|
i would like that but they dont use it at my job and yeah its annoying theyre redoing the whole thing wtf is that about
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 08:30 |
|
|
triple sulk posted:Enjoy relearning it when 2.0 comes out lol as retarded as 2.0 is going to be the changes totally make sense. it's just that once you make explicit all the moron magic going on behind the scenes in angular it becomes transparent how stupid and convoluted it is. oh and by the way the team is also working on a JS+ language (AtScript) which is a super set of TypeScript but I guess they are also at the same time coding everything in ES6 and cross compiling it to ES6. don't worry though you can totally just write your code in ES5 I'm sure it will be fine and not stupid and painful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:Right, but when you see that merge conflict, you tell the guy "rebase your branch" and then they have to fix it on their own and bring it to a mergeable point without loving up with trunk/master or anything and the final result isn't full of merge conflict resolutions when you get to review it. I started everyone out with "no resets!" and "no rebases" because, welp, people don't get what 'push' does, and history rewriting is a pain. Now that I've explained LOCAL resets are ok, I'm wondering about rebase or not. On the one hand I really want them to push often so we don't lose code, which has already happened! OTOH if they can rebase into a big ole squashed hunk-of-work, that's also sweet, and easier to revert just that commit versus a range of commits. Should I start expecting people to do a end of day rebase before a push or something?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
which javascript framework is the one that's totally rewritten every three months?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:34
|
|
|
angular
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:which javascript framework is the one that's totally rewritten every three months? all of them
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Is there some website I can forward to devs that are being introduced to real source control for the first time, "Explain like I'm 5" style? I really like this for explaining workflows in general but even the explanations on that page is too complex for some of these people.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:I started everyone out with "no resets!" and "no rebases" because, welp, people don't get what 'push' does, and history rewriting is a pain. Not really. If they're working fine as they are and you fear they'll gently caress it up, keep them doing good work that works.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
 quote:We are an entertainment company that has started an expansion into Video Games. We are seeking interns for our new department. Our goal is to create the next generation of video games. Do you have the right stuff to be a part of our team? we are making video game. you must have experience with every technology ever. also you must know linux, mac, and windows. no we won't pay you, if you want money gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 19:46
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:
 an intern that literally is doing all the work? nice business model.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:
every part of that is funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
The "If we pull this off, we'll eat like kings." edition of The Far Side comes to mind.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:
isn't this the startup business model? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:
nice dol violations
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
aw drat i have experience writing game engines that use Joomla, html, CSS, Java, networking, C#, C++, lsl, ossl, MySQL, OSX, Irrlicht, Panda 3D, PhysX, Windows server, Linux Ubuntu but not Ruby
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
the drama continues: now they've gone from "WE WANT TO HIRE YOU RIGHT NOW" to "oh sorry hiring freeze" to "hey uh are you still available for this position  " in the space of a month???quote:this place is run by clowns Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 22:14 on Jan 30, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
"toolsVersion: Selected MSBuild tools version is not supported by selected MSBuild version" gently caress why is this so hard
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 22:23
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:Right, but when you see that merge conflict, you tell the guy "rebase your branch" and then they have to fix it on their own and bring it to a mergeable point without loving up with trunk/master or anything and the final result isn't full of merge conflict resolutions when you get to review it. i prefer the continuous integration approach everyone works from the same branch and merges/commits frequently. if your commit breaks the build, a big red light turns on and then there's peer pressure to fix your poo poo your approach is more 1:1 -- i go find an offender on release day and tell him to go gently caress himself. that would work, but it's not how i like to get things done
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i prefer the continuous integration approach we have jenkins set up to run on all commits that get pushed up to the repository and if any of the builds break it sets a big red flag in the code review we also dont have as many tests of all kinds as id like, but they're coming
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
fritz posted:we have jenkins set up to run on all commits that get pushed up to the repository and if any of the builds break it sets a big red flag in the code review yeah naturally i have this now the problem is that of course the tests pass in your feature branch. issues arise when you actually go to merge back to the release branch. then things get sticky i would like use CI to create a social norm around merge-early merge-often, and pushing people away from feature branching is a step in that direction but oh well
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
i'm jealous of you guys that have ci setups and have a standardized development process every one is our projects are literally 3-5 month sprints with a team of 1 pm, 1 sr dev, and 1 jr dev. we might get a ba as well if we're unlucky
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
DaTroof posted:just put the joke in the answer to one of your questions. no one will ever see it again 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:3-5 month sprints hm
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:3-5 month sprints these are called "marathons"
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:I started everyone out with "no resets!" and "no rebases" because, welp, people don't get what 'push' does, and history rewriting is a pain. when i am working on a feature branch i rebase it down to one commit and then just cherry-pick it into master i probably shouldnt be doing that
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:when i am working on a feature branch i rebase it down to one commit and then just cherry-pick it into master why would you do this
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:why would you do this people i work with like to do a squash merge, but i'm not sure why and i've never bothered to ask
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:3-5 month sprints snorted derisively irl
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
I think it's because reverting a range, even if it includes HEAD, is just hard, and a big squashed commit is more easier.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
rotor posted:snorted derisively irl Whilst snorting I
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
trap sprung on all these agile fools but seriously, i was talking about 1 shot projects that run for 3-5 months and then end no time or staff to build any kind of appreciable infrastructure even though it would help all of our projects down the line. also, can't do anything that's not project related because god forbid we're not billable to a client.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:07
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:trap sprung on all these agile fools Update your resume.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:56
|
|
|
yeah i should unfortunately i'm a bit of a polyglot programmer without much specialization. i've written decent software in p much every major language out there but i can't write much code without access to documentation. i think i'm gonna start really diving into c# or java. probably c#. what do you guys think?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
You're significantly more qualified than you think you are, go apply for something
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:39
|
|
|
c# and java are only worth using if you want the best tools, languages, frameworks, and the most money.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:40
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i think i'm gonna start really diving into c# or java. probably c#. what do you guys think? both are good choices. go c# if you only want to work on windows, java if you want to do linux stuff as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
oh yeah, i've also been spoiled like gently caress by the "mission" of my current company all the postings i see out there are for creating tooling for marketing platforms and it disgusts me i wrote software that directs malaria spraying efforts in africa. the code i've written has literally saved lives. i don't want to work for a company that exists to make advertising easier
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:42
|
|
|
also what are good resources for learning advanced concepts in either c# or java? stuff that's really specific to either of the languages
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:c# and java are only worth using if you want the best tools, languages, frameworks, and the most money. This but only c#
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 08:30 |
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:also what are good resources for learning advanced concepts in either c# or java? stuff that's really specific to either of the languages 'clr via c#'
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:51
|
|
