slowly). The advantage is no more pinched or otherwise chewed up film, because now you will immediately notice resistance, also you can always take the film back out (again slowly!) if there are major problems. No more hosed up half-loaded rolls.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 00:52 |
|
How tricky are non-rangefinder folding cameras? I'm considering something like a Zeiss Ikonta / Ercona or Moskva to take with me on work trips, since my TLR is a bit bulky. I'm a bit worried that my distance estimating ability is poo poo, but maybe it's something you learn quickly? Or do you just stop down enough to give yourself a solid margin of error?
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 13:35 |
|
I've found them to be nothing but annoying TBH. I never really photograph what I was aiming to, as you can look through the view finder at a number of angles that feel right, but the resultant framing on the film is always off. A Fuji GS645 might be an option. Spedman fucked around with this message at 14:01 on Jan 17, 2015 |
# ? Jan 17, 2015 13:59 |
|
polyfractal posted:How tricky are non-rangefinder folding cameras? I'm considering something like a Zeiss Ikonta / Ercona or Moskva to take with me on work trips, since my TLR is a bit bulky. I'm a bit worried that my distance estimating ability is poo poo, but maybe it's something you learn quickly? Or do you just stop down enough to give yourself a solid margin of error? I have A Zeiss Ikonta 512 that I shoot regularly and honestly, it's a pain in the rear end. I use the fastest film I can get, close the aperture down and try to use hyperfocal distance as much as possible. You also shouldn't use colour film on them, since the lens are usually designed for black and white film and will have weird colour casting/fringing/whatever. Get a Yashica TLR, they're really loving small.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 14:49 |
|
Spedman posted:I've found them to be nothing but annoying TBH. I never really photograph what I was aiming to, as you can look through the view finder at a number of angles that feel right, but the resultant framing on the film is always off. Primo Itch posted:I have A Zeiss Ikonta 512 that I shoot regularly and honestly, it's a pain in the rear end. I use the fastest film I can get, close the aperture down and try to use hyperfocal distance as much as possible. You also shouldn't use colour film on them, since the lens are usually designed for black and white film and will have weird colour casting/fringing/whatever. Ah, well that's disappointing. Thanks for the tips, guess I'll pass on these (will take a look at that Fuji though). I have a Yashica Mat 124 and love it...was just hoping for something a bit slimmer that I can slide into a small day pack. And the 6x9 format is enticing if I want to take it hiking and do semi-panoramic landscapes.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 15:06 |
|
polyfractal posted:How tricky are non-rangefinder folding cameras? I'm considering something like a Zeiss Ikonta / Ercona or Moskva to take with me on work trips, since my TLR is a bit bulky. I'm a bit worried that my distance estimating ability is poo poo, but maybe it's something you learn quickly? Or do you just stop down enough to give yourself a solid margin of error? The Ikonta's with rangefinders aren't very much more, you can pick up a worn but functional 532 for ~$100 on the 'bay. You will be surprised at how heavy they are though.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 16:08 |
|
The obvious answer is a Fuji gf670
|
# ? Jan 17, 2015 22:27 |
|
Work in progress... Test-1 by Stingray of Doom, on Flickr I will get a proper scan of this guy once parts of my scanning rig come in, but I dig this even at this stage.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2015 07:10 |
|
Wild EEPROM posted:The obvious answer is a Fuji gf670 I have a GF670, alongside numerous other medium format cameras, and unless I have a specific reason to carry something else, I grab it. It's such a wonderful little machine and definitely worth the investment.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2015 19:08 |
|
More backlog b&w stuff Pipes II, Bukit Merah by alkanphel, on Flickr Pipes I, Bukit Merah by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
# ? Jan 18, 2015 23:50 |
|
polyfractal posted:Ah, well that's disappointing. Thanks for the tips, guess I'll pass on these (will take a look at that Fuji though). I have a Yashica Mat 124 and love it...was just hoping for something a bit slimmer that I can slide into a small day pack. And the 6x9 format is enticing if I want to take it hiking and do semi-panoramic landscapes. Counterpoint: give up on such bourgeoise concepts as "focus" and "sharpness" and get an old folder. They're great fun. Also, a quick google tells me B&H is currently out of stock of the Fuji GF670, but when they get more in they sell for $1750. A Moskva 5 is like $100 on eBay.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2015 06:53 |
|
Interesting, I saw on Reddit that someone just tried to 3D print a 4x5 camera: http://imgur.com/a/ojqlz A bit more info here: http://nikonowicz.tumblr.com/
|
# ? Jan 19, 2015 07:06 |
|
ExecuDork posted:Counterpoint: give up on such bourgeoise concepts as "focus" and "sharpness" and get an old folder. They're great fun. Or get a Super Ikonta 533/16 for like $200-300 (or a 532/16 for a bit less) and have all the sharpness and focus you need. When cleaned their rangefinder is better than my Fuji GW690's rangefinder. Which it has no right to be, but there you go - Both of these were shot wide open at f/2.8. Which is considered hella fast on MF anyway. https://flic.kr/p/qpKdKu https://flic.kr/p/qaBgj8
|
# ? Jan 19, 2015 07:11 |
|
ExecuDork posted:Counterpoint: give up on such bourgeoise concepts as "focus" and "sharpness" and get an old folder. They're great fun. Yeah you'll be a little surprised at how well they actually perform given the limitations. Just set it at hyperfocal and don't worry about it. The Agfa folder I got from Pompous Rhombus actually makes some pretty sharp images.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2015 17:16 |
|
Speaking of me, I've got my Hasselblad kit,
|
# ? Jan 22, 2015 01:51 |
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:Speaking of me, I've got my Hasselblad kit, I just bought that exact same Hasselblad kit essentially for quite a bit more. Suits me for not checking the Buy/Sell thread before I go nuts at KEH.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2015 03:59 |
|
I also have a MF kit in the Buy/Sell thread, if Pentax 67 is more your flavor.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2015 18:26 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 18:58 |
|
This series is a bit of a departure for me, shot with a Mat 124g on Tmax 100. I really like Tmax now, it is also amazing for portraits.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2015 08:40 |