|
Fluo posted:
Other than Luke Ayling being one of the ugliest mugs on the planet...the kit is nice.
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 04:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:15 |
|
|
Crunkjuice posted:Fixed it for ya. I don't think jozy even knows what a vegetable is. what the gently caress is that a photoshop
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:what the gently caress is that a photoshop Nope. That's a real product.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
This is definitely fake but too hilarious not to share
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
Always cup the balls, it's just common courtesy
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 10:49
|
|
|
 Hmm, warrior/New Balance have not completely hosed up a kit. Strange.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
reformed bad troll posted:
Warrior (and I guess New Balance) homes have always been fine, it's the aways and thirds that tread into bizarro land.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
reformed bad troll posted:
No one would bother getting creative enough to have a chance of loving up an Irish team's kit. Waste of time.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi posted:Warrior (and I guess New Balance) homes have always been fine, it's the aways and thirds that tread into bizarro land. Surprisingly, the away is also a good kit. 
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 06:42
|
|
|
Semprini posted:Surprisingly, the away is also a good kit. Just you wait until they release a 3rd kit that looks like someone vomited on it (and they'll sell it as "a tribute to a night out in Glasgow") But yes, they're two actually good-looking shirts.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
Hmm we need a kit to wear for when we play other teams that use white or green, how about a nice green and white number.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 08:15
|
|
|
Blue Star Error posted:Hmm we need a kit to wear for when we play other teams that use white or green, how about a nice green and white number. No-one in our division wears green. Hibs might come up, but the needs and views of Hibs don't deserve consideration.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 11:11
|
|
|
The thing is, second kits are no longer the thing you wear when the other team's kit clashes with your first kit, rather they are the thing that you wear by default in away games unless it clashes. And every team has three kits anyway. There's no particular reason for home/away kits to be different colours as long as you have some disgusting orange and pink third option to fall back on.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 11:23
|
|
|
Tunga posted:The thing is, second kits are no longer the thing you wear when the other team's kit clashes with your first kit, rather they are the thing that you wear by default in away games unless it clashes. And every team has three kits anyway. There's no particular reason for home/away kits to be different colours as long as you have some disgusting orange and pink third option to fall back on. That's not true at all. At least not in the Premier League. Are you talking specifically about Scotland? For anyone in Europe, the third kit is usually just for those competitions and any clashes in the league. Reminds me of a situation around 10 years ago when Liverpool played Marseille in the last game of the CL groups. Both teams had European kits that they hadn't had to wear yet and both faced the possibility of elimination that night. Both clubs also had their kits made by adidas, so naturally even though neither's home kit clashed, they both wore the Euro ones. edit: it's also another kit to sell to fans, as are training kits, with their own sponsor.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 11:38
|
|
|
Mickolution posted:That's not true at all. At least not in the Premier League. Are you talking specifically about Scotland?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 12:44
|
|
|
Tunga posted:I watch the PL every week (QPR, so not for much longer). Teams generally wear their away kit for away games even when their home kit would look fine. Just checked your away games since the turn of the year Liverpool - wore home kit Villa - wore home kit West Brom - wore away Palace - wore 3rd kit Hull - wore home Sunderland - wore home Stoke - wore home Burnley - wore home So yeah you're talking bollocks mate
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 12:51
|
|
|
Tunga posted:I watch the PL every week (QPR, so not for much longer). Teams generally wear their away kit for away games even when their home kit would look fine. As Taff said, that's not even close to true. QPR might clash with anyone with white stripes/hoops or any blue on their kit so maybe they wear their away more than other clubs (I haven't noticed this if it is the case), but nobody else does.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
I'd be averting my eyes watching QPR away games too
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 14:46
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Liverpool - wore home kit For QPR specifically we definitely tend to wear our away kit for away matches where it doesn't clash, regardless of whether the home kit would have worked fine. I may be wrong in thinking that this applies to every team. I feel like I see a lot of away kits at Loftus Road but this might just be that our kits clash a lot. Having blue/white for home and red/black for away means pretty every kit in existence will clash with one of them! St Evan Echoes posted:I'd be averting my eyes watching QPR away games too Tunga fucked around with this message at 16:46 on May 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 16:42
|
|
|
Tunga posted:Our away kit is red/black stripes so it clashes with all six of those teams that we wore our home kit against. Away kits don't work like that. You wear the away kit when your HOME kit clashes. Not the other way round. You were wrong. Chin up and move on.
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
none of that is relevant. clashes aside, teams wear kits so people buy the replica versions, it makes no difference who they're playing or where.
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
reformed bad troll posted:Away kits don't work like that. You wear the away kit when your HOME kit clashes. Not the other way round. stickyfngrdboy posted:none of that is relevant. clashes aside, teams wear kits so people buy the replica versions, it makes no difference who they're playing or where. Tunga fucked around with this message at 19:39 on May 8, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 8, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
 + 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
It's not bad it's just boring.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:07
|
|
|
that's loving terrible. it looks like he's wearing one shirt over another. whats the significance of the three white diamonds on the burgundy hem?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
Eau de MacGowan posted:that's loving terrible. it looks like he's wearing one shirt over another. Number of Reichs.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:13
|
|
|
That's not bad, but your coach is!!1
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:30
|
|
|
Gigi Galli posted:Number of Reichs. Please don't steal jokes from earlier in the thread.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:30
|
|
|
reformed bad troll posted:Please don't steal jokes from earlier in the thread. That was the answer I got when I asked so I assume it's true.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
Your Muller's battery is low
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
Already stated but yeah, super boring and it looks like he has 2 shirts on. 5/10 average kit.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
actually kind of like it tbh
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 19:34
|
|
|
Even the Adidas shoulder stripes are barely visible. It all looks a bit too barebones IMO.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Gigi Galli posted:That was the answer I got when I asked so I assume it's true.  Gigi Galli posted:Eh, it's not terrible it's just boring. What're the three diamonds for? Bobby Digital posted:One for each reich.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2015 21:17
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:Even the Adidas shoulder stripes are barely visible. That's why it is good, op
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 10:33
|
|
|
Tunga posted:This is true, of course. Our third kit last season was Lotus colours because Fernandes thought he could sell it to F1 fans or something. And we kept wearing it even when our away kit would have been fine. It was ghastly. I didn't remember this kit. I looked up this kit. Ghastly barely covers it.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 11:02
|
|
|
 That neckline 
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
Why arent the diamonds white all the way along the bottom of Thomas' top instead of just in the Muller Corner
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 13:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:15 |
|
|
reformed bad troll posted:
Good lord that's ridiculous
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 18:16
|
|
