|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Did someone say titty tax? There's something wrong with your link bro
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 19:30 |
|
quote:
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2015/05/newman-climate-change-world-plot/
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:19 |
|
Climate change is a hoax led by the United Nations so that it can end democracy and impose authoritarian rule, according to Prime Minister Tony Abbott's chief business adviser. Maurice Newman, the chairman of the Prime Minister's business advisory council, has written in The Australian that scientific modelling showing the link between humans and climate change is wrong and the real agenda is a world takeover for the UN.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:21 |
|
The international Jewry conspiracy for a post WW2 generation.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:23 |
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:There's something wrong with your link bro Looks like someone is loving with the links
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:25 |
|
That's pretty funny then
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:31 |
|
quote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...872578d6ea1b519
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:39 |
|
You can take the psychopath out of the Immigration portfolio but you can't stop him from using kids for blackmail. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-07/morrison-announces-childcare-funding-boost-for-at-risk-children/6453516 quote:Executive director of advocacy group The Parenthood, Jo Briskey, also welcomed the announcement. "It's great to see those children from disadvantaged families will have greater support to access high-quality early learning and care," she said. However, Ms Briskey also criticised tying the initiative to a budget measure that remains stalled in the Senate. "We don't know whether they'll go through," she said, referring to the Family Tax Benefit changes. The Government wants to cut off Family Tax Benefit Part B when a family's youngest child turns six and freeze all FTB payments for two years, measures that together would save an estimated $4.5 billion over five years. "It's really disappointing that the Government is essentially planning to rob Peter to pay Paul," Ms Briskey said. "To say to one group of parents we need to take away your parenting payments to help another group of parents access more affordable childcare, it's simply unfair." So "Pass our stalled savings measure or screw your disadvantaged kids, and you know I'm not just using hyperbole when I say 'screw'!" http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/may/07/childcare-benefit-changes-will-hit-poorest-children-hard-researchers-warn quote:Expected changes in the budget to reduce benefits will fail to help people into jobs, while damaging their children’s prospects, early education experts say Thursday 7 May 2015 07.40 AEST Last modified on Thursday 7 May 2015 07.42 AEST So we reduce the funding that is keeping kids out of disadvantage to pay for serves to protect disadvantaged kids! What could possibly go wrong! - Noted Psycho-killer Scott 'Those kiddies aren't going to rape themselves' Morrison. Sadistic Muppet Government. And that's how we plan on treating all children. When it comes to indigenous Australians we are going to treat them all like children. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-08/anger-over-aboriginal-community-closures-plan/6453928 quote:But the Indigenous advocate warned that if any communities were to eventually close, the basic question remained as to where people would have to go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLxD_-R8jv0 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-08/giles-government-sweeping-aside-indigenous-people-nlc/6452998 quote:Northern Land Council chief Joe Morrison calls for Indigenous involvement in NT development talks By Joanna Crothers Updated about an hour ago Over governed with worsening outcomes. That's not a glowing endorsement of intervention. But that's just the NT you squeal! Yeah right. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-11/nlc-accuses-scullion-of-breaking-election-promise-on-land-rights/5961088 quote:Northern Land Council accuses Senator Nigel Scullion of breaking election promise on land rights By the National Reporting Team's Kate Wild Updated 12 Dec 2014, 10:04am I can't find a citation (from a decent source) but the issue of cutting aid to Indonseia was all over the news this morning. I'm thinking I might be unfairly denigrating Muppets. Bozo Government
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:44 |
|
tithin posted:UKPol, but still LOLngland. The racists have won. The world is turning right. Give up your lefty views and start hating those who you feel are "less" than you
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:49 |
|
How could you not bold this bit: quote:An MFB incident report into the November Lacrosse fire also reveals there have been seven high-rise apartment fires around the world directly attributed to the unsafe cladding with plastic cores, with more than seven deaths. Four high-rise towers in Dubai including The Torch — all with aluminium cladding with the plastic core — have suffered extensive damage from fires spreading up the facade of the buildings.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 01:54 |
|
Lid posted:Climate change is a hoax led by the United Nations so that it can end democracy and impose authoritarian rule, according to Prime Minister Tony Abbott's chief business adviser. Yeah. He's literally an insane conspiracy theorist, and he is the chief business advisor to this country's Prime Minister, with pretty much unfettered access to media channels and the ability to drive major policy decisions. Let us think about that for a mom-
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:00 |
|
Unrelated but for some idiot reason I started reading today's paper after someone put it on my desk.Friday's Advertiser posted:...SA is set to be the only state where the "gay panic defence" -- where a non-violent homosexual advance could be used to establish provocation -- is able to be considered by a jury. RADelaide.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:02 |
|
There was no way Miliband was going to win that.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:16 |
|
So did they accidentally make aluminium cladding that works as thermite or something?
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:21 |
|
But can it melt steel beams?
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:22 |
|
Shadeoses posted:So did they accidentally make aluminium cladding that works as thermite or something? No, they made aluminium cladding stuffed with plastic filler instead of something less flammable
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:27 |
|
starkebn posted:instead of something less flammable like thermite
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:34 |
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:like thermite Magnesium
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:40 |
|
markgreyam posted:Unrelated but for some idiot reason I started reading today's paper after someone put it on my desk. It's weird that stayed in place during eras of reform like when SA decriminalised marijuana or when Dunstan was doing his thing. Actually, I thought only QLD had the gay panic defence. I wonder if anyone would actually be dumb enough to use it as a defence.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:41 |
|
Ler posted:https://medium.com/@rgmerk/wetherill-s-nuclear-flight-of-fancy-a29716cd6eac You make it sound like breeder reactors aren't a thing and ANSTO somehow doesn't exist despite maintaining our country's sole (state of the art) medical reactor. If that reactor were to be permanently shut down, by the way, you could kiss a large portion of the world's radiopharmaceutical supply goodbye. Bifauxnen posted:I still think thorium would be excellent. Especially for side benefits like harvesting rare earth metal byproducts, or using up existing nuclear waste. But no one ever seems to mean that when they talk nuclear - they just assume more of the same old same old uranium junk, and that can get stuffed. Nuclear fission reactor technology has come a long way since the Cold War, there's no telling what kind of goodies we could have if we had a government willing to put their balls to the wall.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:48 |
|
ScreamingLlama posted:Nuclear fission reactor technology has come a long way since the Cold War, there's no telling what kind of goodies we could have if we had a government willing to put their balls to the wall. The only way that would happen would be for someone to invent a reactor you could feed refugees/poors into.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:51 |
|
Vladimir Poutine posted:It's weird that stayed in place during eras of reform like when SA decriminalised marijuana or when Dunstan was doing his thing. Actually, I thought only QLD had the gay panic defence. I wonder if anyone would actually be dumb enough to use it as a defence. If it exists wouldn't using it as a defense be the smart thing to do?
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:52 |
|
ScreamingLlama posted:You make it sound like breeder reactors aren't a thing and ANSTO somehow doesn't exist despite maintaining our country's sole (state of the art) medical reactor. If that reactor were to be permanently shut down, by the way, you could kiss a large portion of the world's radiopharmaceutical supply goodbye. Wikipedia but I can go and get more. quote:About a third of the world's supply, and most of Europe's supply, of medical isotopes is produced at the Petten nuclear reactor in the Netherlands. Another third of the world's supply, and most of North America's supply, is produced at the Chalk River Laboratories in Chalk River, Ontario, Canada. The NRU started operating in 1957. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission ordered the National Research Universal reactor reactor to be shut down on November 18, 2007 for regularly scheduled maintenance and an upgrade of the safety systems to modern standards. The upgrade took longer than expected, and in December 2007 a critical shortage of medical isotopes occurred. The Canadian government passed emergency legislation allowing the reactor to restart on 16 December 2007, and production of medical isotopes to continue. Update: In Mid-February, 2009, the reactor was shut down once again due to a mechanism problem that extracts the isotope containing rods from the reactor. The reactor was again shut down in Mid May of the same year because of a heavy water leak. The reactor was started again during the first quarter of 2010. The NRU will cease routine production in the fall of 2016, however the reactor will be available for backup production until March 2018, at which point it will be shut down.[9] Fussion/Thorium/Fast Heavywater Breeder are all fairytale techs that may all one day become commercially viable but then so might molten salt solar.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 02:56 |
|
Australia really needs to go nuclear as a transition away from coal energy to renewable energy. But that was nearly 40 years ago. So once we get that time machine we can go nuclear. Then after a time we just move to maintaining token reactors for making heavy isotopes while we go full solar/wind/etc.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 03:03 |
|
ScreamingLlama posted:Nuclear fission reactor technology has come a long way since the Cold War, there's no telling what kind of goodies we could have if we had a government willing to put their balls to the wall. Nuclear power for energy is really not something that's worth compromising other political stances for. While I have no personal problems with it as a power source, when you look at the economics of it there is no way it will ever happen in this country. If nuclear can't win on cost grounds alone against coal (and it really doesn't compete without gigantic subsidy from the public purse) then it's never ever going to win against renewables which are already beating new-build coal plants on costs. We are at the point where it's often cheaper for a farm house to go completely off-grid with solar+battery than it is to have private power poles installed and maintained across their properties. Last I heard was of someone that spent $80k for this sort of system and to get hooked up to the grid was going to be $120k + power bills.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 03:10 |
ScreamingLlama posted:Nuclear fission reactor technology has come a long way since the Cold War, there's no telling what kind of goodies we could have if we had a government willing to put their balls to the wall. What's your plan on how to counteract the huge amount of public animosity towards nuclear power plants and uranium mines? Why do you think a political party would want to spend so much political capital doing that, rather than something much easier?
|
|
# ? May 8, 2015 03:11 |
|
by the way, the government decided to take labor's pissweak compromise figure. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-08/renewable-energy-target-cabinet-agrees-to-compromise-figure/6454302 quote:The Federal Cabinet has agreed to cut the renewable energy target to a figure that Labor is agreeable to and will today try to finalise a deal, the ABC understands. I'm guessing this is just removing this as a bargaining chip from labor's bag before the budget comes down more than anything. The uncertainty was having a bigger effect on the industry than the cuts themselves, which we all know was doing the LNP's job for them.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 03:53 |
|
Isn't solar going to be thing now? They are improving the efficiency of it every day.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 03:58 |
|
It's almost as if some red tape might have prevented this poo poo from being approved.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:02 |
|
OK Ratbag you can't be that poo poo if you're posting Lehrer songs. You did miss the pigeons song but that shouldn't be held against you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhuMLpdnOjY
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:08 |
|
bowmore posted:Isn't solar going to be thing now? They are improving the efficiency of it every day. Yeah, they've got working examples of solar plants that can provide baseload power using mirrors to heat a big tank of salt. They work pretty well even on cloudy days. Combined with wind turbines, wave generators and hydro there isn't really the need to go down the nuclear path. Once affordable batteries have been developed (probably not too far away given Tesla's recent progress) there probably won't even be a debate about nuclear power any more, except for specialist roles like naval propulsion.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:16 |
|
Hydro is also a pretty good storage of excess energy. You use any excess electricity to pump the water back up to storage level and release it through the turbines when you need it.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:21 |
|
I'm going to enjoy reading the same arguments for nuclear or renewables in 10 years (the same arguments were made on this forum a decade ago). Maybe by that point the power generators will be falling apart and someone will need to actually make a decision. There's a good reason why the RET is being cut, no one is interested in building anything. You cant set a target and expect private business to forego squeezing every last cent out of their current assets in order to meet a political goal.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:31 |
|
Birb Katter posted:OK Ratbag you can't be that poo poo if you're posting Lehrer songs. You did miss the pigeons song but that shouldn't be held against you I have tormented my loved ones with Songs & More Songs by Tom Lehrer on so many road trips now that they have taken the CD away from me and hidden it.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:33 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:I have tormented my loved ones with Songs & More Songs by Tom Lehrer on so many road trips now that they have taken the CD away from me and hidden it. Same, but with The 12th Man.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:37 |
|
How viable is solar panels + new tesla battery going to be for Australian households?
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:43 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:Yeah, they've got working examples of solar plants that can provide baseload power using mirrors to heat a big tank of salt. They work pretty well even on cloudy days. Combined with wind turbines, wave generators and hydro there isn't really the need to go down the nuclear path. Once affordable batteries have been developed (probably not too far away given Tesla's recent progress) there probably won't even be a debate about nuclear power any more, except for specialist roles like naval propulsion. Then you have the really big one. One that the green revolution parrots that just sprout the green propaganda will never get, and more than likely never admit. Have you ever stood on a tin roof on the blazing sun? Ever felt the radiated heat that comes from a reflector as dull as a silver roof. And you plan to build huge arrays all over the world that will be radiating so much heat into the atmosphere that green house gasses become irrelevant.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:44 |
|
Before I bother to effort post hooman, are you serious or is that an unsourced quote?
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:49 |
|
hooman posted:Then you have the really big one. One that the green revolution parrots that just sprout the green propaganda will never get, and more than likely never admit. Have you ever stood on a tin roof on the blazing sun? Ever felt the radiated heat that comes from a reflector as dull as a silver roof. And you plan to build huge arrays all over the world that will be radiating so much heat into the atmosphere that green house gasses become irrelevant. I feel like this must be one of those 'copy a stupid comment' posts, but just in case it isn't. Reflecting heat upwards reduces global warming, much like arctic ice reduces heating by reflecting heat away. If it's not reflecting it is absorbed by the earth and raises global temperature. Because where does reflected heat go? A lot of it goes back into space. That comment would fail my grade 7 science class. Seriously. What? It hurts my head it's so dumb.
|
# ? May 8, 2015 04:50 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 19:30 |
|
quote:Labor and Government have reached a deal on a 33,000GWh RET. truly, a victory for the ALP left for some context, we actually reached 30k GWh in 2012 and the original target was 45k GWH Murodese fucked around with this message at 04:52 on May 8, 2015 |
# ? May 8, 2015 04:50 |