|
triple sulk posted:c# owns
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 02:30 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 18:07 |
|
Now I’ve gone beyond just showing you sloppy code. Here be a grave debauchery and a crime against nature. A crime most languages won’t allow you to commit. We’re changing the String, one of the prophets. something about overloading operators and that crazy stringbuilder thing from java? idk im just a terrible programmer
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 12:27 |
|
i only use C strings in unsafee blocks, for the speed benefits. hell, chuck some assembler in there too
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 13:00 |
|
i only program in assembly because that shits faster yo
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 13:03 |
|
Awia posted:i only program in assembly because that shits faster yo same but javascript
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 13:06 |
|
Stringent posted:same but javascript when i said assemby i meant asm.js
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 13:09 |
|
node.js close to the metal etc.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 13:11 |
|
i just want people to know im going to have to handle this monster of a custom encapsulation for a h264 video stream sometime soon:code:
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 15:08 |
|
Awia posted:i just want people to know im going to have to handle this monster of a custom encapsulation for a h264 video stream sometime soon: i loving hate c-style comments
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 15:08 |
|
Awia posted:i just want people to know im going to have to handle this monster of a custom encapsulation for a h264 video stream sometime soon: draw it in a box diagram, print it, and hang it near your desk??
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 15:51 |
|
Awia posted:
im the chunck
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:05 |
|
Awia posted:oh well that sucks, negatively marked exams are dumb he caved in already after some people sent emails about the negative marking and they arent doing it anymore he then went on to write a paragraph talking about how it actually wouldnt have made much difference by giving an example in which someone gets 90% of the answers correct, lol
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:11 |
|
i don't think i've ever heard of negatively marked exams. sounds like a crock of poo poo to me.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:20 |
|
yeah, theyre loving dumb i see where theyre coming from, trying to stop you guessing on mutiple choice, but really it just stops you answering any qiuestion unless youre abso-loving-lutely sure of the answer
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:25 |
|
they did it on the sat as like -0.25 per wrong answer +1 per right answer so if you could eliminate one wrong answer it was still worthwhile to guess but lol that assumes your guess is a evenly distributed random variable when it most certainly isnt and your guess is probably the trap wrong answer
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:47 |
|
actually the wrong answers are specifically constructed so that they're obvious if you paid money to get sat tutoring. unsurprisingly the sat is actually a means/culture check rather than a serious academic tool which is why no one outside of america uses it
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 16:57 |
|
Valeyard posted:he caved in already after some people sent emails about the negative marking and they arent doing it anymore he then went on to write a paragraph talking about how it actually wouldnt have made much difference by giving an example in which someone gets 90% of the answers correct, lol lmao if youre not gonna get 90%+ correct
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 17:17 |
|
still, multiple choice is a loving bullshit way to exam a 4th year class
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 17:35 |
|
my dad had a professor who would give multiple choice tests with over 50 choices per question
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 19:10 |
|
Game Description Language makes me feel like I'm learning programming all over again. I'm week 3 into this course and it just seems really weird.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 20:29 |
|
fart simpson posted:my dad had a professor who would give multiple choice tests with over 50 choices per question checkboxes or radio buttons?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 20:37 |
|
fart simpson posted:my dad had a professor who would give multiple choice tests with over 50 choices per question solve for x A: x = 1 B: x = 2 C: x = 3 ... AX: x = 50 AY: x = 51 AZ: x = 52 BA: x = 53
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 20:41 |
|
prefect posted:checkboxes or radio buttons? radio buttons but he said the latter half were options like "x plus ab through aj, excluding ae" and also it was a history class
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 20:53 |
|
i have a dumb little python script that i wrote up to do some qa on data, check that certain files exist, etc. and i want to make it usable by neurotypicals (on windows). is there a reasonable way to give it a basic gui, or is the right answer to redo it in c# with a regular windows interface?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:57 |
|
turn it into a website
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:00 |
|
The Leck posted:i have a dumb little python script that i wrote up to do some qa on data, check that certain files exist, etc. and i want to make it usable by neurotypicals (on windows). is there a reasonable way to give it a basic gui, or is the right answer to redo it in c# with a regular windows interface? tkinter is the simplest thing. it comes in the default python for windows and it looks pretty good if you need something fancier, i think pyqt works on windows but i have never tried it
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:19 |
|
yeah, tkinter is probably what you want
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:20 |
|
gently caress using tkinter for anything maybe just set up a barebones flask instance and run the script as a webapp, the framework give you easy options if you want to authenticate it
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:26 |
|
Valeyard posted:gently caress using tkinter for anything converting a simple script to a web app and having it show progress, communicate errors, deal with local files is a pain, and I think The Leck is unlikely to lose in the marketplace to a scrappy competitor because of his clunky UI. and I'm someone who likes web tech more than is probably reasonable
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:28 |
|
Valeyard posted:gently caress using tkinter for anything "gently caress straightforward thing designed to solve exactly this problem, maybe just shoehorn it into unnecessarily complicated thing intended for completely different use cases instead"
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 19:17 |
|
The Leck posted:is the right answer to redo it in c# with a regular windows interface?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 20:10 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:this is the right answer 100% of the time for a small app If rewriting it is too much work, just have the c# thing call your python app
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 21:14 |
|
thanks for the input. web stuff is out, since this is happening within my office and lol at getting support for running a server or something, especially one that touches stuff on local file shares. i'll take a look at tkinter and either do that or use this as an opportunity to refresh my c# a little. basically i painted myself into a corner by writing a script to do some work and then being the only one who could comprehend running something not out of an access db.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 00:50 |
|
this thread is way to long to have not have a conv about tcl and its relation to C#/java/go/haskell
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 03:08 |
|
ousterhout threw a cheap shot at me in a presentation once. that's my tcl story.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 03:20 |
|
Subjunctive posted:and I'm someone who likes web tech more than is probably reasonable you mean at all?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 09:26 |
|
The Leck posted:i have a dumb little python script that i wrote up to do some qa on data, check that certain files exist, etc. and i want to make it usable by neurotypicals (on windows). is there a reasonable way to give it a basic gui, or is the right answer to redo it in c# with a regular windows interface? is IronPython still a thing? or some other Python-on-.NET thing where you could just pull your script in and wrap a real app around it?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 09:27 |
|
Innocent Bystander posted:this thread is way to long to have not have a conv about tcl and its relation to C#/java/go/haskell optimization via whitespace removal that should tell you everything you need to know about Tcl also I had to take the real TCL off my resume because of Tcl, drat it. (though that wasn't a big deal since everyone was going to PowerPlant anyway.)
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 09:29 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:If rewriting it is too much work, just have the c# thing call your python app
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 09:37 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 18:07 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:ive never looked at ironpython or anything before but does it pretty much let you write a c# wrapper around your python files so you can deploy the app without having to install python on the client? that was my impression of all the "IronLanguages" stuff - versions of Python, Ruby, etc. that use the CLR and compile to assemblies so they can interop with other CLR code.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 10:08 |