Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
hiddenmovement
Sep 29, 2011

"Most mornings I'll apologise in advance to my wife."
He tried to improvise the deployment of millions. Worst crime imo

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

cpaf posted:

You can blame them for their attitudes towards profit and competition though, which have been myopic in recent history. The idea that you should treat your employees well in order to foster long term productivity and loyalty has only recently been abandoned, or the idea that you pay them a good wage so they in turn feel more comfortable with putting that money back into the economy, or the idea that you pursue a long-term sustainable business model rather than one that maximises short-term profit at the cost of stability. The rejection of these concepts don't come from sense or reason but the lust for growth at any cost in order to satisfy shareholders. Death to financial capitalism and neoliberal economics.

Well yeah. I keep reading articles that touch on these topics indirectly, like one from a speech by the RBA boss talking about releasing the "animal spirits" of the economy. Another lamented the flatlining of people starting their own small businesses. Both people and businesses are much less inclined to take risks these days, since the heady days of the GFC. This has lead to a reduction in people hanging out a shingle, who would rather work for a larger well established company.

John Howard did really well in part by appealing to the so-called "contractor army" that arose mid way through his reign, but that army has since disappeared. Abbott would do well to pay attention to this, either by creating the conditions to encourage risk taking, or appealing to the mostly employee-based economy who have no uncertainty whatsoever about whose interests they're really working for.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

Graic Gabtar posted:

The scenario I would see as far more likely would be shrieks from the small business community, back to back Murdoch media coverage of common workers being put out on the street because these "job killing" policies (for the sake of the argument let's assume this is a Labor policy). A whole bunch of employers sacking people in anticipation of the new laws. Hundreds of thousands of panicked workers thinking better the devil you know voting against it.

It would have to be a well designed policy for that not to happen I believe.

Yes, it would be preferable if policies were well designed. I think you'll find that any implementation of any policy in any area can lead to catastrophe if you gently caress it up.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Mr Chips posted:

The National party tends to support a sort of agrarian socialism.

isnt it sort of silly to have an agrarian party on a continent thats like 80% wasteland?

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

TEAYCHES posted:

isnt it sort of silly to have an agrarian party on a continent thats like 80% wasteland?

Australia was built on the sheep's back mate.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

Cities Skylines is turning out to be a great QLD simulator.

birdstrike
Oct 30, 2008

i;m gay
I thought Joe Hockey was feeling down after what those nasty journalists wrote so I sent him a lollipop to cheer him up.

:unsmith:

drowned in pussy juice
Oct 13, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

TEAYCHES posted:

isnt it sort of silly to have an agrarian party on a continent thats like 80% wasteland?

welcome to the republican Greens Party, comrade

Negative Entropy
Nov 30, 2009

asio posted:

I went to a pie face that had a photo of the owners on the wall and it was just as awkward as the german club that has a photo of kaiser Wilhelm over the door

Nothing wrong with the German Club, it has a rich history.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

TEAYCHES posted:

isnt it sort of silly to have an agrarian party on a continent thats like 80% wasteland?

The 20% that is left is bigger than most countries in Europe anyway.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

SynthOrange posted:

Cities Skylines is turning out to be a great QLD simulator.


You just killed my internet.

Jonah Galtberg
Feb 11, 2009

Graic Gabtar posted:

You just killed my internet.

Why stop there?

Nibbles!
Jun 26, 2008

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

make australia great again as well please

Les Affaires posted:

Well yeah. I keep reading articles that touch on these topics indirectly, like one from a speech by the RBA boss talking about releasing the "animal spirits" of the economy. Another lamented the flatlining of people starting their own small businesses. Both people and businesses are much less inclined to take risks these days, since the heady days of the GFC. This has lead to a reduction in people hanging out a shingle, who would rather work for a larger well established company.

Everyone's waiting for the penny to drop, the perception is that the economy is going to get worse before it gets better atm.

To really understand the hardon for IR reforms you really have to go back 100+ years and look at our unique system of collective bargaining, and how it shaped the landscape today.

Given today though and that our economy is largely consumer driven if you want a stronger economy you need to prod the middle and lower classes into spending. Cutting working conditions does the opposite.

Also, if you want to encourage risk taking, there's an argument for stronger social safety nets so your failure doesn't result in you out on the streets.

Mad Katter
Aug 23, 2010

STOP THE BATS

Chicken Parmigiana posted:

On the topic of goonmeets, I'm gonna be back in Melbourne from March 25th to April 6th, so if one were to to happen within that geographical and temporal window, that'd be tops. (Easter weekend is probably out though.)

I'm planning to be in Melbourne around this time, so I would be interested.

hiddenmovement
Sep 29, 2011

"Most mornings I'll apologise in advance to my wife."

Nibbles! posted:

Everyone's waiting for the penny to drop, the perception is that the economy is going to get worse before it gets better atm.

To really understand the hardon for IR reforms you really have to go back 100+ years and look at our unique system of collective bargaining, and how it shaped the landscape today.

Given today though and that our economy is largely consumer driven if you want a stronger economy you need to prod the middle and lower classes into spending. Cutting working conditions does the opposite.

Also, if you want to encourage risk taking, there's an argument for stronger social safety nets so your failure doesn't result in you out on the streets.

This. I run a small at home business that I'm looking to expand into other areas, and the stuff I sell at the moment is almost totally insulated from the Australian economy (in fact, a weakening dollar is mana from heaven for me). But every expansion idea I've thought of involves physical importation of goods to be sold to Australian consumers, and I'm really reluctant to take on board that much risk in the current economic climate. I just don't trust a) the AUD not to keep falling and b) there not to be major shocks to the economy with knock on effects ultimately affecting consumer spending (and thus, my bottom line).

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak

Nibbles! posted:

Everyone's waiting for the penny to drop, the perception is that the economy is going to get worse before it gets better atm.

To really understand the hardon for IR reforms you really have to go back 100+ years and look at our unique system of collective bargaining, and how it shaped the landscape today.

Given today though and that our economy is largely consumer driven if you want a stronger economy you need to prod the middle and lower classes into spending. Cutting working conditions does the opposite.

Also, if you want to encourage risk taking, there's an argument for stronger social safety nets so your failure doesn't result in you out on the streets.

Hilariously, my class on entrepreneurship teaches that social safety nets discourage people from starting businesses, implying that they'd rather sit on their butts doing nothing on the dole. So glad I have to do this quality subject.

Cartoon
Jun 20, 2008

poop

fiery_valkyrie posted:

Which bit? Apologising, or personally insulting people to make your point and then pretending that you didn't?
C/ Making poo poo up! BINGO!

-/-

Business Confidence has continued to fall despite the RBA rate cut.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-10/business-confidence-deteriorates-with-rate-cut/6293488

Leading to the RBA saying the lever is now broken and there needs to be actual policy from government :stonk:

It's graph heavy and an opinion piece but have a read.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-11/jericho-the-interest-rate-mantra-has-hit-a-wall/6300346

-/-

It's only now hit the headlines but I effort posted about this what? a month or so ago. Where this inhuman policy of removal has been done so far it has resulted in immediate and worse outcomes for the indigenous communities involved.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-11/abbott-defends-indigenous-communities-lifestyle-choice/6300218

quote:

Indigenous advisers slam Tony Abbott's 'hopeless, disrespectful' description of living in remote communities as 'lifestyle choice'

By political correspondent Emma Griffiths, staff Updated 28 minutes ago

RELATED STORY: Closing remote communities will cause chaos: Aboriginal leaders

Tony Abbott's key Indigenous advisers have slammed his description of living in remote communities as a "lifestyle choice", saying the statement is "hopeless", "disrespectful" and simplistic. Yesterday, Mr Abbott backed a plan in Western Australia to close more than 100 remote communities and move more than 12,000 people, saying "what we can't do is endlessly subsidise lifestyle choices". This morning, Mr Abbott defended his use of the term, saying he was "stating a general principle" (The lifestyle choice of vaginal delivery well he's the minister for women too so he should know).

But Indigenous leader Noel Pearson told the ABC remote Indigenous communities deserved an "extensive" explanation and not "off-the-cuff" comments. "I think it's a very disappointing and hopeless statement by the Prime Minister, quite frankly," he told The World Today. "I just think it's very disrespectful to cast fear into these communities through a kind of policy thought bubble rather than a considered position from the Commonwealth Government as to the future — the anxious future — of these remote communities.

"He has got no plan for the future of these communities in the event that they close down. And I'm just bitterly disappointed to hear this deranged debate go on in the substandard manner in which it's being conducted." Chair of the Prime Minister's Indigenous Advisory Council Warren Mundine said it was not as "simple" as the Prime Minister had described. "These people are actually living on their homelands and it affects a lot of things, it affects their cultural activities, it affects their native title (WA Native Title DING! DING! DING! DING!), it affects a number of areas," he told Radio National. "It's not as simple as ... if someone from Sydney decides to have a tree change and go and live in the bush. It's about their life, it's about their very essence, it's about their very culture."

Social justice commissioner 'baffled' by comments

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda said he was "baffled" by the comments. "I think they're poorly thought out," he told ABC News 24. "I think they will cause offence in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community." He added to calls for a thorough policy discussion. "What are we going to have? More communities on the fringe of our towns like we've got in places like Kalgoorlie and Darwin and Alice Springs already?" Mr Gooda said. "We're going to make a situation that's pretty bad already in those places even worse."

Mr Pearson called on the Prime Minister to "get serious about policy".

"There was a time in our history when they kicked us out of town, and now they want to bring us back in - just by a flick of the policy switch," he said. "Who is going to welcome these people in the country towns and suburbs of this country, as if there's a big welcoming mat for Aboriginal people from remote communities to be welcomed into the social and economic mainstream of Australia?" Mr Abbott said he was focused on the practical impacts of living in remote settlements. "If you or I chose to live in very remote place, to what extent is the taxpayer obliged to subsidise our services? And I think this is a very real question," he told Macquarie Radio's Alan Jones. "It is incredibly difficult for the kids to go to school if there's only half a dozen of them and getting teachers there is all but impossible. Similarly it's very difficult for adults to get a proper job if there's no employment within hundreds of miles. And this is where we have to be a little bit realistic."

Cabinet ministers Malcolm Turnbull and Joe Hockey have backed Mr Abbott's stance.

Mr Hockey said the Prime Minister used the "right" phrase. "It's right because it is the lifestyle that they want," he said on 702 ABC Sydney. "Do they want that lifestyle to live in a remote area? Some of them do. Some of them say it is part of their tradition. That is their lifestyle - that is the way they live. The way they live is a lifestyle." Mr Turnbull said very few politicians had as much knowledge of Indigenous Australia as Mr Abbott. "I think he does have a very good understanding," he said on 612 ABC Brisbane. "I think it's important that we talk about the issue thoughtfully and rationally, rather than as is often the case with the Prime Minister - you know, whenever he opens his mouth his critics leap on him."

'You have to be on your country to look after it'

Indigenous leaders across Western Australia criticised the Prime Minister's comments. The chairman of WA's Kimberley community of Djarindjin, Brian Lee, said it was a cultural obligation to live on traditional country and it could not be a "lifestyle choice. We are obliged to look after our country and that's why a lot of us are out here on country," Mr Lee said. "Unless you live out here, you really can't make any judgement on that.

Organisations deal with cuts

The leaders of Aboriginal organisations and councils in the NT are calling for Indigenous Affairs Minister Nigel Scullion to be sacked as federal funding cuts force them to lay off staff and cease some services. The Kalgoorlie-Boulder Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Hugh Gallagher said the Prime Minister should be concerned about the profound impact it would have on Aboriginal culture and the business community. "I would ask him where that fits within the Government's policy on closing the gap?" Mr Gallagher said. "Because it is just so important that regional culture is retained and sadly it begins to shrink when it's in capital cities."

In the Northern Territory, Northern Land Council chief executive Joe Morrison warned against similar closures there.

"We're not funding lifestyle choices, we're funding lives, in fact," he told AM. "I would argue against that it's a 'choice' that people have got deep-rooted connections to their country, it's a 'choice' that they've lived there for generations and generations."

Mr Abbott, who has said he wanted to be the prime minister for Indigenous affairs, was criticised last year for saying in a speech that Australia was "unsettled or scarcely settled" when British settlers arrived. This latest statement has led Mr Pearson, who has long been a political ally of Mr Abbott in relation to Indigenous issues, to question the Prime Minister's commitment. "I don't doubt his high-minded intentions, but I've got to say 18 months into the life of his government, I don't see a great deal of proof of his intentions in his regard."

You can not make this poo poo up.

Nibbles!
Jun 26, 2008

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

make australia great again as well please

Splode posted:

Hilariously, my class on entrepreneurship teaches that social safety nets discourage people from starting businesses, implying that they'd rather sit on their butts doing nothing on the dole. So glad I have to do this quality subject.

I'd argue that it also ignores the fact that many small business owners put their life savings into starting and often use their homes as collateral for loans.

Banks don't care as they have something to sell and many people go into business without solid plans and with rose covered glasses.

Really you should plan on the assumption that you won't even break even till year 3. Many start on the assumption they'll be profiting from day one.

Murodese
Mar 6, 2007

Think you've got what it takes?
We're looking for fine Men & Women to help Protect the Australian Way of Life.

Become part of the Legend. Defence Jobs.
People who are unemployed are more likely to be unskilled and have very little capital base to work off. I don't know about you guys, but those sound like a perfect starting environment for a small business!

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Splode posted:

Hilariously, my class on entrepreneurship teaches that social safety nets discourage people from starting businesses, implying that they'd rather sit on their butts doing nothing on the dole. So glad I have to do this quality subject.

My class on entrepreneurship taught that people are motivated into entrepreneurship by either necessity or by creativity. It's why a lot of small business startups are done by immigrants, because it's often easier for an immigrant to start a business than it is for them to get a job.

Anybody who knows about creativity though will understand that you either need to be the type of person willing to take massive risks, OR have enough capital behind you to ensure that the risk is not going to change your living standards much.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Why take massive risks on creating a small business when you can make MASSIVE GAINS investing in property?

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Cartoon posted:

You can not make this poo poo up.
No you can't.

An endless series of governments try to implement policy only to be howled down on all fronts to the point they always file the issue as too hard and leave it for the next guy.

We will be here again three years time.

And three years after that.

And three years after that.

No you can't make this poo poo up.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

Its so drat depressing when I keep passing the same store lots that house bad idea after bad idea that opens for 2 months then shuts down.

That or the economy just doesnt need a store that sells waffles in a basement? ? ???

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

And endless series of governments trying to implement bad policy.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Nibbles! posted:

I'd argue that it also ignores the fact that many small business owners put their life savings into starting and often use their homes as collateral for loans.

Banks don't care as they have something to sell and many people go into business without solid plans and with rose covered glasses.

Really you should plan on the assumption that you won't even break even till year 3. Many start on the assumption they'll be profiting from day one.
Anyone who thinks they need to put their house on the line for their business should think it through a little more.

Running your own business is hard enough without that hanging over your head.

Mr Chips
Jun 27, 2007
Whose arse do I have to blow smoke up to get rid of this baby?

Splode posted:

Hilariously, my class on entrepreneurship teaches that social safety nets discourage people from starting businesses, implying that they'd rather sit on their butts doing nothing on the dole. So glad I have to do this quality subject.

DO they provide any stats to demonstrate even a correlation, let alone a causal link, for this?

They'd also need to demonstrate how safety net wouldn't encourage risk taking. If you know that failure doesn't guarantee destitution, then you'd be more likely to try something, right?

hiddenmovement
Sep 29, 2011

"Most mornings I'll apologise in advance to my wife."
The best way to start a small business is very very small indeed. A tiny, at home operation doing no more than 1000$ a month turnover that can be expanded gradually is far more preferable than renting and fitting out a corner shop in the inner city and hoping to make a million in the first 6 months.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

open24hours posted:

And endless series of governments trying to implement bad policy.
No government can even propose policy discussion without people going apeshit.

Your either racist, insensitive, wrong, perpetuating the "stolen generations" things, a pack of arseholes - you name it.

It's not limited to any one side of politics either.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

Graic Gabtar posted:

Anyone who thinks they need to put their house on the line for their business should think it through a little more.

Running your own business is hard enough without that hanging over your head.

Banks demand security and often the house is the only option.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

Graic Gabtar posted:

No government can even propose policy discussion without people going apeshit.

Your either racist, insensitive, wrong, perpetuating the "stolen generations" things, a pack of arseholes - you name it.

It's not limited to any one side of politics either.

The government is perfectly willing to run roughshod over people who complain. Look at the intervention, if it was political correctness holding back indigenous policy then we wouldn't have a problem to solve.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Jumpingmanjim posted:

Banks demand security and often the house is the only option.
Start smaller or save some more.

Rent plant instead of buying it.

From a personal perspective I've been there.

One large multinational hosed me badly paying a nearly 50k invoice three months late. The only thing keeping me sane was that no one was going to get to the house.

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Graic Gabtar posted:

Start smaller or save some more.

Rent plant instead of buying it.

From a personal perspective I've been there.

One large multinational hosed me badly paying a nearly 50k invoice three months late. The only thing keeping me sane was that no one was going to get to the house.

How is it that you've come to different conclusions about politics as a small business manager than I have?

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

open24hours posted:

The government is perfectly willing to run roughshod over people who complain. Look at the intervention, if it was political correctness holding back indigenous policy then we wouldn't have a problem to solve.
Yeah, people are going to have different cracks at the problem. Still not solved though. I don't want to claim I have any great insight into this besides what I see in the media, but decade after decade it's fail, fail, fail.

The only great constant seems to be an endless queue of people throwing rocks at the people voted in to tackle the problem.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Les Affaires posted:

How is it that you've come to different conclusions about politics as a small business manager than I have?
Sorry, where was that post?

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Graic Gabtar posted:

Sorry, where was that post?

As you've mentioned we mostly agree on things except for a few items.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Les Affaires posted:

As you've mentioned we mostly agree on things except for a few items.
Tough one to answer, but I'll try to answer it as best as I can.

When you start a business and you already have a mortgage and six mouths to feed it's very good at focusing you on what is important and how closely you have to watch the books.

If you are lucky enough to get into a mutually beneficial position of employing someone you always have a fear that the arrangement is stacked against you.

For every bad employer story there's a bad employee one.

Just don't get into that position is the answer. Go casual, get someone else if you have to. Whatever works. Luckily for me I never had to knife anyone in this way because things kind of fell the right way. But it was discussed often and I would have done it in a heartbeat if it meant not paying some lazy or whiny gently caress.

That may sound really lovely and it is somewhat but I have a lot more to lose than some employee in this deal. I'm either on the dole myself, or I go back to work in some consultancy role that specialises in moving jobs offshore instead of building a business here.

By no means should business be setting policy on workers because employers can be exploitive fuckers. However, until you've lived this kind of poo poo for several years a lot of people are just slinging their ill-informed poo poo.

e: typo

Graic Gabtar fucked around with this message at 03:41 on Mar 11, 2015

Birb Katter
Sep 18, 2010

BOATS STOPPED
CARBON TAX AXED
TURNBULL AS PM
LIBERALS WILL BE RE-ELECTED IN A LANDSLIDE

Graic Gabtar posted:

Tough one to answer, but I'll try to answer it as best as I can.

When you start a business and you already have a mortgage and six mouths to feed it's very good at focusing you on what is important and how closely you have to watch the books.

If you are lucky enough to get into a mutually beneficial position of employing someone you always have a fear that the arrangement is stacked against you.

For every bad employer story there's a bad employee one.

Just don't get into that position is the answer. Go casual, get someone else if you have to. Whatever works. Luckily for me I never had to knife anyone in this way because things kind of fell the right way. But it was discussed often and I would have done it in a heartbeat if it meant not paying some lazy or whiny gently caress.

That may sound really lovely and it is somewhat but I have a lot more to lose than some employee in this deal. I'm either on the dole myself, or I go back to work in some consultancy role that specialises in moving jobs offshore instead of building a business here.

By no means should business be setting policy on workers because employers can be exploitive fuckers. However, until you've lived this kind of poo poo for several years a lot of people are just slinging their ill-informed poo poo.

e: typo

This is the first considered answer I've seen you post here and I genuinely thank you for that. While I know this can come across as a backhanded compliment I'm not meaning it in that way, it is very nice to see a solid post.

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Graic Gabtar posted:

Tough one to answer, but I'll try to answer it as best as I can.

When you start a business and you already have a mortgage and six mouths to feed it's very good at focusing you on what is important and how closely you have to watch the books.

If you are lucky enough to get into a mutually beneficial position of employing someone you always have a fear that the arrangement is stacked against you.

For every bad employer story there's a bad employee one.

Just don't get into that position is the answer. Go casual, get someone else if you have to. Whatever works. Luckily for me I never had to knife anyone in this way because things kind of fell the right way. But it was discussed often and I would have done it in a heartbeat if it meant not paying some lazy or whiny gently caress.

That may sound really lovely and it is somewhat but I have a lot more to lose than some employee in this deal. I'm either on the dole myself, or I go back to work in some consultancy role that specialises in moving jobs offshore instead of building a business here.

By no means should business be setting policy on workers because employers can be exploitive fuckers. However, until you've lived this kind of poo poo for several years a lot of people are just slinging their ill-informed poo poo.

e: typo

I have lived it in a lot of respects and it is a tough mindset to overcome when you're transitioning from "what ideas are good for managing a small business" to "what ideas are good for managing a 1trillion dollar economy". A lot of people don't understand the difference and so they assume systems that look similar to each other will therefore have the same levers for "good" and "bad".

Unfortunately there are deeper philosophical considerations for things that are further and further outside of economics. Race relations, Immigration, cultural considerations, all those sort of things affect how we interact as a community and because they have no immediate economic effects, there is wider diversity of opinion.

Smegmatron
Apr 23, 2003

I hate to advocate emptyquoting or shitposting to anyone, but they've always worked for me.
Forgive me for not crying for my boss who bought his girlfriend a new Porsche and had a carte of mineral water delivered from New Zealand in the same week he told the staff that all pay was frozen for twelve months because of the GFC. I will never understand or appreciate the unique and singular pain of paying people 1/5th of what I collect for their labour.

gently caress any business owner who cries poor while still paying themselves.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KennyTheFish
Jan 13, 2004

Graic Gabtar posted:

Tough one to answer, but I'll try to answer it as best as I can.

When you start a business and you already have a mortgage and six mouths to feed it's very good at focusing you on what is important and how closely you have to watch the books.

If you are lucky enough to get into a mutually beneficial position of employing someone you always have a fear that the arrangement is stacked against you.

For every bad employer story there's a bad employee one.

Just don't get into that position is the answer. Go casual, get someone else if you have to. Whatever works. Luckily for me I never had to knife anyone in this way because things kind of fell the right way. But it was discussed often and I would have done it in a heartbeat if it meant not paying some lazy or whiny gently caress.

That may sound really lovely and it is somewhat but I have a lot more to lose than some employee in this deal. I'm either on the dole myself, or I go back to work in some consultancy role that specialises in moving jobs offshore instead of building a business here.

By no means should business be setting policy on workers because employers can be exploitive fuckers. However, until you've lived this kind of poo poo for several years a lot of people are just slinging their ill-informed poo poo.

e: typo

Do it yourself and you win. Every employer does it and everyone is too scared to spend becasue they don't know if the next pay check is comming and the economy dries up and everyone looses. So the solution is to not allow anyone to do it.

  • Locked thread