|
alkanphel posted:
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
spookygonk posted:Fantastic. Thanks!  Stirling Road by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
Quick question, when loaded and with the shutter cocked the spool knob on the back of my 645pro can be turned backwards freely. Is this normal? The shot counter doesn't go backwards so I'm hoping it's a ratcheting thing to prevent damage. Just wanted to check before I waste some rolls. http://i.imgur.com/iydBZuS.jpg Horrific cell phone pic. Knob can only be turned in direction of red arrow.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
XTimmy posted:Quick question, when loaded and with the shutter cocked the spool knob on the back of my 645pro can be turned backwards freely. Is this normal? The shot counter doesn't go backwards so I'm hoping it's a ratcheting thing to prevent damage. Just wanted to check before I waste some rolls. http://i.imgur.com/iydBZuS.jpg The Hasselblad's film lever can be freely spun backwards when all is cocked and loaded so I would assume that is the same for the Mamiya 645 as well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
 cat tail by mydoski, on Flickri am greatly enjoy medium format
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 04:31
|
|
|
Dang look at the acutance and contrast in the line of shadow between her legs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
 kitties by mydoski, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 05:48
|
|
|
mulls posted:Dang look at the acutance and contrast in the line of shadow between her legs. Yes, its quite compelling...
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 11:27
|
|
|
This amazing thing showed up on local classifieds this weekend for $400. Mamiya Super 23 press camera. I am not buying it, but just wanted to post it because it looks so cool.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
$400 is a lil steep unless there's some bells and whistles thrown in. I remember watching some youtube video of Eggleston shooting one of these.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
If they made an instax back for those I'd get one with the loving quickness.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:If they made an instax back for those I'd get one with the loving quickness. http://www.polaroidconversions.com/instax/
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
Another 400 tho, and I have an instax wide body already
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
Add another 400 and you can shoot install wide at 2.8 aperture! Woo!
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
Another new 4x5 portrait. Please yell at me about my skin tones. Adreena by dorkasaurus_rex, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Great skin tones. Edit: even better after I disabled f.lux
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
Very nice colours, but there's some weird marks on the sky to the right
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Looks like scratches and a pinch mark on the film?
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
Also the bottom left could use some cropping. Your emulsion is showing. Poor dorkasaurus, can't catch a break. That said; this is an excellent portrait!
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 04:12
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Another new 4x5 portrait. Please yell at me about my skin tones. They are a bit yellow!!! ...a..am I doing this right? Great shot by the way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 04:59
|
|
|
VomitOnLino posted:Also the bottom left could use some cropping. Your emulsion is showing. and the left in general
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Another new 4x5 portrait. Please yell at me about my skin tones.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Another new 4x5 portrait. Please yell at me about my skin tones. Looks good!
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
KEH never told me what was wrong with the Hasselblad I sent in for repair, I just saw a huge refund from them on my credit card. I've had crap luck dropping lots of money on medium format - so I'm thinking of just getting a Konica Auto S2 or Contax G or something to fill the film craving for now, and maybe work on building my own large format camera for fun over the next few months. Oh well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
Saint Fu posted:Soooo much better. Love your portraits. Do you typically know your subjects or are you going out with the intent to find interesting people? Lately I've been using ModelMayhem to some degree of success. But I'm also basically asking everyone these days, haha.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2015 06:23
|
|
|
 concrete shadow by mydoski, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 09:57
|
|
|
 Aviel by dorkasaurus_rex, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
That's really nice, but I have a strong urge to clean up the background and get rid of the white portion on the right.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
And...check your skin tones  The skin under his hat shadow looks realllly red.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:And...check your skin tones glad you said it and not me. I was starting to think I was seeing things. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
It looks fine who cares.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 03:04
|
|
|
try it with a lime posted:It looks fine who cares.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
Killing self, brb
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 03:19
|
|
|
Maybe my color vision is complete poo poo but I have not been able to see any color issues with dorkasaurus's stuff and the color corrected versions all look the same to me as the originals.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
voodoorootbeer posted:Maybe my color vision is complete poo poo but I have not been able to see any color issues with dorkasaurus's stuff and the color corrected versions all look the same to me as the originals. I'm a tiny bit on the color-blind side but never had any issue with it either.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
Looks good
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:19
|
|
|
 Eunos by alkanphel, on Flickr  Lakeside by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 11:09
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Killing self, brb
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
voodoorootbeer posted:Maybe my color vision is complete poo poo but I have not been able to see any color issues with dorkasaurus's stuff and the color corrected versions all look the same to me as the originals. I can see the with a redish-tint but honestly I think it works with what hes doing and gives it a unique style? Having 100% perfect colour balancing is not always needed for a nice photo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 16:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
It's hard to say what the intent was in his previous pictures because the gamut was all out of whack. The picture he just posted is a little warm/red, but it works, and I like it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 16:49
|
|
