|
Prolonged Priapism posted:Hey man, sorry. Wasn't trying to be a dick. What I got from your posts was that you didn't see a way for these people to be sincere given what/where they were posting. Oh dang, I'm hoisted, I thought that was sincere and it was supposed to be an almost conspiracy theory-like post like 'What are you talking about, the Indians gave us this land and commited global suicide as is their savage tradition. There was no slave trade or Fascism sentiment in America, return to your home citizen."
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:17 |
|
|
Toasticle posted:Christ I remember I think $ilk or czar bitching in multiple threads when they started the "death tax" meme. No matter how many times people tried to break it down to "Your fathers death is not being taxed, it is the transfer of money from A to B being taxed like every other monetary transfer". Nope. The government is TAXING YOUR FOR DYING WHY DONT YOU LIBTARDS UNDERSTAND. Haha, Czar Czar had an incredible meltdown when he had been going on and on about being a responsible hardworking person who had achieved so much and why can't the poor stop being so lazy blah blah and some goon dug up the property record that proved Czar bought his house from his father in law for literally five dollars or something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:Haha, Czar This right here is an elegant encapsulation of the promise of the internet age.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:Haha, Czar Oh god, when was this I want to read it so bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
Hey kids, guess what time it is! THIS WEEK IN LL101! And since it went over so well last time, we're doing the whole thing at once.  And were then silenced, right? Right?!!?  Everyone to the right of Hillary is stupid. A good macro. Like, seriously, what else does that mean?  So they're claiming she's the Child Catcher now?  Yes, continue insulting the elderly, your base will adore that.  I feel like this is directed at D&D.  Do they really think that if they claim Hillary has no accomplishments, they can overwrite basic reality?  Wow, they really are banking on the age thing.  Because the right were so appreciative of a handsome young man in the form of Barrack Obama.  The Post doesn't like her. HUGE NEWS!  Hey look, an Onion joke done way worse.  Aww, isn't that cute, they think they've given anyone a single reason to think they aren't sexist over the last 6 years.  Because there's a lot of this empty poo poo, I'm going to just list things that are older than Hillary Clinton. Reagan at his inauguration  Hillary is above all the bullshit the right has tried to smear her with. The mathematical connotations of that logo makes AGCing these things way easier.  Hillary's scandals. What are these new scandals you have that are fact based? Well, we can't say anything, but they're MIGHTY SCANDALOUS!  The most vulnerable people in society are kicked to the curb and starved. SUCCESS!  Ah yes, the return of trying to downplay how ridiculous that looked.  Those who wish to be free, shown here, trying to fight off those who wish to curtail marriage freedom and reproductive freedom.  And now the pivot to whining incessantly when their unqualified candidates don't get treated seriously.  ....the gently caress is this argument even? There also aren't cause of death: depression obituaries.  Things older than Hillary Clinton - the average Fox viewer.  So they're trying to play BOTH the "she's old" and "she's inexperienced" cards. I know they're just throwing poo poo at the wall to make something stick, but there's got to be some internal consistency,  The media love Hillary, which is why they pounced on her at a Chipotle, looking for a scandal.  How dare the media say Republicans are sexist. Now more about how Hillary Clinton is a witch.  I know putting in Julian Castro would be too much for them, but could they at least not pretend to be diverse while still having half of them be white males?  Because none of your other attacks worked, might as well.  WHAT Republican effort to try to make rape meaningless?  Its nice to know that their sexism and victim blaming aren't just concentrated on Hillary. And as we all know, fishing and logging, that's where the real money is.  If anyone ever needs a reason to support Hillary, I can think of no more glowing recommendation than how much the right wing hates her.  Hey look, a mistake that Britain unleashed on the world, that has been using undue influence to hurt the innocent and the young for decades. And Israel.  Substance!  They believe in setting people free - in black peoples case, it just happens to be off a cliff.  The sign of a great joke - when you need to explain it, and it still makes no loving sense.  And all it would cost is the United States as we know it.  So they're putting "She hasn't accomplished anything" hand in hand with "she's a woman", and wonder why they're called sexist.  Things older than Hillary Clinton - John McCain if he had won.  Black people suffering? Bah, like that will motivate Republicans to do something.  Ah yes, the illustrious Clintoon legacy, stretching back generations of privilige.  People who Republicans hate? NOT REAL AMERICANS!  Things older than Hillary Clinton - Average Rush Limbaugh listener.  Hey, remember when Obama said in 2009 that he was going to sabotage the Government in the hopes it would reflect badly on Republicans?  Hey look, its the same thing they did for Obama. What are the odds that she is also the worst person ever?  Doesn't make enough to pay taxes, and also doesn't pay taxes. HYPOCRITE!  Much like their asses and a hole in the ground, Republicans can't tell the difference between Democrats and farm animals.  Things older than Hillary Clinton - the average age of membership tot he NRA.  Who the hell is this guy?  And now they're attacking a charity. Is it me, or are they only going after her in ways that will hurt them?  Woman who pays taxes gladly, paid taxes he found out she owed gladly. HYPOCRITE!  And now her latest scandal, misunderstanding her grandparents. ARREST HER!  Since about the third century AD.  And I'm sure they'd be just as supportive of Muslims wanting to pray.  She didn't tip! In a chain restaurant!  Why won't the media report on what we know is true!  Hillary Clinton defended a man, in a function vital for justice! Scandal!  Ah yes, I was wondering what was missing, of course, more screaming about anti-choice.  Hey, speaking of the Death Tax....  Money they printed, and that the Bible compels you to give to them. BUT STOLEN!  Hey look, more basic misunderstandings of reality by gun owners. What are the odds?  Just wouldn't be a helldump without a quote that's completely BS. http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp  When Republicans stopped giving to the Country.  Which is why babies aren't involved at all in abortion, only fetus's. Stay tuned for part 2. Nah, I'm loving with you. Thats it for this week.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:10
|
|
|
Jesus Christ
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:16
|
|
|
Man there's so many ugly pictures of hilary than Obama they're loving this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:
Yeah, dude. Abso-loving-lutely. Not sexist at all. We only look at accomplishments and character.  Oh wait.  Fulchrum posted:
That's like arguing that the reduction in voter turnout was because 'we' stopped voter fraud. Fulchrum posted:
THANK THE loving LORD 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 14:46
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, that was brutal. Don't know how you do that each week, Fulchrum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
The tears in November 2016 are going to be so delicious when she face crushes whatever loser they put up against her. You'll be able to hear their wailing from space.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
Man, I need a cigarette after that poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:17
|
|
|
Wow, lotsa contradictory images this week. "Lying liberals will call us sexist if we don't vote for Hillary." "Look what an ugly hold hag that Hillary is. Ugly hags can't be president, only hot babes have worth!" And...  just going to save this to the ol' hard drive right now for when the summer's gay marriage decision comes out.  "Unelected unaccountable judges overruled the voice of the people and killed democracy, we're a dictatorship now"
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
TheScott2K posted:Man, I need a cigarette after that poo poo I picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue. So LL is basically
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:44
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:
Bill is going to have sex in the back of his truck, possibly with a member of the media. Actually you're right, it doesn't make sense beyond CLINTON BAD MEDIA BAD
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 15:53
|
|
|
Bill is such a stallion, he can even use metaphorical astroturf as his love pallet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 16:00
|
|
|
I used to play (field) hockey on astroturf and I'm pretty sure I'd rather have sex on the pickup bed itself than on that poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
Black Republicans: we can fit every single one into this one picture
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 16:29
|
|
|
Yeah stick with that marketing strategy, Republicans. 96% of black voters picked Obama in our secret ballot because they've been tricked into thinking it's not okay to be Republican. It has nothing to do with the irrepressible glee from the right every time an unarmed black man is murdered by police or anything.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 16:37
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:
Something occurred to me the other day in the political cartoons thread, when I saw a Ramirez joking about a broomstick being Air Force 3, that there's no male counterpart to calling a woman a witch. I guess because for several centuries in Europe the powerful were men by default and the only conceivable way a woman could gain power was through sexuality and/or arcane magical knowledge, both associated with witchcraft. I've honestly tried but the closest I can come up with is "wizard" which is pretty much universally complementary, at least in tech circles.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
dingy dimples posted:that there's no male counterpart to calling a woman a witch. It's Warlock you doof.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:35
|
|
|
Warlock would be the male equivalent. It's not really used to put people down now, but it used to carry the connotations of being treasonous, untrustworthy, or an oath-breaker. Wizard just makes me think of Wizardchan, which is not complementary.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:37
|
|
|
Wouldn't that also be because during that time the male "equivalent" of calling someone a witch would just stabbing them in the loving throat?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
Otto von Ruthless posted:Black Republicans: we can fit every single one into this one picture re: Eazy-E quote:The Upshot: Republicans and fans of Eazy-E alike were stunned: How could the sitting American President allow this gangster rapper into the White House? and Eazy-E is a Republican? The Bush White House, for their part, decided to kill the matter by never commenting on it. Eazy did, however, explaining in an interview: "How the gently caress can I be a Republican when I got a song called 'gently caress tha Police'? I ain't poo poo—ain't a Republican or Democrat. I didn't even vote. My vote ain't going to help! I don't give a gently caress who's the president," and later, explaining in song: "So, you can kiss my black rear end/gently caress the White House, it ain't my house/So, you can burn the mothafucka down for all I care/Cause T-shirts and khakis is all I wear." http://ca.complex.com/music/2013/03/the-40-biggest-hip-hop-moments-in-pop-culture-history/eazy-e-george-bush-white-house I don't think they would be thrilled with the comments from Frederick Douglas as well, who pretty much ripped into Lincoln back in the day. (in that he didn't care about black people, didn't do enough, etc. Not that he was a southern democrat, which is likely the side of the aisle these people would have been on).
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
This is all so manufactured. I'm not particularly excited by Hillary (which I think may indicate she will be less dominant than Obama if she's the eventual candidate) but having all these nonsense demonizing things is ridiculous. Benghazi didn't work in 2012, who cares now? And everything else is mysoginy and misrepresentation of the Democrat platform. Apparently the right is terrified of her running because they're virtually ignoring any other Democrat candidate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
Moxie posted:This is all so manufactured. I'm not particularly excited by Hillary (which I think may indicate she will be less dominant than Obama if she's the eventual candidate) but having all these nonsense demonizing things is ridiculous. Benghazi didn't work in 2012, who cares now? And everything else is mysoginy and misrepresentation of the Democrat platform. Apparently the right is terrified of her running because they're virtually ignoring any other Democrat candidate. Haha you think bringing up old poo poo from the past that didn't work before will stop them from trying again. They still bring up cattle ventures for christ sake.  Hell, they still bring up chappaquiddick!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
Fulchrum, please take care of yourself. I know people that used to work as Facebook contractors filtering through reported content and the turn-over rate on that project was something like 50% and barely anyone lasted over 6 months.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:Yeah stick with that marketing strategy, Republicans. 96% of black voters picked Obama in our secret ballot because they've been tricked into thinking it's not okay to be Republican. It has nothing to do with the irrepressible glee from the right every time an unarmed black man is murdered by police or anything. Not to mention that Key and Peele weren't very far off in their portrayal of black Republicans. They're out of touch and square.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Not to mention that Key and Peele weren't very far off in their portrayal of black Republicans. They're out of touch and square. And pissed. Royally pissed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Fulchrum, please take care of yourself. I know people that used to work as Facebook contractors filtering through reported content and the turn-over rate on that project was something like 50% and barely anyone lasted over 6 months. I'm fine. This week actually marks my 2 year anniversary of doing this (I started April 16, 2013), so I think I've beaten the stretch on burnout. I do this willingly, so if I wanted I could take a week off.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
He's posting stuff to laugh at idiots on the internet dude not sifting through murder photos or child porn.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Now I am subjected to a Facebook group called "Chicks on the Right" which features comments like this gem: "the founders knew what they were doing when they did not allow EVERYONE the vote. (and before anyone starts with the "you don't want women to vote" crap...."landowners" today, would include women....i have no problem with women voting. i have a major problem with LIBERAL women or their sissy-men voting) without exception, libtards who vote for libtards do NOT have the best interests of the country at heart....only their own. -_-" And then this gem popped up:  My sanity requires me to start blocking folks, but this stuff is morbidly fascinating!
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
The correct way to deal with "inane gotcha questions" is by shushing the woman asking them. Sure.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
I had a friend from high school (lives in Alaska and her husband is in the military) post a picture that said "If you are voting for Hillary, unfriend me now." Several people said "hell yeah" and a few said "I am voting for her." She then said "there is only one word to explain why she will not vote for her: Benghazi" I asked her what about Benghazi. She gave some rambling thing that proved Hillary was at fault. (And used Brietbart as her source) I posted an article that showed that Republican committees found her and the administration without fault. She said that there is nothing that will make her forgive her for that even after I showed that they did nothing wrong. Husband (the soldier) then posted the four reasons to not vote for Hillary picture with the four dead from Benghazi.  Some people are just delusional.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Serious question: when conservatives complain that liberals are voting selfishly...why is this supposed to be a problem? Of course I vote in my own interests! Why wouldn't I?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Serious question: when conservatives complain that liberals are voting selfishly...why is this supposed to be a problem? Of course I vote in my own interests! Why wouldn't I? Society's needs come before the individual's needs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
Society, of course, meaning rich white dudes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Society's needs come before the individual's needs. Now let me tell you why those
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:30
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Society's needs come before the individual's needs. (it's debatable because a common argument in political philosophy is that if, under certain conditions, people act wholly self-interestedly, the outcome is a just society, but that's not what's at issue when people get pissed about voting for welfare programs and higher taxes, because they benefit the voter). Ghost of Reagan Past fucked around with this message at 03:41 on Apr 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Serious question: when conservatives complain that liberals are voting selfishly...why is this supposed to be a problem? Of course I vote in my own interests! Why wouldn't I? Because admitting that you need or take assistance in any form from the government is supposed to be shameful and the mark that you are a failure, and not the entire loving reason there is a government. If you vote Republican, it means that you don't need any help from anybody. Its just that the ways that rich white straight men benefeit from government don't count as the shameful kind.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:17 |
|
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Debatable. But isn't that also the exact opposite of what conservatives claim their ideology is? Besides, if it benefits me, it may very well benefit lots and lots of other people, and so benefit society generally. No that ideology shifts and morphs, chimaera-like whenever it suits them. Gay rights, for example, have to be opposed because they harm society for the selfish benefit of a few individual sodomites. The ideology is "gently caress the poor, gays, blacks, and women". Compare their outlook on children. Children need to sit down, shut up, respect their elders, say the pledge, and be kept in line with a belt. Unless they're refusing to eat Michelle Obama's healthy food and then they should run everything and have ice cream and fries for breakfast if they want.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2015 03:53
|
|