|
mrkillboy posted:Surprisingly not an Asylum joint. I would pay full ticket price to see this in a theater instead of that new Jurassic Park movie.
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
Goddamnit Eric Roberts!
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 06:06
|
|
|
That's some fine footwear.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 06:56
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:Thank you Read Snigfut and thank you thread. 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 10:25
|
|
|
Vibram really missed the boat to tie-in with the Hobbit movies.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 10:40
|
|
|
 Saw this book cover and had to laugh. All I can imagine is that double barrel recoil going DIRECTLY into your maimed stump of a hand, followed by you laying on the ground yelling about how much that hurt.  "Draw, pardnah"*BOOM*  "OH JESUS CHRIST MOTHER FUCKER MY ARM OH GOD I THINK IT'S A BONE BRUISE OH gently caress NUGGETS I THINK I DONE BUSTED IT AGAIN *SSSSSSSSSSSSSS* *HHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*"
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:
He obviously has some mechanism to channel recoil to his shoulder.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:Meh, it's been done before. 2000AD (creators of Judge Dredd) had time-travelling cowboys vs. dinosaurs. 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:He obviously has some mechanism to channel recoil to his shoulder. What if he uses a bearing surface that supports the butt of the gun and another that supports the gun from beneath the hand guard (Lee, Joon-Ho, et al.)? The rear of the firearm could be placed against a force transducer. This method has the advantage of positively locating the firearm so that it can only slide directly backwards. This method also requires the user to account for the weight of the bearing and clamping fixtures if absolute numbers are required. The recoil force felt by the shooter has two components: “acceleration of the projectile itself… and the second component is associated with the acceleration of the gases created by the combustion of the gunpowder propellant” (Hall 2008). The force created by the acceleration of the projectile can be calculated using conservation of momentum, however, the force due to the combustion gas acceleration cannot be accurately calculated. The force felt by the shooter is the combination of these two forces and thus has to be measured instead of calculatedlknjthepijhpwignqewv 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 14:05
|
|
|
Chrpno posted:What if he uses a bearing surface that supports the butt of the gun and another that supports the gun from beneath the hand guard (Lee, Joon-Ho, et al.)? The rear of the firearm could be placed against a force transducer. This method has the advantage of positively locating the firearm so that it can only slide directly backwards. This method also requires the user to account for the weight of the bearing and clamping fixtures if absolute numbers are required. The recoil force felt by the shooter has two components: “acceleration of the projectile itself… and the second component is associated with the acceleration of the gases created by the combustion of the gunpowder propellant” (Hall 2008). The force created by the acceleration of the projectile can be calculated using conservation of momentum, however, the force due to the combustion gas acceleration cannot be accurately calculated. The force felt by the shooter is the combination of these two forces and thus has to be measured instead of calculatedlknjthepijhpwignqewv More importantly, how the gently caress does he pull the trigger on his arm-gun? Especially considering his other hand seems quite intent on fast-drawing his other gun for some reason.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Chrpno posted:What if he uses a bearing surface that supports the butt of the gun and another that supports the gun from beneath the hand guard (Lee, Joon-Ho, et al.)? The rear of the firearm could be placed against a force transducer. This method has the advantage of positively locating the firearm so that it can only slide directly backwards. This method also requires the user to account for the weight of the bearing and clamping fixtures if absolute numbers are required. The recoil force felt by the shooter has two components: “acceleration of the projectile itself… and the second component is associated with the acceleration of the gases created by the combustion of the gunpowder propellant” (Hall 2008). The force created by the acceleration of the projectile can be calculated using conservation of momentum, however, the force due to the combustion gas acceleration cannot be accurately calculated. The force felt by the shooter is the combination of these two forces and thus has to be measured instead of calculatedlknjthepijhpwignqewv haha butt
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Please don't doxx me.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 14:43
|
|
|
Chrpno posted:What if he uses a bearing surface that supports the butt of the gun and another that supports the gun from beneath the hand guard (Lee, Joon-Ho, et al.)? The rear of the firearm could be placed against a force transducer. This method has the advantage of positively locating the firearm so that it can only slide directly backwards. This method also requires the user to account for the weight of the bearing and clamping fixtures if absolute numbers are required. The recoil force felt by the shooter has two components: “acceleration of the projectile itself… and the second component is associated with the acceleration of the gases created by the combustion of the gunpowder propellant” (Hall 2008). The force created by the acceleration of the projectile can be calculated using conservation of momentum, however, the force due to the combustion gas acceleration cannot be accurately calculated. The force felt by the shooter is the combination of these two forces and thus has to be measured instead of calculatedlknjthepijhpwignqewv He might be twisting his elbow to absorb the recoil, although that's more of a revolver technique. At any rate, he's definitely not cut out for an automatic.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 16:01
|
|
|
LoonShia posted:He might be twisting his elbow to absorb the recoil, although that's more of a revolver technique. 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 16:07
|
|
|
Chrpno posted:What if he uses a bearing surface that supports the butt of the gun and another that supports the gun from beneath the hand guard (Lee, Joon-Ho, et al.)? The rear of the firearm could be placed against a force transducer. This method has the advantage of positively locating the firearm so that it can only slide directly backwards. This method also requires the user to account for the weight of the bearing and clamping fixtures if absolute numbers are required. The recoil force felt by the shooter has two components: “acceleration of the projectile itself… and the second component is associated with the acceleration of the gases created by the combustion of the gunpowder propellant” (Hall 2008). The force created by the acceleration of the projectile can be calculated using conservation of momentum, however, the force due to the combustion gas acceleration cannot be accurately calculated. The force felt by the shooter is the combination of these two forces and thus has to be measured instead of calculatedlknjthepijhpwignqewv I was just gonna say he could have it on sliding rails or something so it just slides to his elbow and bounces back but that works too
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
LorrdErnie posted:I was just gonna say he could have it on sliding rails or something so it just slides to his elbow and bounces back but that works too But what if the gun goes off when it blows back and hits his elbow? It could blow off his fuckin hand.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
I'm starting to doubt the feasibility of one-armed cyborg shotgun cowboys.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 17:02
|
|
|
Chard posted:I'm starting to doubt the feasibility of one-armed cyborg shotgun cowboys. Agreed. They might be able to get me back on board with a no-armed model, though.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
If you look at it, the cover clearly says "don't even bother to draw". It's all intimidation, man. I bet that thing isn't even loaded. They're too busy staring at the gun-hand and then they get popped by someone else.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
mrkillboy posted:Surprisingly not an Asylum joint. Lol, one of my buddies is in this and he's been posting behind the scenes poo poo for like the last two years on Facebook. Kinda crazy how long it takes to make a pile of poo poo like that.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:2000AD (creators of Judge Dredd) had time-travelling cowboys vs. dinosaurs. The guy's falling chest-down to the ground but he's turning towards the dino, apparently preparing to fight it from a one-arm push-up position. The beast doesn't stand a chance.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
mrkillboy posted:Surprisingly not an Asylum joint. Immediately thought of Tremors.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
Oldsrocket_27 posted:Immediately thought of Tremors. My first thought was that Cowboys vs Aliens had gotten a sequel.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
 lol.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:Lol, one of my buddies is in this and he's been posting behind the scenes poo poo for like the last two years on Facebook. Kinda crazy how long it takes to make a pile of poo poo like that. There's copious amounts of drinking and not-taking-it-seriously going on, right?  Right?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
Someone actually thought this was a good idea.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Doctor Malaver posted:The guy's falling chest-down to the ground but he's turning towards the dino, apparently preparing to fight it from a one-arm push-up position. The beast doesn't stand a chance. You clearly haven't read enough early 2000AD if you think that's not exactly what's happening here. (Warning, 2000AD holds no responsibility towards any pregnancies caused by reading itself.)
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
mrkillboy posted:Surprisingly not an Asylum joint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPaUdWkGKa8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPUWeYOACzg
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
Six-Of-Hearts posted:Please don't doxx me. I appreciate you
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
Good to see Ken M is still at it/back 
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
More violent dinosaurs!
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Humbug Scoolbus posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPaUdWkGKa8 Just going to say that "Valley of the Gwanji" is pretty great if you like Ray Harryhausen. Dickey Butts has a new favorite as of 03:15 on May 5, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Ken M is so gloriously dumb. I hope years from now historians will see that he was the funniest person of our time.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
Command Ant posted:More violent dinosaurs! That wedding photographer is a loving pro.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
I just passed in front of this restaurant and it's official; I'm five. No time to take a pic though.
SpaceGoatFarts has a new favorite as of 14:35 on May 5, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 14:33
|
|
