|
By the way stand dev with HC-110 or Ilfotec HC is exactly the same as stand with R09. Same dilutions, same times, same procedures.
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 16:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 05:07 |
|
|
Understanding posted:Dilution H, 38 mins.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
Or get a Jobo or Uniroller, turn it on, and walk away for 38 minutes 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
Understanding posted:Dilution H, 38 mins. It's babby's first stand dev so I plan on drinking beers while the film develops without my help in the uni's dark room this evening 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:gently caress that noise so much Worked fine for 35mm, but i tried once every 10 mins with 4x5 and it came out all hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
pootiebigwang posted:
Having re-rolled film onto backing paper in the past, I can say with certainty that this sounds like a giant pain in the dick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
bulk load 220 then
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:bulk load 220 then I have a bunch of 220 that my girlfriends dad gave me from his freezer stock but I have no idea what to do with it. Pretty sure I can shoot it with my Pentax 67 right? What's different about it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
220 is twice the film but the same size spool because it has no backing paper. You need to swap pressure plates to use it or your shots will all be out of focus. The p67 takes 220 yeah
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:I have a bunch of 220 that my girlfriends dad gave me from his freezer stock but I have no idea what to do with it. just make sure to move the 120 switch to 220 and you are golden.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
Yup, the backing pressure plate slides from 120 to 220, and there's also that screw on the side that you rotate from 120 to 220. The back will also say 220 once you slide the pressure plate over.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:03
|
|
|
I intentionally left a holder with a sheet of Portra in my checked luggage for the Ethiopia -> US trip.
MrBlandAverage fucked around with this message at 01:04 on Apr 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
I thought ISO 800 and below was supposed to go through x-rays just fine 
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
I am guessing they use pretty intense x-rays when you travel from Africa to US
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
404notfound posted:I thought ISO 800 and below was supposed to go through x-rays just fine BANME.sh posted:I am guessing they use pretty intense x-rays when you travel from Africa to US ISO 800 and below are fine for the carry-on x-ray machines and all of my other film went through those just fine. It's the x-ray machines for the checked luggage you need to worry about. tl;dr never ever ever put your film in checked luggage, at the very least if you're traveling to the US. MrBlandAverage fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Apr 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:ISO 800 and below are fine for the carry-on x-ray machines and all of my other film went through those just fine. It's the x-ray machines for the checked luggage you need to worry about. Just to add on that. >800 is ok through carry-on too. It's all about how many times you go through. I can't remember where, but I think kodak even put out some numbers on how many passes is ok. As a note, I had to put my 3200 film through 3 carry-on xray passes on a recent trip. No problems.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Question about dust spotting B+W. This is a partially processed negative. Shot on Ilford 3200 B+W. I've been noticing that the spot healing tool does a really poor job when it comes to grain like this. It basically just creates a blur, which is fine for color films at a lower ISO. For this though, it seems pretty noticeable. Is there a better way to do dust spotting? Should I just clone stamp it? It's particularly noticeable to the left of his head.  img007 by spikemccue, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
Spot Healing Brush with Type set to "content-aware" works really good, I found. Type "proximity match" might work well too, especially at duplicating the grain.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 05:37
|
|
|
I never have an issue with content aware spot healing but in older versions I would have to use the patch tool sometimes if it did that mushy grain thing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 06:09
|
|
|
BANME.sh posted:Spot Healing Brush with Type set to "content-aware" works really good, I found. Type "proximity match" might work well too, especially at duplicating the grain. That's exactly what I use. 8th-snype posted:I never have an issue with content aware spot healing but in older versions I would have to use the patch tool sometimes if it did that mushy grain thing. This is photoshop cc.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:I intentionally left a holder with a sheet of Portra in my checked luggage for the Ethiopia -> US trip. I feel like a dick for asking TSA to hand check my 400 now, but to be fair, the common consensus is that there's no reason to use film over digital, so I don't really expect them to care/know about minor imperfections due to Xrays. This is good info. VVV that's exactly my point luchadornado fucked around with this message at 15:06 on Apr 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 15:00
|
|
|
And yet there's still no reason to have your 400 speed film hand-checked (out of your carry-on, clearly) because that won't happen unless it's in a checked bag.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 15:05
|
|
|
I've been doing it when I fly just to preempt a "what the gently caress is this?" from the screener.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 15:08
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:That's exactly what I use. Use a smaller brush.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 15:32
|
|
|
Pukestain Pal posted:Use a smaller brush. Yeah, this, and I think the spot healing brush has a "create texture" option that samples the surrounding texture.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:That's exactly what I use. Oh well then if manually selecting a heal source (or the create texture thingy) doesn't work then I suggest using the patch tool on a larger area and then if you have to heal out the edges of that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 17:21
|
|
|
Is Astia as good as everyone says? I found myself 10 rolls of it tonight - 35mm though. Wish it was 120 but I can't complain. Expired 2002 but refrigerated.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
BANME.sh posted:Is Astia as good as everyone says? I found myself 10 rolls of it tonight - 35mm though. Wish it was 120 but I can't complain. Expired 2002 but refrigerated. Visit the Astia Microthread and look around! Or check out most of MrBlandAverage's posts - I'm not sure what other color he's shooting, but I'm pretty sure it's his favorite.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
I lovvvve Astia
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:Visit the Astia Microthread and look around! Portra 400 and Astia for me! I should be using more of my Astia hoard. https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=astia&sort=relevance&user_id=40786724%40N00
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
I shot some expired Portra 400NC. Is there any compensation I can do for it in development or did I gently caress up by just shooting it at box speed? I shot some expired Ektachrome at box speed that was was stored in the same conditions and those came out fine, but I don't know about Portra.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 18:35
|
|
|
pootiebigwang posted:I shot some expired Portra 400NC. Is there any compensation I can do for it in development or did I gently caress up by just shooting it at box speed? I shot some expired Ektachrome at box speed that was was stored in the same conditions and those came out fine, but I don't know about Portra. Portra NC was introduced in... 2006, I think? When did yours expire? You might want to push it a stop, but I really doubt it's expired enough to make a huge difference.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:Portra NC was introduced in... 2006, I think? When did yours expire? You might want to push it a stop, but I really doubt it's expired enough to make a huge difference. Expired in 2008 I think
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
You'll be fine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
I shot some expired Portra NC and 1/3 of the rolls had a really heavy cyan cast.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Anime Sandwich posted:I shot some expired Portra NC and 1/3 of the rolls had a really heavy cyan cast. Heavy cyan cast usually means that it was stored hot. Was yours stored in a hot environment?
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
VomitOnLino posted:Heavy cyan cast usually means that it was stored hot. Portra 160NC just gets cyan. I had some 20 count boxes bought from a pro that had always been frozen and they had a tinge to them at 3+ years old.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2015 06:56
|
|
|
VomitOnLino posted:Heavy cyan cast usually means that it was stored hot. No clue. I bought them at a used gear sale at a photography school so I assume they were stored properly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2015 14:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 05:07 |
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:Question about dust spotting B+W. I use the healing tool (not the spot healing tool) with clone stamp and content-aware fill for larger sections as needed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2015 15:34
|
|