|
what do you like best This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| pics |
|
69 | 0.39% |
| vids |
|
420 | 2.40% |
| gazza.txt |
|
8008 | 45.77% |
| havin yer mam |
|
9001 | 51.44% |
| Total: | 17498 votes | ||
|
Who the gently caress edits on AVID anymore? And if he did, why didn't he just export that clip?
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 21:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 06:53 |
|
|
The head doctor and some of his staff resigned today. Dude has been at the club since 1977
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
 Young Del Bosque looks a lot like Puyol here
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
Bit like De Niro in Cape Fear too
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
liverpoolfans.jpg
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 08:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 10:41
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/FutbolSergi/status/588969896253399040 I too would make an impression of r2d2 screaming if I scored that goal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 11:00
|
|
|
I can't decide if these names are better or worse than Keirrison
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 13:59
|
|
|
Bogan Krkic posted:I can't decide if these names are better or worse than Keirrison Bactéria and Lynneeker are still the best worst Brazilian footballer names
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 14:30
|
|
|
There's some dude named (real name not brazilian nickname) Rudigullithi
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 15:48
|
|
|
Raikard.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 17:33
|
|
|
Tsaedje posted:Bactéria and Lynneeker are still the best worst Brazilian footballer names When this topic comes up I always wonder who thinks a football chairman and manager will be sitting in their office going "You know who we need to liven up this team? Bacteria and Mosquito."
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 21:22
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:When this topic comes up I always wonder who thinks a football chairman and manager will be sitting in their office going "You know who we need to liven up this team? Bacteria and Mosquito." They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:20
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI Awesome.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:07
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI Not bad, not bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:08
|
|
|
guardian.jpg
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
Paddyb posted:They'd be the backbone of Fully Sick XI Idgi
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
 are you serious
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:44
|
|
|
Paperback Writer posted:
excuse me lady posted:guardian.jpg
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 09:10
|
|
|
The Guardian made the decision to throw everything into the internet a few years ago and so what you have are a bunch of middle-aged men all armed with twitter accounts and who have been told to sit 'below the line' for hours a day who are absolutely clueless about any of it but are self-important enough to believe that they should shape it. The whole paper has been completely unreadable for years now. Football Weekly is the only decent thing about the whole thing
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 09:11
|
|
|
this is a good page
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 09:15
|
|
|
opus111 posted:The Guardian made the decision to throw everything into the internet a few years ago and so what you have are a bunch of middle-aged men all armed with twitter accounts and who have been told to sit 'below the line' for hours a day who are absolutely clueless about any of it but are self-important enough to believe that they should shape it. The whole paper has been completely unreadable for years now. Football Weekly is the only decent thing about the whole thing "Decent" is very relative, a good deal of the guests are loving garbage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 11:32
|
|
|
I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:05
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist? ah yes
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:14
|
|
|
opus111 posted:Football Weekly is the only decent thing about the whole thing decent is being very generous
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist? It's not the article, it's the bigger picture.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
lots of closet racists ITT atm
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 13:05
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist? WOW mods??
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 13:35
|
|
|
So that guy changed his hairstyle two times, I don't get what's the big deal
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:04
|
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist?  ephex posted:So that guy changed his hairstyle two times, I don't get what's the big deal 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:09
|
|
|
this whole page is wrong thread, Jesus Christ
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Froist posted:It's not the article, it's the bigger picture. that's a drat good avatar, friend
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
opus111 posted:The Guardian made the decision to throw everything into the internet a few years ago and so what you have are a bunch of middle-aged men all armed with twitter accounts and who have been told to sit 'below the line' for hours a day who are absolutely clueless about any of it but are self-important enough to believe that they should shape it. The whole paper has been completely unreadable for years now. Football Weekly is the only decent thing about the whole thing somehow missed this, what utter shite
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 06:53 |
|
|
Syncopated posted:I didn't get what was so funny about that article when it was first posted in the other thread, and I don't get it now either. Something about the Guardian? The journalist? The Guardian is owned by KFC
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:49
|
|
