|
That Hulkbuster vs Hulk fight is going to be the poo poo though.
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
Who is the black woman at about 33 secs in?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
Hakkesshu posted:Who is the black woman at about 33 secs in? Marvel bought back the rights to just Storm from Fox so they could make her Black Panther's wife obviously...
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
A few have suggested that she's Black Panther's sister.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:55
|
|
Oh, I see. All black people have to be related, right? 
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
I figured it might be Shuri, but it's strange how there haven't been any casting announcements and then they just drop it in such a weirdly edited trailer.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
It looks like there is a flashback to Black Widow's early days. And judging by that scene involved a syringe, could they be introducing that she's older than she looks?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
GLOSS posted:And here's the new Avengers 2 trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZoO8QVMxkk I'm as excited for Avengers 2 as anyone but this trailer really underwhelmed me. It felt like 2 minutes of nothing. Between this and the Ant Man trailer Marvel seems to be off their trailer-game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
mikeraskol posted:I'm as excited for Avengers 2 as anyone but this trailer really underwhelmed me. It felt like 2 minutes of nothing. Between this and the Ant Man trailer Marvel seems to be off their trailer-game. They're trying go ape the DARK and GRITTY stuff that DC obviously does better and it's not working.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
Haha I think Marvel knows how to market thier movies guys.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:43
|
|
|
Last I heard the Ant-Man trailer surpassed the Guardians trailer for total views, I'd say the trailers are fine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
Avengers 2 is going to destroy the MCU because Marvel can't make good movies like DC,.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:47
|
|
|
The reason the trailer isn't getting you pumped is because they're using the creepy pinocchio music again. Why are they still doing that? We get it. He's a real boy. You can put in some exciting music now to get me excited please.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Avengers 2 is going to destroy the MCU because Marvel can't make good movies like DC,. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
zoux posted:Haha I think Marvel knows how to market thier movies guys. No, marvel's empire is now crumbling because of two trailers 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
zoux posted:Haha I think Marvel knows how to market thier movies guys. No doubt. The last two trailers just felt kind of wonky to me compared to the trailers for everything else prior.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
mikeraskol posted:I'm as excited for Avengers 2 as anyone but this trailer really underwhelmed me. It felt like 2 minutes of nothing. Between this and the Ant Man trailer Marvel seems to be off their trailer-game. Agreed. Especially as it didn't show that much new stuff. I mean, Ultrons climbing up cliffs, Hulkbuster, Scarlet Witch blasting
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm kinda disappointed with the trailer. Really nothing new and it isn't as memorable as the first one with creepy Spader giving the "no strings on me" speech. But I do appreciate them not giving too much away since it's still 4 months out. But I really wanted to see a good shot of the Vision or something that would make this stand out. I'm sure I'll enjoy the movie regardless!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 06:19
|
|
|
I for one like that they're holding back a lot of this stuff. No one doubts that this will be a mega blockbuster and that we're gonna see some seriously crazy poo poo. I'd love to be surprised by characters showing up who aren't in the trailers. Plot twists too. Age of Ultron doesn't really NEED much advertising.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 08:14
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Yeah, I'm kinda disappointed with the trailer. Really nothing new and it isn't as memorable as the first one with creepy Spader giving the "no strings on me" speech. But I do appreciate them not giving too much away since it's still 4 months out. They should have had his "in the flesh" line be the one to punctuate the trailer imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 08:42
|
|
|
I dunno. The trailer seems exactly like the trailers for the first one. There's the opening 5 minute action scene, a lot of standing around arguing (they're not a team, they're a timebomb), a scene where Hulk gets brainwashed to attack the rest of the team and then the finale which will be a large CGI army fighting the Avengers but none of the CGI is ready so it's a lot of people looking off camera with some practical explosions around.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 10:12
|
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:The reason the trailer isn't getting you pumped is because they're using the creepy pinocchio music again. Why are they still doing that? We get it. He's a real boy. You can put in some exciting music now to get me excited please. Pretty much ANY music works better. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 10:58
|
|
|
I like the continued use of the pinocchio music, it makes a nice change to the generic action movie traier THOOM THOOM that's been popular since Inception.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 12:09
|
|
|
Starsnostars posted:I like the continued use of the pinocchio music, it makes a nice change to the generic action movie traier THOOM THOOM that's been popular since Inception. Yeah, me too. And it's actually thematically linked to the content of the movie, and it's a pretty recognizable song. People complaining about it are weird. achillesforever6 posted:It looks like there is a flashback to Black Widow's early days. And judging by that scene involved a syringe, could they be introducing that she's older than she looks? What, is she using Botox?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 12:42
|
|
|
My problem with the new Avengers 2 trailer is that its pretty much all the same material as the last trailer. Or at least different parts of the same scenes. If they aren't really prepared to show anything new why bother?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 13:15
|
|
|
Grendels Dad posted:What, is she using Botox?  But I meant if they are introducing the serum in the comics that was used on her to slow her aging
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:My problem with the new Avengers 2 trailer is that its pretty much all the same material as the last trailer. Or at least different parts of the same scenes. If they aren't really prepared to show anything new why bother?  Let's not forget that trailers are still commercials.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 15:30
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:It looks like there is a flashback to Black Widow's early days. And judging by that scene involved a syringe, could they be introducing that she's older than she looks? I get the impression that Wanda is messing with everyone's minds and giving them hosed up visions of their past or possible futures so there's no guarantee any of that stuff is real
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
zoux posted:
Just because something is popular doesn't mean people can't be unimpressed about it. Of course anything Marvel is going to be popular.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 16:31
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:Just because something is popular doesn't mean people can't be unimpressed about it. Of course anything Marvel is going to be popular. Not the comics!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 16:42
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:Just because something is popular doesn't mean people can't be unimpressed about it. Of course anything Marvel is going to be popular. he was answering the question "why even do it if you're not going to show new stuff". Because people will watch it and get hyped for your movie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 16:59
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:If they aren't really prepared to show anything new why bother? Waterhaul posted:Just because something is popular doesn't mean people can't be unimpressed about it. Of course anything Marvel is going to be popular. That was posted in response to someone saying "why bother releasing this if there isn't anything new to show" which to me is like asking, "why does McDonald's bother advertising their chicken sandwich? We all know they sell chicken sandwiches already". It wasn't saying "I'm unimpressed" "no but look at these views!" Even if some people were unimpressed, there are 50,000 thumbs up there and a lot of forwarding to friends/family on facebook. That's why Marvel did it, to keep it in the public eye, not to reveal all of the new scenes so nerds can stitch together the plot even further. It gets them a fresh round of buzz.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 17:01
|
|
|
Well yeah everybody knows that but there is the possibility of re-using the same stuff or cutting a bad trailer and people becoming disinterested in a film because of it. Like the main point is that regardless of the conversation everyone is smart enough to know that Marvel films are ridiculously popular right now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Well that's why they are cutting just a handful of trailers rather than one every week. There are certainly diminishing returns on trailers. I know we've pretty much guessed this but what's that around Andy Serkis' neck here hmmmmm? 
zoux fucked around with this message at 17:32 on Jan 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:Marvel. Does that mean they can use Punisher for the Netflix DD series? I'm hoping for a decent, fairly faithful adaptation of the Miller run (with Bullseye, Punisher, Kingpin, Elektra and leaving out the ninja bullshit) and then maybe a take on the Bendis/Brubaker runs if the series gets renewed. It'd be hard to do all that without Punisher though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:Does that mean they can use Punisher for the Netflix DD series? I'm hoping for a decent, fairly faithful adaptation of the Miller run (with Bullseye, Punisher, Kingpin, Elektra and leaving out the ninja bullshit) and then maybe a take on the Bendis/Brubaker runs if the series gets renewed. They can use Punisher for TV, I'd say we won't likely see him until the second seasons of the Netflix stuff though
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
I think a lot of it is going to depend on how well the Netflix shows do, but if they go gang busters then I'd expect Marvel to greenlight more street-level shows. And since I think every single Netflix series has gotten at least a second season, I think the odds are good that that will happen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
zoux posted:I think a lot of it is going to depend on how well the Netflix shows do, but if they go gang busters then I'd expect Marvel to greenlight more street-level shows. And since I think every single Netflix series has gotten at least a second season, I think the odds are good that that will happen. I didn't think those were meant to get second seasons, I thought they were basically miniseries with a potential crossover event movie at the end.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
theironjef posted:I didn't think those were meant to get second seasons, I thought they were basically miniseries with a potential crossover event movie at the end. You mean announced crossover movie at the end.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
theironjef posted:I didn't think those were meant to get second seasons, I thought they were basically miniseries with a potential crossover event movie at the end. Yeah I'm pretty sure they haven't confirmed any second seasons yet. Doesn't mean it can't happen later on if they're super successful I guess
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2015 20:13
|
|