|
Pinterest Mom posted:Salon is here to burst the Gore 2016 bubble before its momentum overwhelms the race. What about as VP (again)? Clinton/Gore '16 
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:10 |
|
|
That would be...something, alright. What's funny is that it's actually not a bad choice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:I'm not so sure you can apply that label to a man who was offered a chance to laugh off an old article he wrote about dancing being unchristian-like and instead more-or-less said "Well I wasn't wrong". I was referring to his appearance on the Daily Show back in 2008. He was literally the only Republican candidate that would even touch it, and he was actually really funny. He seems to have gotten even more stodgy since.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
Probably true I just like bringing that exchange up as much as I can. A GOP presidential candidate of varying legitimacy takes his ques from the bad guys in Footloose. This is my real life.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Christie/Huckster "a couple of mean fatasses" ticket.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Bush/Cheney 2016
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
I always considered the GOP a bunch of snake-oil salesmen but I'm not sure how to take it when one of them is literally doing it. How will his supporters reconcile that, I wonder? Does this mean we'll never get to ironically use the term 'Huckmentum' for when he jumps ahead in a state primary for a week in early 2017 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
Mister Macys posted:What about as VP (again)? gently caress that. Double VP ticket. Biden/Gore (or vice versa)
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 22:00
|
|
|
Gee, I don't know. Hillary's base is looking pretty shaky in the latest CNN/ORC poll....
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Who are these 17% of Republicans who like her, anyway?Full Battle Rattle posted:That would be...something, alright. What's funny is that it's actually not a bad choice. Total nonstarter, you need someone substantially younger than her.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Who are these 17% of Republicans who like her, anyway? They probably consider themselves accelerationists. e: v America would elect a President Camacho. agent_wildflower fucked around with this message at 23:13 on Mar 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
QwertyAsher posted:Huckamania WELL LEMME TELL YOU SOMETHING ABOUT GOD BROTHER, THE BIG DUDE'S GOT A PLAN TO BEAT CANCER DUDE
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Who are these 17% of Republicans who like her, anyway? Non-crazy Republican women would be my guess.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Who are these 17% of Republicans who like her, anyway? Probably a lot of them are women who have leftover sympathy for her from the 90s.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
Also in '08 and to a diminished degree in 2012 Republicans would praise Clinton to disparage Obama fairly often. I hope the oppo research teams dig plenty of those tapes up for the general.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
That reminds me of how sometimes Republicans will criticize Obama by recalling Bill Clinton's administration as a bipartisan golden age. I can't wait for future Republicans to ask President Hillary why she can't be reasonable like Obama.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Who are these 17% of Republicans who like her, anyway? California Republicans, IL Republicans, Moderate republicans who might like her hawk-ish stance without being insane.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 00:53
|
|
|
What's really, truly beautiful about that is that the latest FOX poll has this:  That's right, folks! The Congressional approval rating among the Republican party is currently polling even with their opinion of Hillary Clinton.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
Tobermory posted:What's really, truly beautiful about that is that the latest FOX poll has this: More Democrats than Republicans approve of the job the Republican-controlled Congress is doing....
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 01:07
|
|
|
Jackson Taus posted:More Democrats than Republicans approve of the job the Republican-controlled Congress is doing.... not surprising, considering the job Republican-controlled congress is doing consists of "failing to prevent POTUS from enacting his agenda via executive fiat"
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
Jackson Taus posted:More Democrats than Republicans approve of the job the Republican-controlled Congress is doing.... I mean obviously because congress is just a hotbed of Washington insiders
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
PupsOfWar posted:don't underestimate the Huckster Oh come on, I can't be the first to weigh in on these quality fat jokes! I liked them, at least...
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 02:42
|
|
|
"Huck is a fatass" just doesn't occur as easily in an election where Chris Cristie is a candidate Huckabee is just normal southron dad fat. Cristie's the kind of fat where if he falls down he might get smothered by his own chins.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
For more on the Huckster, check out BuzzFeed Andy's latest, which goes down the rabbit hole of a "free" morality DVD about driving for young children.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
There's a very popular video of a 14 year old reversing in the middle of a free-way outside Moscow and his hapless victims were a Mother and child who burned alive after hitting him from behind. I'm proud Huck shills for manslaughter en masse.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Alter Ego posted:let a guy out of prison whose first act was to murder another person.... It's far worse than that. He pardoned a rapist who went on to rape and murder (at least) one woman, then he pardoned Maurice Clemmons who, after he got out, murdered four police officers. Huckabee will never, ever, ever get the nom for president or VP and he knows it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Here's the case against [Democrat not named Hillary] in one chart: Martin O'Malley must be pissed. He's actually running and doesn't even make the graph. Also, Martin O'Malley looks like a legit good candidate with solid liberal bona fides. Maybe in 2024
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 03:55
|
|
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3500534/bvuhzlitbksmpr1npybusg.0.png)
|
Rygar201 posted:Martin O'Malley must be pissed. He's actually running and doesn't even make the graph. You're right, liberals are huge fans of The Wire. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 04:19
|
|
|
Wolfsheim posted:I always considered the GOP a bunch of snake-oil salesmen but I'm not sure how to take it when one of them is literally doing it. How will his supporters reconcile that, I wonder? Does this mean we'll never get to ironically use the term 'Huckmentum' for when he jumps ahead in a state primary for a week in early 2017 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 04:26
|
|
|
Rygar201 posted:Martin O'Malley must be pissed. He's actually running and doesn't even make the graph. Despite how many times Drudge posts a picture of him in cutoffs holding a guitar, O'Malley has the charisma of a filing cabinet. I really can't see him ever being President. He'd be a good VP in 2024 for nominee Julian Castro.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 05:37
|
|
|
Proposition Joe posted:You're right, liberals are huge fans of The Wire. I want to see him run just to see David Simon just scream why don't they listen. Quick somebody find that pick of O' Malley on horseback it's super cheesy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
SirKibbles posted:I want to see him run just to see David Simon just scream why don't they listen. http://davidsimon.com/within-the-acela-cocoon/
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 07:41
|
|
|
Is this where we talk about Tom Cotton?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
echronorian posted:Is this where we talk about Tom Cotton? You're looking for the 2020 Presidential Primary thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 08:25
|
|
|
PupsOfWar posted:You're looking for the 2020 Presidential Primary thread Unlikely, why would a Republican run off against a Republican President?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 08:28
|
|
|
echronorian posted:Unlikely, why would a Republican run off against a Republican President? Because eventually the Cult of Reagan will go so far as staging real-world reenactments of Reagan's career.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 08:32
|
|
|
PupsOfWar posted:Because eventually the Cult of Reagan will go so far as staging real-world reenactments of Reagan's career. As long as they include the bit with Hinckley.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 10:49
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Bush/Cheney 2016 J.E.B. for Shadow President!
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 11:35
|
|
|
echronorian posted:Unlikely, why would a Republican run off against a Republican President? Because by 2020 Ted Cruz will have gone Independent and will govern by vetoing everything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 13:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:10 |
|
|
Joementum posted:For more on the Huckster, check out BuzzFeed Andy's latest, which goes down the rabbit hole of a "free" morality DVD about driving for young children. Holy hell, everyone watch the video in this article. They spend 2 minutes talking about how important the educational history DVD series is, and how they got great animators and historians to make it for them. Then they play a clip, and it's horrible. Not that you'd expect anything different, of course, but it's astonishingly bad. edit: I also really want to know what's going on behind the camera at 4:15 when the guy suddenly looks very afraid when looking toward the producers. Cognac McCarthy fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Mar 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 13:21
|
|
