|
That's weird, he's leaving out some pretty major ones. I can't imagine why. . .
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:09
|
|
2
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:58 |
|
|
Hmm where did Muir copy that last face from?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:15
|
|
1
|
FishBulb posted:It's all symbolic dumb nonsense to pander No it's n-oh, right. The right's sense of victimization is so thick it can be cut with a knife.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
frajaq posted:Hmm where did Muir copy that last face from? Google'd "Shouting woman."  First page of results. Odd choice on Muir's part to steal the whole fuckin' pose, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
Pander posted:The right's sense of victimization is so thick it can be cut with a knife. Wow direct death threats against an ideology just because they're more correct then you? You are one sick puppy you lefty-loon you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Mo_Steel posted:I'll let Neil handle this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQlHaGhYoF0
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:35
|
|
|
Waifu: I'm talking about your elderly father Zed: I'm talking about your sister Both: Let's make out!
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
The GOP is indeed a greater threat to our freedom, democracy and our way of life than any of the others. AGC.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
THAT'S A PENIS
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 05:23
|
|
10
|
I tried guys but I haven't done anything serious in photoshop in years:
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 05:38
|
|
|
Duckbag posted:Horsey and Villaraigosa are both LA Democrats. LA Dems have a huge chip on their shoulder (but it's nothing compared to what we have down in San Diego). Boxer and Feinstein both came out of the Bay Area and have been in office for ages. Los Angeles is the largest city in the state, it's solidly Democratic, and Villaraigosa was its popular mayor. Harris (who I like a lot), is a popular progressive Attorney General, but she would also be yet another Bay Area Democrat and a lot of people in Southern California feel like maybe we should get a turn. There's not much chance of a Republican beating either Democrat, so these kinds of regional shooting matches can take place freely without the party having to worry about picking someone "unelectable." Cpt.Americant posted:Basically any Dem would win in California, infighting or not. Only a very freak bad Dem/moderate Rep combination would have a chance. But Southern California is 60% of the state's population, if it were it's own state it would be second only to Texas in population. Its demographics and politics are different from the Bay Area, and yet the Bay Area has had both of California's Senators now for a generation. LA is the population center, it's very strongly Democratic, so it's certainly reasonable that it would be upset that the party would go with yet another Bay Area democrat than someone from Southern California. Interesting, didn't know that at all. Yea in that context I can see how a guy from south California would be a little bitter about the state party seeming to brush their guy aside if he's perfectly good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 05:47
|
|
|
Okay so the heroes of the story that we're supposed love are the ones whose first concern after jumping to the conclusion that their dad might be going on a date is who gets his stuff. Right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 05:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:01
|
|
|
I'm betting at least two more "National Conversation" comics.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:I'm betting at least two more "National Conversation" comics.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
HisMajestyBOB posted:The GOP is indeed a greater threat to our freedom, democracy and our way of life than any of the others. AGC. I mean, it wasn't any of those other guys who attempted to destroy the entire loving economy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
   'Political Cannibalism' 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:17
|
|
|
Wasn't Tinsley doing one of his dumb countdowns for New Years or whatever? I swear he was on like #17 when he dropped it out of nowhere. Never thought I'd say it, but I wish he'd go back to those awful rhymes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:18
|
|
|
I'm beginning to think that Mallard Fillmore is consistently the worst cartoon posted. I've begun to dread seeing whatever stupid stuff he says more than whatever Branco or the McCoys post.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 06:33
|
|
|
Mallard Fillmore is so awful that my mother gets angry seeing it in the paper, and she only opens the funnies for Pearls Before Swine and Zits.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:34
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Interesting, didn't know that at all. Yea in that context I can see how a guy from south California would be a little bitter about the state party seeming to brush their guy aside if he's perfectly good. IIRC, the LA mayor guy is hella corrupt. That might have something to do with the party bosses picking Harris too Rygar201 fucked around with this message at 07:45 on Jan 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:39
|
|
|
I was trying to google search and find when that article was published. I ended up just looking up the date of India's first nuclear test since the article is before that. May 18, 1974 quote:India first tested a nuclear device in 1974 (code-named "Smiling Buddha"), which it called a "peaceful nuclear explosion."
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:43
|
|
|
Utterly horrific.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
Post 9-11 User posted:Utterly horrific. Is that the blow-up-doll waifu edit? Post the original comic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 07:59
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:Meanwhile, Stantis and Allie keep ranting about their self-censored cartoons being censored. This only makes me appreciate any editor who would willingly run this to support some rear end in a top hat's freedom of speech of making GBS threads on them. Tengames fucked around with this message at 08:24 on Jan 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 08:21
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:I'm betting at least two more "National Conversation" comics. I vote for at least 3 with 4-5 definitely being possible
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 08:24
|
|
|
Ralepozozaxe posted:I'm beginning to think that Mallard Fillmore is consistently the worst cartoon posted. I've begun to dread seeing whatever stupid stuff he says more than whatever Branco or the McCoys post. I'd say DbD is the worst regularly posted cartoon in this thread if we take it solely on its own merits (or lack thereof). It's just outright bad art (Tinsley can actually draw if he can sober up and be bothered to do so), even nuttier/worse talking points than Drinky Duck, etc. etc. But once you factor in the fact that Mallard Fillmore is actually printed across the country in the papers, in the funny pages no less, then suddenly Drinky Duck jumps ahead in the "worst serial regularly posted in this thread" category.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 08:25
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Interesting, didn't know that at all. Yea in that context I can see how a guy from south California would be a little bitter about the state party seeming to brush their guy aside if he's perfectly good. The difference is that SoCal is an enormous cancerous suburb that drains all the water from the rest of California, whereas the Bay Area is cool & good. Er, except Hunter's Point. Hunter's Point is not good. Still cool, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 08:33
|
|
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:The difference is that SoCal is an enormous cancerous suburb that drains all the water from the rest of California, whereas the Bay Area is cool & good. Yes, Silicon Valley, famous for having no suburban development at all. But either way, is your argument that the 8 million in the Bay Area get all the Senators while the 22 million in Southern California get none for decades? Because of water? Because you don't find LA as cool all those cool San Francisco hipsters?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 09:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 09:35
|
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:Yes, Silicon Valley, famous for having no suburban development at all. But either way, is your argument that the 8 million in the Bay Area get all the Senators while the 22 million in Southern California get none for decades? Because of water? Because you don't find LA as cool all those cool San Francisco hipsters? SoCal really isn't that great and it's not just a dumb LA vs. SF issue. SoCal is much more of a conservative hellhole desert than NorCal is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 09:53
|
|
|
All goons should watch this
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 10:20
|
|
|
Portals posted:SoCal really isn't that great and it's not just a dumb LA vs. SF issue. SoCal is much more of a conservative hellhole desert than NorCal is. But again, just because SoCal's "not that great" they shouldn't be a little pissed when the Dems ignore them? This isn't a home turf thing, I'm not even from California, but I can see why this would be really annoying. Numerically they are a majority of the state and two and a half times the population of bay area, but for 24 years the Bay Area has dominated national level politics. Now for the first time in a generation California is getting a new senator and the party is trying to push a bay area replacement, can you not see why they would be pissed? Like, taking apart weather it's a justified reaction or not, just put yourself in the shoes of a liberal in LA. That's where the cartoon was coming from and it's a legitimate thing to complain about from that perspective.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 10:42
|
|
|
Grapplejack posted:That's weird, he's leaving out some pretty major ones. I can't imagine why. . . Because he's an incompetent hack. Also, the Taliban were first considered to be insurgents during the Russia-Afghanistan War, when they were heavily armed by the US. I wonder who was President between 1981 and 1989? I really can't recall.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 10:52
|
|
|
Rygar201 posted:IIRC, the LA mayor guy is hella corrupt. That might have something to do with the party bosses picking Harris too Do you have any evidence at all for this? Or are you just going to poo poo all over a guy because of something you think you might have heard? You see, there's a service on the world wide internet superhighway known as "google" that allows you to "search" for "terms" such as "Villaraigosa" and "corruption." With this incredible tool, you can actually confirm your vague recollections of wrongdoing and provide the sort of sources that would make you seem credible. You didn't bother, but I went ahead and performed said search and found nothing but rumor and innuendo. I'm not in the tank for Villaraigosa by any means. Hell, if the election were tomorrow, I'd almost certainly vote for Harris, but I still have a problem with you casually slandering him. If you can point to real evidence of wrongdoing -- as opposed to, say, some poo poo on Breitbart -- I'll retract my criticism and offer a full apology. Otherwise, shut the gently caress up when grown folks is talking.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 11:14
|
|
|
Duckbag posted:Do you have any evidence at all for this? Or are you just going to poo poo all over a guy because of something you think you might have heard? You see, there's a service on the world wide internet superhighway known as "google" that allows you to "search" for "terms" such as "Villaraigosa" and "corruption." With this incredible tool, you can actually confirm your vague recollections of wrongdoing and provide the sort of sources that would make you seem credible. You didn't bother, but I went ahead and performed said search and found nothing but rumor and innuendo. You can also do that same search. There was an ethics investigation of him back in 2010, he accepted tickets as gifts without reporting all of them. He paid the fines for doing so. Don't know if that counts as "hella corrupt," but it's not nothing either.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
Duckbag posted:Do you have any evidence at all for this? Or are you just going to poo poo all over a guy because of something you think you might have heard? You see, there's a service on the world wide internet superhighway known as "google" that allows you to "search" for "terms" such as "Villaraigosa" and "corruption." With this incredible tool, you can actually confirm your vague recollections of wrongdoing and provide the sort of sources that would make you seem credible. You didn't bother, but I went ahead and performed said search and found nothing but rumor and innuendo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 13:17
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Because he's an incompetent hack. My heart tells me that it was a Democrat...
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 14:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:58 |
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:But again, just because SoCal's "not that great" they shouldn't be a little pissed when the Dems ignore them? This isn't a home turf thing, I'm not even from California, but I can see why this would be really annoying. Numerically they are a majority of the state and two and a half times the population of bay area, but for 24 years the Bay Area has dominated national level politics. Now for the first time in a generation California is getting a new senator and the party is trying to push a bay area replacement, can you not see why they would be pissed? I'd tell them to harden the gently caress up and field better candidates next time. It's not so much turf war as personal experience, I was born and spent my first eleven years trapped behind the Orange Curtain. Luckily we moved up north, and things stopped being so horrible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2015 15:41
|
|