|
If you're teaching a module that has a competency like 'be able to solve these types of problems with this method' the assessment somewhere is going to have force you to demonstrate that you can. You have to be one obtuse motherfucker to not get that.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 08:34 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:19 |
|
I would rather read a Moby Dick-length tome of LL101s than one page of goons talking about food. Jesus Christ, guys.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 11:25 |
|
Mellow Seas posted:Moby Dick-length
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 11:34 |
|
Mellow Seas posted:I would rather read a Moby Dick-length tome of LL101s than one page of goons talking about food. Jesus Christ, guys. Someone Toxx this man. I physically recoiled when I thought about that much LL101.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 13:04 |
|
robotsinmyhead posted:Someone Toxx this man. I physically recoiled when I thought about that much LL101. Fulchrum is only at 14 pages in this thread, so Moby Dick is a bit far off, but you can get an idea of the nausea out of the most recent 2 to 3 pages of LL101 summaries. Truly it is a monument to Fulchrum's dedication for sticking with it this long.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 13:27 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:Fulchrum is only at 14 pages in this thread, so Moby Dick is a bit far off, but you can get an idea of the nausea out of the most recent 2 to 3 pages of LL101 summaries. I usually find that kind of dumb political poo poo mildly amusing, but after a couple of LL101 posts, I end up swearing at the computer screen. They are true artistes in that regard.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 13:51 |
|
Today I spent my lunch hour listening to a group of 60-something men discuss how we'd be better off if the country was run like in Logan's Run, without noticing the apparent irony.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 16:30 |
|
Maybe they just want the whore-teleporters. Or they believe in Carousel.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 16:33 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Maybe they just want the whore-teleporters. Let's build the euthanasia roller coaster.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 16:54 |
|
Does anyone have that cartoon of a town where one half is democrats and the other is republicans and the democrat side is nice and quaint while the republican side is a toxic wasteland filled with pawn shops?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 17:28 |
|
Just went to Wendy's with my little bro. We're in line to use the free style machine and some guy in a Sherwin Williams shirt was talking to some older gentleman wearing a "Jesus" hat. "Better be careful wearing that or the Obama REGIME will go after you" He then went on this rant about how Obama was the Anti-Christ because of the deal with Iran, and about how Jesus said a phrase similar to his name in the bible (in Luke), therefore Obama was the Anti-Christ. Incredible. I've never seen someone like this in this wild. e: link to this insanity http://www.truthorfiction.com/obama-antichrist-video/
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 19:08 |
|
I'm sorry if this is the wrong thread for it, but can someone explain to me the whole Clinton email thing? My father in law went off on a tangent about how the Clintons can do whatever they want and Hillary deleted all her emails about Benghazi, but I can't find a decent "here's what is factual and here's what is bullshit, and does any of this loving matter" site online. I probably won't even bring it up because gently caress arguing about politics to family, but not being able to find an unbiased account of what happened is kind of annoying.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 19:50 |
|
AFewBricksShy posted:Clinton lied, emails died.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:01 |
|
AFewBricksShy posted:I'm sorry if this is the wrong thread for it, but can someone explain to me the whole Clinton email thing? My father in law went off on a tangent about how the Clintons can do whatever they want and Hillary deleted all her emails about Benghazi, but I can't find a decent "here's what is factual and here's what is bullshit, and does any of this loving matter" site online. I probably won't even bring it up because gently caress arguing about politics to family, but not being able to find an unbiased account of what happened is kind of annoying. The unbiased account is nothing happened. There is nothing to rebut. The Right is absolutely convinced that HIlary is to blame somehow for Benghazi in some way because she did some thing and despite a complete lack of evidence for two and a half years now they absolutely will not give up on a stone cold trail. It's hysteria over nothing, because the media is fueled on outrage and if there's no outrage to be had welp better create some out of thin air. You can't rebut it any more than you can prove the non-existence of government agents to someone who is absolutely convinced an invisible gman lives in their closet. The current scandal is that she used her own email server for a while which is not a good idea but it doesn't mean anything by itself.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:07 |
|
There's something rather grim about the Benghazi story, given we are constantly forced to debunk bullshit Conservative conspiracy theories trying to score political points when one of the victims is literally the creator of the topic we're posting in. It has to be positively infuriating when opponents use your personal tragedy, or those of your loved ones, to score political points. PoizenJam fucked around with this message at 20:17 on Apr 10, 2015 |
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:14 |
|
Poizen Jam posted:There's something rather grim about the Benghazi story, given we are constantly forced to debunk bullshit Conservative conspiracy theories trying to score political points when one of the victims is literally the creator of the topic we're posting in. Something tells me Vilerat would have found the whole thing darkly hilarious, seeing people constantly having to deal with conspiracy theories surrounding his death in a thread he started.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:18 |
|
Poizen Jam posted:There's something rather grim about the Benghazi story, given we are constantly forced to debunk bullshit Conservative conspiracy theories trying to score political points when one of the victims is literally the creator of the topic we're posting in. They had vilerat's mother on Fox News paraded around about how she wanted an investigation among other things. She clearly looked like she was going through grief and didn't seem all that with it. She needs counseling and support, not for Neil Cavuto to interview her for conservative political points.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:23 |
|
I thought it was Chris Steven's mother that was being paraded around. Not that that'd be any better. I wish I could be angry about Fox exploiting a grief stricken mother but to be honest it breaches through the barrier of 'outrage' and straight into 'depressing' territory.Mister Bates posted:Something tells me Vilerat would have found the whole thing darkly hilarious, seeing people constantly having to deal with conspiracy theories surrounding his death in a thread he started. I really hope so.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:30 |
|
Poizen Jam posted:I thought it was Chris Steven's mother that was being paraded around. Not that that'd be any better. I wish I could be angry about Fox exploiting a grief stricken mother but to be honest it breaches through the barrier of 'outrage' and straight into 'depressing' territory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zijhKy_Avg . Fox News is loving awful. She's clearly about to cry, She's clearly upset and they're just using her for talking points. e2: And they were still doing it. In 20-loving-14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wgNY1XM4ok FuzzySkinner fucked around with this message at 20:39 on Apr 10, 2015 |
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:36 |
|
It's apparently very common for senior officials to use personal email accounts. Sarah Palin used a Yahoo account, Jeb Bush used Jeb@Jeb.com, Colin Powell used personal email too. I think it's now forbidden, but the policy went into effect after Hillary left.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:36 |
|
AFewBricksShy posted:I'm sorry if this is the wrong thread for it, but can someone explain to me the whole Clinton email thing? My father in law went off on a tangent about how the Clintons can do whatever they want and Hillary deleted all her emails about Benghazi, but I can't find a decent "here's what is factual and here's what is bullshit, and does any of this loving matter" site online. I probably won't even bring it up because gently caress arguing about politics to family, but not being able to find an unbiased account of what happened is kind of annoying. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/03/10/timeline-hillary-clintons-email-chain/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2015/03/10/hillary-clintons-emails-a-timeline-of-actions-and-regulations/ Have a good timeline of what she did and how the news broke. The main points is that it wasn't illegal, was noticed years ago, and anything to smear her will be used as fully as possible.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 20:45 |
|
happyhippy posted:http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/03/10/timeline-hillary-clintons-email-chain/ Thank you. I'll probably just ignore him like I do with everyone elses politics but at least I have the info.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 21:25 |
|
AFewBricksShy posted:Thank you. I'll probably just ignore him like I do with everyone elses politics but at least I have the info. The hell you are. You're gonna dump that poo poo on him and tell us how it turns out.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2015 22:48 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:It's apparently very common for senior officials to use personal email accounts. Sarah Palin used a Yahoo account, Jeb Bush used Jeb@Jeb.com, Colin Powell used personal email too. From that Washington Post article: quote:Nov. 4, 2005: The State Department updates the Foreign Affairs manual to state that “sensitive but unclassified” information should not be transmitted through personal e-mail accounts. “It is the Department’s general policy that normal day-to-day operations be conducted on an authorized AIS [Automated Information System], which has the proper level of security control to provide nonrepudiation, authentication and encryption, to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident information,” the manual says. The policy was changed immediately after she took office and she personally was charged with enforcing it. It was already in "hey, please don't do this" territory in 2005. It was not explicitly illegal to use a personal email address at the time she did it, but she was required to store copies of those emails on a governmental system, which she didn't do.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 00:12 |
|
Mellow Seas posted:I would rather read a Moby Dick-length tome of LL101s than one page of goons talking about food. Jesus Christ, guys. Be very careful what you wish for. I'm currently building a web app for an interview, and I am likely to just do a raw, full sized helldump this week, without the comments.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 00:13 |
|
Ah screw it, better to get it over and done with now. THIS WEEK IN LL101! Stay tuned for part 2
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 00:39 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Ah screw it, better to get it over and done with now. I actually tried to read these. I gave up after a dozen. Now I have a headache.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 00:49 |
|
Oh man my favorite game: is this person a moron or intentionally misrepresenting Obama? It's my favorite game because the answer is always both. quote:Says the person who has spent a non-zero amount of time complaining about businesses being compelled to make cakes for the gays. quote:LIBRULS THINK SMART BUT LIBRULS ACTUALLY DUMB HEH quote:You know what LL101, if you truly believed Christians were mere years away from being massacred in a millions-large genocide in the U.S. and you had any moral sense at all you'd probably take up arms in violent protest against such an outcome. I've been over this before, but that you haven't means you're either spineless cowards happy to sit by and watch the New Holocaust, or you're disingenuous shitlords who are making light of a travesty to try and gin up outrage over a political discussion. You choose. (Again it's both). Mo_Steel fucked around with this message at 01:07 on Apr 11, 2015 |
# ? Apr 11, 2015 00:59 |
|
VorpalBunny posted:I actually tried to read these. I gave up after a dozen. Now I have a headache.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 01:00 |
|
This is so disingenuous. No one is asking you to make a cake that is any different than you would for a straight couple, just gently caress off with this poo poo.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 01:47 |
|
The thing that bothers the poo poo out of me is the constant conflation of Christianity with being a bigoted shitstain. For any of that logic to make sense then Jesus would have to have said, "yo, judge the poo poo out of people, and let those fuckers know they done wrong." I have a suspicion he may have said something different than that. It's like they're strawmanning their own religion. Fulchrum posted:Ah screw it, better to get it over and done with now. "Stay tuned..." loving broke me dude. It broke me. I was like, "phew, this poo poo's over.." and then my heart sank.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 01:52 |
|
ErIog posted:"Stay tuned..." loving broke me dude. It broke me. I was like, "phew, this poo poo's over.." and then my heart sank. I was done about halfway through the list. Sheeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiit.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 01:55 |
|
ErIog posted:The thing that bothers the poo poo out of me is the constant conflation of Christianity with being a bigoted shitstain. For any of that logic to make sense then Jesus would have to have said, "yo, judge the poo poo out of people, and let those fuckers know they done wrong." I have a suspicion he may have said something different than that. Do you find yourself yelling at the screen as you read them too, or is it just me?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 02:06 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Ah screw it, better to get it over and done with now.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 02:07 |
|
ErIog posted:The thing that bothers the poo poo out of me is the constant conflation of Christianity with being a bigoted shitstain. For any of that logic to make sense then Jesus would have to have said, "yo, judge the poo poo out of people, and let those fuckers know they done wrong." I have a suspicion he may have said something different than that. It's also annoying that these same bakeries make cakes for second or third weddings without batting an eye. And I'll be they make cakes for baby showers for single mothers as well. If you are going to claim religious exemptions, you need to apply them evenly. Maybe these idiots could have a questionnaire to make sure they aren't baking cakes for sinful celebrations. Nope, they just hate the gays.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 02:17 |
|
Rick_Hunter posted:The Raw Story had an even better article about that: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/04/georgia-florists-religious-hypocrisy-shell-serve-adulterers-but-gay-couples-are-a-different-kind-of-sin/ Some batshit crazy woman posted:When he asked whether she would provide flowers for an adulterer or someone who had “dishonored” their parents, she replied affirmatively.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 02:23 |
|
I think I need to stop following this thread. All these LL101 posts are just making me too angry and it can't be good for my mental health.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 02:57 |
The LL posts were making me angry at first but I feel like my eyes just slide right off the screen now if I try to look at them. They've finally gotten so ridiculously stupid to the point that they just read more like a stupid dog barking than anything resembling a coherent thought.
|
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 03:02 |
|
Normally LL101 projects, but this time they projected so hard it was Imax levels of projection. Keep up the good work!
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 03:10 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:19 |
|
Opposition to gay marriage is rhetorically justified after the fact by scripture, but doesn't actually originate from it
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 03:12 |