|
Dr. Gitmo Moneyson posted:Seriously, though, I think dogcrash truther is asking whether there is such a thing as bugchaser porn. pentyne posted:Absolutely not. Just from a health and safety standpoint there's no way in hell any company could get a license/permit to do that in the US. I wouldn't be shocked by porn where they pretend to have an STD for the fantasy but I've never heard of anything like that. Apparently there is. I agree that it's probably not real from a liability standpoint, but apparently it's a real kink in the community.
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
IndianaZoidberg posted:I have often wondered about locations where porn it filmed. I do know that there are people in LA that will rent there home to have porn filmed it, or just have homes that are just for shooting in and they rake in the profit. (There is one very distinctive home that I have seen SOO many times in videos) What does the contract for something like this look like? I assume that there are clauses in it that when filming is done a very thorough job of cleaning. It's a bit easier then most perceive. The same agents that represent locations for mainstream also rent them for adult. There are other factors that go into it, but that is the basic overview of it. There are some locations that have been used very often. Some producers specifically buy houses with the goal of shooting in them. There isn't some crazy iron clad contract. Don't destroy or ruin anything. If you do, then pay for it. The extreme locations, ie estates that are in the 10 or 20 million range will probably have more rules and may require production insurance. If your a small production it is actually far easier to get nice locations, as you don't really do much. While the crew puts everything back in order and cleans up, in the end it is up to the location owner to keep on top of their property. The well managed properties keep their places extremely clean. Others don't. There is this myth that after shooting everything is just completely wrecked. It isn't true. Many clubs offer their locations for rental to mainstream, some in turn will allow adult production. Any time filming happens, the location is shut down. Anyone in the background is a paid extra, as they have to provide an ID and sign a release.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2015 20:24
|
|
is a pro of some sort with medical tests and age verification, so nothing spontaneity.
|
darkpriest posted:Culture. Kinda related to this, is Kenny Styles still in the industry? He seemed to be the only Asian dude who was doing higher end flicks for a while?
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
red19fire posted:Apparently there is. I agree that it's probably not real from a liability standpoint, but apparently it's a real kink in the community. Wait...... so HIV is an important staple of gay culture now? This interview made my brain hurt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
Ever work with Steve Holmes? I was disappointed to find out he wasn't doing scenes anymore, I can't get enough of his cock.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2015 07:09
|
|
|
darkpriest posted:If your a small production it is actually far easier to get nice locations, as you don't really do much. Except for getting body fluids on furniture. How profitable is porn now? I can't imagine your traditional blonde bombshell and tanned, roided up dudebro porn is doing so well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
GiveUpNed posted:Except for getting body fluids on furniture. How profitable is porn now? I can't imagine your traditional blonde bombshell and tanned, roided up dudebro porn is doing so well. It's all about teens next door, Curvy Milfs, and James Deen nowadays.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 07:37
|
|
|
With the prevalence of tube sites and torrents, I find it hard to imagine porn doing well. Isn't the cost of talent kinda low anyways? At like $1000USD per scene or something? Like here in Singapore when porn is illegal? Do porn producer instead switch to making money from ads in those countries?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
jerichojx posted:With the prevalence of tube sites and torrents, I find it hard to imagine porn doing well. Isn't the cost of talent kinda low anyways? At like $1000USD per scene or something? I think the $1000 is a day rate, not a 'per scene' rate.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2015 16:50
|
|
|
Apparently Madison Ivy was in a pretty serious car accident. She had to have some major operations.That really sucks.
metachronos fucked around with this message at 22:51 on Feb 9, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
jerichojx posted:With the prevalence of tube sites and torrents, I find it hard to imagine porn doing well. Isn't the cost of talent kinda low anyways? At like $1000USD per scene or something? I've seen number that's say porn is really suffering outside of the fetish stuff which tends to be very controlled.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
Professor Shark posted:Speaking of distasteful porn, Team Skeet (I think it's them...) have a new site that has Border Patrols having sex with Mexican border crossers. It's pretty messed up. hmmmm.....
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2015 09:10
|
|
|
/\/\/\/\ Look, we've all fantasized about an X-rated My Fair Lady, there's no shame in it. Is it too much to ask for 50's or 60's-style hotties like Audrey Hepburn pretending to be whatever time period My Fair Lady takes place in? Early 1900's? But also a porno. Yes, apparently. I don't know what my fetish is, but just like obscenity, I know it when I see it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2015 16:54
|
|
|
CAPT. Rainbowbeard posted:/\/\/\/\ Look, we've all fantasized about an X-rated My Fair Lady, there's no shame in it. try http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0189774/ It's from the 80's and has a fun title so.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
Has there been a porno about the life of Jesus yet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2015 04:57
|
|
|
The Last Temptation of Christ was pretty close.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2015 13:28
|
|
|
sbaldrick posted:I can guess the reason but it's super loving racist. Finding physical traits common to a particular race attractive or unattractive is not racism.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Never mind, that's dumb as hell
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
Rygar201 posted:Proceed Those black chicks and their big butts, amirite?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
Arch Stanton posted:Finding physical traits common to a particular race attractive or unattractive is not racism. That sounds like something a racist would say. The hounds have been released. Stay where you are. \/\/\/\/ preach it sibling! CAPT. Rainbowbeard fucked around with this message at 21:49 on Feb 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2015 21:26
|
|
|
If presented with two people, finding one of them attractive and not the other is literally rape. Vice versa, finding the OTHER one attractive is literally racism.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
Darkpriest, Or anyone. One of my old favorite performers was / is "Krystina King" aka "Suzie St. James" She performed from 1989 to 1993 (I think) I have googled and looked for her movies but when I find them there are never any seeders. Anyone know how I can download Kristina Kings movies? Thanks in advance. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 08:24
|
|
|
Positive Optimyst posted:Darkpriest, Are you asking the adult movie producer, director and actor, who makes his living off his films, what the best torrent site for adult movies is?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 09:33
|
|
|
Positive Optimyst posted:
usually you right click on the link and there's a "save as" command in the contextual menu, hth
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 15:01
|
|
|
Positive Optimyst posted:Darkpriest, I think the answer is you go buy them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:I think the answer is you go buy them. Where does one buy niche/specific movies for a reasonable price?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 17:39
|
|
|
CAPT. Rainbowbeard posted:Where does one buy niche/specific movies for a reasonable price? I'll freely admit that I didn't have a clue where I might, but I googled her name and the first link was an IMDB style page for porn that if you click any of the titles in her discography it links to places it can be purchased on demand. http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=kking/gender=f/kristina-king.htm  obviously.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
Arch Stanton posted:Finding physical traits common to a particular race attractive or unattractive is not racism. Except he never said anything even remotely related to that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
So what's so cool about Christina King?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
Dillbag posted:Have the recent condom laws affected the way you shoot? I.e. are you shooting with condoms now or have you been forced to relocate to shoot without condoms? If so, has it negatively affected your business? I left LA County before the condom law went into effect. Measure B has yet to be enforced. The County doesn't seem interested in dealing with it. They didn't even defend the law in court, instead an outside organization that was behind the condom law were the ones who defended it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
Kaal posted:Honestly, it's pretty likely that the judge would be all too happy to throw down that kind of court order if a woman asked for it. The men wouldn't have to pay for the testing (unless they were the father), but they'd probably be obligated to do it. It'd be pretty tough to argue that they weren't eligible to be tested when the judge would have photographic proof that sex occurred, complete with documents establishing the time and date. It'd all be done for the good of the child, and the privacy rights and professional expectations of the sex partners would play second fiddle. There is theory and then there's reality. How is the court going to find her partner? 90% of the time, performers don't know each other's real names. On top of that the industry has greatly spread out. Performers travel to shoot today more than ever shooting in LA, Las Vegas, San Fran and Florida. The court would have to track down all of the performers real names, where they live and if they don't live in state, compel them to take a blood test. That isn't going to happen. Considering they have been unable to enforce the condom law only reinforces that. The industry has been around for 30 plus years and nothing like that has even remotely occurred.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
Landsknecht posted:How is budget/financing in the industry (or for you at least) taken care of? I know you've said you're an independent contractor, so are you just hired on a costs+materials or flat fee contract, and then you do your thing, or do you go to studios with proposals for certain films/scenes and then work out complete arrangements? Are there certain funds or financial institutions which fund productions for the industry? Or do production companies front all the capital for their own stuff? The production companies fund the specific content they want through freelance producers. The majority of production companies do not have in house crews. This way, they avoid any legal issues and the individual producer is liable. The production company tends to build a relationship with specific freelance producers. This way they know they are getting the content they specifically are requesting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
pentyne posted:This is something I'd love to hear about in detail, or at least be pointed to a site that explains it. The Japanese scenes you mentioned are staged. Those are extras. JAV companies come here to the US and sometimes create that content here. They will rent a bus and hire extras to achieve the same look.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Shadowhand00 posted:Kinda related to this, is Kenny Styles still in the industry? He seemed to be the only Asian dude who was doing higher end flicks for a while? He seems to float in and out. He is not very active these days.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:39
|
|
|
darkpriest posted:The Japanese scenes you mentioned are staged. Those are extras. JAV companies come here to the US and sometimes create that content here. They will rent a bus and hire extras to achieve the same look. Do they bring their own crew or hire locals?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
darkpriest posted:There is theory and then there's reality. How is the court going to find her partner? 90% of the time, performers don't know each other's real names. On top of that the industry has greatly spread out. Performers travel to shoot today more than ever shooting in LA, Las Vegas, San Fran and Florida. The court would have to track down all of the performers real names, where they live and if they don't live in state, compel them to take a blood test. That isn't going to happen. Considering they have been unable to enforce the condom law only reinforces that. The industry has been around for 30 plus years and nothing like that has even remotely occurred. All very hypothetical, but assuming the court really wanted to, tracking down all the performers should be easy enough right? They'd just have to compel the production company to produce the contacts for the shoots in question, and those would have to have the performers real names?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 09:11
|
|
Yes, it's like a lava lamp.
|
I thought production companies had to keep copies of performers IDs on file to prevent accidental child porn.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 12:14
|
|
|
PittTheElder posted:All very hypothetical, but assuming the court really wanted to, tracking down all the performers should be easy enough right? They'd just have to compel the production company to produce the contacts for the shoots in question, and those would have to have the performers real names? They'd also have to force the performers into a dna test, which would basically be impossible.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2015 15:03
|
|
|
darkpriest posted:There is theory and then there's reality. How is the court going to find her partner? 90% of the time, performers don't know each other's real names. Huh, I always assumed that they all knew each others names and that they just used stage names when the cameras were on 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
jerichojx posted:With the prevalence of tube sites and torrents, I find it hard to imagine porn doing well. Isn't the cost of talent kinda low anyways? At like $1000USD per scene or something? The industry has greatly contracted in terms of the number of active production companies, however there is still lots of production. The difference now is that most production is controlled by larger companies, with the largest being MindGeek (aka Manwin aka Mansef) which is the parent company of Brazzers. In the past anyone with money could start a production company and even if the content was sub par, make money from it. Today that is nearly impossible. The industry hit a bubble of sorts in the mid 2000's, right around 05 or 06. There was simply to much production, to many production companies that flooded the market with inferior product. Then came the tube sites and then came the Great Recession. It was a combination of the economic issues of 2008, combined with the tube sites that eventually drove many companies out of business. The ones that survived were the ones that either shot high quality productions or shot product that had a very strong and very loyal core audience. What also came out of that bubble collapse were the Internet companies. Some of those companies are now major producers, because they understood how to create and market a product. The biggest of those is now called MindGeek. They were originally known as Mansef and were created by three guys (Keez, Manos and Sam) who were extremely good at aggregating web traffic. They used that traffic they had built to start Brazzers. On top of that, though they didn't create the Tube concept, they improved upon it and made a series of adult Tube sites. Things started to turn a bit ugly for them, as they originally tried to hide their involvement in the tube sites and they got out, selling Mansef to a new owner (Fabian Thylmann) who was the creator of the biggest adult content management system. He renamed the company Manwin. Manwin then went and bought some of the largest production companies and folded them all into this very large corporate institution. Today that includes Brazzers, Mofos, Twistys, Digital Playground, Reality Kings and even partial stake in Playboy. There is much conjecture of how Thylmann was able to get the funding to buy up all these companies, but according to the company he secured financing from a New York investment firm. Thylmann then ran into trouble in his own country of Germany, where he was put under house arrest for tax evasion. He sold his stake in the company to other partners he had and they renamed the company MindGeek. Besides the production of content that MindGeek is involved in, they also own the 8 largest tube sites. Arguably MindGeek is probably the largest adult company ever. No longer do these smaller studios exist. Back in the early 2000's there were probably 100 studios, but they weren't large. Most were small. That is completely gone today. It is now mostly controlled by much larger entities, with 100's of employees. MindGeek is making money due to the fact that they use their tube sites to sell ads, and to also promote their own various brands. They also have insane amounts of data at their finger tips from theses tube sites that give them detailed insight into what consumers want to see. They are a juggernaught. While there are much less companies, production is still solid. There are probably several 100's of scenes shot a month through the professional industry. The difference now is profit is collected through a variety of mediums. It is no longer just one avenue that generates profits. The companies that are solid still produce content for physical media (DVD), Internet (membership site), VOD and Broadcast. The real issue is for the small producer. They can't compete with the established brands and don't have access to all the avenues of revenue as stated above, that a larger company would be able to do. The profits are also much leaner. The average performer or producer is never going to be a millionaire. Most people in the industry make a middle class to above middle class living. Quality is what now makes a product sell. This is a combination of casting the popular performers and producing the content with a solid technical execution. Pukestain Pal posted:I think the $1000 is a day rate, not a 'per scene' rate. Performers are paid per scene. In the professional side of the industry, most female performers start at 1,000 per scene and then their rate can go much higher depending on their popularity. A female performer in the top 5% can charge a very high rate and will consistently receive that rate due some of the reasons mentioned above.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 22:01
|
|