|
Indolent Bastard posted:Nope, but that was never the plan. It would have upset my wife. I asked for a picture of her with it but she played shy and refused, but she was over the moon about it. I made her swear on her life to take pictures when she gets it painted. I'd like to see them- I've given a lot to Goons (mostly the oath thread), so I'd like to not get shat on Quite so much for saying £20 for a single jetbike is a bit much ! Also, I wasn't sure it'd arrived ok
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 22:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 16:37 |
|
Lord Twisted posted:Pic dump from yesterdays game against JackMack These are good. My favourite is the dreadnought implacably advancing on the scouts for the whole game and then standing there, menacingly at the critical moment or the bravery evident inthe land raider precision parking to avoid the wrath of the knight (stupid idea) It was up there with my most enjoyable games ever. JackMack fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Apr 16, 2015 |
# ? Apr 16, 2015 22:30 |
|
Anyone got a map I can straight up steal that would be great for a 6 player 40k campaign that would last about 5 turns? Edit: Compulsory GW hilarity. In the Warzone Damnos book, they have a Pedro Kantor painted up as a deathwatch marine. DJ Dizzy fucked around with this message at 02:34 on Apr 17, 2015 |
# ? Apr 17, 2015 02:32 |
|
Renfield posted:I'd like to see them- I've given a lot to Goons (mostly the oath thread), so I'd like to not get shat on Quite so much for saying £20 for a single jetbike is a bit much ! £20 for a single jetbike is definitely a bit much.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 02:44 |
|
I want all my warhams made in China by people that make $5 a day so I can have my $15 box of space marines. Do it, GeeDubs
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:01 |
|
How's that computer/smartphone/everythingelectronicyouown working out for you?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:10 |
|
I want all of my thread posts to be false dichotomies with the assumption that the only possible options are "slave labor" and "be willing to pay literally any amount of money no matter how much for plastic toys."
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:11 |
|
You're doing it all wrong. You can't be self aware.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:14 |
|
AbusePuppy posted:I want all of my thread posts to be false dichotomies with the assumption that the only possible options are "slave labor" and "be willing to pay literally any amount of money no matter how much for plastic toys." I'm just poo poo posting. I think the price of things needs to come down as a new player that wants to get involved more. Things like a box of tactical marines could really stand to come down to $30 instead of the $40 that they are, and I'm sure that can be done without outsourcing their labor overseas. It's just discouraging going in to a store and looking at two boxes of models and knowing that it's going to run up to $100 after tax.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:23 |
|
I'm fairly certain all their plastics are already made overseas. Have you checked the source of the product lately? It could be why all the resin knock offs are so easy to do, since those 5 dollar a day workers can get with their cousins down the block and together make 30 buck resin Riptides after the factory closes down for the night.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:28 |
|
spacegoat posted:How's that computer/smartphone/everythingelectronicyouown working out for you? It's pretty sweet tbh. I have all my stolen rule books in pdfs on my phone.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:30 |
|
Doctor Borris posted:I'm fairly certain all their plastics are already made overseas. Have you checked the source of the product lately? It could be why all the resin knock offs are so easy to do, since those 5 dollar a day workers can get with their cousins down the block and together make 30 buck resin Riptides after the factory closes down for the night. All of their plastics are made either in Nottingham or Memphis. That's it. It's one of the few genuinely and entirely admirable things about the company.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:33 |
|
Gapey Joe Stalin posted:All of their plastics are made either in Nottingham or Memphis. That's it. It's one of the few genuinely and entirely admirable things about the company. The Wall of Martyrs stuff is made in China, though.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:52 |
|
DO IT TO IT posted:The Wall of Martyrs stuff is made in China, though.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:58 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:In some countries/industries there are laws that regulate what you can and can't put in credits. For games made in America, for example, if 100 people were voice actors on GTA and one of them was unionized and 99 weren't you couldn't include the other 99 people in the credits without breaking your union contract. You could give them 'special thanks', but you couldn't list them as an actor. Agreed, if GW hasn't cared about anything else its' customers have bellyached about, they aren't going to start with taking authors' names off of codexes because people said terrible things about Mat Ward (or Cruddace, or Gav Thorpe, or whoever). My guess is that it's possible that someone started moaning about how since it's their book with their name on the cover, they should start receiving more compensation/have more say in the way things are going regarding whatever game they were writing for (or something that basically made GW go "ok we need to slap this person down a notch or two"). Something like that, anyways.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 07:15 |
|
Dumb rules question. If a model has a pistol, but no CCW, does that mean it gets a "free" CCW because it doesn't have a weapon with the melee type? In other words, if a model is only armed with a pistol, does it get +1 extra attacks for having 2 weapons? I'm looking at the pistol entries on page 41/42 which contradict each other. One says pistols "count as a CCW in the assault phase" and on the other page it says they "can be used as a CCW". Then there's the no melee weapon rule with 'unless it's specifically stated you have a weapon with the Melee type, your model is treated as having a single CCW.' I love this well written game.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 07:32 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:Dumb rules question. If a model has a pistol, but no CCW, does that mean it gets a "free" CCW because it doesn't have a weapon with the melee type? In other words, if a model is only armed with a pistol, does it get +1 extra attacks for having 2 weapons? I'm going to guess that if a dude only has a pistol he doesn't get a bonus attack since it counts as a close combat weapon and he wouldn't be entitled to a "free" one. Seems pretty simple to me.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 07:39 |
|
My guess: if you choose to not use a pistol as melee weapon, you get a free ccw, but since the pistol doesn't count as a second melee weapon your model is still stuck with a single attack.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 07:47 |
|
spacegoat posted:You're doing it all wrong. You can't be self aware. I am a Space Marine. My fandom isn't horrifically overpriced. ... Thank you, Tumblr. Star Man posted:I want all my warhams made in China by people that make $5 a day so I can have my $15 box of space marines. Do it, GeeDubs They are already doing it. I've mentioned before that my brother impulse-bought the "Asian people have smaller hands for soldering electronics!" -An Actual hosed Up Human Being in the 1980's. "If we outsource labor prices will go down!" -A Marketing Expert That Knows Prices Will Go UP Along With Profits Post 9-11 User fucked around with this message at 09:20 on Apr 17, 2015 |
# ? Apr 17, 2015 09:13 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:My guess: if you choose to not use a pistol as melee weapon, you get a free ccw, but since the pistol doesn't count as a second melee weapon your model is still stuck with a single attack. Yes, otherwise tactical marines would get an extra attack and then they would be equally as effect in assault as assault marines.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 09:25 |
|
ZachAttack posted:Actually I really appreciate the feedback! I have no idea how to price this stuff so I mostly just took the GW price for the individual pieces and took %30 off. How much was the old BF MSRP/RRP? I think it was £60 - I don't know the american price, but the exchange rate is almost exactly 2:3 right now. Plenty of online stores go down to 25% off retail, so if I were selling NOS models I would probably try and get 25-30% off retail for them. Hope that helps, I'd buy the buggers myself if we weren't on opposite sides of the Atlantic.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 09:27 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:Dumb rules question. If a model has a pistol, but no CCW, does that mean it gets a "free" CCW because it doesn't have a weapon with the melee type? In other words, if a model is only armed with a pistol, does it get +1 extra attacks for having 2 weapons? This loving game. If not for the "counts as a CCW" passage, then technically yes the model would get a free invisible CCW and get +1 attack. The passage about counting-as having a CCW only exists to counter-act other grognards that would say, "Your model doesn't have a weapon therefore it doesn't get to attack in close combat." I remember as far back as 3rd edition some people were confused about if you could swing a bolter in close combat or not. But it doesn't. This is even worse than people that say you can't use a pistol in close combat after you shoot it. This (and editorial laziness) is why Games Workshop inserted a section into the rules about not being a thick-skulled donk starting in 6th edition.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 09:36 |
|
In the nick of time! Just sold my Eldar codex a few minutes ago, already received payment! I hope this guy doesn't check the GW website this weekend.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 10:51 |
|
krushgroove posted:In the nick of time! Just sold my Eldar codex a few minutes ago, already received payment! I hope this guy doesn't check the GW website this weekend. Do you feel bad a lil?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 11:40 |
|
Post 9-11 User posted:This loving game. If not for the "counts as a CCW" passage, then technically yes the model would get a free invisible CCW and get +1 attack. The passage about counting-as having a CCW only exists to counter-act other grognards that would say, "Your model doesn't have a weapon therefore it doesn't get to attack in close combat." I remember as far back as 3rd edition some people were confused about if you could swing a bolter in close combat or not. I'm reminded of the 5E Necron codex - the Canoptek Wraiths could buy a chest-mounted particle caster (S6AP5 pistol, essentially) for 5P - paired with them obviously having close combat implements of some sort you'd expect they'd get an extra attack out of it but of course when somebody asked, the FAQ ruled 'no'. Meanwhile Canoptek Spyders could buy the fabricator claw array that gave them the repair ability AND said 'this counts as a close combat weapon' - again, somebody asked if the extra CCW would give them an extra attack and the answer was 'no'. Why the hell did they even feel the need to add the note, then? poo poo like this is why me and my buds have been tempted to make a 'for common sense' set of houserules for our mancave. Drake_263 fucked around with this message at 12:11 on Apr 17, 2015 |
# ? Apr 17, 2015 12:08 |
|
Moola posted:Do you feel bad a lil? Maybe the guy's a collector, who knows?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 12:58 |
|
I finally finished my havoc squad for my Black Legion army. I hate assembling these loving metal autocannon bits. Beats finecast, though. The best part is that this gives me 1,500 points of Black Legion*, finally. Wooooo! It's a pretty poo poo army as-is, but I don't care. Have some lovely photos! *I have more, but I only play with painted mans.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 13:26 |
|
You could've just converted some autocannons out of the heavy bolters no one uses Your army is though. Despite being the 'generic' legion I don't think I've ever seen anyone actually PLAY a Black Legion force, so bonus points on that.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 13:43 |
|
Great painting on those Black Legion rhinos, looks sharp.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 13:55 |
|
That army coupled with the fact that I just finished the Talon of Horus book has convinced me to get back to painting CSM. Just ordered a Chaos Lord kit to make a counts-as Abbadon (I loath the "current" model).
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:02 |
|
PierreTheMime posted:That army coupled with the fact that I just finished the Talon of Horus book has convinced me to get back to painting CSM. Just ordered a Chaos Lord kit to make a counts-as Abbadon (I loath the "current" model). The sword from the DV chaos lord would be perfect for Drach'nyen.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:09 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:Dumb rules question. If a model has a pistol, but no CCW, does that mean it gets a "free" CCW because it doesn't have a weapon with the melee type? In other words, if a model is only armed with a pistol, does it get +1 extra attacks for having 2 weapons? This is the first "exploit" people were wondering about in 6th. The rules are actually pretty clear though: Pistols count as close combat weapons. You look up what a close combat weapon is and under its entry on page 41 it has Type: Melee. Therefore Pistol has Type: Melee and the model has a weapon with the Melee type.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:36 |
|
Stupid rules question since I haven't used a Walker before. The Skitarii chickenbots have a S+3 AP- lance, but since the unit type is 'Walker' they get Smash, so the lance attacks are all AP2, correct?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:44 |
|
Walkers don't get smash.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:47 |
|
TKIY posted:Stupid rules question since I haven't used a Walker before. MasterSlowPoke posted:Walkers don't get smash. Bingo. They DO get Hammer of Wrath though.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:53 |
|
drat I thought that they did. So S8 AP- then. How does that make sense? Like being hit really hard with a pillow.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:54 |
|
PierreTheMime posted:That army coupled with the fact that I just finished the Talon of Horus book has convinced me to get back to painting CSM. Just ordered a Chaos Lord kit to make a counts-as Abbadon (I loath the "current" model). Mine's a kitbash of the finecast abaddon model with the plastic Terminator Lord. I used Abaddon's top-knot, shoulder trophies, talon, and sword. I made the chest decor using a plastic skull from the chaos vehicle upgrade kit and some green stuff. The Abaddon bits fit fine, though you want to use the plastic chaos lord head--the finecast one is tiny. Here are some old poo poo photos of him for (semi) detail: On that note, here's a gallery of all my BL dudes so far for anyone interested: http://imgur.com/a/JpFCu TheChirurgeon fucked around with this message at 15:04 on Apr 17, 2015 |
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:55 |
|
Moola posted:Do you feel bad a lil? Caveat Emptor mother fucker. It's OK Moola, when a ham is spurned by their beloved game it takes them one step closer to quitting it forever; krushgroove probably did the guy a favor.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 14:59 |
|
Sydney Bottocks posted:Agreed, if GW hasn't cared about anything else its' customers have bellyached about, they aren't going to start with taking authors' names off of codexes because people said terrible things about Mat Ward (or Cruddace, or Gav Thorpe, or whoever). My guess is that it's possible that someone started moaning about how since it's their book with their name on the cover, they should start receiving more compensation/have more say in the way things are going regarding whatever game they were writing for (or something that basically made GW go "ok we need to slap this person down a notch or two"). Something like that, anyways. Actually, around the time they stopped using author names Jervis Johnson was publicly extremely hosed off with the Matt Ward hate. I was in the room with him when someone asked a thinly veiled Ward question during a seminar. I have no doubt in my mind that they dropped the credit in a direct response to the ludicrous internet vitriol. Not everything needs to be a retarded conspiracy theory about how evil GW is.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 15:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 16:37 |
Ward was (is he still with GW?) the best codex writer. All of his books were good and the only reason people hated him was because they used codexes where cruddace assigned point values using a dartboard.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 15:23 |