|
qirex posted:macromedia, it was a total dumb move to buy them then waste another billion dollars trying to build a flash consulting company oh wait I mean air which is totally not flash but needs flash to work. flash, dreamweaver and fireworks are all mega fail software and should be stricken from the record [freehand was ok for a while then they macromedia'd into irrelevance] 
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 11:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 20:43 |
|
|
adobo 
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 14:46
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:see this is what is so lovely. sure there might be a way to achieve a thing, but its backwards and suboptimal and instead of people making GBS threads over adobe for not being losers they defend them becaue.. idk? stokholm or something yeah. and they make the most money making creative software. think they are on to something
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
so coz photoshop is the best. doesn't mean it's flawless or doesnt have issues
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
i took a photoshop class at community college and finished the syllabus on the first day and she was like, ok, you got an A, if you want to come in and use the computers now and then thats cool
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 20:35
|
|
|
hi I'm photoshop and when you're setting up a paragraph I only allow you to enter line spacing as a point figure, not a relative percentage, and if yo want something bigger than 72 it's uou have to type it in and you can't fine tune me by dragging like any other software
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 20:38
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:hi I'm photoshop and when you're setting up a paragraph I only allow you to enter line spacing as a point figure, not a relative percentage, and if yo want something bigger than 72 it's uou have to type it in and you can't fine tune me by dragging like any other software why would you try to do a whole paragraph of text in photoshop that's just stupid echinopsis posted:translation : all the people who use our products are simpletons and couldnt handle a bit of change
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
qirex posted:why would you try to do a whole paragraph of text in photoshop that's just stupid agreed, why r u typing a whole paragraph of size 72 letters
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Adobe® Premiere® Pro CC own zone oi think its freakin amazing that someobody composit export immediatly updates in the timeline of someone else. that hit with the deer. that fcukin amazing
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
its almost as though modern scripts and actors are fuckin garb so we just work it out in post and dazzle u w/ breads+circuses thanks, computers thomputers
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
Smythe posted:oi think its freakin amazing that someobody composit export immediatly updates in the timeline of someone else. that hit with the deer. that fcukin amazing idk i don't do anything with moving pictures but this and that other thing about being able to work with different shots of the same scene together seems super loving basic and if that's new and revolutionary in the year 2015 then lol like how lovely was film editing workflow in the recent past
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
du -hast posted:agreed, why r u typing a whole paragraph of size 72 letters because maybe my image is huge? plus two lines isn't a paragraph but you use the paragraph settings toxhange line spacing qirex posted:why would you try to do a whole paragraph of text in photoshop that's just stupid built in or anything perhaps I should use that excuse when I do anyhinf in photoshop "why would you try to combine layers in photoshop that's stupid" quote:does your wrong posting know no bounds
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Adobe® Premiere® Pro CC own zone i've only taken a couple video courses (not a video student, just part of the graphic design courseload i have) and this is the workflow they teach. v cool poo poo imo
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
photoshop owns so hard. premiere owns so hard. after effects owns so hard.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
big scary monsters posted:idk i don't do anything with moving pictures but this and that other thing about being able to work with different shots of the same scene together seems super loving basic and if that's new and revolutionary in the year 2015 then lol what they were showing was that you can drag and drop projects from after effects directly into your premiere pro project - two completely different pieces of software doing completely different things, but no need to export from one to another. so you can make your animations and do your rotoscoping and whatever else in after effects, which is built for that, and then just drag your work straight into the premiere pro work file without having to gently caress around with file compatibility etc. being able to do this kind of thing and play it all back in real time is a Big loving Deal
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
qirex posted:flash is mega fail software and should be stricken from the record
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
wesley snypes posted:what they were showing was that you can drag and drop projects from after effects directly into your premiere pro project - two completely different pieces of software doing completely different things, but no need to export from one to another. so you can make your animations and do your rotoscoping and whatever else in after effects, which is built for that, and then just drag your work straight into the premiere pro work file without having to gently caress around with file compatibility etc. being able to do this kind of thing and play it all back in real time is a Big loving Deal oh ok i missed that part, ty. so it's like how you can copy and paste from word into excel
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 23:10
|
|
|
user-facing java is the only thing worse than user-facing flash so not sure what you're trying to get at here
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:hi I'm photoshop and if yo want something bigger than 72 it's uou have to type it in and you can't fine tune me by dragging like any other software https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm-3LFIII1o
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
hopy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:03
|
|
|
5
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
wesley snypes posted:what they were showing was that you can drag and drop projects from after effects directly into your premiere pro project - two completely different pieces of software doing completely different things, but no need to export from one to another. so you can make your animations and do your rotoscoping and whatever else in after effects, which is built for that, and then just drag your work straight into the premiere pro work file without having to gently caress around with file compatibility etc. being able to do this kind of thing and play it all back in real time is a Big loving Deal given what the programs are and that they are made by same people and etc it absolutely expected that this would be the case, this is the minimum expected from this workflow
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:given what the programs are and that they are made by same people and etc it absolutely expected that this would be the case, this is the minimum expected from this workflow lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
indesign seems ok
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:indesign seems ok Insufficient InDesign Enthusiasm is punishable by 2 months labor in Quark Camp
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
the source code for photoshop 1.0.1 is online if for some reason you want to read mostly-uncommented pascal
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
op, have you considered using physical media. taking some acrylics (or maybe conte crayons if ur feeling saucy), going outside, away from the computer, and arting a sunset
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
isn't that what an arri Alexa is for?
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
oh, dear
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
The Kins posted:the source code for photoshop 1.0.1 is online if for some reason you want to read mostly-uncommented pascal god what a weanky rear end kissing article "comments in the code would have gotten in the way"
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:hopy poo poo i think u can also put ur cursor over the place where it changes to <-> and then use the scroll wheel
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
Elder Postsman posted:i think u can also put ur cursor over the place where it changes to <-> and then use the scroll wheel or just resize it with the transform box since it's vectors
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
qirex posted:or just resize it with the transform box since it's vectors oh i'm talking just in general, u can do that with a lot of size changing slider things. brush size and whatever too. you know?
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 20:35
|
|
|
god guys, didnt want to spend more than an hour on the video
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
Elder Postsman posted:i think u can also put ur cursor over the place where it changes to <-> and then use the scroll wheel
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 22:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 20:43 |
|
|
bobbilljim posted:i use gimp because im not some kind of "creator" thats it. you've found gimp's new trademark
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 02:26
|
|