|
----------------
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 19:55 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:20 |
im taking a data structures class on the internet. p. much all my working programmer friends said that's as far into their cs degree as they ever use at work.
|
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 21:52 |
|
no you don't get it if it's not Java or c# it isn't really programming
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 21:59 |
|
PokeJoe posted:im taking a data structures class on the internet. p. much all my working programmer friends said that's as far into their cs degree as they ever use at work. ~TRIVIA ABOUT REGULAR LANGUAGES~
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 22:30 |
|
my school teaches java and then c, with some x86 in comp arc classes, which I actually think is a pretty good way to do ti my only complaint is we have an upper level class that is basically just "memorize the POSIX api" which is an awful class everyone hates but is taught by an awesome professor who drops sex jokes all the time so its chill
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 22:51 |
|
PokeJoe posted:im taking a data structures class on the internet. p. much all my working programmer friends said that's as far into their cs degree as they ever use at work. which one
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:13 |
|
Joe Law posted:my school teaches java and then c, with some x86 in comp arc classes, which I actually think is a pretty good way to do ti lmao @ ur terrible university
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:42 |
|
the best systems computering course i know of just makes u write a kernel in like 10 weeks
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:43 |
|
Malcolm XML posted:the best systems computering course i know of just makes u write a kernel in like 10 weeks no bootloader tho that's just gross
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:43 |
|
Malcolm XML posted:the best systems computering course i know of just makes u write a kernel in like 10 weeks yeah that sounds ownage alright
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:45 |
|
Malcolm XML posted:the best systems computering course i know of just makes u write a kernel in like 10 weeks pffft you should have to write the verilog for the processor too
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:47 |
|
also latex is still and always will be trash
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 23:53 |
|
Valeyard posted:also latex is still and always will be trash On one of my internships they used word to do equations. Not the equation editor, just normal characters. Latex is fine.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:06 |
|
pointsofdata posted:On one of my internships they used word to do equations. I agree, much like bash scripting if you don't try to be fancy and use it just for simple and obvious poo poo (like a resume!) then latex will serve your needs
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:09 |
|
latex is great
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:14 |
|
latex is bad, but so are all the alternatives. choose your poison best thing about latex imo is you can put it in source control
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:17 |
|
pointsofdata posted:On one of my internships they used word to do equations. The actual equation editor in Word is actually surprisingly good tho my biggest gripe with Latex is trying to position images. Even when you set the right compiler flags or w/e (not something you should be saying about word processing jfc) it still barely works
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:24 |
|
Soricidus posted:latex is bad, but so are all the alternatives. choose your poison Nothing makes me happier when working on simulation stuff than seeing a latex doc in source control or a specific bit of a paper/book (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:43 |
KARMA! posted:which one http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/61b/ e: all the lectures and assignments are online for the grabbing, you just won't get any outside support. hope you're self motivated.
|
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:47 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:pffft you should have to write the verilog for the processor too theres that nand to tetris course somewhere
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 00:58 |
|
Shaggar posted:java is probably the best language to use to teach data structures cause collections is easy to understand and extend/implement. the collections are fundamentally flawed because they lack a super interface for immutable data structures. Scala got that right at least. but I don't know that it's a deal breaker for teaching.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 09:02 |
|
there is nothing like trying to get android stuff building to remind me that im a terrible programmer
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 15:52 |
|
Janitor Prime posted:the collections are fundamentally flawed because they lack a super interface for immutable data structures. Scala got that right at least. how does a super interface help? breaking everything into { access } -> { mutate } still leaves you with const problem,. i.e. if I get a instance of {access} it's only immutable to me, I still have to defensively copy it ... also, I went and looked and the type hierarchies seem disjoint, which is the smarter choice imho, so I don't know what you mean Brain Candy fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Mar 15, 2015 |
# ? Mar 15, 2015 16:14 |
|
code:
edit: hang on there's more code:
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 17:11 |
|
lord funk posted:
if only c had something like stdint.h
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 17:15 |
|
one more:code:
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 17:22 |
|
lord funk posted:one more: C is whacky, you never know whats gonna happen!!
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 17:38 |
|
lord funk posted:
say one arch has 32 bit signed ints, and another has 32bit signed longs?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 18:09 |
|
types not of the form (u)int(#bits)_t suck
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 20:55 |
|
in the short time using C seriously, i appreciate typedefs ending with _t
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 21:47 |
|
Bloody posted:types not of the form (u)int(#bits)_t suck no intptr_t? no ssize_t?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 22:34 |
|
lord funk posted:
long is 32 bits on Windows. Also, Windows doesn't have stdint.h.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 22:46 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:long is 32 bits on Windows. It does since MSVC2010SP1.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 23:39 |
|
so ive got some images laid out in a latex doc. I edited one of the images to have a small inside stroke, its the same dimension as before. Now the image isnt working in the pdf. same scale as before is now breaking the image and making it super huge, and its also breaking the image AFTER it aswell wtf
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 03:46 |
|
Valeyard posted:so ive got some images laid out in a latex doc. I edited one of the images to have a small inside stroke, its the same dimension as before. Now the image isnt working in the pdf. same scale as before is now breaking the image and making it super huge, and its also breaking the image AFTER it aswell yeah sounds like you're using latex
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 04:01 |
|
Subjunctive posted:no intptr_t? no ssize_t? sorry for not writing the ebnf grammar of what i consider to be an acceptable type
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 04:52 |
|
Bloody posted:sorry for not writing the ebnf grammar of what i consider to be an acceptable type lol if your acceptable types don't constitute a regular language, just lol
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 05:02 |
|
Brain Candy posted:how does a super interface help? it's me I'm the terrible programmer I could have sworn they were super interfaces but you're right
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 05:36 |
|
Bloody posted:sorry for not writing the ebnf grammar of what i consider to be an acceptable type well, I thought your point was that types should explicitly indicate their storage size and not their intended role.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 05:43 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:20 |
|
nah my complaints mostly involve numeric types and that their size is significantly important to their functionality and also very poorly conveyed
|
# ? Mar 16, 2015 06:11 |