|
ya I like it
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 14:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 21:19 |
|
|
it was you that recommended it to me 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 14:44
|
|
|
Got a red hat offer
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer  have you decided what your gonna do
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer  congrats, thats awesome
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:good job Gonna tell my bosses (who I like) where my feelings are and see what they say
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer sorry for your lots
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
im curious to know if it is north or south of a 6 figgy salary
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 15:24
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:im curious to know if it is north or south of a 6 figgy salary 90k but it's contract. Pretty sure my company will come up to at least 80k but salaried / benefits. Then the hardball starts.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:40
|
|
|
But im still a terrible programmer / literal highschool dropout with only 10 months of actual industry experience working at a relatively unknown company. This would be very good for my career, even if it's less money.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:90k but it's contract. Pretty sure my company will come up to at least 80k but salaried / benefits. Then the hardball starts. normally contract to hire can suck but the money is great and it's red hat.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:47
|
|
|
the name recognition on your resume is worth more than 10k
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:the name recognition on your resume is worth more than 10k
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer Congrats! Keep us posted. As someone in academia its really interesting to see how this all goes down.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:the name recognition on your resume is worth more than 10k
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 16:54
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:modern ui for wpf owns super hard What's good about it. Is it just the visuals.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:48
|
|
|
Yeah Ragg posted:What's good about it. Is it just the visuals. because i really stuck at doing layouts and stuff and that takes care of a good portion of it for me
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:But im still a terrible programmer / literal highschool dropout with only 10 months of actual industry experience working at a relatively unknown company. This would be very good for my career, even if it's less money. wow same
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:13
|
|
|
the whole mui/zune look and feel is what Microsoft should have used for win8+
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
code:Edit: Has anybody thought up the word schadencöde yet?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
that's probably auto generated
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
Nope. Somebody typed it.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
i feel the same way about your posts, shaggar
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:i feel the same way about your posts, shaggar lol
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
guys, how does branch and bound work in travelling salesman? i am hella confused right now you somehow work out your lower bound and then????????
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:12
|
|
|
Awia posted:guys, how does branch and bound work in travelling salesman? i am hella confused right now you encode your routes in a bunch of integer choices. usually "do i go to node x after visiting y other ones" in a nxn boolean matrix with a bunch of constraints that you can only visit one node at a time etc, as well as the constraints that each element can be only 0 or 1. so for example, the path 1-2-3-4-5-6 will be the 6x6 identity matrix, whereas 6-5-4-3-2-1 it would be flipped horizontally (i.e. node 6 is first so x_{1,6} = 1 and the rest of row 1 = 0, and node 5 is second so x_{2,5} = 1 and the rest of row 2 = 0, etc.) the way that branch and bound works, is that you solve WITHOUT the integer constraints so you get, say, A_{1,2} = 0.4 now the branching is, you have two possibilities (since in the actual value needs to be 0 or 1), either A_{1,2} = 0 or = 1. So now you have two models, one for each case. solve both nonintegerly. if one's lower bound is higher than your current best, then congrats you have a new current best. if not, recurse and split each one of those in half. the case gets a little more interesting with nonboolean variables, as when you have x = 3.6 for some x that needs to eventually be integer, you branch into one with x <= 3 and one with x >= 4. the trick is deciding WHICH noninteger-but-should-be-integer variable to branch on, and that's still an open problem as far as I know. i've seen some people use whichever is closest to a whole number, some pick randomly, some heuristic based etc. tl;dr: say you have a constraint 'integer x' in your solution. solve WITHOUT that constraint to get a noninteger x. then you branch on whether to round x up or down. this is literally my phd topic gonadic io fucked around with this message at 20:28 on May 1, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Got a red hat offer goongrats  but seriously, nice
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
Welp, looks like 2015 is the year of the terrible programmer on the enterprise linux operating system
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:this is literally my phd topic nerd
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Welp, looks like 2015 is the year of the terrible programmer on the enterprise linux operating system grats + thanks for the heads up on which distro not to use
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Welp, looks like 2015 is the year of the terrible programmer on the enterprise linux operating system congrats!
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 01:00
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:congrats! Power Ambient posted:grats + thanks for the heads up on which distro not to use thanks! and you're right, it woulda been way more efficient if i'd gotten a job at ubuntu
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
make something version 219 and then we can put it in the saclopedia and be all smug all of us nursing from your teat as it were
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:Welp, looks like 2015 is the year of the terrible programmer on the enterprise linux operating system so i take it boss wasn't receptive?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:the name recognition on your resume is worth more than 10k ya, but being a contractor @ 90k means less money than salaried @ 80k so but whatever,
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Brain Candy posted:ya, but being a contractor @ 90k means less money than salaried @ 80k so sure but do it a year and you can easily jump directly to contracting at 120k+ just by said name recognition 60 per hour should be the minimum
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:so i take it boss wasn't receptive? Nah, this is just the right decision.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 21:19 |
|
|
so lisp is, uh, interesting. frightening? emacs sure likes to explode at the drop of a hat preference for using dashes instead of spaces in everything makes me think of the time i had to do cobol once and i involuntarily vomit all over my computer
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 03:18
|
|
