|
I'm so loving hype for toon support.
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 16:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:41 |
|
|
Toon is going to be the most annoying deck to play against though. "Oh you're not playing lvl 4 toolbox and didn't draw MST? GG" It's going to be so much fun. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 16:52
|
|
|
Wait, there's MORE toon support? Or is this just Kingdom and Cydra?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
I feel guilty that I love this show and yet I absolutely can't understand the card game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:While that video was an overkill, Sphere does have plenty of potential. Specially on today's meta where many decks can summon more than two monsters on the first turn. The biggest problem with Toons isn't anything more than Toon Kingdom not being supported well enough. Card Guard/Field Barrier don't tend to it well enough, and toons need a better way of protecting it. EDIT: Nevermind, Malefic Stardust Dragon exists.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:
YES!  god this new toon support is everything I ever wanted and more.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
Slur posted:The biggest problem with Toons isn't anything more than Toon Kingdom not being supported well enough. Card Guard/Field Barrier don't tend to it well enough, and toons need a better way of protecting it. The biggest problem with Toons is that all their old monsters are bogged down by arbitrary restrictions and tribute summoning.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
Playtesting Malefic Stardust Dragon in toons has made me realize that playing toons with it is making them not fun, but practical. Playing without it makes toons fun, but impractical.
Slur fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Apr 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
Regarding the Tag Team event tonight, depending on when I finish work I may prioritize FNM instead. Fair warning if I don't show by 6:30 or so.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
I'm going to have to drop out of Neo Team Xyz. I've had some IRL stuff come up, so I probably won't be around when things get going.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Dexie posted:I'm going to have to drop out of Neo Team Xyz. I've had some IRL stuff come up, so I probably won't be around when things get going. Its fine, ive had some stuff come up too, and it looks like old xyz is gonna be there. Ill try and make the tournament but Ill definitely be late .
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
Quincytbb posted:Its fine, ive had some stuff come up too, and it looks like old xyz is gonna be there. Ill try and make the tournament but Ill definitely be late . Sorry Quincy. We'll team back up and kick some rear end next time though!
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
Dexie posted:Sorry Quincy. Im looking forward to it!
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
Okay then so if everyone can file into the Steam chat so we can begin?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
So, we have these things now: http://ygorganization.com/ocg-cardo-updates/ New cards for the Igknights. They're not named Igknight, but they're meant to be used with the archetype. I'll go ahead and warn you, this is going to be an angry rant, so feel free to ignore the rest of this post if you'd like. I could rant all day about how terrible Igknights are. Let's ignore the fact that Igknights are one of the most degenerate, broken decks in the game already. Let's ignore the fact that Fire/Warrior is a super uncreative type of monster and that Konami could be doing so much more. No, let's focus on the fact that these two cards are Dragons. loving DRAGONS. Why? loving WHY? I get it. They're knights with dragon powers and dragon armor. Whatever, that's fine. Uncreative, but fine. But why are they DRAGONS? Why are they not WYRMS? You made a new loving monster type, now actually USE it. DO SOMETHING with it. All you've done with the drat things is one mediocre archetype and some not too great support for them. I mean, look at Psychics. Konami handled Psychics PERFECTLY. They had tons of awesome, non-archetypal cards straight from the start (in fact, we still don't have a true Psychic archetype), they were GOOD cards that were super splashable. They were meant to push Synchro Summoning, the new summoning type that was introduced when they were, and they had a pretty noticeable role in the anime. Why haven't there been any Wyrms in Arc-V yet? Just one Wyrm user to help push the type and make it seem important. Why don't we have any Wyrm Pendulums (aside from the Zefra pair)? It's just...for gently caress's sake, Wyrms are already super redundant (seriously, Dragons and Wyrms are thematically the exact same thing, and making a new monster type when there's so many unsupported and unloved monster types already is insulting), but if they're going to be around, at least DO SOMETHING with them!  Alright, rant over. I just needed to get that out of my system. Fuckin' Konami, I swear. SO! How did the tournament go?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:26
|
|
|
Igknights are cool
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:34
|
|
|
Igknights are super lame and break the game almost as much as Nekroz.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
Dexie posted:But why are they DRAGONS? Why are they not WYRMS? more dragon support during the time of the dragon rulers: a good idea
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:42
|
|
|
You mean those things that are banned now?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:43
|
|
|
Dexie posted:You mean those things that are banned now? alcharagia posted:during the time of the dragon rulers
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:44
|
|
|
as in, "the reason wyrms exist was because giving dragons that much more support during the time of the dragon rulers is a bad idea"
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
alcharagia posted:as in, "the reason wyrms exist was because giving dragons that much more support during the time of the dragon rulers is a bad idea" How about...not making any support for Dragons and then not making Wyrms, then? How about giving some attention to something that's not a Spellcaster/Fiend/Dragon/Warrior/Machine for once? Reptiles, Insects, Pyros, and Rocks all say hi.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
Dexie posted:How about...not making any support for Dragons and then not making Wyrms, then? How about giving some attention to something that's not a Spellcaster/Fiend/Dragon/Warrior/Machine for once? I am giving you the reason, I'm no miracle worker. Also: Gem-Knights.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
Eh, true, I forgot Gem-Knights, but all their support is archetypal stuff. I'd love to see the undersupported monsters types get more attention in the form of generic type support. The whole point is, anyway, that Wyrms are stupid and Konami has horribly mismanaged them so far.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 04:57
|
|
|
Everyone forgot Thunder type. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:01
|
|
|
Okay so obviously the tournament didn't continue today, and it can't happen tomorrow, so instead, we're going to try for the 23rd/24th in the coming week. okay?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
Nyaa posted:Everyone forgot Thunder type. Thunders are in an okay place, which is why I didn't mention them. They have Recycling Batteries and Thunder Seahorse, both of which are amazing, Hunders are a solid rank 4/synchro 8 deck, and Thunder King Rai-Oh and Denko Sekka are two of the most powerful anti-meta monsters in the game. Watts and Batterymen are also both decent, mid-ranged archetypes. Could they be better? Definitely. But as it stands, they're not a bad typing at all. EDIT: One of my favorite Yugitubers, TheRJB0, loving loves Thunder monsters, and has an entire series of videos about the type. Some of it is a little outdated, but anyone who's interested in Thunder monsters should check him out. https://www.youtube.com/user/TheRJB0/search?query=rethinking+thunder Vandar fucked around with this message at 05:22 on Apr 18, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Nyaa posted:Everyone forgot Thunder type. What about the Divine Beast attribute? Come now, it's like Konami completely forgot about them!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
Slur posted:What about the Divine Beast attribute? Come now, it's like Konami completely forgot about them! Its hilarious because you posted this during the one time when they actually got something new, even if it is just the Raball.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 06:01
|
|
|
where is the arcana force and neo spacian support?!?!?!?!?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 07:10
|
|
|
Dexie posted:So, we have these things now: It's amazing how there's not yet a single Igknight boss monster that has anything going for it that would motivate using it over the standard Infinity plus Lancer opening. They really did not think through the base-cards.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 07:10
|
|
|
You guys should recommend Yugitubers I need some to watch now that Yugioh4realmen is apparently dead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 07:40
|
|
|
Dexie posted:Eh, true, I forgot Gem-Knights, but all their support is archetypal stuff. I'd love to see the undersupported monsters types get more attention in the form of generic type support. Well, the Zexal-era packs had a bunch of support for rocks thrown in. Nothing gamebreaking or anything, but still able to synergize with previous rocks. Catapult zone, block golem and Attack the Moon spring to mind. Not to mention the Gogogo monsters and all the really good Koaki Meirus.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 07:51
|
|
|
Speaking of, interesting video of a Dreadscythe OTK deck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRbIjg815vY Honestly, I didn't even thought the card were playable
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 07:51
|
|
|
VJeff posted:You guys should recommend Yugitubers I need some to watch now that Yugioh4realmen is apparently dead. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NT6X3GSakE *Dude which has been adding all the new cards to YGOPRO Salvation at breakneck speeds, spends the rest of his time trying out absurd gimmick decks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlKkrYUtKYM *Tries out new archetypes, keeps track of the competitive scene and does cross format duels frequently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNO5j1MkV1w *Trigger warning: AznEyes ** It cannot be emphasised enough how peak internet AznEyes is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-nHrSvi48I MiddleOne fucked around with this message at 09:14 on Apr 18, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 08:28
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9dtNUzKtfY I'd like to recommend this guy. Makes all kinds of decks, coded for how competitive he's making it. quote:--Deck code names--
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 11:07
|
|
|
Dabir posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9dtNUzKtfY Whoa, this guy is even more fond of gimmick decks than I am. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MpaOvYpGW0
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 11:57
|
|
|
So people who still haven't watched Zexal don't know how dumb this show got, apologies for the impact font it's the only image I could find 100000 attack, because you know, with 4000 LP that's necessary
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:20
|
|
|
Onmi posted:So people who still haven't watched Zexal don't know how dumb this show got, apologies for the impact font it's the only image I could find So how'd they beat it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:41 |
|
|
Onmi posted:100000 attack, because you know, with 4000 LP that's necessary Let me remind you that the Doma arc had a monster with infinite attack points.  SyntheticPolygon posted:So how'd they beat it? Raigeki in an anti-climactic twist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 12:30
|
|