|
I guess this settles the discussion about Bobby Jindal wanting to just be white. gently caress that dude, he knows his constituents hate him the browner he looks like. That must hurt to pretend being white.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 04:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 16:28 |
|
You guys may want to ease up on the "Bobby Jindal wishes he was white" thing, right-wingers love to hear pinkos reveal their true colors.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:10 |
|
I love how righties refer to Obama as "Barry" as though the name were some devious device Obama once used to disguise his un-American roots... but Piyush Jindal calling himself "Bobby" ain't no thing.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:12 |
|
My relative still thinks that people can actually learn from watching Fox.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:31 |
|
That portrait also makes him not look like an alcoholic crypt beast that, for centuries, has roamed Louisiana feasting on the souls of children below the poverty line.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:32 |
|
Why are his teeth the same colour as his skin? Why does his left hand look as if it small and shrivelled? Why do the legs and feet look like the were paint by some who really hates painting legs and feet? Thats is a super bad painting no matter what way you look at it. And he seen it and said "Wow thanks , hang it up". What in the gently caress?
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:43 |
|
SedanChair posted:You guys may want to ease up on the "Bobby Jindal wishes he was white" thing, right-wingers love to hear pinkos reveal their true colors. A pinko is a red who wishes he was white.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:58 |
|
Chimera-gui posted:My relative still thinks that people can actually learn from watching Fox. You can; just not about anything they're reporting on.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 05:59 |
CommieGIR posted:So remember that trip Israel the RNC is taking courtesy of the American Family Association? From Ben Franklin's auto biography. And it being found inconvenient to assemble in the open air, subject to its inclemencies, the building of a house to meet in was no sooner proposed, and persons appointed to receive contributions, but sufficient sums were soon received to procure the ground and erect the building, which was one hundred feet long and seventy board, about the size of Westminster Hall; and the work was carried on with such spirit as to be finished in a much shorter time than could have been expected. Both house and ground were vested and in trustees, expressly for the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who might desire to say something to the people at Philadelphia; the design in building not being to accommodate any particular sect, but the inhabitants in general; so that even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service.
|
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 06:20 |
|
Armyman25 posted:From Ben Franklin's auto biography. Wow those sneaky browns planted sleeper cells pretty drat early huh.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 06:22 |
|
CommieGIR posted:
He has no mouth. He has lips, but they open to more skin instead of teeth. Why doesn't he have a mouth? Look at it. On a human that would be an open toothed smile, but he just has more marzipan colored skin. No teeth, no tongue, no mouth, just flesh.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 06:28 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:Debate & Discussion: We tortured some folks > Right Wing Media: No teeth, no tongue, no mouth, just flesh.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 06:30 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:He has no mouth. He has lips, but they open to more skin instead of teeth. Why doesn't he have a mouth? Look at it. On a human that would be an open toothed smile, but he just has more marzipan colored skin. No teeth, no tongue, no mouth, just flesh. This sounds like something out of Lovecraft.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 06:34 |
|
I was thinking more like Jake the Dog from Adventure Time taking the shape of someone else.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 07:05 |
|
The thing that gets me most about that portrait is that going off of the outline around his left leg, he seems to be casting two completely unrelated shadows, or has some kind of aura of power radiating off of him.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 07:46 |
|
DrProsek posted:The thing that gets me most about that portrait is that going off of the outline around his left leg, he seems to be casting two completely unrelated shadows, or has some kind of aura of power radiating off of him. I'm convinced that it's a page from the official Bobby Jindal sticker book.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 07:56 |
|
So what we've learned today is that Bobby Jindal is the Michael Jackson of American politics. And he likes to play pocket pool.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 07:58 |
|
CommieGIR posted:
This HAS to be satire. ...right?
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 08:52 |
|
Hmm...maybe; but he could use more pancakes on his head.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 08:55 |
|
Back to Orwell and his thoughts on language - his essay was clearly meant to be read while it was contemporary. Even so, I have had countless English teachers tell my class that the passive voice is terrible and must be avoided at all costs. By that reasoning Spanish is superior. La novela se escribió en 1949. The novel wrote itself in 1949 (understood to mean the novel was written in 1949 and the focus of this sentence is not on whoever committed the act of writing the novel.) clearly, however it is phrased, it is necessary to have some way of discussing the recipients of actions without discussing the actor. Instead of teaching kids that passive is evil, cut to the chase and tell them to put the most important item in the sentence last (unless they are writing a lede or something.) Orwell is another example of how reactionaries have a "if you can't beat em, make them one of us" policy. Like MLK, Hellen Keller, and others, the ship has sailed on vilifying Orwell for his politics, so now they pretend the politics they didn't like don't exist. I also have conniptions if anyone tells me not to end a sentence with a preposition. It's a crime we don't teach native English speakers what phrasal verbs are. All right lads and ladies, carry on! dear nitpicky high school teachers: carry on is a phrasal verb meaning "continue"
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 09:00 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:He has no mouth. He has lips, but they open to more skin instead of teeth. Why doesn't he have a mouth? Look at it. On a human that would be an open toothed smile, but he just has more marzipan colored skin. No teeth, no tongue, no mouth, just flesh. those are supposed to be his lips I think. same shade of white as the rest of his skin
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 12:44 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:He has no mouth. He has lips, but they open to more skin instead of teeth. Why doesn't he have a mouth? Look at it. On a human that would be an open toothed smile, but he just has more marzipan colored skin. No teeth, no tongue, no mouth, just flesh. Right Wing Media: I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream Intellectually Dishonest Dogwhistle Racist Things
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 12:55 |
|
Cognac McCarthy posted:Right Wing Media: I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream Intellectually Dishonest Dogwhistle Racist Things I Have No Mouth And I Must Eat Mor Chikin
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 13:20 |
|
Where does the straw for his Big Gulp go?
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:06 |
|
DrProsek posted:The thing that gets me most about that portrait is that going off of the outline around his left leg, he seems to be casting two completely unrelated shadows, or has some kind of aura of power radiating off of him. There is a sharp outline going around his entire form, so I think that was intentional. It's a lovely photo of a painting taken at a slight angle, and it's hard to see any real details in it. Paintings always look a lot different in person. Sometimes a lovely photo from a digital camera will make a painting look dramatically different.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:19 |
|
robotsinmyhead posted:Where does the straw for his Big Gulp go? The same place the desperate pleas to god to spare this country from the gaypocalypse come from.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:20 |
|
DrProsek posted:The thing that gets me most about that portrait is that going off of the outline around his left leg, he seems to be casting two completely unrelated shadows, or has some kind of aura of power radiating off of him. This is a painting of a photograph, so the painting shows not only the natural scene lighting, but that of the camera flash as well.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:43 |
|
So we're seeing a photograph of a painting of a photograph. Jindalception.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:53 |
|
CommieGIR posted:The same place the desperate pleas to god to spare this country from the gaypocalypse come from. Not in MY annus.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 16:53 |
|
Xibanya posted:Back to Orwell and his thoughts on language - his essay was clearly meant to be read while it was contemporary. Even so, I have had countless English teachers tell my class that the passive voice is terrible and must be avoided at all costs. By that reasoning Spanish is superior. La novela se escribió en 1949. The novel wrote itself in 1949 (understood to mean the novel was written in 1949 and the focus of this sentence is not on whoever committed the act of writing the novel.) clearly, however it is phrased, it is necessary to have some way of discussing the recipients of actions without discussing the actor. Instead of teaching kids that passive is evil, cut to the chase and tell them to put the most important item in the sentence last (unless they are writing a lede or something.) Fox did a thing where they pointed out MLK voted republican or some nonsense like that, right?
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:03 |
|
Kenzie posted:There is a sharp outline going around his entire form, so I think that was intentional. Someone correct it for his actual skin color then, I want to see just how dark the painting becomes.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:20 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Fox did a thing where they pointed out MLK voted republican or some nonsense like that, right? It's not 'some thing', it's a core component of the modern conservative ideology. Just by societal osmosis they know they can't be monstrous enough to outright oppose people like MLK even if they don't truly understand why, so they just tell themselves and others that actually he was one of them and studiously ignore reality
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:21 |
|
CommieGIR posted:
The worst part is brown shoes with a black suit
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:25 |
|
Mister Macys posted:
Actually it's just good ol' Jindal just using his superpowers to further blend in with that wall there.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:52 |
|
gallup CEO jim clifton makin comments about the unemployment rate being a big lie and now all the right wing places are feeding off that despite using the same statistics 3+ years ago to hammer the white house.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 17:54 |
|
Mercury_Storm posted:Actually it's just good ol' Jindal just using his superpowers to further blend in with that wall there. I want to make a Dorian Gray joke with this, but I lack the comedic talent.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 18:00 |
|
CommieGIR posted:
I like how the "artist" forgot to not paint the shadow caused by the camera flash
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 18:03 |
|
Mister Macys posted:I want to make a Dorian Gray joke with this, but I lack the comedic talent. It wouldn't work, he wants himself to get whiter, not the picture
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 18:28 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Fox did a thing where they pointed out MLK voted republican or some nonsense like that, right? Oh yes, they constantly love pointing out the one time MLK voted GOP or whatever. Never mind he was a solid leftist by the time he was assassinated and would probably be vilified and hated by Fox and company just as much as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton if he had survived to the current day. In fact, didn't the right go with the "card-carrying communist/adulterer/race baiter" image of MLK up until the Reagan era or so? I'll still hear the occasional right-winger trot that out when they're pretending to be edgy and knowledgeable but are in fact just being racist.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 18:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 16:28 |
|
IIRC, that view of MLK by the right lasted well into the 90's. The whole "He was one of the good ones" is pretty recent. Even in the mid 90's Virginia had Lee/Jackson/King Day. Look who's at the back of the bus in that trio....
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 18:46 |