|
Time to make my Goblins EDH deck a proper Tiny Leaders deck. Mono-red sucks in Commander anyways 
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 06:24 |
|
|
Are people even running tutors to find their commanders and not to find the cards they need in their 100 card singleton decks?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
Wezlar posted:Are people even running tutors to find their commanders and not to find the cards they need in their 100 card singleton decks? No, they're pretty much just to find the other half of your combo or get your engine going.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
Four Score posted:Time to make my Goblins EDH deck a proper Tiny Leaders deck. Mono-red sucks in Commander anyways Someone has never heard of Feldon.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
lol if you're playing commander and this rule makes you mad because now you can't beat the decks that should combo off too fast to be vulnerable to tuck effects anyways (aka what you should be playing if you had any clue what you were doing)
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
Chill la Chill posted:Coming in Q2 2016: magic keeps up with the cool kids and releases Small Heroes TM product, compatible with their old commander products! They'd just call it Tiny Leaders anyway, since unlike EDH, that name is marketable and cool.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:lol if you're playing commander I joke but having watched people play 1v1 commander at fnm I honestly don't see why anyone would choose to play it over any of the other formats. Baffles me even more that I know several people who play nothing but edh
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Wurzag posted:I joke but having watched people play 1v1 commander at fnm I honestly don't see why anyone would choose to play it over any of the other formats. Baffles me even more that I know several people who play nothing but edh 1v1 edric is the true essence of magic, and if people would play against it with their garbage commander decks all day I would rather do that than play any other format tbh
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
EDH is a circlejerking format, it's bad if you circlejerk with only one buddy. you have two hands, use them people!
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
Four Score posted:Time to make my Goblins EDH deck a proper Tiny Leaders deck. Mono-red sucks in Commander anyways You clearly haven't played Norin the Wary. There's nothing more wonderful than getting multiple triggers out of Goblin Matron using Cloudstone Curio, Warstorm Surge, Pandemonium, and Confusion in the Ranks. Also, Purphoros and the newly gifted Impact Tremors. And all I need to do is cast Norin once and wait. People will play dudes and swing with dudes. Nor in does everything else. Also, your favorite combination is Nor in, Genesis Chamber, and Confusion in the Ranks. I have never seen so many people afraid of Confusion in the Ranks in my life. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:49
|
|
|
Wurzag posted:I joke but having watched people play 1v1 commander at fnm I honestly don't see why anyone would choose to play it over any of the other formats. Baffles me even more that I know several people who play nothing but edh French 1v1 is actually an amazingly diverse format where about 20 different dudes make up the top tier. If you want to play "Ux control" you've got Narset, Tasigur, Wydwen, Nin, and Thraximundar as choices for this, all of which play differently from each other. I'm waiting for Tiny Leaders to develop a real cool metagame since it seems to be kind of the same except with Anafenza and Geist doing donuts in the parking lot and I want to know if I'm way off.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
Wezlar posted:Are people even running tutors to find their commanders and not to find the cards they need in their 100 card singleton decks? Only in Magical Sheldon Land.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
Chill la Chill posted:Coming in Q2 2016: magic keeps up with the cool kids and releases Small Heroes TM product, compatible with their old commander products! Unironically pumped for that; at least some of those cards would have an impact in Legacy due to the low cmc nature of Tiny Leaders.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 04:12
|
|
|
bhsman posted:Unironically pumped for that; at least some of those cards would have an impact in Legacy due to the low cmc nature of Tiny Leaders. can't do that because then you'll repeat what happened with TNN
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 04:22
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:can't do that because then you'll repeat what happened with TNN You still had stuff like Rain of Filth(?) and Fork-Mage that at least have a bit of an impact without going Pro-Player or anything, and even then TNN is not some oppressive monster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 04:29
|
|
|
bhsman posted:You still had stuff like Rain of Filth(?) and Fork-Mage that at least have a bit of an impact without going Pro-Player or anything, and even then TNN is not some oppressive monster. Toxic Deluge, right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 04:31
|
|
|
Unfortunately Force of Will is not tiny leaders compatible, but you know what is? Wasteland. And it'll be uncommon for a printing like that like it should be.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Toxic Deluge, right? Are we sure it's not Dirty Rain? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
I like how they got rid of tuck to mitigate the need to play tutors, instead of just getting rid of the stupid loving tutors in the first place. Survival of the Fittest is not banned in a singleton format lol.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
LordSaturn posted:And Ixidron could always turn poo poo face down. The face-down exile rules are weird - did they ever 'fix' the Pyxis trick? What's the Pyxis trick?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
100cs is actually a really fun format with a lot more sensible banlist than EDH and I wish more people played it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:I like how they got rid of tuck to mitigate the need to play tutors, instead of just getting rid of the stupid loving tutors in the first place. Survival of the Fittest is not banned in a singleton format lol. Hey dude, I still need to trade off 5 of them so let me finish doing that first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:18
|
|
|
vOv posted:What's the Pyxis trick? Pyxis exiles the top card of all libraries face-down. Since you can't look at the cards and they remain face-down until you actually use the Pyxis' second ability if it gets their Commander they can't get it back. If anyone could look at the cards it would be sent immediately to the Command Zone. This is why Praetor's Grasp-ing a Commander doesn't work. You get to look at the card so if you take a Commander you're forced to reveal it and give it back. It's kinda dumb. Cernunnos fucked around with this message at 05:22 on Mar 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:I like how they got rid of tuck to mitigate the need to play tutors, instead of just getting rid of the stupid loving tutors in the first place. Survival of the Fittest is not banned in a singleton format lol. Did a green deck kill your lover in cold blood why you were injured and powerless to stop it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
Some of us enjoy using Survival to get all the Praetors in the graveyard followed by Living Death thank you very much.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
Since I just got back into playing a bunch recently and I'm sad that it got banned in pauper... Did they ever explain how Treasure Cruise actually got printed in 2014?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Wezlar posted:Since I just got back into playing a bunch recently and I'm sad that it got banned in pauper... Its not overpowered at all in Standard. They don't test formats that aren't Standard.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
Wurzag posted:I joke but having watched people play 1v1 commander at fnm I honestly don't see why anyone would choose to play it over any of the other formats. Baffles me even more that I know several people who play nothing but edh It has the most built in excuses for losing and lets you pretend you're some kind of deck building mastermind. It's like the ultimate end game for anyone who has ever said "netdeck" unironically.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:27
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Its not overpowered at all in Standard. They don't test formats that aren't Standard. It's not like much testing is needed to say "this spell that lets you draw 3 cards for 1 mana might be broken in Modern/Legacy."
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:31
|
|
|
Konstantin posted:It's not like much testing is needed to say "this spell that lets you draw 3 cards for 1 mana might be broken in Modern/Legacy." It's no Visions of Beyond.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:I like how they got rid of tuck to mitigate the need to play tutors, instead of just getting rid of the stupid loving tutors in the first place. Survival of the Fittest is not banned in a singleton format lol. What do you ban when you ban tutors though? Stuff with [whatever]cycling? How about the Sliver Overlord?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
Just ban all cards that let you search your library. Problem solved.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:39
|
|
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:I like how they got rid of tuck to mitigate the need to play tutors, instead of just getting rid of the stupid loving tutors in the first place. Survival of the Fittest is not banned in a singleton format lol. Look they can only ban them if they let me play Maelstrom Nexus as a commander
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:47
|
|
|
theironjef posted:What do you ban when you ban tutors though? Stuff with [whatever]cycling? How about the Sliver Overlord? I mean not literally every tutor needs to be banned, but I don't see why they don't try and take out easy repeatable tutors like survival/ fauna shaman or really cheap powerful ones like demonic/vamp. I don't see Sliver Overlord as a problems because he only searches for slivers, so he keeps it kind of limited and he is your commander so you build around him. It's just super lame to play against some bant value/goodstuff deck that just tutors up silver bullets or efficient boring threats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:I mean not literally every tutor needs to be banned, but I don't see why they don't try and take out easy repeatable tutors like survival/ fauna shaman or really cheap powerful ones like demonic/vamp. I don't see Sliver Overlord as a problems because he only searches for slivers, so he keeps it kind of limited and he is your commander so you build around him. It's just super lame to play against some bant value/goodstuff deck that just tutors up silver bullets or efficient boring threats. As a sliver overlord edh player, I will now refer to tutor targets as sliver bullets.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:17
|
|
|
Would Cabal Therapy be fair game as a card that could see a reprint, functional or otherwise, at some point in the future in Standard?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Wezlar posted:Since I just got back into playing a bunch recently and I'm sad that it got banned in pauper... It's great for standard and limited, which is where they want to ensure cards are balanced.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Would Cabal Therapy be fair game as a card that could see a reprint, functional or otherwise, at some point in the future in Standard? I think Cabal Therapy is probably too good for Modern, but might be fine for Standard or if they want Modern to be 100% Abzan Hellscape forever. Therapy seems good in a format where Lingering Souls is playable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:34
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Would Cabal Therapy be fair game as a card that could see a reprint, functional or otherwise, at some point in the future in Standard? Maybe as a functional reprint? I think the "Cabal" part would probably disqualify it due to ~flavor reasons~ or whatever unless Cabal is a generic enough term for them to just reprint it as-is.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 06:24 |
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Would Cabal Therapy be fair game as a card that could see a reprint, functional or otherwise, at some point in the future in Standard? Someone asked Maro about that card specifically and he said it's too good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 07:40
|
|